@misc{BrabandtLocherPruegl2002,
  author    = {Brabandt, Heike and Locher, Birgit and Pr{\"u}gl, Elisabeth},
  title     = {Normen, Gender und Politikwandel : internationale Beziehungen aus der Geschlechterperspektive ; eine Einf{\"u}hrung},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-9517},
  year      = {2002},
  abstract  = {This introduction provides an overview of feminist approaches to International Relations. The authors compare the Anglo-American debate with the Germanspeaking discussion in order to reveal similarities and differences. They identify three particular areas of research that characterize the German-speaking feminist debate in International Relations: (1) works evolving out of peace studies; (2) research on globalization and international economic institutions; (3) studies focusing on women's movements together with most current works centering around international norms. They argue that feminist approaches to norms constitute a particularly promising research area which provides new "tools" to account for international, regional or domestic policy-change. Gender-sensitive research on norms also allows to address ethical questions that are vital for feminist understandings of science. Moreover, this new focus on norms enables bridge-building between feminism and the mainstream.},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{HolzscheiterGholiaghaLiese2022,
  author    = {Holzscheiter, Anna and Gholiagha, Sassan and Liese, Andrea},
  title     = {Advocacy coalition constellations and norm collisions},
  series = {Global society : journal of interdisciplinary international relations},
  volume    = {36},
  journal   = {Global society : journal of interdisciplinary international relations},
  number    = {1},
  publisher = {Taylor \& Francis},
  address   = {London},
  issn      = {1360-0826},
  doi       = {10.1080/13600826.2021.1885352},
  pages     = {25 -- 48},
  year      = {2022},
  abstract  = {To date, there has been little research on how advocacy coalitions influence the dynamic relationships between norms. Addressing norm collisions as a particular type of norm dynamics, we ask if and how advocacy coalitions and the constellations between them bring such norm collisions to the fore. Norm collisions surface in situations in which actors claim that two or more norms are incompatible with each other, promoting different, even opposing, behavioural choices. We examine the effect of advocacy coalition constellations (ACC) on the activation and varying evolution of norm collisions in three issue areas: international drug control, human trafficking, and child labour. These areas have a legally codified prohibitive regime in common. At the same time, they differ with regard to the specific ACC present. Exploiting this variation, we generate insights into how power asymmetries and other characteristics of ACC affect norm collisions across our three issue areas.},
  language  = {en}
}