@misc{AngeleSlatteryYangetal.2008,
  author    = {Angele, Bernhard and Slattery, Timothy J. and Yang, Jinmian and Kliegl, Reinhold and Rayner, Keith},
  title     = {Parafoveal processing in reading: Manipulating n+1 and n+2 previews simultaneously},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-57128},
  year      = {2008},
  abstract  = {The boundary paradigm (Rayner, 1975) with a novel preview manipulation was used to examine the extent of parafoveal processing of words to the right of fixation. Words n+1 and n+2 had either correct or incorrect previews prior to fixation (prior to crossing the boundary location). In addition, the manipulation utilized either a high or low frequency word in word n+1 location on the assumption that it would be more likely that n+2 preview effects could be obtained when word n+1 was high frequency. The primary findings were that there was no evidence for a preview benefit for word n+2 and no evidence for parafoveal-on-foveal effects when word n+1 is at least four letters long. We discuss implications for models of eye-movement control in reading.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{ArslanFelser2017,
  author    = {Arslan, Seckin and Felser, Claudia},
  title     = {Comprehension of wh-questions in Turkish-German bilinguals with aphasia},
  series = {Clinical linguistics \& phonetics},
  volume    = {32},
  journal   = {Clinical linguistics \& phonetics},
  number    = {7},
  publisher = {Taylor \& Francis Group},
  address   = {Philadelphia},
  issn      = {0269-9206},
  doi       = {10.1080/02699206.2017.1416493},
  pages     = {640 -- 660},
  year      = {2017},
  abstract  = {The aim of our study was to examine the extent to which linguistic approaches to sentence comprehension deficits in aphasia can account for differential impairment patterns in the comprehension of wh-questions in bilingual persons with aphasia (PWA). We investigated the comprehension of subject and object wh-questions in both Turkish, a wh-in-situ language, and German, a wh-fronting language, in two bilingual PWA using a sentence-to-picture matching task. Both PWA showed differential impairment patterns in their two languages. SK, an early bilingual PWA, had particular difficulty comprehending subject which-questions in Turkish but performed normal across all conditions in German. CT, a late bilingual PWA, performed more poorly for object which-questions in German than in all other conditions, whilst in Turkish his accuracy was at chance level across all conditions. We conclude that the observed patterns of selective cross-linguistic impairments cannot solely be attributed either to difficulty with wh-movement or to problems with the integration of discourse-level information. Instead our results suggest that differences between our PWA's individual bilingualism profiles (e.g. onset of bilingualism, premorbid language dominance) considerably affected the nature and extent of their impairments.},
  language  = {en}
}
@misc{ArslanFelser2017,
  author    = {Arslan, Se{\c{c}}kin and Felser, Claudia},
  title     = {Comprehension of wh-questions in Turkish-German bilinguals with aphasia},
  series = {Postprints der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Humanwissenschaftliche Reihe},
  journal   = {Postprints der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Humanwissenschaftliche Reihe},
  number    = {462},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-412813},
  pages     = {22},
  year      = {2017},
  abstract  = {The aim of our study was to examine the extent to which linguistic approaches to sentence comprehension deficits in aphasia can account for differential impairment patterns in the comprehension of wh-questions in bilingual persons with aphasia (PWA). We investi- gated the comprehension of subject and object wh-questions in both Turkish, a wh-in-situ language, and German, a wh-fronting language, in two bilingual PWA using a sentence-to-picture matching task. Both PWA showed differential impairment patterns in their two languages. SK, an early bilingual PWA, had particular difficulty comprehending subject which-questions in Turkish but performed normal across all conditions in German. CT, a late bilingual PWA, performed more poorly for object which-questions in German than in all other condi- tions, whilst in Turkish his accuracy was at chance level across all conditions. We conclude that the observed patterns of selective cross-linguistic impairments cannot solely be attributed either to difficulty with wh-movement or to problems with the integration of discourse-level information. Instead our results suggest that differ- ences between our PWA's individual bilingualism profiles (e.g. onset of bilingualism, premorbid language dominance) considerably affected the nature and extent of their impairments.},
