@inproceedings{OPUS4-8463, title = {Proceedings : Anglistentag 2012 Potsdam}, series = {Proceedings of the conference of the German Association of University Teachers of English}, volume = {34}, booktitle = {Proceedings of the conference of the German Association of University Teachers of English}, editor = {R{\"o}der, Kathrin and Wischer, Ilse}, publisher = {Wissenschaftlicher Verlag}, address = {Trier}, isbn = {978-3-86821-488-8}, pages = {406}, year = {2013}, language = {en} } @incollection{Lottes2014, author = {Lottes, G{\"u}nther}, title = {Language and Content}, series = {Perspectives on English revolutionary republicanism}, booktitle = {Perspectives on English revolutionary republicanism}, publisher = {Ashgate}, address = {Farnham}, publisher = {Universit{\"a}t Potsdam}, pages = {53 -- 61}, year = {2014}, language = {en} } @book{WiemannMahlbergDzelzainisetal.2014, author = {Wiemann, Dirk and Mahlberg, Gaby and Dzelzainis, Martin and Cuttica, Cesare and Lottes, G{\"u}nther and Davis, J. C. and Pankratz, Anette and Sedlmayr, Gerold and Vallance, Edward and Vanderbeke, Dirk and Borot, Luc and Champion, Justin and Burgess, Glenn}, title = {Perspectives on English revolutionary republicanism}, editor = {Wiemann, Dirk and Mahlberg, Gaby}, publisher = {Ashgate}, address = {Farnham}, isbn = {978-1-4094-5567-7}, publisher = {Universit{\"a}t Potsdam}, pages = {IX, 228}, year = {2014}, abstract = {Perspectives on English Revolutionary Republicanism takes stock of developments in the scholarship of seventeenth-century English republicanism by looking at the movements and schools of thought that have shaped the field over the decades: the linguistic turn, the cultural turn and the religious turn. While scholars of seventeenth-century republicanism share their enthusiasm for their field, they have approached their subject in diverse ways. The contributors to the present volume have taken the opportunity to bring these approaches together in a number of case studies covering republican language, republican literary and political culture, and republican religion, to paint a lively picture of the state of the art in republican scholarship. The volume begins with three chapters influenced by the theory and methodology of the linguistic turn, before moving on to address cultural history approaches to English republicanism, including both literary culture and (practical) political culture. The final section of the volume looks at how religion intersected with ideas of republican thought. Taken together the essays demonstrate the vitality and diversity of what was once regarded as a narrow topic of political research.}, language = {en} } @article{WiemannMahlberg2014, author = {Wiemann, Dirk and Mahlberg, Gaby}, title = {Introduction : Perspectives on English revolutionary republicanism}, series = {Perspectives on English revolutionary republicanism}, journal = {Perspectives on English revolutionary republicanism}, editor = {Wiemann, Dirk and Mahlberg, Gaby}, publisher = {Ashgate}, address = {Farnham}, pages = {1 -- 12}, year = {2014}, language = {en} } @misc{Wiemann2014, author = {Wiemann, Dirk}, title = {George, Rosemary Marangoly, Indian English and the Fiction of National Literature / [rezensiert von] Dirk Wiemann}, series = {Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Anglistik und Amerikanistik : ZAA ; a quarterly of language, literature and culture}, volume = {62}, journal = {Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Anglistik und Amerikanistik : ZAA ; a quarterly of language, literature and culture}, number = {4}, publisher = {DeGruyter}, address = {T{\"u}bingen}, issn = {0044-2305}, doi = {10.1515/zaa-2014-0039}, pages = {385 -- 388}, year = {2014}, abstract = {Rezensiertes Werk George, Rosemary Marangoly, Indian English and the Fiction of National Literature - Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013. - Hb. viii, 285 pp. - (Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Anglistik und Amerikanistik ; 62(4)) ISBN 978-1-107-04000-7.}, language = {en} } @article{Stillmark2015, author = {Stillmark, Hans-Christian}, title = {Perturbation als Analysemethode dramatischer Texte}, series = {Tendenzen der zeitgen{\"o}ssischen Dramatik}, journal = {Tendenzen der zeitgen{\"o}ssischen Dramatik}, editor = {Langner, Paul Martin and Mirecka, Agata}, publisher = {Lang-Ed.}, address = {Frankfurt, M.}, isbn = {978-3-631-65597-9}, pages = {11 -- 29}, year = {2015}, abstract = {Perturbation als Analysemethode f{\"u}r dramatische Texte wird hier am Beispiel von Brecht und M{\"u}ller ausprobiert.}, language = {de} } @article{Hartung2018, author = {Hartung, Heike}, title = {Longevity narratives}, series = {Journal of aging studie}, volume = {47}, journal = {Journal of aging studie}, publisher = {Elsevier}, address = {New York}, issn = {0890-4065}, doi = {10.1016/j.jaging.2018.03.002}, pages = {84 -- 89}, year = {2018}, abstract = {The essay looks at longevity narratives as an important configuration of old age, which is closely related to evolutionary theories of ageing. In order to analyse two case studies of longevity published in the early twentieth century, the American psychologist G. Stanley Hall's book Senescence (1922) and the British dramatist Bernard Shaw's play cycle Back to Methuselah (1921), the essay draws on an outline of theories of longevity from the Enlightenment to the present. The analysis of the two case studies illustrates that evolutionary and cultural perspectives on ageing and longevity are ambivalent and problematic. In Hall's and Shaw's texts this is related to a crisis narrative of culture and civilization against which both writers place their specific solutions of individual and species longevity. Whereas Hall employs autobiographical accounts of artists as examples of longevity to strengthen his argument about wise old men as exclusive repositories of knowledge, Shaw in his vision of longevity as an extended form of midlife for both genders encounters the limits of age representation.