@misc{Botsch2020, author = {Botsch, Gideon}, title = {Frei, Norbert, Franka Maubach, Christina Morina, und Maik T{\"a}ndler (2019): Zur rechten Zeit. Wider die R{\"u}ckkehr des Nationalismus. Berlin: Ullstein. 253 Seiten. 20,00 €}, series = {Politische Vierteljahresschrift}, volume = {61}, journal = {Politische Vierteljahresschrift}, number = {1}, publisher = {Springer VS}, address = {Wiesbaden}, issn = {0032-3470}, doi = {10.1007/s11615-020-00221-x}, pages = {199 -- 201}, year = {2020}, abstract = {„Zur rechten Zeit" ist ein fl{\"u}ssig geschriebenes, gut lesbares und an ein breites Publikum gerichtetes Sachbuch. Es will die Geschichte der Bundesrepublik „unter dem Eindruck der gegenw{\"a}rtigen rechten Konjunktur anders denn als g{\"a}ngige Erfolgsgeschichte" (S. 10) erz{\"a}hlen. Die Autorinnen und Autoren sind nicht bestrebt, das Erfolgsnarrativ radikal zu dekonstruieren und damit den Forschungsertrag der Zeitgeschichtsschreibung zu ignorieren, wohl aber rekonstruieren sie Abschattungen und Br{\"u}che, die zeigen, dass der Prozess weniger geradlinig war als h{\"a}ufig angenommen - und dass seine Ergebnisse nicht irreversibel sind.}, language = {de} } @incollection{Botsch2020, author = {Botsch, Gideon}, title = {"Am Anfang stand die {\"U}berw{\"a}ltigung"}, series = {Erasmus von Rotterdam}, booktitle = {Erasmus von Rotterdam}, editor = {Sch{\"o}ppner, Ralf}, publisher = {Alibri Verlag}, address = {Aschaffenburg}, isbn = {978-3-86569-212-2}, pages = {19 -- 36}, year = {2020}, language = {de} } @incollection{Botsch2020, author = {Botsch, Gideon}, title = {"Wann I' denk wie's fr{\"u}her war."}, series = {One nation under a groove - »Nation« als Kategorie popul{\"a}rer Musik}, booktitle = {One nation under a groove - »Nation« als Kategorie popul{\"a}rer Musik}, editor = {von Appen, Ralf and Hindrichs, Thorsten}, publisher = {transcript}, address = {Bielefeld}, isbn = {9783837655810}, doi = {10.14361/9783839455814}, pages = {15 -- 29}, year = {2020}, abstract = {The successful Austrian pop-musician Andreas Gabalier has devoted several of his songs to his Styrian homeland. Gabalier's work and performance has often been per-ceived as nationalist. When analyzing some of his lyrics, an astonishing observation can be made: Most references to the »homeland« are backward-looking. This article argues that the remarkable lack of a national »future« in Gabalier's work is charac-teristic for contemporary nationalist manifestations, not only in popular culture, but also in ideologies and politics. The article introduces a new typology of nationalist movements. With regard to the character of the related nation-state, three types are discussed: »constructive nationalism« whereby the nationalist movement strives for a future sovereign nation state; »maintaining nationalism« wherein a nation state already exists; and »reconstructive nationalism« where nationalists believe that the nation state has lost its independence, sovereignty, and freedom in the course of globalization and hope for a reconstruction. However, these types are defined here as »ideal types« in a Weberian sense and will hardly be found in their »pure« forms in history or social reality.}, language = {de} } @article{BindenagelŠehović2020, author = {Bindenagel Šehović, Annamarie}, title = {Towards a new definition of health security}, series = {Global public health : an international journal for research, policy and practice}, volume = {15}, journal = {Global public health : an international journal for research, policy and practice}, number = {1}, publisher = {Routledge, Taylor \& Francis Group}, address = {Abingdon, Oxfordshire}, issn = {1744-1692}, doi = {10.1080/17441692.2019.1634119}, pages = {1 -- 12}, year = {2020}, abstract = {In recent years the framings of global health security have shifted while the structures governing global health have largely remained the same. One feature of the emerging re-ordering is the unresolved allocation of accountability between state and non-state actors. This brings to critical challenges to global health security to the fore. The first is that the consensus on the seeming shift from state to human security framing with regard to the global human right to health (security) risks losing its salience. Second, this conceptual challenge is mirrored on the operational level: if states and non-state actors do not assume responsibility for health security, who or what can guarantee health security? In order to address global health security against the backdrop of these twenty-first Century challenges, this article proceeds in three parts. First, it analyses the shortcomings of the current state-based World Health Organization (WHO) definition of health security. Second, taking into account the rising pressures posed to global health security and the inadequacy both of state-based and of ad hoc non-state responses, it proposes a new framing. Third, the article offers initial insights into the operational application of beyond state responses to (health) security challenges.