@article{UllmannvonStaden2023,
  author    = {Ullmann, Andreas J. and von Staden, Andreas},
  title     = {A room full of 'views'},
  series = {Journal of conflict resolution},
  volume    = {68},
  journal   = {Journal of conflict resolution},
  number    = {2-3},
  publisher = {Sage Publications},
  address   = {Thousand Oaks},
  issn      = {0022-0027},
  doi       = {10.1177/00220027231160460},
  pages     = {534 -- 561},
  year      = {2023},
  abstract  = {Quantitative research into the effectiveness of the UN human rights treaty bodies (UNTBs) in eliciting remedial responses from states is impeded by a lack of usable data on how states respond to their decisions. The new Treaty Body Views Dataset (TBVD) aims to fill this gap. It comprises details on all published decisions in individual complaints cases issued by the UNTBs between 1979 and 2019 and matches these with information on their state of compliance. The TBVD can be used for research on the activities of the treaty bodies, the nature of the decisions themselves, or state behavior following a decision. An empirical application illustrates how the TBVD can advance knowledge about the factors that correlate with compliance with adverse UNTB decisions. Results show that the likelihood of implementation hinges critically on decision-level characteristics, and reveal differences and similarities between compliance with UNTB decisions and regional human rights court judgments.},
  language  = {en}
}
@misc{Elsaesser2017,
  type      = {Master Thesis},
  author    = {Els{\"a}sser, Joshua Philipp},
  title     = {Institutional interplay in global environmental governance},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-406183},
  school      = {Universit{\"a}t Potsdam},
  pages     = {V, 64},
  year      = {2017},
  abstract  = {The Rio Conventions stand at the centerpiece of international cooperation within the governance area of climate change, biodiversity, and desertification. Due to substantial environmental and political linkages, there are interrelations between the three regimes. This study seeks to examine the inter-institutional relationship between the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, the Convention on Biological Diversity and the United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification by analyzing and assessing their horizontal interplay activities from the starting point of their genesis at Earth Summit in 1992 until today. In this research, I address the connections between the three conventions and identify the conflicting, cooperative, and synergetic aspects of inter-institutional relationship. While the overall empirical analysis suggests weak indications of a conflictive type, this research asserts that the interplay activities have thus far led to a cooperative relationship between the Rio Conventions. Moreover, increasing coordination and collaboration between the conventions' treaty secretariats signals characteristics of a synergetic relationship, which could open up a potential window of opportunity for these actors to further engage and progress in institutional management in the future. In a conclusion, this study explores the possibility of the formation of an overarching environmental institution as a result of joint institutional management within the complex of climate change, biodiversity, and desertification.},
  language  = {en}
}