@book{OPUS4-1006,
  title     = {Three papers on German verb movement},
  editor    = {Vogel, Ralf},
  isbn      = {978-3-937786-07-0},
  issn      = {1864-1857},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-10934},
  publisher      = {Universit{\"a}t Potsdam},
  year      = {2004},
  abstract  = {This volume offers new arguments and perspectives in the ongoing debate about the optimal analysis of verb movement, mainly, but not exclusively, in German. Fanselow and Meinunger deal with verb second (V2) movement in German main clauses. Fanselow argues that head movement of the substitution type follows the standard minimalist conceptions of Merge and Move and is therefore not subject to the same objections as head movement as head adjunction which violates Chomsky's minimalist extension condition, operates countercyclically, and fails to let the moved head c-command its trace. Fanselow argues for V2 movement as head movement of the substitution type. Meinunger discusses a restriction on V2 movement imposed by phrases like "mehr als" ('more than'), as in "Der Wert hat sich weit mehr als verdreifacht" ('the value has far more than tripled') where V2 movement is ruled out (cf. *"Der Wert verdreifachte sich mehr als"). Meinunger claims that this restriction is best analysed in phonological terms: the preposition/complementiser "als" acts as a prefixal clitic to its host, the finite verb, which therefore may not move without it. With respect to the V2 debate, Meinunger argues for an interface perspective. He shows that V2 is restricted from both the conceptual and the phonological interface. Vogel, finally, discusses the syntax of clause-final verbal complexes and their dialectal variation in German. He compares three different syntactic analyses, a minimalist head movement analysis, a minimalist XP movement analysis, and an Optimality theoretic PF movement analysis. The three accounts are evaluated relative to the additional assumptions they have to make, the complications they face and how they fit the observations. Vogel argues in favour of the phonologically oriented OT analysis because of its ability to create a direct link between the coming about of a particular word order pattern and its basically phonological trigger. Each of the three papers recognises the relevance of surface forms in the analysis of German verb movement. They differ, however in the extent to which phonological aspects take part in the explanations they offer.},
  language  = {en}
}
@book{OPUS4-1195,
  title     = {Interdisciplinary studies on information structure : ISIS ; Working papers of the SFB 632 - Vol. 5},
  editor    = {Ishihara, Shinichiro and Schmitz, Michaela and Schwarz, Anne},
  publisher = {Universit{\"a}tsverlag Potsdam},
  address   = {Potsdam},
  issn      = {1866-4725},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-13047},
  publisher      = {Universit{\"a}t Potsdam},
  pages     = {221},
  year      = {2006},
  abstract  = {In this paper we compare the behaviour of adverbs of frequency (de Swart 1993) like usually with the behaviour of adverbs of quantity like for the most part in sentences that contain plural definites. We show that sentences containing the former type of Q-adverb evidence that Quantificational Variability Effects (Berman 1991) come about as an indirect effect of quantification over situations: in order for quantificational variability readings to arise, these sentences have to obey two newly observed constraints that clearly set them apart from sentences containing corresponding quantificational DPs, and that can plausibly be explained under the assumption that quantification over (the atomic parts of) complex situations is involved. Concerning sentences with the latter type of Q-adverb, on the other hand, such evidence is lacking: with respect to the constraints just mentioned, they behave like sentences that contain corresponding quantificational DPs. We take this as evidence that Q-adverbs like for the most part do not quantify over the atomic parts of sum eventualities in the cases under discussion (as claimed by Nakanishi and Romero (2004)), but rather over the atomic parts of the respective sum individuals.},
  language  = {en}
}
@book{OPUS4-462,
  title     = {Ein groſs vnnd narhafft haffen : Festschrift f{\"u}r Joachim Gessinger},
  editor    = {Berner, Elisabeth and Voeste, Anja and B{\"o}hm, Manuela},
