4575
2005
deu
postprint
0
2010-09-24
--
--
"Wie viel ist genug?" : Bevölkerungswachstum ; Forschungsgegenstand mit vielen Facetten
"How much is enough?" : Population growth ; object of research with many facets
„Menschen benötigen Platz zum Leben.“ In dieser Erkenntnis liegt noch nichts Besonderes oder gar Aufregendes. Erst die Tatsache, dass die menschliche Bevölkerung seit jeher zunimmt, aber der zur Verfügung stehende Platz konstant bleibt bzw. die Ressourcen in ihrem Bestand sogar abnehmen, macht dieses Thema wesentlich gehaltvoller. Offensichtlich ist außerdem: „Population growth seems to affect everything but is seldom held responsible for anything.“ (McKee 2003: 10) Dies ist der Hauptgrund dafür, dass gerade die Thematik der Bevölkerungsentwicklung internationale Beachtung und Aufmerksamkeit verdient.
urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-47919
4791
WeltTrends - Zeitschrift für Internationale Politik, 47 (2005), S. 154 - 161
<hr/>
In Printform erschienen bei <a href="http://www.welttrends.de/"> WeltTrends e.V.</a>:<br/><br/>
Europäische Arbeitspolitik. - Potsdam : Welt-Trends, 2005. - 208 S. - (Welttrends; 13.2005, 47)<br/>
ISSN 0944-8101<br/>
ISBN 3-937786-41-4<br/>
--> <a href="http://www.welttrends.de/index.php/start/zeitschrift/heft-47/">bestellen</a>
Keine öffentliche Lizenz: Unter Urheberrechtsschutz
Markus Seyfried
deu
uncontrolled
Bevölkerungswachstum
deu
uncontrolled
Bevölkerungswissenschaft
deu
uncontrolled
Entwicklung
deu
uncontrolled
Weltbevölkerungsbericht
eng
uncontrolled
Population increase
eng
uncontrolled
population science
eng
uncontrolled
development
eng
uncontrolled
report of world population
Politikwissenschaft
Europäische Arbeitspolitik 47 (2005)
WeltTrends e.V. Potsdam
Universität Potsdam
29580
2009
2009
eng
article
1
--
--
--
Does executive governance matter? executives an policy performance
978-3-86793-013-0
allegro:1991-2014
10105279
Sustainable governance indicators 2009 : policy performance and executive capacity in the OECD / Hrsg.: Bertelsmann Stiftung - Gütersloh : Verl. Bertelsmann Stiftung, 2009. - ISBN 978-3-86793-013-0. - S. 145 - 186
Werner Jann
Markus Seyfried
Sozialwissenschaften
31418
2011
2011
deu
288 S.
17
doctoralthesis
VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften / Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH Wiesbaden
Wiesbaden
1
--
--
--
Unabhängigkeit und Wirksamkeit von Landesrechnungshöfen : eine empirisch-vergleichende Bestandsaufnahme
Interdisziplinäre Organisations- und Verwaltungsforschung
10.1007/978-3-531-92799-2
978-3-531-92799-2
allegro:1991-2014
10107689
Zugl.: Potsdam, Univ., Diss., 2010
Markus Seyfried
Sozialwissenschaften
35586
2012
2012
deu
209
232
24
2
11
article
Waxmann
Münster
1
--
--
--
Problems and methods of quality evaluation in different policy fields
This article distinguishes methodological problems in quality evaluation and measurement in two policy fields, namely higher education and public broadcasting. Both are characterized by similar external and internal basic conditions and are thus suitable for comparative research. The difficulties of quality measurement and evaluation are discussed with respect to three main features: (1) definition of quality, (2) operationalization of quality and (3) interpretation of quality. Furthermore the identified difficulties in both areas are not always the same, because they depend on different research criteria. Thus the debates of quality measurement and evaluation in higher education and public broadcasting can learn from each other and increase the understanding of quality measurement in general. In addition the comparative design provides opportunities for the development of methods and perspectives.
Zeitschrift für Evaluation
1619-5515
wos:2011-2013
WOS:000318832700004
Seyfried, M (reprint author), Univ Potsdam, Lehrstuhl Polit Wissensch Verwaltung & Org, August Hebel Str 89,Univ Komplex 3,Haus 2, D-14482 Potsdam, Germany., seyfried@uni-potsdam.de
Markus Seyfried
eng
uncontrolled
Quality-Measurement
eng
uncontrolled
Evaluation
eng
uncontrolled
Higher Education
eng
uncontrolled
Public Broadcasters
Sozialwissenschaften
Referiert
40447
2013
2018
eng
12
postprint
1
2018-04-17
2018-04-17
--
Drawing from the bargaining pool
This article expands our current knowledge about ministerial selection in coalition governments and analyses why ministerial candidates succeed in acquiring a cabinet position after general elections. It argues that political parties bargain over potential office-holders during government-formation processes, selecting future cabinet ministers from an emerging bargaining pool'. The article draws upon a new dataset comprising all ministrable candidates discussed by political parties during eight government-formation processes in Germany between 1983 and 2009. The conditional logit regression analysis reveals that temporal dynamics, such as the day she enters the pool, have a significant effect on her success in achieving a cabinet position. Other determinants of ministerial selection discussed in the existing literature, such as party and parliamentary expertise, are less relevant for achieving ministerial office. The article concludes that scholarship on ministerial selection requires a stronger emphasis for its endogenous nature in government-formation as well as the relevance of temporal dynamics in such processes.
