@incollection{SchmidtWellenburg2020,
  author    = {Schmidt-Wellenburg, Christian},
  title     = {Kampf und Konflikt},
  series = {Max Weber-Handbuch},
  booktitle = {Max Weber-Handbuch},
  editor    = {M{\"u}ller, Hans-Peter and Sigmund, Steffen},
  publisher = {J.B. Metzler},
  address   = {Stuttgart},
  isbn      = {978-3-476-05141-7},
  doi       = {10.1007/978-3-476-05142-4_21},
  pages     = {97 -- 98},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {Der Begriff des Kampfes nimmt in der Soziologie Max Webers eine zentrale Rolle ein. In \S 8 der Soziologischen Grundbegriffe definiert Weber: »Kampf soll eine soziale Beziehung insoweit heißen, als das Handeln an der Absicht der Durchsetzung des eigenen Willens gegen Widerstand des oder der Partner orientiert ist« (WuG, 20). Als soziales Handeln sind K{\"a}mpfe objektiv verstehbar, weil die Handelnden mit ihrem Verhalten einen subjektiv gemeinten Sinn verbinden.},
  language  = {de}
}
@book{Schneider2023,
  author    = {Schneider, Matthias},
  title     = {M{\"a}nnlichkeit und Flucht},
  publisher = {Springer VS},
  address   = {Wiesbaden},
  isbn      = {978-3-658-41766-6},
  doi       = {10.1007/978-3-658-41767-3},
  pages     = {XIII, 341},
  year      = {2023},
  abstract  = {Dieses Buch bietet Einsicht in das komplexe Verh{\"a}ltnis von M{\"a}nnlichkeit und Flucht. Anhand von biographischen Interviews zeigt es, welche Konstruktionen von Geschlecht bei M{\"a}nnern vom Leben in Eritrea, {\"u}ber die Flucht durch den Sudan und Libyen bis zum Ankommen in Deutschland von Bedeutung sind. In der Geschlechter- und Fluchtforschung lag mehrere Jahrzehnte der Fokus auf dem Leben gefl{\"u}chteter M{\"a}dchen und Frauen. M{\"a}nner kamen meist nur als T{\"a}ter geschlechtsbasierter Gewalt vor. Inzwischen existieren zwar einige Arbeiten {\"u}ber das Leben von gefl{\"u}chteten M{\"a}nnern, allerdings wird meist nur das Leben im Ankunftskontext betrachtet und M{\"a}nnlichkeit im Singular gedacht. Flucht erscheint so als eine Marginalisierung von M{\"a}nnlichkeit. Dass dieses Verh{\"a}ltnis allerdings weitaus komplexer ist und vielf{\"a}ltige M{\"a}nnlichkeiten in unterschiedlichen Beziehungen zu Flucht stehen, ist die zentrale Erkenntnis dieser Arbeit.},
  language  = {de}
}
@book{Schmidt2021,
  author    = {Schmidt, Max Oliver},
  title     = {Seenotrettung und Kirchenasyl},
  series = {Organisation und Gesellschaft - Forschung},
  journal   = {Organisation und Gesellschaft - Forschung},
  publisher = {Springer VS},
  address   = {Wiesbaden},
  isbn      = {978-3-658-32472-8},
  doi       = {10.1007/978-3-658-32473-5},
  pages     = {XI, 415},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {Der Zugang zu einem Asylverfahren in der EU ist ein umk{\"a}mpftes soziales Gut. Die Studie zeichnet ein komplexes Bild von Ausschließungs- und Usurpationsstrategien im Feld der europ{\"a}ischen und speziell der italienischen und deutschen Asylverwaltung zwischen 2015 und 2018. (Supra-)nationale Verwaltungs- und Vollzugsorganisationen versuchen Fl{\"u}chtende von dem Verwaltungsakt abzuhalten und entwickeln territoriale und administrative Exklusionsstrategien, um Fluchtmobilit{\"a}t und Asyl zu verwehren. Gleichzeitig erk{\"a}mpfen Seenotrettungs- und Kirchenorganisationen den Zugang zum Asylverfahren, indem sie sich mit Fl{\"u}chtenden solidarisieren und diesen eine Partizipation an {\"o}ffentlichen G{\"u}tern und Rechten der Aufnahmegesellschaft erm{\"o}glichen. F{\"u}r Fl{\"u}chtende wird der formale Zugang zu und die tempor{\"a}re Mitgliedschaft in einer Aufnahmegesellschaft in konfliktreichen und inter-organisationalen Entscheidungen ausgehandelt. Die formale Organisation wird zum Ort der Schließungsk{\"a}mpfe, indemsie als Schließungsakteur und zwischengesellschaftliches Schließungssystem formale Interaktionen zwischen Gefl{\"u}chteten und Aufnahmegesellschaft erm{\"o}glicht oder verhindert. Die Synthese von schließungs- und organisationstheoretischen Perspektiven tr{\"a}gt dazu bei, dass gesellschaftliche Ordnungsbildung organisationssoziologisch erkl{\"a}rbar wird.},
  language  = {de}
}
@incollection{SchmidtWellenburg2023,
  author    = {Schmidt-Wellenburg, Christian},
  title     = {Die Gouvernementalit{\"a}t des Unternehmens im Wandel},
  series = {Dispositiv und {\"O}konomie},
  booktitle = {Dispositiv und {\"O}konomie},
  editor    = {Diaz-Bone, Rainer and Hartz, Ronald},
  publisher = {Springer VS},
  address   = {Wiesbaden},
  isbn      = {978-3-658-31532-0},
  doi       = {10.1007/978-3-658-31533-7_10},
  pages     = {271 -- 293},
  year      = {2023},
