@incollection{Moser2024, author = {Moser, Natalie}, title = {Historisch von der nahen Zukunft erz{\"a}hlen}, series = {Zukunft - Zukunftswissen - Zukunfts{\"a}sthetik}, booktitle = {Zukunft - Zukunftswissen - Zukunfts{\"a}sthetik}, publisher = {Rombach Wissenschaft}, address = {Baden-Baden}, isbn = {978-3-96821-870-0}, doi = {10.5771/9783968218717-85}, pages = {85 -- 106}, year = {2024}, language = {de} } @book{Ungelenk2023, author = {Ungelenk, Johannes}, title = {Touching at a Distance}, series = {Edinburgh Critical Studies in Shakespeare and Philosophy : ECSSP}, journal = {Edinburgh Critical Studies in Shakespeare and Philosophy : ECSSP}, publisher = {Edinburgh University Press}, address = {Edinburgh}, isbn = {978-1-4744-9784-8}, doi = {10.1515/9781474497848}, pages = {296}, year = {2023}, abstract = {Studies the capacity of Shakespeare's plays to touch and think about touchBased on plays from all major genres: Hamlet, The Tempest, Richard III, Much Ado About Nothing and Troilus and CressidaCentres on creative, close readings of Shakespeare's plays, which aim to generate critical impulses for the 21st century readerBrings Shakespeare Studies into touch with philosophers and theoreticians from a range of disciplinary areas - continental philosophy, literary criticism, psychoanalysis, sociology, phenomenology, law, linguistics: Friedrich Nietzsche, Maurice Blanchot, Jacques Lacan, Luce Irigaray, Jacques Derrida, Roland Barthes, Niklas Luhmann, Hans Blumenberg, Carl Schmitt, J. L. AustinTheatre has a remarkable capacity: it touches from a distance. The audience is affected, despite their physical separation from the stage. The spectators are moved, even though the fictional world presented to them will never come into direct touch with their real lives. Shakespeare is clearly one of the master practitioners of theatrical touch. As the study shows, his exceptional dramaturgic talent is intrinsically connected with being one of the great thinkers of touch. His plays fathom the complexity and power of a fascinating notion - touch as a productive proximity that is characterised by unbridgeable distance - which philosophers like Friedrich Nietzsche, Maurice Blanchot, Jacques Derrida, Luce Irigaray and Jean-Luc Nancy have written about, centuries later. By playing with touch and its metatheatrical implications, Shakespeare raises questions that make his theatrical art point towards modernity: how are communities to form when traditional institutions begin to crumble? What happens to selfhood when time speeds up, when oneness and timeless truth can no longer serve as reliable foundations? What is the role and the capacity of language in a world that has lost its seemingly unshakeable belief and trust in meaning? How are we to conceive of the unthinkable extremes of human existence - birth and death - when the religious orthodoxy slowly ceases to give satisfactory explanations? Shakespeare's theatre not only prompts these questions, but provides us with answers. They are all related to touch, and they are all theatrical at their core: they are argued and performed by the striking experience of theatre's capacities to touch - at a distance}, language = {en} } @article{PhilipowskiZeman2022, author = {Philipowski, Katharina and Zeman, Sonja}, title = {Wann und wo ist n{\^u}?}, series = {Beitr{\"a}ge zur Geschichte der deutschen Sprache und Literatur : (PBB)}, volume = {144}, journal = {Beitr{\"a}ge zur Geschichte der deutschen Sprache und Literatur : (PBB)}, number = {1}, publisher = {De Gruyter}, address = {Berlin}, issn = {0005-8076}, doi = {10.1515/bgsl-2022-0004}, pages = {92 -- 120}, year = {2022}, abstract = {What are the narrative functions of the present tense in medieval narrations? In order to address this question, the paper brings together linguistic observations on tense semantics and a literary analysis of >Wilhalm von Wenden< by Ulrich von Etzenbach. It shows that the present tense can refer to three different kinds of >now<, i. e. the >discourse now<, the >story now<, and the >recipient's now<. In all three contexts, the present tense is not used as a narrative tense but rather indicates a speaker's voice commenting on the events. This leads to the hypothesis that the development of the >narrative present< (as common in modern novels) is based on two requirements: The decoupling between the >discourse now< and the diegetic world as well as the decoupling between the author and the fictional instance of the narrator.