@incollection{Juchler2020,
  author    = {Juchler, Ingo},
  title     = {Demokratische Aufbr{\"u}che in Berlin},
  series = {Forschen.Lernen.Lehren an {\"o}ffentlichen Orten - The Wider View},
  booktitle = {Forschen.Lernen.Lehren an {\"o}ffentlichen Orten - The Wider View},
  editor    = {Jungwirth, Martin},
  publisher = {WTM-Verlag},
  address   = {M{\"u}nster},
  isbn      = {978-3-95987-136-5},
  doi       = {10.37626/GA9783959871365.0},
  pages     = {155 -- 160},
  year      = {2020},
  language  = {de}
}
@misc{Dannemann2024,
  author    = {Dannemann, Udo},
  title     = {Antidemokratische Positionen und Einstellungen in Schulen},
  publisher = {Bundeszentrale f{\"u}r politische Bildung},
  address   = {Bonn},
  year      = {2024},
  abstract  = {Die Krisen der letzten Jahre machen antidemokratische Tendenzen in der Gesellschaft immer wieder sichtbar. Diskriminierende {\"A}ußerungen werden f{\"u}r Lehrkr{\"a}fte zu einer zunehmenden Herausforderung.},
  language  = {de}
}
@misc{Juchler2022,
  author    = {Juchler, Ingo},
  title     = {Narrationen in der f{\"a}cher{\"u}bergreifenden politischen Bildung},
  publisher = {bbp, Bundeszentrale f{\"u}r politische Bildung},
  address   = {Bonn},
  pages     = {19},
  year      = {2022},
  abstract  = {In welchem Verh{\"a}ltnis stehen Literatur und das Politische? F{\"o}rdert narrative politische Bildung Ambiguit{\"a}tstoleranz und Mehrstimmigkeit? Der Beitrag diskutiert aktuelle didaktische Theorien und Beispiele.},
  language  = {de}
}
@book{OPUS4-63889,
  title     = {Gender and the governance of terrorism and violent extremism},
  editor    = {Rothermel, Ann-Kathrin and Shepherd, Laura J.},
  publisher = {Routledge},
  address   = {London},
  isbn      = {978-1-003-38126-6},
  doi       = {10.4324/9781003381266},
  pages     = {xi, 291},
  year      = {2023},
  abstract  = {This book brings together a variety of innovative perspectives on the inclusion of gender in the governance of (counter-)terrorism and violent extremism. Several global governance initiatives launched in recent years have explicitly sought to integrate concern for gender equality and gendered harms into efforts to counter terrorism and violent extremism (CT/CVE). As a result, commitments to gender-sensitivity and gender equality in international and regional CT/CVE initiatives, in national action plans and at the level of civil society programming, ´have become a common aspect of the multilevel governance of terrorism and violent extremism. In light of these developments, there is a need for more systematic analysis of how concerns about gender are being incorporated in the governance of (counter-)terrorism and violent extremism and how it has affected (gendered) practices and power relations in counterterrorism policy-making and implementation. Ranging from the processes of global and regional integration of gender into the governance of terrorism, via the impact of the shift on government responses to the return of foreign fighters, to state and civil society-led CVE programming and academic discussions, the essays engage with the origins and dynamics behind recent shifts which bring gender to the forefront of the governance of terrorism. This book will be of great value to researchers and scholars interested in gender, governance and terrorism. The chapters in this book were originally published in Critical Studies on Terrorism.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{RockstroemKotzeMilutinovićetal.2024,
  author    = {Rockstr{\"o}m, Johan and Kotz{\´e}, Louis and Milutinović, Svetlana and Biermann, Frank and Brovkin, Victor and Donges, Jonathan and Ebbesson, Jonas and French, Duncan and Gupta, Joyeeta and Kim, Rakhyun and Lenton, Timothy and Lenzi, Dominic and Nakicenovic, Nebojsa and Neumann, Barbara and Schuppert, Fabian and Winkelmann, Ricarda and Bosselmann, Klaus and Folke, Carl and Lucht, Wolfgang and Schlosberg, David and Richardson, Katherine and Steffen, Will},
