@book{Schmidt2016, author = {Schmidt, Thorsten Ingo}, title = {Finanzierungspflichten und Konnexit{\"a}tsprinzip}, series = {Recht der Steuern und der {\"o}ffentlichen Finanzordnung ; 10}, journal = {Recht der Steuern und der {\"o}ffentlichen Finanzordnung ; 10}, editor = {Gosch, Dietmar and Hufeld, Ulrich and Kirchhof, Gregor and Rust, Alexander and Schenke, Ralf and Tappe, Henning and Weitemeyer, Birgit}, publisher = {Nomos}, address = {Baden-Baden}, isbn = {978-3-8487-2822-0}, publisher = {Universit{\"a}t Potsdam}, pages = {86}, year = {2016}, abstract = {Die Finanzkrise der Kommunen beruht auch auf der {\"U}bertragung staatlicher Aufgaben ohne entsprechenden finanziellen Ausgleich. Davor sollen nun das grundgesetzliche Aufgaben{\"u}bertragungsverbot vom Bund auf die Kommunen und die landesverfassungsrechtlichen Konnexit{\"a}tsregeln beim Transfer vom Land auf die Kommunen sch{\"u}tzen. Zwar ist anerkannt, dass diese Vorschriften f{\"u}r Sachaufgaben gelten. Doch ist streitig, ob dies auch f{\"u}r die Auferlegung von Finanzierungspflichten zu gelten hat. Der Autor vergleicht die landesverfassungsrechtlichen Bestimmungen in ihrer Auslegung durch das jeweilige Landesverfassungsgericht und arbeitet unter besonderer Ber{\"u}cksichtigung der nordrhein-westf{\"a}lischen Rechtslage heraus, dass die {\"U}bertragungsvorschriften nicht umgangen werden d{\"u}rfen. {\"U}bertragung einer Sachaufgabe und Auferlegung einer Finanzierungspflicht sind funktionell gleichwertig und beide konnexit{\"a}tsrelevant. Der Autor ist Direktor des Kommunalwissenschaftlichen Instituts der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam.}, language = {de} } @incollection{Kraemer2016, author = {Kr{\"a}mer, Raimund}, title = {EU-Osterweiterung und Grenzsichten von Oder und Neiße}, series = {Grenzen in den internationalen Beziehungen}, booktitle = {Grenzen in den internationalen Beziehungen}, edition = {2. erw., Aufl.}, publisher = {WeltTrends}, address = {Potsdam}, isbn = {978-3-945878-28-6}, issn = {1861-5139}, publisher = {Universit{\"a}t Potsdam}, pages = {207 -- 225}, year = {2016}, language = {de} } @article{DornfeldtMaharramowa2016, author = {Dornfeldt, Matthias and Maharramowa, Sona}, title = {Die Zusammenarbeit zwischen Aserbaidschan und Deutschland im fossilen Energiesektor}, series = {Welt-Trends : das außenpolitische Journal}, volume = {24}, journal = {Welt-Trends : das außenpolitische Journal}, number = {114}, publisher = {WeltTrends}, address = {Potsdam}, pages = {9 -- 13}, year = {2016}, language = {de} } @article{Wernert2016, author = {Wernert, Yann}, title = {Die Zeit der Großen Reformen in Russland}, series = {WeltTrends : das außenpolitische Journal [24 (2016), 121]}, volume = {24}, journal = {WeltTrends : das außenpolitische Journal [24 (2016), 121]}, number = {121}, publisher = {WeltTrends}, address = {Potsdam}, isbn = {978-3-945878-33-0}, pages = {52 -- 55}, year = {2016}, language = {de} } @phdthesis{Kaltschew2016, author = {Kaltschew, Kristian}, title = {Die politische Opposition in autorit{\"a}ren Regimen}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-103930}, school = {Universit{\"a}t Potsdam}, pages = {237}, year = {2016}, abstract = {Die Empirie des beginnenden 21. Jahrhunderts weist mehr autorit{\"a}re Regime aus als am Ende des 20. Jahrhunderts angenommen. Die gegenw{\"a}rtige Autoritarismusforschung versucht die Fortdauer dieses Regimetyps in Hinblick auf die politischen Institutionen zu erkl{\"a}ren - dabei bleiben politische Akteure, die nicht zum Herrschaftszentrum geh{\"o}ren, außen vor. Das vorliegende Projekt untersucht die Rolle und Funktion politischer Opposition in autorit{\"a}ren Regimen. Es wird davon ausgegangen, dass sich an der Opposition eine signifikante Charakteristik autorit{\"a}rer Regime manifestiert. Das akteurszentrierte Projekt ist der qualitativ orientierten Politikwissenschaft zuzurechnen und verkn{\"u}pft das Autoritarismuskonzept von Juan Linz mit klassischen Ans{\"a}tzen der Oppositionsforschung und macht diese Theorien f{\"u}r die gegenw{\"a}rtige Autoritarismusforschung nutzbar. Die eigens entwickelte elitenorientierte Oppositionstypologie wird am Beispiel Kenias im Zeitraum 1990-2005 angewendet. Die Oppositionsgruppen werden im Institutionengef{\"u}ge autorit{\"a}rer Regime verortet und ihr politisches Agieren in den Dimensionen Handlungsstatus, Handlungs{\"u}berzeugung und Handlungsstrategie analysiert. Unter Beachtung der historisch gewachsenen regionalen und kulturellen Spezifika wird angenommen, dass generelle, Regionen {\"u}bergreifende Aussagen zur Opposition in autorit{\"a}ren Regimen getroffen werden k{\"o}nnen: Kein Oppositionstyp kann allein einen Herrschaftswechsel bewirken. Der Wechsel bzw. die Fortdauer der Herrschaft h{\"a}ngt von der Dominanz bestimmter Oppositionstypen im Oppositionsgeflecht sowie der gleichzeitigen Schw{\"a}che anderer Oppositionstypen ab. Durch die konzeptionelle Besch{\"a}ftigung mit Opposition sowie deren empirische Erschließung soll ein substantieller Beitrag f{\"u}r die notwendige Debatte um autorit{\"a}re Regime im 21. Jahrhundert geleistet werden.