  abstract  = {Der oft beschworene Aufstieg der Managementberatung zu einem integralen Bestandteil von Unternehmensf{\"u}hrung besitzt eine selten beachtete Seite: Managementberatung ist nicht nur zu einer anerkannten Praktik der „guten Regierung" des Unternehmens geworden, sondern zugleich zu einer legitimen Form der Produktion von Managementwissen. Im Folgenden soll dem Wandel der diskursiven Praxis der Produktion von Managementwissen nachgegangen und seine Bedeutung f{\"u}r den Wandel der Praxis der Unternehmensf{\"u}hrung eruiert werden. In einem ersten Schritt sind die Praxis des Managements und ihre Logik zu skizzieren, um einerseits den Alltag des Managements zu begreifen und andererseits zu verstehen, dass in diesem Alltag die M{\"o}glichkeit diskursiven Wandels angelegt ist.},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{RodriguezSanchezWucherpfennigRischkeetal.2023,
  author    = {Rodr{\´i}guez S{\´a}nchez, Alejandra and Wucherpfennig, Julian and Rischke, Ramona and Iacus, Stefano Maria},
  title     = {Search-and-rescue in the Central Mediterranean Route does not induce migration},
  series = {Scientific reports},
  volume    = {13},
  journal   = {Scientific reports},
  number    = {1},
  publisher = {Macmillan Publishers Limited, part of Springer Nature},
  address   = {London},
  issn      = {2045-2322},
  doi       = {10.1038/s41598-023-38119-4},
  pages     = {1},
  year      = {2023},
  abstract  = {State- and private-led search-and-rescue are hypothesized to foster irregular migration (and thereby migrant fatalities) by altering the decision calculus associated with the journey. We here investigate this 'pull factor' claim by focusing on the Central Mediterranean route, the most frequented and deadly irregular migration route towards Europe during the past decade. Based on three intervention periods—(1) state-led Mare Nostrum, (2) private-led search-and-rescue, and (3) coordinated pushbacks by the Libyan Coast Guard—which correspond to substantial changes in laws, policies, and practices of search-and-rescue in the Mediterranean, we are able to test the 'pull factor' claim by employing an innovative machine learning method in combination with causal inference. We employ a Bayesian structural time-series model to estimate the effects of these three intervention periods on the migration flow as measured by crossing attempts (i.e., time-series aggregate counts of arrivals, pushbacks, and deaths), adjusting for various known drivers of irregular migration. We combine multiple sources of traditional and non-traditional data to build a synthetic, predicted counterfactual flow. Results show that our predictive modeling approach accurately captures the behavior of the target time-series during the various pre-intervention periods of interest. A comparison of the observed and predicted counterfactual time-series in the post-intervention periods suggest that pushback policies did affect the migration flow, but that the search-and-rescue periods did not yield a discernible difference between the observed and the predicted counterfactual number of crossing attempts. Hence we do not find support for search-and-rescue as a driver of irregular migration. In general, this modeling approach lends itself to forecasting migration flows with the goal of answering causal queries in migration research.},
  language  = {en}
}
@book{MatthiesenMusterLaudenbach2022,
  author    = {Matthiesen, Kai and Muster, Judith and Laudenbach, Peter},
  title     = {Die Humanisierung der Organisation},
  publisher = {Verlag Franz Vahlen},
  address   = {Baden-Baden},
  isbn      = {978-3-8006-6757-4},
  doi       = {10.15358/9783800667581},
  pages     = {253},
  year      = {2022},
  abstract  = {F{\"u}r Menschen, die unter Organisationen leiden, sie l{\"a}stig finden oder einfach besser verstehen wollen. Zu den Missverst{\"a}ndnissen, die das Dasein in Organisationen unn{\"o}tig schwer machen, geh{\"o}rt die Annahme, Kern und Kernproblem einer Organisation seien die Menschen, die in ihr arbeiten. Diese Unterstellung macht den Einzelnen zum Puffer, der gen{\"o}tigt wird, jedes Organisationsversagen aufzufangen - eine Aufgabe, an der man nur scheitern kann. Statt das Verhalten der Einzelnen heroisch zu glorifizieren oder therapeutisch zu problematisieren, interessieren uns die Verh{\"a}ltnisse, in denen sich dieses Verhalten abspielt. Dieses Buch richtet den Blick deshalb auf die Funktionslogiken der Organisation. Statt die Menschen mit Coachings und Identifikationsappellen zu bearbeiten, um sie an die Bed{\"u}rfnisse der Organisation anzupassen, w{\"a}re es hilfreich, die Organisationsstrukturen an die Bed{\"u}rfnisse ihrer Mitglieder und der Arbeitsabl{\"a}ufe anzupassen.},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{LiedlFritschSamperMejiaetal.2023,
