@article{JacobHeyerVerissimo2018,
  author    = {Jacob, Gunnar and Heyer, Vera and Verissimo, Joao Marques},
  title     = {Aiming at the same target},
  series = {International journal of bilingualism : cross-disciplinary, cross-linguistic studies of language behavior},
  volume    = {22},
  journal   = {International journal of bilingualism : cross-disciplinary, cross-linguistic studies of language behavior},
  number    = {6},
  publisher = {Sage Publ.},
  address   = {London},
  issn      = {1367-0069},
  doi       = {10.1177/1367006916688333},
  pages     = {619 -- 637},
  year      = {2018},
  abstract  = {Aims and objectives/purpose/research questions: We compared the processing of morphologically complex derived vs. inflected forms in native speakers of German and highly proficient native Russian second language (L2) learners of German. Design/methodology/approach: We measured morphological priming effects for derived and inflected German words. To ensure that priming effects were genuinely morphological, the design also contained semantic and orthographic control conditions. Data and analysis: 40 native speakers of German and 36 native Russian learners of L2 German participated in a masked-priming lexical-decision experiment. For both participant groups, priming effects for derived vs. inflected words were compared using linear mixed effects models. Findings/conclusions: While first language (L1) speakers showed similar facilitation effects for both derived and inflected primes, L2 speakers showed a difference between the two prime types, with robust priming effects only for derived, but not for inflected forms. Originality: Unlike in previous studies investigating derivation and inflection in L2 processing, priming effects for derived and inflected prime-target pairs were determined on the basis of the same target word, allowing for a direct comparison between the two morphological phenomena. In this respect, this is the first study to directly compare the processing of derived vs. inflected forms in L2 speakers. Significance/implications: The results are inconsistent with accounts predicting general L1/L2 differences for all types of morphologically complex forms as well as accounts assuming that L1 and L2 processing are based on the same mechanisms. We discuss theoretical implications for L2 processing mechanisms, and propose an explanation which can account for the data pattern.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{Trilcke2020,
  author    = {Trilcke, Peer},
  title     = {In der "Sophaecke" der Berliner Moderne},
  series = {Theodor Fontane, Gerhart Hauptmann und die vergessene Moderne},
  journal   = {Theodor Fontane, Gerhart Hauptmann und die vergessene Moderne},
  publisher = {Quintus},
  address   = {Berlin},
  isbn      = {978-3-947215-79-9},
  pages     = {233 -- 245},
  year      = {2020},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{Hein2021,
  author    = {Hein, Johannes},
  title     = {Verb movement and the lack of verb-doubling VP topicalization in Germanic},
  series = {The journal of comparative Germanic linguistics},
  volume    = {24},
  journal   = {The journal of comparative Germanic linguistics},
  number    = {1},
  publisher = {Springer Science + Business Media B.V.},
  address   = {Dordrecht},
  issn      = {1383-4924},
  doi       = {10.1007/s10828-021-09125-5},
  pages     = {89 -- 144},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {In the absence of a stranded auxiliary or modal, VP-topicalization in most Germanic languages gives rise to the presence of a dummy verb meaning 'do'. Cross-linguistically, this is a rather uncommon strategy as comparable VP-fronting constructions in other languages, e.g. Hebrew, Polish, and Portuguese, among many others, exhibit verb doubling. A comparison of several recent approaches to verb doubling in VP-fronting reveals that it is the consequence of VP-evacuating head movement of the verb to some higher functional head, which saves the (low copy of the) verb from undergoing copy deletion as part of the low VP copy in the VP-topicalization dependency. Given that almost all Germanic languages have such V-salvaging head movement, namely V-to-C movement, but do not show verb doubling, this paper suggests that V-raising is exceptionally impossible in VP-topicalization clauses and addresses the question of why it is blocked. After discussing and rejecting some conceivable explanations for the lack of verb doubling, I propose that the blocking effect arises from a bleeding interaction between V-to-C movement and VP-to-SpecCP movement. As both operations are triggered by the same head, i.e. C, the VP is always encountered first by a downward search algorithm. Movement of VP then freezes it and its lower copies for subextraction precluding subsequent V-raising. Crucially, this implies that there is no V-to-T raising in most Germanic languages. V2 languages with V-to-T raising, e.g. Yiddish, are correctly predicted to not exhibit the blocking effect.},
  language  = {en}
}
@masterthesis{Schulze2015,
  type      = {Bachelor Thesis},
  author    = {Schulze, Carsta},
  title     = {Der Gebrauch des Perfekts im Spanischen und Deutschen},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-394850},
  school      = {Universit{\"a}t Potsdam},
  pages     = {58},
  year      = {2015},