  isbn      = {978-3-937786-35-3},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-5231},
  publisher      = {Universit{\"a}t Potsdam},
  year      = {2005},
  abstract  = {Kolleginnen und Kollegen aus Literaturwissenschaft und Linguistik sind der Aufforderung der Herausgeberinnen gefolgt, Beitr{\"a}ge zu Ehren Joachim Gessingers zu verfassen, die sein zentrales Arbeitsgebiet, die j{\"u}ngere Sprach-, Mentalit{\"a}ts- und Wissenschaftsgeschichte, zum Thema haben. Entstanden ist eine facettenreiche Festschrift, die Aspekte der Schriftgeschichte, der Sprachpolitik und der Universit{\"a}tsgeschichte ebenso aufgreift wie linguistische Fragen zur Sprachvariation - und nicht zuletzt Einblicke in das komplexe Privatleben des Autors gew{\"a}hrt. Die Festschrift ist in Form eines Men{\"u}s zum 60. Geburtstag des Jubilars pr{\"a}sentiert und enth{\"a}lt nach dem Entr{\´e}e als Plats du jour im Kapitel "L{\"u}ttje Lage und Maultaschen" Beitr{\"a}ge von Otto Ludwig (Von Kopf und Hand : zur Konstitution der neuzeitlichen Schreibpraxis in sp{\"a}tmittelalterlicher Zeit) und Isabel Zollna (Ohr und Hand : die Taquigraf{\´i}a castellana o arte de escribir con tanta velocidad como se habla (1803) von Francisco de Paula Mart{\´i}). Es folgt der Abschnitt "Bouletten" mit Beitr{\"a}gen von Angelika Ebrecht / Klaus Laermann (Wie kommt Farbe zur Sprache?), Wolfert von Rahden („{\"A}chte Weimaraner" : zur Genealogie eines Genealogen), Susanne Scharnowski („Die Studirten dr{\"u}cken jetzt einander todt, wenn ich so sagen darf" : einige Anmerkungen zu Universit{\"a}tsreform und Gelehrsamkeitskritik seit der Aufkl{\"a}rung), Hartmut Schmidt (Die Sprache des Regimes und die Sprache der B{\"u}rger : Carl Goerdeler und andere zum Leipziger Universit{\"a}tsjubil{\"a}um 1934) und J{\"u}rgen Trabant (Welche Sprache f{\"u}r Europa?). Im Kapitel „R{\"u}ben und Kartoffeln" geben sich folgende Autoren die Ehre: Elisabeth Berner („Im ersten Augenblick war es mir Deinetwegen leid" : Theodor Fontane im Krisenjahr 1876), Manuela B{\"o}hm (Berliner Sprach-Querelen : ein Ausschnitt aus der Debatte {\"u}ber den style r{\´e}fugi{\´e} im 18. Jahrhundert), Peter Eisenberg (Jeder versteht jeden : wie Luther die Pfingstgeschichte schreibt), Christian Fischer (Variation und Korrelation im Mittelniederdeutschen : M{\"o}glichkeiten und Grenzen der Variablenlinguistik), Anja Voeste („Die Neger heben"? : die Sprachenfrage in Deutsch-Neuguinea (1884-1914)), Heide Wegener (Das H{\"u}hnerei vor der Hundeh{\"u}tte : von der Notwendigkeit historischen Wissens in der Grammatikographie des Deutschen) und Birgit Wolf („Woher kommt eigentlich ...?" : Sprachberatung und Sprachgeschichte an der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam). Anschließend geht es ans Dessert: Liliane Weissberg (Die Unschuld des Namens und die ungeheure Unordnung der Welt), Roland Willemyns / Eline Vanhecke / Wim Vandenbussche (Politische Loyalit{\"a}t und Sprachwahl : eine Fallstudie aus dem Flandern des fr{\"u}hen 19. Jahrhunderts), J{\"u}rgen Erfurt (Zweisprachige Alphabetisierung im R{\"a}derwerk politischer und wissenschaftlicher Diskurse), Franz Januschek ({\"U}ber Fritz und andere Auslaufmodelle : ein Beitrag zur Lingologie), Ulrich Schmitz (Gr{\"u}n bei Grimm) und Wolfert von Rahden (Immer wieder pl{\"o}tzlich am Ende des Sommers : zur Ph{\"a}nomenologie des Abschiedsrituals auf einem italienischen Landsitz in den achtziger Jahren) servieren Pralinen und Marshmallows, Obst und Hupferl.},
  language  = {de}
}
@book{OPUS4-1107,
  title     = {Optimality theory and minimalism : a possible convergence?},
  editor    = {Broekhuis, Hans and Vogel, Ralf},
  publisher = {Universit{\"a}tsverlag Potsdam},
  address   = {Potsdam},
  isbn      = {978-3-939469-54-4},
  issn      = {1616-7392},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-11909},
  publisher      = {Universit{\"a}t Potsdam},
  pages     = {vii ; 231},
  year      = {2006},