  language  = {en}
}
@misc{ArslanGuerFelser2017,
  author    = {Arslan, Se{\c{c}}kin and G{\"u}r, Eren and Felser, Claudia},
  title     = {Predicting the sources of impaired wh-question comprehension in non-fluent aphasia},
  series = {Postprints der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Humanwissenschaftliche Reihe},
  journal   = {Postprints der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Humanwissenschaftliche Reihe},
  number    = {464},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-412717},
  pages     = {21},
  year      = {2017},
  abstract  = {This study investigates the comprehension of wh-questions in individuals with aphasia (IWA) speaking Turkish, a non-wh-movement language, and German, a wh-movement language. We examined six German-speaking and 11 Turkish-speaking IWA using picture-pointing tasks. Findings from our experiments show that the Turkish IWA responded more accurately to both object who and object which questions than to subject questions, while the German IWA performed better for subject which questions than in all other conditions. Using random forest models, a machine learning technique used in tree-structured classification, on the individual data revealed that both the Turkish and German IWA's response accuracy is largely predicted by the presence of overt and unambiguous case marking. We discuss our results with regard to different theoretical approaches to the comprehension of wh-questions in aphasia.},
  language  = {en}
}
@inproceedings{ArtsteinPoesio2006,
  author    = {Artstein, Ron and Poesio, Massimo},
  title     = {Identifying reference to abstract objects in dialogue},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-10357},
  year      = {2006},
  abstract  = {In two experiments, many annotators marked antecedents for discourse deixis as unconstrained regions of text. The experiments show that annotators do converge on the identity of these text regions, though much of what they do can be captured by a simple model. Demonstrative pronouns are more likely than definite descriptions to be marked with discourse antecedents. We suggest that our methodology is suitable for the systematic study of discourse deixis.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{AsherReese2007,
  author    = {Asher, Nicholas and Reese, Brian},
  title     = {Intonation and discourse},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-19399},
  year      = {2007},
  abstract  = {This paper surveys a range of constructions in which prosody affects discourse function and discourse structure.We discuss English tag questions, negative polar questions, and what we call "focus" questions. We postulate that these question types are complex speech acts and outline an analysis in Segmented Discourse Representation Theory (SDRT) to account for the interactions between prosody and discourse.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{AuhagenUth2022,
  author    = {Auhagen, Christopher Patrick and Uth, Melanie},
  title     = {Variation of relative complementizers in Yucatecan Spanish},
  series = {Languages},
  volume    = {7},
  journal   = {Languages},
  number    = {4},
  publisher = {MDPI},
  address   = {Basel},
  issn      = {2226-471X},
  doi       = {10.3390/languages7040279},
  pages     = {16},
  year      = {2022},
