@article{Hassler2020,
  author    = {Haßler, Gerda},
  title     = {Pasigraf{\´i}a y antipasigraf{\´i}a a finales del siglo XVIII y a principios del siglo XIX},
  volume    = {41},
  editor    = {Calero Vaquerao, Mar{\´i}a Luisa},
  publisher = {Infoling},
  address   = {Barcelona},
  issn      = {1139-8736},
  pages     = {169 -- 192},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {In 1797 a rather short work appeared in Paris in two volumes, under the title Pasigraphie in both its French and German versions. The author, Joseph de Maimieux (1753-1820), is said to have coined the term pasigraphie. With the invention of pasigraphy, Maimieux pursued the goal of creating a conceptually based writing system that could be applied to all languages. In this way, a text written in this script could be read in all languages. The pasigraphic system is based on an a priori system of conceptual classification to which written characters are assigned. It is therefore initially an exclusively written language, on which Maimieux two years later also built a spoken language with the Pasilalie. The first arguments against the endeavour represented by the Pasigraphie were brought forward by Maimieux' immediate contemporaries, the ideologues. These objections were re-affirmed in particular by Johann Severin Vater. The decisive difference between Maimieux and his critics lies in the determination of the role of signs in the formation of concepts. While for Maimieux the signs only name the finished concepts, his critics argued that signs have a function in the constitution of the concepts. A universal language is therefore ultimately not possible, since there are no universal concepts and the individual languages lead to different conceptual structures.},
  language  = {es}
}
@article{AmatuzziAyresBennettGerstenbergetal.2020,
  author    = {Amatuzzi, Antonella and Ayres-Bennett, Wendy and Gerstenberg, Annette and Schosler, Lene and Skupien-Dekens, Carine},
  title     = {Changement linguistique et p{\´e}riodisation du fran{\c{c}}ais (pr{\´e})classique},
  series = {Journal of French language studies},
  volume    = {30},
  journal   = {Journal of French language studies},
  number    = {3},
  publisher = {Cambridge Univ. Press},
  address   = {Cambridge},
  issn      = {0959-2695},
  doi       = {10.1017/S0959269520000058},
  pages     = {301 -- 326},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {RESUME Cette etude propose d'explorer et d'identifier des moments particuliers oU le changement linguistique se produit, afin de confirmer ou de rejeter l'idee d'une periode specifique designee par le terme << francais preclassique >>, avec une rupture - ou frontiere chronolectale - detectable autour de 1630 (cf. Ayres-Bennett et Caron, 2016). Afin de verifier dans quelle mesure cette chronologie peut etre confirmee, il est necessaire de multiplier des analyses fines et pointues sur des traits linguistiques qui ont subi des changements a l'epoque en question et d'interroger une gamme de textes qui refletent la variation discursive et pragmatique, au lieu de consulter le canon des traditions textuelles actuellement disponibles sur des bases numerisees, qui sont essentiellement litteraires. C'est pourquoi nous avons consulte des sources de nature differente, qui pourraient attester des usages emergents, a savoir les corpus du Reseau Corpus Francais Preclassique et Classique (RCFC). Seront presentes les resultats de deux etudes de cas (la recategorisation des formes dedans/dessous/dessus/dehors et la montee des clitiques), abondamment discutes par les remarqueurs.},
  language  = {fr}
}
@book{OPUS4-722,
  title     = {Marguerite Duras : l'existence passionn{\´e}e ; actes du colloque de Potsdam 18 - 24 avril 2005},
  editor    = {Cieslak, Benjamin and Beigel, Yve},
  publisher = {Universit{\"a}tsverlag Potsdam},
  address   = {Potsdam},
  isbn      = {978-3-937786-82-7},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-8144},
  publisher      = {Universit{\"a}t Potsdam},
  pages     = {133},
  year      = {2006},
  abstract  = {Der Band fasst die Ergebnisse der Tagung "Marguerite Duras : l'existence passionn{\´e}e" zusammen, die im April 2005 an der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam stattgefunden hat. Zu diesem Kolloquium in franz{\"o}sischer Sprache, welches von Studierenden der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam organisiert wurde, waren Wissenschaftler und Studierende aus Polen, Frankreich und Deutschland eingeladen, um den "Diskurs der Leidenschaft" im filmischen und literarischen Werk von Marguerite Duras zu untersuchen. Der Band erscheint in franz{\"o}sischer Sprache (teilweise {\"u}bersetzt) und beinhaltet den Er{\"o}ffnungsvortrag der Tagung, die anschließende Diskussion und die Vortr{\"a}ge der Referenten. Ebenso enthalten sind die Arbeitsergebnisse der studentischen Teilnehmer, die sich im Vorfeld der Tagung in Arbeitsgruppen mit dem Thema auseinandergesetzt haben.},
  language  = {fr}
}
@article{Hassler2022,
  author    = {Hassler, Gerda},
  title     = {Jos{\´e} Jes{\´u}s G{\´o}mez Asencio (4.5.1953 - 20.3.2022)},
  series = {Beitr{\"a}ge zur Geschichte der Sprachwissenschaft},
  volume    = {16},
  journal   = {Beitr{\"a}ge zur Geschichte der Sprachwissenschaft},
  number    = {32/2},
  publisher = {Nodus-Publ.},
  address   = {M{\"u}nster},
  issn      = {0939-2815},
  pages     = {131 -- 136},