}, language = {de} } @misc{Moser2024, author = {Moser, Natalie}, title = {Elmiger, Dorothee: Aus der Zuckerfabrik}, series = {Kindlers Literatur Lexikon (KLL)}, journal = {Kindlers Literatur Lexikon (KLL)}, publisher = {J.B. Metzler}, address = {Stuttgart}, isbn = {978-3-476-05728-0}, doi = {10.1007/978-3-476-05728-0_23513-2}, pages = {2}, year = {2024}, language = {de} } @book{OPUS4-64256, title = {Zukunft - Zukunftswissen - Zukunfts{\"a}sthetik}, series = {Litterae}, volume = {259}, journal = {Litterae}, editor = {Lampart, Fabian and Moser, Natalie}, publisher = {Rombach Wissenschaft}, address = {Baden-Baden}, isbn = {978-3-96821-870-0}, doi = {10.5771/9783968218717}, pages = {292}, year = {2024}, abstract = {Das historische Erz{\"a}hlen ist im 19. Jahrhundert eine der prominentesten narrativen Formen. Aber es ist immer auch zukunftsaffin. In diesem Band wird diese Kehrseite der Vergangenheitsorientierung in historischer und systematischer Perspektive entlang folgender Leitfragen untersucht: Wie k{\"o}nnen Zukunftsreflexionen in Genres analytisch und konzeptionell gefasst werden, die nicht programmatisch dem Zukunftssujet verpflichtet sind? Wie ist das Wissen um Zukunft organisiert und {\"a}sthetisch strukturiert? Wie verh{\"a}lt sich eine solche implizite {\"a}sthetische Problematisierung von Zukunft gegen{\"u}ber expliziten Zukunftsmodellen der entstehenden Science Fiction?}, language = {de} } @article{SchillingHarschHippetal.2024, author = {Schilling, Erik and Harsch, Corinna and Hipp, Lena and Knobloch, Marcel and Munnes, Stefan and Vogel, Johannes S.}, title = {Wer wird nominiert, wer gewinnt?}, series = {Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Literaturwissenschaft und Linguistik}, volume = {54}, journal = {Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Literaturwissenschaft und Linguistik}, number = {1}, publisher = {Springer International Publishing}, address = {Cham}, issn = {0049-8653}, doi = {10.1007/s41244-024-00321-w}, pages = {125 -- 144}, year = {2024}, abstract = {Wir nehmen eine vergleichende Untersuchung der Nominierten und Preistr{\"a}ger:innen von sieben Buchpreisen im deutschsprachigen Raum vor, die mit einer vorab ver{\"o}ffentlichten Long- und/oder Shortlist arbeiten. Dazu vergleichen wir die Preise in Bezug auf soziodemographische Faktoren der Autor:innen (Geschlecht, Alter und Muttersprache), deren Bekanntheit zum Zeitpunkt der Nominierung (Aufrufe auf Wikipedia), die Anzahl vorheriger Nominierungen der Autor:innen f{\"u}r den gleichen Buchpreis, die ›Qualit{\"a}t‹ der ausgezeichneten B{\"u}cher (Anzahl der Rezensionen des nominierten Buches, positive bzw. negative Beurteilung in Rezensionen sowie die Einigkeit der Rezensent:innen dar{\"u}ber), das Ansehen der Verlage und die Geschlechterzusammensetzung der Jurys. Der Analysezeitraum umfasst 15 Jahre. Unser Datensatz beinhaltet Informationen zu 428 Autor:innen mit insgesamt 627 zwischen den Jahren 2005 und 2020 nominierten B{\"u}chern und 2.469 Rezensionen zu diesen B{\"u}chern. Der Datensatz wurde mittels mehrerer Methoden (z. B. Web-Scraping, Hand-Kodierung, Expert:innenbewertungen) aus verschiedenen Quellen (z. B. Web-Daten, Bibliothekskataloge, Expert:innenbewertungen) zusammengestellt. Auf diese Weise k{\"o}nnen wir unter anderem zeigen, dass f{\"u}r alle untersuchten Preise {\"u}berwiegend deutsche Muttersprachler:innen mit gut rezensierten B{\"u}chern aus renommierten Verlagen nominiert werden und die Preise gewinnen.