  author    = {Liedl, Bernd and Fritsch, Nina-Sophie and Samper Mejia, Cristina and Verwiebe, Roland},
  title     = {Risk perceptions of individuals living in single-parent households during the COVID-19 crisis},
  series = {Frontiers in sociology},
  volume    = {8},
  journal   = {Frontiers in sociology},
  publisher = {Frontiers Media},
  address   = {Lausanne},
  issn      = {2297-7775},
  doi       = {10.3389/fsoc.2023.1265302},
  pages     = {13},
  year      = {2023},
  abstract  = {The COVID-19 crisis had severe social and economic impact on the life of most citizens around the globe. Individuals living in single-parent households were particularly at risk, revealing detrimental labour market outcomes and assessments of future perspectives marked by worries. As it has not been investigated yet, in this paper we study, how their perception about the future and their outlook on how the pandemic will affect them is related to their objective economic resources. Against this background, we examine the subjective risk perception of worsening living standards of individuals living in single-parent households compared to other household types, their objective economic situation based on the logarithmised equivalised disposable household incomes and analyse the relationship between those indicators. Using the German SOEP, including the SOEP-CoV survey from 2020, our findings based on regression modelling reveal that individuals living in single-parent households have been worse off during the pandemic, facing high economic insecurity. Path and interaction models support our assumption that the association between those indicators may not be that straightforward, as there are underlying mechanisms-such as mediation and moderation-of income affecting its direction and strength. With respect to our central hypotheses, our empirical findings point toward (1) a mediation effect, by demonstrating that the subjective risk perception of single-parent households can be partly explained by economic conditions. (2) The moderating effect suggests that the concrete position at the income distribution of households matters as well. While at the lower end of the income distribution, single-parent households reveal particularly worse risk perceptions during the pandemic, at the high end of the income spectrum, risk perceptions are similar for all household types. Thus, individuals living in single-parent households do not perceive higher risks of worsening living standards due to their household situation per se, but rather because they are worse off in terms of their economic situation compared to individuals living in other household types.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{SchmidtWellenburgSchmitz2023,
  author    = {Schmidt-Wellenburg, Christian and Schmitz, Andreas},
  title     = {Divided we stand, united we fall?},
  series = {International review of sociology},
  volume    = {33},
  journal   = {International review of sociology},
  number    = {3},
  publisher = {Taylor \& Francis},
  address   = {London},
  issn      = {0390-6701},
  doi       = {10.1080/03906701.2023.2244170},
  pages     = {512 -- 545},
  year      = {2023},
  abstract  = {This contribution presents an analysis of the structure and conflictual dynamics of contemporary German sociology which has recently separated into two professional societies. Using geometric data analysis, we present an empirical construction of the power/knowledge structure of the field, its paradigmatic plurality, and the various forms of sociological practices involved.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{KhalilLietzMayer2022,
  author    = {Khalil, Samir and Lietz, Almuth and Mayer, Sabrina J.},
  title     = {Overeducation as moderator for the link between job change and job satisfaction among immigrants and natives in Germany},
  series = {Current psychology},
  volume    = {42},
  journal   = {Current psychology},
  number    = {30},
  publisher = {Springer},
  address   = {New York, NY},
  issn      = {1046-1310},
  doi       = {10.1007/s12144-022-03695-7},
  pages     = {26692 -- 26708},
  year      = {2022},