  abstract  = {This issue of Linguistics in Potsdam contains a number of papers that grew out of the workshop Descriptive and Empirical Adequacy in Linguistics held in Berlin on December 17-19 December, 2005. One of the goals of this meeting was to bring together scholars working in various frameworks (with emphasis on the Minimalist Program and Optimality Theory) and to discuss matters concerning descriptive and empirical adequacy. Another explicit goal was to discuss the question whether Minimalism and Optimality Theory should be considered incompatible and, hence, competing theories, or whether the two frameworks should rather be considered complementary in certain respects (see http://let.uvt.nl/deal05/call.html for the call for papers). Five of the seven papers in this volume directly grew out of the oral presentations given at the workshop. Although Vieri Samek-Lodovici's paper was not part of the workshop, it can also be considered a result of the workshop since it pulls together some of his many comments during the discussion time. The paper by Eva Engels and Sten Vikner discusses a phenomenon that received much interest from both minimalist and optimality theoretic syntax in the recent years, Scandinavian object shift. The paper may serve as a practical example for a claim that is repeatedly made in this volume: minimalist and OT analyses, even where they might be competing, can fruitfully inform each other in a constructive manner, leading to a deeper understanding of syntactic phenomena.},
  language  = {en}
}
@book{OPUS4-1011,
  title     = {Experimental studies in linguistics 1},
  editor    = {Fischer, Susann and van de Vijver, Ruben and Vogel, Ralf},
  issn      = {1864-1857},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-10960},
  publisher      = {Universit{\"a}t Potsdam},
  year      = {2003},
  abstract  = {This is the first issue of a series in which affiliates of the Institute of Linguistics report the results of their experimental work. Generative linguistics usually rely on the method of native speaker judgements in order to test their hypotheses. If a hypothesis rules out a set of sentences, linguistics can ask native speakers whether they feel these sentences are indeed ungrammatical in their language. There are, however, circumstances where this method is unreliable. In such cases a more elaborate method to test a hypothesis is called. All papes in this series, and hence, all papers in this volume deal with issues that cannot be reliably tested with native speaker judgements. This volume contains 7 papers, all using different methods and finding answers to very different questions. This heterogenity, by the way, reflects the various interests and research programs of the institute. The paper, by Trutkowski, Zugck, Blaszczak, Fanselow, Fischer and Vogel deals with superiority in 10 Indo-European languages. The paper by Schlesewsky, Fanselow and Frisch and by Schlesewsky and Frisch, deal with the role of case in processing German sentences. The paper by Vogel and Frisch deals with resolving case conflicts, as does the paper by Vogel and Zugck. The nature of partitive case is the topic of the paper by Fischer. The paper by K?gler deals with the realization of question intonation in two German dialects. We hope that you enjoy reading the papers!},
  language  = {en}
}
@book{OPUS4-1294,
  title     = {Information structure in cross-linguistic corpora : annotation guidelines for phonology, morphology, syntax, semantics and information structure},
  editor    = {Dipper, Stefanie and Goetze, Michael and Skopeteas, Stavros},
  publisher = {Universit{\"a}tsverlag Potsdam},
  address   = {Potsdam},
  isbn      = {978-3-939469-66-7},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-14199},
  publisher      = {Universit{\"a}t Potsdam},
  pages     = {210},
  year      = {2007},
  abstract  = {This volume presents annotation guidelines that have been developed in the context of the SFB 632, a collaborative research center entitled "Information Structure: the Linguistic Means for Structuring Utterances, Sentences and Texts". An important result of the SFB 632 are the SFB corpora from more than 20 typologically different languages, which have been annotated according to the guidelines presented here. The ultimate target of the data and its annotations is to support the study of Information Structure. Information Structure involves all levels of grammar and, hence, the present guidelines cover relevant aspects of all these levels: - Phonology - Morphology - Syntax - Semantics - Information Structure These levels are dealt with in individual chapters, containing tagset declarations with obligatory and optional tags, detailed annotation instructions, and illustrative examples. The volume also presents an evaluation of inter-annotator agreement of Syntax and Information Structural annotation.},
  language  = {en}
}
@book{OPUS4-1430,
  title     = {The notions of information structure},