Party politics
determinants of ministerial selection in Germany
urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-404479
online registration
Party Politics 21 (2015) Nr. 4, S. 503–514 DOI: 10.1177/1354068813487108
<a href="http://publishup.uni-potsdam.de/opus4-ubp/frontdoor/index/index/docId/38799">Bibliographieeintrag der Originalveröffentlichung/Quelle</a>
Keine öffentliche Lizenz: Unter Urheberrechtsschutz
Julia Fleischer
Markus Seyfried
Zweitveröffentlichungen der Universität Potsdam : Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaftliche Reihe
87
eng
uncontrolled
candidates
eng
uncontrolled
Germany
eng
uncontrolled
government-formation
Politikwissenschaft
open_access
Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaftliche Fakultät
Referiert
Open Access
Sage
Universität Potsdam
https://publishup.uni-potsdam.de/files/40447/pwsr_87.online.pdf
38799
2015
2015
eng
503
514
12
4
21
article
Sage Publ.
London
1
--
--
--
Drawing from the bargaining pool: Determinants of ministerial selection in Germany
This article expands our current knowledge about ministerial selection in coalition governments and analyses why ministerial candidates succeed in acquiring a cabinet position after general elections. It argues that political parties bargain over potential office-holders during government-formation processes, selecting future cabinet ministers from an emerging bargaining pool'. The article draws upon a new dataset comprising all ministrable candidates discussed by political parties during eight government-formation processes in Germany between 1983 and 2009. The conditional logit regression analysis reveals that temporal dynamics, such as the day she enters the pool, have a significant effect on her success in achieving a cabinet position. Other determinants of ministerial selection discussed in the existing literature, such as party and parliamentary expertise, are less relevant for achieving ministerial office. The article concludes that scholarship on ministerial selection requires a stronger emphasis for its endogenous nature in government-formation as well as the relevance of temporal dynamics in such processes.
Party politics : an international journal for the study of political parties and political organizations
10.1177/1354068813487108
1354-0688
1460-3683
wos:2015
WOS:000356415700001
Fleischer, J (reprint author), Dept Polit Sci, OZ Achterburgwal 237, NL-1012 DL Amsterdam, Netherlands., J.Fleischer@uva.nl
<a href="http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-404479">Zweitveröffentlichung in der Schriftenreihe Postprints der Universität Potsdam : Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaftliche Reihe ; 87</a>
Julia Fleischer
Markus Seyfried
eng
uncontrolled
Candidates
eng
uncontrolled
Germany
eng
uncontrolled
government-formation
Sozialwissenschaften
Referiert
45784
2016
2016
eng
492
511
20
31
article
Emerald Group Publishing Limited
Bingley
1
--
--
--
Setting a fox to guard the henhouse? Determinants in elections for presidents of supreme audit institutions Evidence from the German federal states (1991-2011)
Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to provide evidence regarding the selection procedures for and characteristics of senior officials in supreme audit institutions (SIAs). Design/methodology/approach - This study follows a quantitative approach using original data collected for presidential elections of SIAs in the 16 federal states in Germany. A fractional logit model is calculated to test different theoretical assumptions in relation to structural, political and individual factors. Findings - The descriptive results confirm the findings of prior research that presidential candidates are elected with very high approval rates. The main determinants are the vote share of the ruling coalition and the executive experience of the presidential candidate. Research limitations/implications - This study focuses on 16 federal states in Germany, but an international comparative perspective covering subnational levels would further augment analysis through the variance of selection procedures and electoral outcomes. Social implications - Independence of auditors is a fundamental issue for the control of the executive, but it seems that there are inevitable trade-offs therein, such as between knowledge of the auditing objects or the politicization of the election process and the independence of the auditor. Originality/value - This study provides novel empirical insights into the election and selection procedures for senior SIA officials at the subnational level, and shows that the executive exerts strong, but functionally reasonable, influence on candidate selection.