}, language = {en} } @article{Crane2019, author = {Crane, Kylie Ann}, title = {Anthropocene Presences and the Limits of Deferral}, series = {Open library of humanities}, volume = {5}, journal = {Open library of humanities}, number = {1}, publisher = {Open library of humanities}, address = {Cambridge}, issn = {2056-6700}, doi = {10.16995/olh.348}, pages = {24}, year = {2019}, abstract = {Literary criticism, particularly ecocriticism, occupies an uneasy position with regard to activism: reading books (or plays, or poems) seems like a rather leisurely activity to be undertaking if our environment—our planet—is in crisis. And yet, critiquing the narratives that structure worlds and discourses is key to the activities of the (literary) critic in this time of crisis. If this crisis manifests as a 'crisis of imagination' (e.g. Ghosh), I argue that this not so much a crisis of the absence of texts that address the environmental disaster, but rather a failure to comprehend the presences of the Anthropocene in the present. To interpret (literary) texts in this framework must entail acknowledging and scrutinising the extent of the incapacity of the privileged reader to comprehend the crisis as presence and present rather than spatially or temporally remote. The readings of the novels Carpentaria (2006) and The Swan Book (2013) by Waanyi writer Alexis Wright (Australia) trace the uneven presences of Anthropocenes in the present by way of bringing future worlds (The Swan Book) to the contemporary (Carpentaria). In both novels, protagonists must forge survival amongst ruins of the present and future: the depicted worlds, in particular the representations of the disenfranchisement of indigenous inhabitants of the far north of the Australian continent, emerge as a critique of the intersections of capitalist and colonial projects that define modernity and its impact on the global climate.}, language = {en} } @article{Ungelenk2020, author = {Ungelenk, Johannes}, title = {Touching this dreaded sight}, series = {Tangieren : Praktiken und Arrangements des Ber{\"u}hrens in den performativen K{\"u}nsten}, journal = {Tangieren : Praktiken und Arrangements des Ber{\"u}hrens in den performativen K{\"u}nsten}, editor = {Fluhrer, Sandra and Waszynski, Alexander}, publisher = {Rombach}, address = {Freiburg i. Br.}, isbn = {978-3-96821-002-5}, pages = {203 -- 220}, year = {2020}, abstract = {Ausgehend von der in Shakespeare zweimal wiederkehrenden Phrase „Touching this dreaded sight" widmet sich der Beitrag mithilfe ausgew{\"a}hlter Stellen aus Shakespeares Hamlet und The Tempest der Wirkkraft des fr{\"u}hneuzeitlichen Theaters. Er geht der Frage nach, wie Zuschauer*innen eines St{\"u}ckes aus der Distanz be-troffen und ge-r{\"u}hrt werden. Um dem nachzudenken, wie diese Distanz zwischen dem Visuellen, dem Schauen im Theater, und dem Haptischen, der Ber{\"u}hrung, {\"u}berbr{\"u}ckt werden kann, helfen fr{\"u}hneuzeitliche Vorstellungen von theatraler Ansteckungskraft und Hans Blumenbergs Konzept menschlicher Betreffbarkeit.}, language = {de} } @phdthesis{Behrendt2020, author = {Behrendt, Aileen Jorena}, title = {Gender Politics and British Women Writers of the 1930s}, series = {Epistemata : W{\"u}rzburger wissenschaftliche Schriften. Reihe Literaturwissenschaft}, journal = {Epistemata : W{\"u}rzburger wissenschaftliche Schriften. Reihe Literaturwissenschaft}, number = {937}, publisher = {K{\"o}nigshausen \& Neumann}, address = {W{\"u}rzburg}, isbn = {978-3-8260-7177-5}, issn = {2699-5859}, pages = {298}, year = {2020}, abstract = {Today's focus on the 1930s as a time of radical politics paving the way for the apocalypse of the Second World War ignores the complexity of the decade's cultural responses, especially those by British women writers who highlighted gender issues within their contemporary political climate. The decade's literature is often understood to capture the political unrest, either narrating people's chaotic movement or their paralysed shock. This book argues that 1930s novels collapse the distinction between movement and standstill and calls this phenomenon Dynamic Stasis. This Dynamic Stasis thematically and structurally informs the novels of Nancy Mitford, Stevie Smith, Rosamond Lehmann and Jean Rhys. By disrupting the oft-repeated clich{\´e} of the 1930s as the age of political extremes, gender politics and negotiations of femininity can emerge from the discursive periphery. This book therefore corrects a persistent gender blind spot, which opens up a (re)consideration of authors that have been overlooked in literary criticism of 1930s to this day.}, language = {en} }