@article{Grohmann2022,
  author    = {Grohmann, Nils-Hendrik},
  title     = {Tracing the development of the proportionality analysis in relation to forced evictions under the ICESCR},
  series = {Human rights law review},
  volume    = {22},
  journal   = {Human rights law review},
  number    = {3},
  publisher = {Oxford University Press},
  address   = {Oxford},
  issn      = {1461-7781},
  doi       = {10.1093/hrlr/ngac025},
  pages     = {1 -- 24},
  year      = {2022},
  abstract  = {Since 2013, the Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights can examine individual communications under the Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR). This opens up the possibility to interpret Covenant provisions in a thorough manner. With regard to forced evictions and the right to housing under Article 11 ICESCR, one can discern a fast-developing approach concerning the proportionality analysis of evictions, entailing the establishment of specific criteria that may guide such analysis. This paper seeks to delineate these developments and will also shed light on possible general trends on the topic of limitations within the Committee's emerging jurisprudence. In doing so, the paper will address if, and how, the developing proportionality analysis under the individual complaints procedure takes into consideration multi-discriminatory dimensions of State measures and how it specifically relates to or incorporates other ICESCR-concepts, such as minimum core obligations or the reasonableness review under Article 8(4) OP ICESCR.},
  language  = {en}
}