  year      = {2022},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{Gwozdz2020,
  author    = {Gwozdz, Patricia Aneta},
  title     = {Autopoiesis als Modell interdiskursive Selbst{\"u}bersetzung},
  series = {Selbst{\"u}bersetzung als Wissenstransfer},
  journal   = {Selbst{\"u}bersetzung als Wissenstransfer},
  editor    = {Willer, Stefan and Keller, Andreas},
  publisher = {Kadmos},
  address   = {Berlin},
  isbn      = {978-3-86599-467-7},
  pages     = {279 -- 302},
  year      = {2020},
  language  = {de}
}
@book{OPUS4-52055,
  title     = {Bilder in Bewegung},
  series = {Mimesis ; 90},
  journal   = {Mimesis ; 90},
  editor    = {Gwozdz, Patricia Aneta and Lenz, Markus Alexander and Kraft, Tobias},
  publisher = {De Gruyter},
  address   = {Berlin},
  isbn      = {978-3-11-073048-7},
  doi       = {10.1515/9783110730340},
  pages     = {VII, 315},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {Ikonotextuali{\"a}t spielt im wissenschaftlichen Schaffen des Romanisten und Kulturwissenschaftlers Ottmar Ette eine zentrale Rolle. Der Sammelband zu Ehren seines 65. Geburtstages untersucht in drei Sektionen Zusammenh{\"a}nge zwischen Bild und Text, die {\"u}ber eine statische Verbindung von Ekphrasis und Evidenz-Strategie hinausgehen. Der Fokus liegt auf Schnittstellen zwischen Bildlichkeit und Formen der Bewegung, die Ottmar Ette in zahlreichen Publikationen untersucht hat. Autor*innen aus Europa, Lateinamerika, den USA, China und den F{\"a}r{\"o}er-Inseln verfolgen einen interdisziplin{\"a}ren Parcours von der Naturgeschichte und dem Nature Writing {\"u}ber die Zusammenh{\"a}nge von Schriftlichkeit und Bildlichkeit in literarischen und wissenschaftlichen Texten bis hin zu Bildern des Urbanen und der Reise in einem transarealen Netzwerk.},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{Gwozdz2021,
  author    = {Gwozdz, Patricia Aneta},
  title     = {Id est figura corporis mei},
  series = {Bilder in Bewegung : Ansichten des Bildlichen zwischen Kunst und Wissenschaft},
  journal   = {Bilder in Bewegung : Ansichten des Bildlichen zwischen Kunst und Wissenschaft},
  publisher = {De Gruyter},
  address   = {Berlin},
  isbn      = {978-3-11-073524-6},
  year      = {2021},
  language  = {de}
}
@incollection{Hassler2021,
  author    = {Haßler, Gerda},
  title     = {L'expression de l'{\´e}vidence directe en fran{\c{c}}ais},
  series = {De la diachronie {\`a} la synchronie et vice versa. M{\´e}langes offerts {\`a} Annie Bertin par ses {\´e}tudiants et ses amis en remerciement pour son apport aux {\´e}tudes diachroniques},
  booktitle = {De la diachronie {\`a} la synchronie et vice versa. M{\´e}langes offerts {\`a} Annie Bertin par ses {\´e}tudiants et ses amis en remerciement pour son apport aux {\´e}tudes diachroniques},
  publisher = {Presses universitaires Savoie Mont Blanc},
  address   = {Savoie},
  isbn      = {978-2-37741-069-9},
  pages     = {423 -- 440},
  year      = {2021},
  language  = {fr}
}
@book{OPUS4-53581,
  title     = {Manuel des modes et modalit{\´e}s},
  series = {Manuals of Romance Linguistics ; 29},
  journal   = {Manuals of Romance Linguistics ; 29},
  editor    = {Haßler, Gerda},
  publisher = {de Gruyter GmbH},
  address   = {Berlin},
  isbn      = {978-3-11-054927-0},
  pages     = {X, 690},
  year      = {2022},
  abstract  = {Modality refers to the attitudes a speaker can adopt toward the propositional content of an utterance including, among others, possibility and necessity. After introducing different theoretical perspectives on this concept, this manual presents the markers of modality (moods, modal verbs, adverbs) in Romance languages. It also addresses diachronic questions and the overlaps between modality and other grammatical categories.},
  language  = {fr}
}
@article{McElvenny2017,
  author    = {McElvenny, James},
  title     = {Grammar, typology and the Humboldtian tradition in the work of Georg von der Gabelentz},
  series = {Language \& history : journal of the Henry Sweet Society for the History of Linguistic Ideas},
  volume    = {60},
  journal   = {Language \& history : journal of the Henry Sweet Society for the History of Linguistic Ideas},
  publisher = {Routledge, Taylor \& Francis Group},
  address   = {Abingdon},
  issn      = {1759-7536},
  doi       = {10.1080/17597536.2016.1212580},
  pages     = {1 -- 20},
  year      = {2017},
  abstract  = {A frequently mentioned if somewhat peripheral figure in the historiography of late nineteenth-century linguistics is the German sinologist and general linguist Georg von der Gabelentz (1840-1893). Today Gabelentz is chiefly remembered for several insights that proved to be productive in the development of subsequent schools and subdisciplines. In this paper, we examine two of these insights, his analytic and synthetic systems of grammar and his foundational work on typology. We show how they were intimately connected within his conception of linguistic research, and how this was in turn embedded in the tradition established by Wilhelm von Humboldt (1767-1835), especially as it was further developed by H. Steinthal (1823-1899). This paper goes beyond several previous works with a similar focus by drawing on a wider range of Gabelentz' writings, including manuscript sources that have only recently been published, and by examining specific textual connections between Gabelentz and his predecessors.},
  language  = {en}
}