@article{BrenneckeErtugKovacsetal.2022,
  author    = {Brennecke, Julia and Ertug, Gokhan and Kov{\´a}cs, Bal{\´a}zs and Zou, Tengjian},
  title     = {What does homophily do?},
  series = {Academy of Management Annals},
  volume    = {16},
  journal   = {Academy of Management Annals},
  number    = {1},
  publisher = {Erlbaum},
  address   = {Mahwah},
  issn      = {1941-6520},
  doi       = {10.5465/annals.2020.0230},
  pages     = {38 -- 69},
  year      = {2022},
  abstract  = {Understanding the consequences of homophily, which is among the most widely observed social phenomena, is important, with implications for management theory and practice. Therefore, we review management research on the consequences of homophily. As these consequences have been studied at the individual, dyad, team, organizational, and macro levels, we structure our review accordingly. We highlight findings that are consistent and contradictory, as well as those that point to boundary conditions or moderators. In conducting our review, we also derive implications for management research from insights gained by research in other disciplines on this topic. We raise specific issues and opportunities for future research at each level, and conclude with a discussion of broader future research directions, both empirical and conceptual, that apply across levels. We hope that our review will open new vistas in research on this important topic.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{ElsaesserHickmannJinnahetal.2022,
  author    = {Els{\"a}sser, Joshua Philipp and Hickmann, Thomas and Jinnah, Sikina and Oberthur, Sebastian and Van de Graaf, Thijs},
  title     = {Institutional interplay in global environmental governance},
  series = {International environmental agreements: politics, law and economics},
  volume    = {22},
  journal   = {International environmental agreements: politics, law and economics},
  number    = {2},
  publisher = {Springer},
  address   = {Dordrecht},
  issn      = {1567-9764},
  doi       = {10.1007/s10784-022-09569-4},
  pages     = {373 -- 391},
  year      = {2022},
  abstract  = {Over the past decades, the growing proliferation of international institutions governing the global environment has impelled institutional interplay as a result of functional and normative overlap across multiple regimes. This article synthesizes primary contributions made in research on institutional interplay over the past twenty years, with particular focus on publications with International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics. Broadening our understanding about the different types, dimensions, pathways, and effects of institutional interplay, scholars have produced key insights into the ways and means by which international institutions cooperate, manage discord, engage in problem solving, and capture synergies across levels and scales. As global environmental governance has become increasingly fragmented and complex, we recognize that recent studies have highlighted the growing interactions between transnationally operating institutions in the wake of polycentric governance and hybrid institutional complexes. However, our findings reveal that there is insufficient empirical and conceptual research to fully understand the relationship, causes, and consequences of interplay between intergovernmental and transnational institutions. Reflecting on the challenges of addressing regulatory gaps and mitigating the crisis of multilateralism, we expound the present research frontier for further advancing research on institutional interplay and provide recommendations to support policy-making.},
  language  = {en}
}