  editor    = {F{\´e}ry, Caroline and Fanselow, Gisbert and Krifka, Manfred},
  publisher = {Universit{\"a}tsverlag Potsdam},
  address   = {Potsdam},
  isbn      = {978-3-939469-88-9},
  issn      = {1614-4708},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-15472},
  publisher      = {Universit{\"a}t Potsdam},
  pages     = {235},
  year      = {2007},
  abstract  = {Contents: Introduction (The Editors) Basic Notions of Information Structure (Manfred Krifka) Notions of Focus Anaphoricity (Mats Rooth) Topic and Focus: Two Structural Positions Associated with Logical Functions in the Left Periphery of the Hungarian Sentence (Katalin {\´E}. Kiss) Direct and Indirect Aboutness Topics (Cornelia Endriss \& Stefan Hinterwimmer) Information Structure as Information-based Partition (Satoshi Tomioka) Focus Presuppositions (Dorit Abush) Contrastive Focus, Givenness and the Unmarked Status of "Discourse-new"(Elisabeth O. Selkirk) Contrastive Focus (Malte Zimmermann) The Fallacy of Invariant Phonological Correlates of Information Structural Notions (Caroline F{\´e}ry) Notions and Subnotions of Information Structure (Carlos Gussenhoven) The Restricted Access of Information Structure to Syntax - A Minority Report (Gisbert Fanselow) Focus and Tone (Katharina Hartmann)},
  language  = {en}
}
@book{OPUS4-1537,
  title     = {Interdisciplinary studies on information structure : ISIS ; Working papers of the SFB 632. - Vol. 10},
  editor    = {Ishihara, Shinichiro and Schwarz, Anne},
  issn      = {1866-4725},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-16929},
  publisher      = {Universit{\"a}t Potsdam},
  year      = {2008},
  abstract  = {The 10th volume of the working paper series contains two papers contributed by SFB-members. The first paper "Single prosodic phrase sentences" by Caroline F{\´e}ry (A1) and Heiner Drenhaus (C6, University of Potsdam) investigates the prosody of Wide Focus Partial Fronting in a series of production and perception experiments. The second paper "Focus Asymmetries in Bura" by Katharina Hartmann, Peggy Jacob (B2, Humboldt University Berlin) and Malte Zimmermann (A5, University of Potsdam) explores the strategies of marking focus in Bura (Chadic).},
  language  = {en}
}
@book{OPUS4-49050,
  title     = {Althochdeutsch, Mittelhochdeutsch und Fr{\"u}hneuhochdeutsch},
  editor    = {Berner, Elisabeth and Wolf, Norbert Richard},
  edition   = {12., verbesserte und erweiterte},
  publisher = {Hirzel},
  address   = {Stuttgart},
  isbn      = {978-3-7776-2777-9},
  publisher      = {Universit{\"a}t Potsdam},
  pages     = {XXI, 261-509},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {Der zweite Teil des bew{\"a}hrten Lehr- und Handbuchs Geschichte der deutschen Sprache enth{\"a}lt konzise und trotzdem leicht verst{\"a}ndliche Darstellungen des Alt-, Mittel- und Fr{\"u}hneuhochdeutschen im Bereich der Phonologie, der Graphematik, der Morphologie und der Syntax. Dabei handelt es sich nicht nur um synchrone Beschreibungen des jeweiligen Sprachzustands, sondern auch um die Entwicklung des deutschen Sprachbaus auf allen strukturellen Ebenen. Die Verbindung von grammatischer Synchronie und struktureller Diachronie ist ein besonderes Markenzeichen dieses zweiten Teils der Schmidt'schen Sprachgeschichte.},
  language  = {de}
}
@book{OPUS4-49049,
  title     = {Einf{\"u}hrung, Vorgeschichte und Geschichte},
  editor    = {Berner, Elisabeth and Wolf, Norbert Richard},
  edition   = {12., {\"u}berarbeiteten und aktualisierte},
  publisher = {Hirzel},
  address   = {Stuttgart},
  isbn      = {978-3- 7776-2776-2},
  publisher      = {Universit{\"a}t Potsdam},
  pages     = {XXI, 259},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {Die Geschichte der deutschen Sprache als unverzichtbares Standardwerk f{\"u}r das germanistische Studium erscheint nunmehr in der 12., {\"u}berarbeiteten und aktualisierten Auflage. Das umfassende Lehrbuch zur Sprachgeschichte gliedert sich fortan in zwei B{\"a}nde: Dieser erste Teil bietet neben einer Einf{\"u}hrung in sprachgeschichtliche Fragen eine detaillierte Darstellung der Vorgeschichte und der Geschichte der deutschenSprache bis in die Gegenwart. Basierend auf intensiven Quellenanalysen fokussiert sich die Darstellung auf kultur- und sozialgeschichtliche Aspekte. Lediglich dieKapitel zur indogermanischen und germanischen Sprache enthalten bereits wichtige strukturgeschichtliche Informationen.},
  language  = {de}
}