  abstract  = {The starting point of this article is the occurrence of determiner-less and bare que relative complementizers like (en) que, '(in) that', instead of (en) el que, '(in) which', in Yucatecan Spanish (southeast Mexico). While reference grammars treat complementizers with a determiner as the standard option, previous diachronic research has shown that determiner-less complementizers actually predate relative complementizers with a determiner. Additionally, Yucatecan Spanish has been in long-standing contact with Yucatec Maya. Relative complementation in Yucatec Maya differs from that in Spanish (at least) in that the non-complex complementizer tu'ux ('where') is generally the only option for locative complementation. The paper explores monolingual and bilingual data from Yucatecan Spanish to discuss the question whether the determiner-less and bare que relative complementizers in our data constitute a historic remnant or a dialectal recast, possibly (but not necessarily) due to language contact. Although our pilot study may not answer these far-reaching questions, it does reveal two separate, but intertwined developments: (i) a generally increased rate of bare que relative complementation, across both monolingual speakers of Spanish and Spanish Maya bilinguals, compared to other Spanish varieties, and (ii) a preference for donde at the cost of other locative complementizer constructions in the bilingual group. Our analysis thus reveals intriguing differences between the complementizer preferences of monolingual and bilingual speakers, suggesting that different variational patterns caused by different (socio-)linguistic factors can co-develop in parallel in one and the [same] region.},
  language  = {en}
}
@misc{AuhagenUth2022,
  author    = {Auhagen, Christopher Patrick and Uth, Melanie},
  title     = {Variation of relative complementizers in Yucatecan Spanish},
  series = {Zweitver{\"o}ffentlichungen der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Philosophische Reihe},
  journal   = {Zweitver{\"o}ffentlichungen der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Philosophische Reihe},
  issn      = {1866-8380},
  doi       = {10.25932/publishup-58437},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-584375},
  pages     = {18},
  year      = {2022},
  abstract  = {The starting point of this article is the occurrence of determiner-less and bare que relative complementizers like (en) que, '(in) that', instead of (en) el que, '(in) which', in Yucatecan Spanish (southeast Mexico). While reference grammars treat complementizers with a determiner as the standard option, previous diachronic research has shown that determiner-less complementizers actually predate relative complementizers with a determiner. Additionally, Yucatecan Spanish has been in long-standing contact with Yucatec Maya. Relative complementation in Yucatec Maya differs from that in Spanish (at least) in that the non-complex complementizer tu'ux ('where') is generally the only option for locative complementation. The paper explores monolingual and bilingual data from Yucatecan Spanish to discuss the question whether the determiner-less and bare que relative complementizers in our data constitute a historic remnant or a dialectal recast, possibly (but not necessarily) due to language contact. Although our pilot study may not answer these far-reaching questions, it does reveal two separate, but intertwined developments: (i) a generally increased rate of bare que relative complementation, across both monolingual speakers of Spanish and Spanish Maya bilinguals, compared to other Spanish varieties, and (ii) a preference for donde at the cost of other locative complementizer constructions in the bilingual group. Our analysis thus reveals intriguing differences between the complementizer preferences of monolingual and bilingual speakers, suggesting that different variational patterns caused by different (socio-)linguistic factors can co-develop in parallel in one and the [same] region.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{Aust2014,
  author    = {Aust, Gottfried},
  title     = {St{\"o}rungen des H{\"o}rverm{\"o}gens},
  series = {Spektrum Patholinguistik},
  journal   = {Spektrum Patholinguistik},
  number    = {7},
  publisher = {Universit{\"a}tsverlag Potsdam},
  address   = {Potsdam},
  issn      = {1866-9085},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-71422},
  pages     = {1 -- 11},
  year      = {2014},