}, language = {de} } @article{Karolewski2016, author = {Karolewski, Ireneusz Pawel}, title = {Der pebiszit{\"a}re Zerfall Europas?}, series = {WeltTrends : das außenpolitische Journal [24 (2016), 118]}, volume = {24}, journal = {WeltTrends : das außenpolitische Journal [24 (2016), 118]}, number = {113}, publisher = {WeltTrends}, address = {Potsdam}, pages = {11 -- 14}, year = {2016}, language = {de} } @book{Schmidt2016, author = {Schmidt, Thorsten Ingo}, title = {Das Mitverwaltungsmodell}, series = {Kommunalrechtliche Studien ; 3}, journal = {Kommunalrechtliche Studien ; 3}, editor = {Br{\"u}ning, Christoph and Schmidt, Thorsten Ingo}, publisher = {Nomos}, address = {Baden-Baden}, isbn = {978-3-8487-2797-1}, publisher = {Universit{\"a}t Potsdam}, pages = {165}, year = {2016}, abstract = {Demographischer Wandel einerseits und zunehmende Aufgaben andererseits erzwingen bei finanzieller Notlage kommunale Reformen. Vielfach antworten die Landesgesetzgeber auf diesen Reformbedarf mit immer gr{\"o}ßeren kommunalen Einheiten. Um dieser „Flucht in die Einheitsgemeinde" entgegenzuwirken, entwickelt der Verfasser das Mitverwaltungsmodell: Eine Gemeinde bleibt zwar rechtlich selbstst{\"a}ndig, bedient sich aber der hauptamtlichen Verwaltung einer anderen Gemeinde. Die M{\"o}glichkeit einer solchen {\"o}ffentlich-rechtlichen Gesch{\"a}ftsbesorgung wird unter Wahrung der Selbstverwaltungsgarantie beider Gemeinden entfaltet. Die notwendigen gesetzlichen Bestimmungen und vertraglichen Regelungen werden entworfen. Dieses Modell soll im Rahmen der Brandenburgischen Verwaltungsstrukturreform umgesetzt werden und kann auch anderen L{\"a}ndern als Vorbild dienen. Der Autor ist Direktor des Kommunalwissenschaftlichen Instituts der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam.}, language = {de} } @phdthesis{Schmidt2016, author = {Schmidt, Peter}, title = {Contributions to EU regional policy}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-90837}, school = {Universit{\"a}t Potsdam}, pages = {xii, 137}, year = {2016}, abstract = {This cumulative dissertation contains four self-contained articles which are related to EU regional policy and its structural funds as the overall research topic. In particular, the thesis addresses the question if EU regional policy interventions can at all be scientifically justified and legitimated on theoretical and empirical grounds from an economics point of view. The first two articles of the thesis ("The EU structural funds as a means to hamper migration" and "Internal migration and EU regional policy transfer payments: a panel data analysis for 28 EU member countries") enter into one particular aspect of the debate regarding the justification and legitimisation of EU regional policy. They theoretically and empirically analyse as to whether regional policy or the market force of the free flow of labour (migration) in the internal European market is the better instrument to improve and harmonise the living and working conditions of EU citizens. Based on neoclassical market failure theory, the first paper argues that the structural funds of the EU are inhibiting internal migration, which is one of the key measures in achieving convergence among the nations in the single European market. It becomes clear that European regional policy aiming at economic growth and cohesion among the member states cannot be justified and legitimated if the structural funds hamper instead of promote migration. The second paper, however, shows that the empirical evidence on the migration and regional policy nexus is not unambiguous, i.e. different empirical investigations show that EU structural funds hamper and promote EU internal migration. Hence, the question of the scientific justification and legitimisation of EU regional policy cannot be readily and unambiguously answered on empirical grounds. This finding is unsatisfying but is in line with previous theoretical and empirical literature. That is why, I take a step back and reconsider the theoretical beginnings of the thesis, which took for granted neoclassical market failure theory as the starting point for the positive explanation as well as the normative justification and legitimisation of EU regional policy. The third article of the thesis ("EU regional policy: theoretical foundations and policy conclusions revisited") deals with the theoretical explanation and legitimisation of EU regional policy as well