}, language = {de} } @book{OPUS4-3712, title = {Literatur, Mythos und Freud : Kolloquium zu Ehren von Prof. Dr. Elke Liebs 20. Juli 2007}, editor = {Peitsch, Helmut and Lezzi, Eva}, publisher = {Universit{\"a}tsverlag Potsdam}, address = {Potsdam}, isbn = {978-3-940793-39-3}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-35146}, publisher = {Universit{\"a}t Potsdam}, pages = {158}, year = {2009}, language = {de} } @book{CurielMartinez2024, author = {Curiel Mart{\´i}nez, Geishel}, title = {Rumbo a Venecia}, editor = {Ette, Ottmar}, publisher = {Universit{\"a}tsverlag Potsdam}, address = {Potsdam}, isbn = {978-3-86956-558-3}, issn = {2629-2548}, doi = {10.25932/publishup-58696}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-586964}, publisher = {Universit{\"a}t Potsdam}, pages = {212}, year = {2024}, abstract = {Esta investigaci{\´o}n explora la representaci{\´o}n de viajes a Venecia en la literatura latinoamericana y de lengua alemana del siglo XX. Aplicando planteamientos te{\´o}ricos de literatura de viaje, se descodifica la estructura m{\´i}tica que subyace en la descripci{\´o}n del desplazamiento hacia la ciudad lacustre. El objetivo es exponer los recursos narrativos y estil{\´i}sticos utilizados para entrelazar este recorrido, en su mayor{\´i}a oblicuo, con la emersi{\´o}n gradual del conflicto de los y las protagonistas. Adem{\´a}s, a partir del estudio comparativo de algunos elementos arquitect{\´o}nicos emblem{\´a}ticos como son los palacios, los puentes y, sobre todo, la conformaci{\´o}n laber{\´i}ntica, se muestran las peculiaridades de la representaci{\´o}n de Venecia en obras de Julieta Campos, Alejo Carpentier, Julio Cort{\´a}zar, Hugo von Hofmannsthal, Thomas Mann y Sergio Pitol. Con ello se busca, primeramente, visibilizar el papel de Venecia en la literatura latinoamericana y, segundo, ofrecer nuevas claves de lectura a obras que han sido ampliamente estudiadas, mas no en una confrontaci{\´o}n transareal.}, language = {es} } @phdthesis{Wilke2024, author = {Wilke, Heinrich}, title = {The order of destruction}, series = {Transdisciplinary souths}, journal = {Transdisciplinary souths}, publisher = {Routledge}, address = {London}, isbn = {978-1-032-51416-1}, doi = {10.4324/9781003465935}, pages = {ix, 224}, year = {2024}, abstract = {This book studies sugarcane monoculture, the dominant form of cultivation in the colonial Caribbean, in the later 1600s and 1700s up to the Haitian Revolution. Researching travel literature, plantation manuals, Georgic poetry, letters, and political proclamations, this book interprets texts by Richard Ligon, Henry Drax, James Grainger, Janet Schaw, and Toussaint Louverture. As the first extended investigation into its topic, this book reads colonial Caribbean monoculture as the conjunction of racial capitalism and agrarian capitalism in the tropics. Its eco-Marxist perspective highlights the dual exploitation of the soil and of enslaved agricultural producers under the plantation regime, thereby extending Marxist analysis to the early colonial Caribbean. By focusing on textual form (in literary and non-literary texts alike), this study discloses the bearing of monoculture on contemporary writers' thoughts. In the process, it emphasizes the significance of a literary tradition that, despite its ideological importance, is frequently neglected in (postcolonial) literary studies and the environmental humanities. Located at a crossroads of disciplines and perspectives, this study will be of interest to literary critics and historians working in the early Americas, to students and scholars of agriculture, colonialism, and (racial) capitalism, to those working in the environmental humanities, and to Marxist academics. It will be of great interest to scholars and researchers of language and literature, post-colonial studies, cultural studies, diaspora studies, and the Global South studies}, language = {en} }