9705
2016
2016
eng
8
7
article
Frontiers Research Foundation
Lausanne
1
--
2016-06-02
--
Dropping Out or Keeping Up?
The aim of this study was to examine how automatic evaluations of exercising (AEE) varied according to adherence to an exercise program. Eighty-eight participants (24.98 years ± 6.88; 51.1% female) completed a Brief-Implicit Association Task assessing their AEE, positive and negative associations to exercising at the beginning of a 3-month exercise program. Attendance data were collected for all participants and used in a cluster analysis of adherence patterns. Three different adherence patterns (52 maintainers, 16 early dropouts, 20 late dropouts; 40.91% overall dropouts) were detected using cluster analyses. Participants from these three clusters differed significantly with regard to their positive and negative associations to exercising before the first course meeting (η2p = 0.07). Discriminant function analyses revealed that positive associations to exercising was a particularly good discriminating factor. This is the first study to provide evidence of the differential impact of positive and negative associations on exercise behavior over the medium term. The findings contribute to theoretical understanding of evaluative processes from a dual-process perspective and may provide a basis for targeted interventions.
Frontiers in psychology
Early-Dropouts, Late-Dropouts, and Maintainers Differ in Their Automatic Evaluations of Exercise Already before a 14-Week Exercise Course
10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00838
1664-1078
Universität Potsdam, Publikationsfonds
PA 2016_27
1528.53
online registration
838
<a href="http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-97060">Zweitveröffentlichung in der Schriftenreihe Postprints der Universität Potsdam : Humanwissenschaftliche Reihe ; 304</a>
CC-BY - Namensnennung 4.0 International
Franziska Antoniewicz
Ralf Brand
eng
uncontrolled
exercise adherence
eng
uncontrolled
automatic evaluations
eng
uncontrolled
BIAT
eng
uncontrolled
dropout
eng
uncontrolled
associations
eng
uncontrolled
affect
Psychologie
Referiert
Publikationsfonds der Universität Potsdam
Open Access
Department Sport- und Gesundheitswissenschaften
Universität Potsdam
9706
2016
2016
eng
8
postprint
1
--
2016-06-02
--
Dropping Out or Keeping Up?
The aim of this study was to examine how automatic evaluations of exercising (AEE) varied according to adherence to an exercise program. Eighty-eight participants (24.98 years ± 6.88; 51.1% female) completed a Brief-Implicit Association Task assessing their AEE, positive and negative associations to exercising at the beginning of a 3-month exercise program. Attendance data were collected for all participants and used in a cluster analysis of adherence patterns. Three different adherence patterns (52 maintainers, 16 early dropouts, 20 late dropouts; 40.91% overall dropouts) were detected using cluster analyses. Participants from these three clusters differed significantly with regard to their positive and negative associations to exercising before the first course meeting (η2p = 0.07). Discriminant function analyses revealed that positive associations to exercising was a particularly good discriminating factor. This is the first study to provide evidence of the differential impact of positive and negative associations on exercise behavior over the medium term. The findings contribute to theoretical understanding of evaluative processes from a dual-process perspective and may provide a basis for targeted interventions.
Early-Dropouts, Late-Dropouts, and Maintainers Differ in Their Automatic Evaluations of Exercise Already before a 14-Week Exercise Course
urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-97060
online registration
1284.48
Universität Potsdam, Publikationsfonds
PA 2016_27
Frontiers in psychology (2016), Nr. 8:838. - DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00838
<a href="http://publishup.uni-potsdam.de/opus4-ubp/frontdoor/index/index/docId/9705">Bibliographieeintrag der Originalveröffentlichung/Quelle</a>
CC-BY - Namensnennung 4.0 International
Franziska Antoniewicz
Ralf Brand
Zweitveröffentlichungen der Universität Potsdam : Humanwissenschaftliche Reihe
304
eng
uncontrolled
BIAT
eng
uncontrolled
affect
eng
uncontrolled
associations
eng
uncontrolled
automatic evaluations
eng
uncontrolled
dropout
eng
uncontrolled
exercise adherence
Psychologie
open_access
Referiert
Open Access
Department Sport- und Gesundheitswissenschaften
Universität Potsdam
https://publishup.uni-potsdam.de/files/9706/phr304_online.pdf
40734
2016
2018
eng
12
postprint
1
2018-06-19
2018-06-19
--
Uninstructed BIAT faking when ego depleted or in normal state
Background:
Deception can distort psychological tests on socially sensitive topics. Understanding the cerebral
processes that are involved in such faking can be useful in detection and prevention of deception. Previous research
shows that faking a brief implicit association test (BIAT ) evokes a characteristic ERP response. It is not yet known
whether temporarily available self-control resources moderate this response. We randomly assigned 22 participants
(15 females, 24.23
±
2.91
years old) to a counterbalanced repeated-measurements design. Participants first com-
pleted a Brief-IAT (BIAT ) on doping attitudes as a baseline measure and were then instructed to fake a negative dop
-
ing attitude both when self-control resources were depleted and non-depleted. Cerebral activity during BIAT perfor
-
mance was assessed using high-density EEG.
Results:
Compared to the baseline BIAT, event-related potentials showed a first interaction at the parietal P1,
while significant post hoc differences were found only at the later occurring late positive potential. Here, signifi-
cantly decreased amplitudes were recorded for ‘normal’ faking, but not in the depletion condition. In source space,
enhanced activity was found for ‘normal’ faking in the bilateral temporoparietal junction. Behaviorally, participants
were successful in faking the BIAT successfully in both conditions.
Conclusions:
Results indicate that temporarily available self-control resources do not affect overt faking success on
a BIAT. However, differences were found on an electrophysiological level. This indicates that while on a phenotypical
level self-control resources play a negligible role in deliberate test faking the underlying cerebral processes are markedly different.
BMC neuroscience
differential effect on brain and behavior
urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-407342
online registration
BMC Neuroscience 17 (2016); DOI: 10.1186/s12868-016-0249-8
CC-BY - Namensnennung 4.0 International
Wanja Wolff
Sebastian Schindler
Christoph Englert
Ralf Brand
Johanna Kissler
eng
uncontrolled
EEG/ERP
eng
uncontrolled
implicit association test (IAT)
eng
uncontrolled
faking
eng
uncontrolled
deception
eng
uncontrolled
ego depletion
eng
uncontrolled
cognitive control
Medizin und Gesundheit
open_access
Humanwissenschaftliche Fakultät
Referiert
Open Access
Department Sport- und Gesundheitswissenschaften
BioMed Central
Universität Potsdam
https://publishup.uni-potsdam.de/files/40734/phr_445.online.pdf