  abstract  = {Schwerh{\"o}rigkeiten treten beim Menschen h{\"a}ufig auf und k{\"o}nnen angeboren oder erworben sein. Man unterscheidet in Schallleitungsschwerh{\"o}rigkeiten, bei denen Schallaufnahme und Schallleitung in das Innenohr durch Fremdk{\"o}rper, Infektionen, Verletzungen, Mittelohrbel{\"u}ftungsprobleme und Fehlbildungen gest{\"o}rt sind und in Schallempfindungsschwerh{\"o}rigkeiten, bei denen der Sinnesbereich des Innenohres, die Nervenleitung zum Hirnstamm oder die zentrale Verarbeitung im Gehirn betroffen sind. Urs{\"a}chlich hierf{\"u}r kommen neben vererbten Faktoren Infektionen, Verletzungen, L{\"a}rm, toxische Substanzen, Geburtsprobleme, Stoffwechselst{\"o}rungen und Tumoren in Betracht. Bestehen Schwerh{\"o}rigkeiten unbehandelt lange Zeit, kommt es - je nach Auspr{\"a}gung - bei Kindern zu St{\"o}rungen der Gehirn-, Sprachund emotionalen Entwicklung, bei allen Betroffenen auch zu Kommunikationsproblemen und zu Schwierigkeiten bei der Teilhabe am Leben in der sozialen Gemeinschaft. Schallleitungsschwerh{\"o}rigkeiten k{\"o}nnen medizinisch behandelt und gebessert werden, w{\"a}hrend bei Schallempfindungsschwerh{\"o}rigkeiten eine urs{\"a}chliche medizinische Behandlung zur Zeit nicht m{\"o}glich ist. In diesen F{\"a}llen ist die Versorgung mit H{\"o}rsystemen erforderlich. Hierzu z{\"a}hlt man, wiederum in Abh{\"a}ngigkeit vom Ausmaß der Schwerh{\"o}rigkeit, IdO- und HdO-H{\"o}rger{\"a}te, implantierbare H{\"o}rger{\"a}te, cochle{\"a}re Implantate und Hirnstammimplantate. Bei Schwerh{\"o}rigkeiten, die durch beruflichen L{\"a}rm verursacht sind, ist eine Herausnahme aus dem L{\"a}rmberuf Voraussetzung, um eine weitere Verschlechterung zu verhindern. Eine besondere Stellung kommt der einseitigen Schallempfindungsschwerh{\"o}rigkeit zu, da sie bei Normalh{\"o}rigkeit des anderen Ohres, seltener auff{\"a}llt, den Betroffenen aber Probleme im t{\"a}glichen Leben bereiten kann. Wichtig sind ihre Erkennung und Ber{\"u}cksichtigung, zum Beispiel in der Schule, am Arbeitsplatz und im Straßenverkehr. Dem bleibend h{\"o}rbehinderten Menschen stehen nach dem Sozialgesetzbuch Hilfen und Verg{\"u}nstigungen zu, um die durch die H{\"o}rbehinderung verursachten Nachteile zum Teil auszugleichen.},
  language  = {de}
}
@misc{AustHeinemannHenniesetal.2014,
  author    = {Aust, Gottfried and Heinemann, Steffi and Hennies, Johannes and Penke, Martina and Rothweiler, Monika and Wimmer, Eva and Hess, Markus and Becker, Maryanne and Ehrmann-Neuhoff, Brigitte and Hamann, Elke and Wachtlin, Bianka and Sch{\"a}fer, Blanca and W{\"u}rzner, Kay-Michael and Heister, Julian and Schroeder, Sascha and D{\"u}sterh{\"o}ft, Stefanie and Tr{\"u}ggelmann, Maria and Richter, Kerstin and Gagarina, Natalʹja Vladimirovna and Posse, Dorothea and Topaj, Nathalie and Acikg{\"o}z, Duygu and Neumann, Charleen and Baumann, Jeannine and Meyer, Sarah and Siegm{\"u}ller, Julia and K{\"o}sterke-Buchardt, Antje and Jung, Kristina and Jassens, Frank and Golchert, Kristin and Wolff von Gudenberg, Alexander and Schmidt, Sabine and Kisielewicz, Daria and Heide, Judith and G{\"o}ldner, Angie and Ostermann, Anja},
  title     = {Spektrum Patholinguistik = Schwerpunktthema: H{\"o}ren - Zuh{\"o}ren - Dazugeh{\"o}ren : Sprachtherapie bei H{\"o}rst{\"o}rungen und Cochlea-Implantat},
  number    = {7},
  editor    = {Adelt, Anne and Fritzsche, Tom and Roß, Jennifer and D{\"u}sterh{\"o}ft, Stefanie},
  publisher = {Universit{\"a}tsverlag Potsdam},
  address   = {Potsdam},
  organization    = {Verband f{\"u}r Patholinguistik e. V.},
  isbn      = {978-3-86956-294-0},
  issn      = {1869-3822},
  doi       = {10.25932/publishup-6848},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-70629},
  year      = {2014},
  abstract  = {Das Herbsttreffen Patholinguistik wird seit 2007 j{\"a}hrlich vom Verband f{\"u}r Patholinguistik e.V. (vpl) durchgef{\"u}hrt. Das 7. Herbsttreffen mit dem Schwerpunktthema "H{\"o}ren - Zuh{\"o}ren - Dazugeh{\"o}ren: Sprachtherapie bei H{\"o}rst{\"o}rungen und Cochlea-Implantat" fand am 16.11.2013 in Potsdam statt. Der vorliegende Tagungsband beinhaltet die sechs Vortr{\"a}ge zum Schwerpunktthema aus verschiedenen Perspektiven: der medizinischen, der therapeutischen, der wissenschaftlichen sowie der von Betroffenen. Weiterhin sind die Beitr{\"a}ge der Posterpr{\"a}sentationen zu Themen der sprachtherapeutischen Forschung und Praxis abgedruckt.},
  language  = {de}
}