  abstract  = {In dieser Bachelorarbeit werden die Bedeutung und die Gebrauchsweisen des Vergangenheitstempus Perfekt in der deutschen und spanischen Sprache kontrastiv untersucht. Aufgrund des Zusammenwirkens der funktional-semantischen Kategorien Temporalit{\"a}t, Aspektualit{\"a}t und Modalit{\"a}t wird der Perfektgebrauch hinsichtlich dieser Kategorien analysiert. Es wird angenommen, dass sich das Perfekt im Spanischen und Deutschen nicht nur in Bezug auf seine temporalen und aspektuellen Werte, sondern auch hinsichtlich seiner modal-evidentiellen Werte und Ausdrucksweisen unterscheidet. Ziel dieses Beitrags ist es, die spezifischen temporalen und aspektuellen Bedeutungen dieses Vergangenheitstempus in der jeweiligen Sprache herauszustellen, kontrastiv zu betrachten und zu zeigen, inwiefern Perfektformen als Evidentialit{\"a}tsmarker fungieren k{\"o}nnen. Der modal-evidentiellen Bedeutung des Perfekts kommt in dieser Arbeit eine zentrale Rolle zu, da insbesondere hinsichtlich der deutschen Perfekt-Konstruktionen noch wenige Forschungsans{\"a}tze vorliegen. Die modalen und evidentiellen Bedeutungen des Perfekts werden in beiden Sprachen in der Schriftsprache unter Einbezug der Erkenntnisse der RAE (2009), Wachtmeister-Berm{\´u}dez (2005) und Diewald (2011) diskutiert und anhand von Beispielen aus spanischen und deutschen Pressetexten des CREA sowie der Zeit Online und S{\"u}ddeutsche Zeitung belegt. Als Ergebnis dieser Untersuchung l{\"a}sst sich feststellen, dass das Perfekt in beiden Sprachen als Evidentialit{\"a}tsmarker dienen und verschiedene Arten von Evidenz markieren kann. Die Relevanz der kontrastiven Betrachtung kommt in zwei signifikanten Forschungsbereichen zum Tragen: zum Einen bei der {\"U}bersetzung, da die temporalen, aspektuellen und modal-evidentiellen Werte des Perfekts in der jeweiligen Sprache beachtet werden m{\"u}ssen und zum Anderen in der Fremdsprachendidaktik, da das Perfekt verschiedene Stellenwerte in den einzelnen Verbalsystemen einnimmt.},
  language  = {de}
}
@incollection{GranzowEmden2022,
  author    = {Granzow-Emden, Matthias},
  title     = {Grammatik},
  series = {Basiswissen Lehrerbildung: Deutsch unterrichten},
  booktitle = {Basiswissen Lehrerbildung: Deutsch unterrichten},
  editor    = {Kilian, J{\"o}rg and Ramm, Gesa and Sosna, Anette and Riecke-Baulecke, Thomas},
  publisher = {Klett-Kallmeyer},
  address   = {Hannover},
  isbn      = {978-3-7727-1496-2},
  pages     = {204 -- 217},
  year      = {2022},
  language  = {de}
}
@incollection{GranzowEmden2022,
  author    = {Granzow-Emden, Matthias},
  title     = {Sprachstrukturen verstehen},
  series = {Sprachreflexion und Grammatikunterricht},
  booktitle = {Sprachreflexion und Grammatikunterricht},
  edition   = {2., {\"u}berarbeitete und erweiterte Auflage},
  publisher = {Schneider},
  address   = {Baltmannsweiler},
  isbn      = {978-3-8340-2205-9},
  pages     = {205 -- 233},
  year      = {2022},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{GranzowEmden2020,
  author    = {Granzow-Emden, Matthias},
  title     = {Sind Haupt- und Nebensatz noch zu retten?},
  series = {Der Deutschunterricht : Beitr{\"a}ge zu seiner Praxis und wissenschaftlichen Grundlegung},
  volume    = {72},
  journal   = {Der Deutschunterricht : Beitr{\"a}ge zu seiner Praxis und wissenschaftlichen Grundlegung},
  number    = {2},
  publisher = {Friedrich},
  address   = {Hannover},
  issn      = {0340-2258},
  pages     = {14 -- 24},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {Zu Haupt- und Nebens{\"a}tzen existieren in unterschiedlichen Grammatiken ganz unterschiedliche Vorstellungen. Diese werden in Schulb{\"u}chern aufgegriffen und mit unvereinbaren Kriterien zu Merkmalen erhoben, die allenfalls prototypisch in dieser Kombination vorkommen. Eine so modellierte Grammatik ist von Ausnahmen und Widerspr{\"u}chen durchsetzt. Dabei w{\"a}re es nur ein kleiner Schritt zu einer widerspruchsfreien Modellierung, ausgehend vom Feldermodell und dem konsequenten Blick auf die Stellung des finiten Verbs.},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{GranzowEmden2020,
  author    = {Granzow-Emden, Matthias},
  title     = {Das rote und das blaue Feld},
  series = {Praxis Deutsch: Zeitschrift f{\"u}r den Deutschunterricht},
  volume    = {47},
  journal   = {Praxis Deutsch: Zeitschrift f{\"u}r den Deutschunterricht},
  number    = {282},
  editor    = {M{\"u}ller, Astrid and Tophinke, Doris},
  issn      = {0341-5279},
  pages     = {24 -- 28},
  year      = {2020},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{Jacob2017,
  author    = {Jacob, Gunnar},
  title     = {Morphological priming in bilingualism research},
  series = {Bilingualism : language and cognition.},
  volume    = {21},
  journal   = {Bilingualism : language and cognition.},
  number    = {3},
  publisher = {Cambridge Univ. Press},
  address   = {New York},
  issn      = {1366-7289},
  doi       = {10.1017/S1366728917000451},
  pages     = {443 -- 447},
  year      = {2017},
  abstract  = {The review describes how morphological priming can be utilised to study the processing of morphologically complex words in bilinguals. The article starts with an overview of established experimental paradigms based on morphological priming, discusses a number of basic methodological pitfalls with regard to experimental design and materials, then reviews previous L2 morphological priming studies, and concludes with a brief discussion of recent developments in the field as well as possible future directions.},
  language  = {en}
}
@incollection{Berner2022,
  author    = {Berner, Elisabeth},
  title     = {Mundart und Umgangssprache},
  series = {Die N{\"o}rdliche Uckermark um Prenzlau : eine landeskundliche Bestandsaufnahme},
  booktitle = {Die N{\"o}rdliche Uckermark um Prenzlau : eine landeskundliche Bestandsaufnahme},
  publisher = {B{\"o}hlau},
  address   = {K{\"o}ln},
  isbn      = {978-3-412-22540-7},
  pages     = {54 -- 56},
  year      = {2022},
  language  = {de}
}