  title     = {The planetary commons},
  series = {Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America},
  volume    = {121},
  journal   = {Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America},
  number    = {5},
  publisher = {National Academy of Sciences},
  address   = {Washington, DC},
  issn      = {1091-6490},
  doi       = {10.1073/pnas.2301531121},
  pages     = {10},
  year      = {2024},
  abstract  = {The Anthropocene signifies the start of a no- analogue tra­jectory of the Earth system that is fundamentally different from the Holocene. This new trajectory is characterized by rising risks of triggering irreversible and unmanageable shifts in Earth system functioning. We urgently need a new global approach to safeguard critical Earth system regulating functions more effectively and comprehensively. The global commons framework is the closest example of an existing approach with the aim of governing biophysical systems on Earth upon which the world collectively depends. Derived during stable Holocene conditions, the global commons framework must now evolve in the light of new Anthropocene dynamics. This requires a fundamental shift from a focus only on governing shared resources beyond national jurisdiction, to one that secures critical functions of the Earth system irrespective of national boundaries. We propose a new framework—the planetary commons—which differs from the global commons frame­work by including not only globally shared geographic regions but also critical biophysical systems that regulate the resilience and state, and therefore livability, on Earth. The new planetary commons should articulate and create comprehensive stewardship obligations through Earth system governance aimed at restoring and strengthening planetary resilience and justice.},
  language  = {en}
}
@phdthesis{Blanz2024,
  author    = {Blanz, Alkis},
  title     = {Essays on the macroeconomics of climate change and policy},
  pages     = {166},
  year      = {2024},
  language  = {en}
}
@incollection{Schuppert2022,
  author    = {Schuppert, Fabian},
  title     = {Gemeinwohl und soziale Gleichheit},
  series = {Handbuch Gemeinwohl},
  booktitle = {Handbuch Gemeinwohl},
  editor    = {Hiebaum, Christian},
  publisher = {Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden},
  address   = {Wiesbaden},
  isbn      = {978-3-658-21086-1},
  doi       = {10.1007/978-3-658-21086-1_24-1},
  pages     = {1 -- 12},
  year      = {2022},
  abstract  = {Das Verh{\"a}ltnis von Gemeinwohl und Gleichheit ist kein spannungsfreies. Soziale Gleichheit ist ein Grundwert liberal-demokratischer Gemeinwesen. Um diese Gleichheit zu bewahren, entwickelten sich im 20. Jahrhundert Konzeptionen von Gemeinwohl, die versuchten, das Gemeinwohl eher prozedural und pluralistisch zu verstehen. Eine zu spezifische, vorher festgelegte Definition des Gemeinwohls sei letzten Endes undemokratisch und ideologisch und somit der sozialen Gleichheit abtr{\"a}glich. In den letzten Jahren haben sich unter dem Oberbegriff des sozialen Egalitarismus jedoch auch die Vorstellungen der sozialen Gleichheit ver{\"a}ndert, hin zu einem substanzielleren Verst{\"a}ndnis, was die Frage aufwirft, ob prozedurale Gemeinwohlverst{\"a}ndnisse ihrer Rolle als W{\"a}chter der Gleichheit immer noch gerecht werden k{\"o}nnen.},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{DannemannGuertler2024,
  author    = {Dannemann, Udo and G{\"u}rtler, Friedemann},
  title     = {Meine Krise, deine Krise - unsere Krise(n)?},
  series = {POLIS},
  volume    = {28},
  journal   = {POLIS},
  number    = {1},
  publisher = {Wochenschau Verlag},
  address   = {Frankfurt, M.},
  issn      = {2749-4861},
  doi       = {10.46499/2377.3002},
  pages     = {22 -- 25},
  year      = {2024},
  language  = {de}
}