Managerial auditing journal
10.1108/MAJ-03-2015-1168
0268-6902
1758-7735
wos2016:2019
WOS:000379666600007
Seyfried, M (reprint author), Univ Potsdam, Fac Econ & Social Sci, Potsdam, Germany., seyfried@uni-potsdam.de
importub
2020-03-22T21:25:01+00:00
filename=package.tar
5c4aa29f96da1dc3f6b98b24e704b9b9
Markus Seyfried
eng
uncontrolled
Independence
eng
uncontrolled
President
eng
uncontrolled
Sub-national
eng
uncontrolled
Supreme audit institutions
Sozialwissenschaften
Referiert
Import
45743
2016
2016
eng
888
905
18
23
article
Springer Publishing Company
Abingdon
1
--
--
--
Co-ordination across internal organizational boundaries: how the EU Commission co-ordinates climate policies
Through an analysis of climate policy-making in the European Commission (EU), this article argues that co-ordination in the Commission displays the same characteristics as the co-ordination across ministries in central governments, i.e., the properties of negative co-ordination. The article is based on a survey among Commission officials. Overall, the article reveals that a public administration perspective on the Commission proves invaluable to gain insights on how decisions are made at the European Union level. The article contributes to the emerging literature viewing the Commission as an ordinary bureaucracy - as opposed to a unique supranational organization.
Journal of European public policy
10.1080/13501763.2015.1074605
1350-1763
1466-4429
wos2016:2019
WOS:000385288000006
Hustedt, T; Seyfried, M (reprint author), Univ Potsdam, Fac Econ & Social Sci, August Bebel Str 89, D-14482 Potsdam, Germany., Thurid.Hustedt@uni-potsdam.de; Markus.Seyfried@uni-potsdam.de
German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF)
importub
2020-03-22T21:05:01+00:00
filename=package.tar
fa4f8be471ae832fb8afe43f5d944c2f
Thurid Hustedt
Markus Seyfried
eng
uncontrolled
Bureaucratic organization
eng
uncontrolled
climate change policy
eng
uncontrolled
co-ordination
eng
uncontrolled
Directorate General
eng
uncontrolled
EU policy-making
eng
uncontrolled
European Commission
Sozialwissenschaften
Referiert
Import
53462
2017
2017
eng
368
384
17
2
56
article
Wiley
Hoboken
1
2017-08-22
2017-08-22
--
Inside the EU Commission
This article studies the perception of the EU Commission's Secretariat General in policy-making. Recently, research on EU institutions devotes increasing attention to analyzing structures and procedures of decision-making in EU institutions, most notably the EU Commission. Conventionally, the EU Commission is portrayed as a fragmented organization, divided along the lines of staff nationality, sectoral responsibilities and cabinets and General Directorates (DGs). The Secretariat General has long been viewed a weak actor that is hardly able or motivated to steer internal decision-making. However, recent research indicates a changing role of the Secretariat General as a pro-active broker and last arbiter. This article studies how the Secretariat General is perceived by the DGs in policy coordination and argues that this perception depends on the pattern of political authority, bureaucratic roles and the relevance and the alternatives prevailing in the policy field. The article is based on data from a survey among Commission officials.
JCMS - Journal of common market studies
Evidence on the Perceived Relevance of the Secretariat General in Climate Policy-Making
10.1111/jcms.12605
0021-9886
1468-5965
wos:2018
WOS:000425186100011
Hustedt, T (reprint author), Free Univ Berlin, Otto Suhr Inst Polit Sci, Berlin, Germany., thurid.hustedt@fu-berlin.de
German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF)Federal Ministry of Education & Research (BMBF)
2022-01-17T11:44:52+00:00
sword
importub
filename=package.tar
fc213c69d4ea11b9af18178c2372e5a1
Hustedt, Thurid
false
true
Thurid Hustedt
Markus Seyfried
eng
uncontrolled
EU Commission
eng
uncontrolled
Secretariat General
eng
uncontrolled
co-ordination
eng
uncontrolled
centralization
eng
uncontrolled
climate policies
Sozialwissenschaften
Import
Fachgruppe Politik- & Verwaltungswissenschaft
54517
2017
2017
eng
387
409
23
article
Palgrave
Basingstoke
1
2017-12-22
2017-12-22
--
Mayors and administrative reforms
In recent decades, a wave of administrative reforms has changed local governance in many European countries. However, our knowledge about differences as well as similarities between the countries, driving forces, impacts, perceptions, and evaluation of these reforms is still limited. In the chapter, the authors give an overview about mayors’ perceptions and evaluations of two major reform trajectories: (a) re-organisation of local service delivery and (b) internal administrative/managerial reforms. Furthermore, differences between (groups of) countries as well as similarities among them are shown in these two fields of administrative reform. Finally, the authors tried to identify explanatory factors for specific perceptions of administrative reforms at the local level.
Political Leaders and Changing Local Democracy
10.1007/978-3-319-67410-0_13
978-3-319-67410-0
978-3-319-67409-4
wos:2018
WOS:000433451600013
Kuhlmann, S (reprint author), Univ Potsdam, Fac Econ & Social Sci, Chair Polit Sci Adm & Org, Potsdam, Germany.
2022-03-28T14:46:53+00:00
sword
importub
filename=package.tar
1f6f1fcfb24e80666002c517db65607c
Sabine Kuhlmann
Markus Seyfried
Irena Baclija Brajnik
eng
uncontrolled
New public management
eng
uncontrolled
Local administrative systems
eng
uncontrolled
Administrative reform
eng
uncontrolled
Public-private partnerships
Politikwissenschaft
Import
Fachgruppe Politik- & Verwaltungswissenschaft