}, language = {en} } @article{Wagner2020, author = {Wagner, Rolf}, title = {Neues Internationales Privatrecht zur Adoption}, series = {Das Standesamt}, volume = {73}, journal = {Das Standesamt}, publisher = {Verl. f{\"u}r Standesamtswesen}, address = {Frankfurt am Main}, issn = {0341-3977}, pages = {129 -- 135}, year = {2020}, abstract = {Nach einer kurzen Darstellung des bislang geltenden Internationalen Privatrechts und der Hauptkritik hieran werden im Beitrag die Entstehungsgeschichte und der Inhalt der neuen internationalprivat- und verfahrensrechtlichen Vorschriften zur Adoption dargestellt.}, language = {de} } @misc{JasserKellyRothermel2020, author = {Jasser, Greta and Kelly, Megan and Rothermel, Ann-Kathrin}, title = {Male supremacism and the Hanau terrorist attack}, publisher = {International Centre for Counter-Terrorism (ICCT)}, address = {Den Haag}, year = {2020}, language = {en} } @misc{JasserKellyRothermel2020, author = {Jasser, Greta and Kelly, Megan and Rothermel, Ann-Kathrin}, title = {Frauenfeind, aber kein Incel}, series = {Belltower.News}, journal = {Belltower.News}, publisher = {Amadeu Antonio Stiftung}, address = {Berlin}, year = {2020}, abstract = {Der Attentater von Hanau war, das verr{\"a}t sein Manifest, ein Frauenfeind - aber kein Incel. Warum die Einsch{\"a}tzung als Incel bequem und gef{\"a}hrlich ist, erl{\"a}utert dieser Gastbeitrag der Wissenschaftlerinnen Megan Kelly, Ann-Kathrin Rothermel und Greta Jasser, Fellows am Institute for Research on Male Supremacism (IRMS).}, language = {de} } @article{BuschHeinzelKempkenetal.2020, author = {Busch, Per-Olof and Heinzel, Mirko Noa and Kempken, Mathies and Liese, Andrea}, title = {Mind the gap?}, series = {Journal of comparative policy analysis : research and practice}, volume = {24}, journal = {Journal of comparative policy analysis : research and practice}, number = {3}, publisher = {Taylor \& Francis}, address = {London}, issn = {1387-6988}, doi = {10.1080/13876988.2020.1820866}, pages = {230 -- 253}, year = {2020}, abstract = {Many authors have argued that International Public Administration can influence policy-making through their expert authority. The article compares de jure and de facto expert authority of IPAs to evaluate their conformity. It comparatively assesses the two kinds of authority for five important IPAs (BIS, FAO, IMF, OECD and World Bank) active in agriculture or financial policy. It shows that, on average, de jure and de facto authority seem to conform. At the same time, it demonstrates that gaps between de jure and de facto authority exist at the level of the IPAs, the policy areas and the IPAs' addressees}, language = {en} } @article{Juchler2020, author = {Juchler, Ingo}, title = {Urteilskompetenz}, series = {W{\"o}rterbuch Politikunterricht}, journal = {W{\"o}rterbuch Politikunterricht}, publisher = {Wochenschau}, address = {Frankfurt}, isbn = {978-3-7344-0954-7}, pages = {232 -- 235}, year = {2020}, language = {de} } @misc{HeinzelRichterBuschetal.2020, author = {Heinzel, Mirko Noa and Richter, Jonas and Busch, Per-Olof and Feil, Hauke and Herold, Jana and Liese, Andrea Margit}, title = {Birds of a feather?}, series = {Zweitver{\"o}ffentlichungen der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaftliche Reihe}, journal = {Zweitver{\"o}ffentlichungen der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaftliche Reihe}, number = {5}, issn = {1867-5808}, doi = {10.25932/publishup-52169}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-521690}, pages = {27}, year = {2020}, abstract = {The International Monetary Fund and the World Bank ascribe to impartiality in their mandates. At the same time, scholarship indicates that their decisions are disproportionately influenced by powerful member states. Impartiality is seen as crucial in determining International Organizations' (IOs) effectiveness and legitimacy in the literature. However, we know little about whether key interlocutors in national governments perceive the International Financial Institutions as biased actors who do the bidding for powerful member states or as impartial executors of policy. In order to better understand these perceptions, we surveyed high-level civil servants who are chiefly responsible for four policy areas from more than 100 countries. We found substantial variations in impartiality perceptions. What explains these variations? By developing an argument of selective awareness, we extend rationalist and ideational perspectives on IO impartiality to explain domestic perceptions. Using novel survey data, we test whether staffing underrepresentation, voting underrepresentation, alignment to the major shareholders and overlapping economic policy paradigms are associated with impartiality perceptions. We find substantial evidence that shared economic policy paradigms influence impartiality perceptions. The findings imply that by diversifying their ideational culture, IOs can increase the likelihood that domestic stakeholders view them as impartial.}, language = {en} }