as the policy recommendations given to EU regional policymakers deduced from neoclassical market failure theory. The article elucidates that neoclassical market failure is a normative concept, which justifies and legitimates EU regional policy based on a political and thus subjective goal or value-judgement. It can neither be used, therefore, to give a scientifically positive explanation of the structural funds nor to obtain objective and practically applicable policy instruments. Given this critique of neoclassical market failure theory, the third paper consequently calls into question the widely prevalent explanation and justification of EU regional policy given in static neoclassical equilibrium economics. It argues that an evolutionary non-equilibrium economics perspective on EU regional policy is much more appropriate to provide a realistic understanding of one of the largest policies conducted by the EU. However, this does neither mean that evolutionary economic theory can be unreservedly seen as the panacea to positively explain EU regional policy nor to derive objective policy instruments for EU regional policymakers. This issue is discussed in the fourth article of the thesis ("Market failure vs. system failure as a rationale for economic policy? A critique from an evolutionary perspective"). This article reconsiders the explanation of economic policy from an evolutionary economics perspective. It contrasts the neoclassical equilibrium notions of market and government failure with the dominant evolutionary neo-Schumpeterian and Austrian-Hayekian perceptions. Based on this comparison, the paper criticises the fact that neoclassical failure reasoning still prevails in non-equilibrium evolutionary economics when economic policy issues are examined. This is surprising, since proponents of evolutionary economics usually view their approach as incompatible with its neoclassical counterpart. The paper therefore argues that in order to prevent the otherwise fruitful and more realistic evolutionary approach from undermining its own criticism of neoclassical economics and to create a consistent as well as objective evolutionary policy framework, it is necessary to eliminate the equilibrium spirit. Taken together, the main finding of this thesis is that European regional policy and its structural funds can neither theoretically nor empirically be justified and legitimated from an economics point of view. Moreover, the thesis finds that the prevalent positive and instrumental explanation of EU regional policy given in the literature needs to be reconsidered, because these theories can neither scientifically explain the emergence and development of this policy nor are they appropriate to derive objective and scientific policy instruments for EU regional policymakers.}, language = {en} } @incollection{KuhlmannBouckaert2016, author = {Kuhlmann, Sabine and Bouckaert, Geert}, title = {Conclusion : Tensions, Challenges, and Future "Flags" of Local Public Sector Reforms and Comparative}, series = {Local Public Sector Reforms in Times of Crisis : national trajectories and international comparisons}, booktitle = {Local Public Sector Reforms in Times of Crisis : national trajectories and international comparisons}, publisher = {Palgrave Macmillan}, address = {London}, isbn = {978-1-137-52547-5}, publisher = {Universit{\"a}t Potsdam}, pages = {347 -- 354}, year = {2016}, language = {en} } @misc{Esguerra2016, author = {Esguerra, Alejandro}, title = {Conclusion}, series = {Sustainability Politics and Limited Statehood: Contesting the New Modes of Governance}, journal = {Sustainability Politics and Limited Statehood: Contesting the New Modes of Governance}, editor = {Esguerra, Alejandro and Helmerich, Nicole and Risse, Thomas}, publisher = {Cham}, address = {Basingstoke}, isbn = {978-3-319-39871-6}, doi = {10.1007/978-3-319-39871-6_9}, pages = {211 -- 224}, year = {2016}, abstract = {This chapter revisits the role of the new modes of governance in areas of limited statehood. First, it states that there is no linear relationship between degrees of statehood and the overall effectiveness of new modes of sustainability governance. Second, the chapter states that, in most of the cases, national governments are hesitant or even actively hamper the development of new modes of governance. Third, it shows that the absence of the shadow of hierarchy can indeed lead to ineffective new modes of governance. However, the shadow of hierarchy does not necessarily need to be cast by states. Finally, the author reviews the complexities involved in participatory practices, stressing the importance of institutional structures and knowledgeable brokers. The chapter concludes by outlining fields for future research.}, language = {en} }