  abstract  = {Job satisfaction is a major driver of an individual's subjective well-being and thus affects public health, societal prosperity, and organisations, as dissatisfied employees are less productive and more likely to change jobs. However, changing jobs does not necessarily lead to higher job satisfaction in the long run. Previous studies have shown, instead, that changing jobs only increases job satisfaction for a short period of time before it gradually falls back to similar levels as before. This phenomenon is known as the 'honeymoon-hangover' pattern. In our study, we identify an important new moderator of the relation between job change and job satisfaction: the job-education match of job changes. Based on relative deprivation theory, we argue that job changes from being overeducated in a job lowers the likelihood of negative comparisons and thus increases the honeymoon period, lessens the hangover period, and increases long-term job satisfaction. We use data from the Socio-Economic Panel ranging from 1994-2018 and focus specifically on individual periods of employees before and after job changes (n = 134,404). Our results confirm that a change to a job that requires a matched education has a stronger and longer-lasting effect on job satisfaction, and that this effect is slightly lower for respondents born abroad.},
  language  = {en}
}
@misc{LoeckmannSchneider2022,
  author    = {L{\"o}ckmann, Teresa and Schneider, Matthias},
  title     = {Geschlechtergerechtigkeit im Verbraucher_innenschutz?},
  series = {Genderblog},
  journal   = {Genderblog},
  publisher = {Zentrum f{\"u}r transdisziplin{\"a}re Geschlechterstudien an der Humboldt-Universit{\"a}t zu Berlin},
  address   = {Berlin},
  year      = {2022},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{PostClassKohler2020,
  author    = {Post, Julia C. and Class, Fabian and Kohler, Ulrich},
  title     = {Unit nonresponse biases in estimates of SARS-CoV-2 prevalence},
  series = {Survey research methods},
  volume    = {14},
  journal   = {Survey research methods},
  number    = {2},
  publisher = {European Survey Research Association},
  address   = {Duisburg},
  issn      = {1864-3361},
  doi       = {10.18148/srm/2020.v14i2.7755},
  pages     = {115 -- 121},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {Since COVID-19 became a pandemic, many studies are being conducted to get a better understanding of the disease itself and its spread. One crucial indicator is the prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 infections. Since this measure is an important foundation for political decisions, its estimate must be reliable and unbiased. This paper presents reasons for biases in prevalence estimates due to unit nonresponse in typical studies. Since it is difficult to avoid bias in situations with mostly unknown nonresponse mechanisms, we propose the maximum amount of bias as one measure to assess the uncertainty due to nonresponse. An interactive web application is presented that calculates the limits of such a conservative unit nonresponse confidence interval (CUNCI).},
  language  = {en}
}
@incollection{HamannSchmidtWellenburg2020,
  author    = {Hamann, Julian and Schmidt-Wellenburg, Christian},
  title     = {The double function of rankings},
  series = {Charting transnational fields},
  booktitle = {Charting transnational fields},
  editor    = {Schmidt-Wellenburg, Christian and Bernhard, Stefan},
  publisher = {Routledge},
  address   = {Abingdon ; New York},
  isbn      = {978-0-429-27494-7},
  doi       = {10.4324/9780429274947-10},
  pages     = {160 -- 177},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {Rankings have grown in importance in the last decades. This is particularly evident in, but not limited to, academia. In this paper, we propose a power analytical take on academic rankings as a transnational(izing) phenomenon. In doing so, we make two contributions. First, we develop a conceptual definition of rankings as consecratory institutions. After providing an overview of the most prominent types of rankings in the academic field and discussing the different forms they can take, we suggest that rankings operate through subjectivation, zero-sum comparisons, quantification, publication and generating a doxical belief. Second, we propose that rankings fulfil a strategic double function. As a particularly momentous consecratory institution, rankings propel power shifts in the academic field and beyond by preferring (and being pushed by) specific academic milieus, types of agents, paradigms, and strategies. As a dispositif, rankings operate at the intersection of different fields, open academic fields up for a lay audience and advance processes of transnationalization by facilitating new modes of governance for hubs of state institutions, private corporations, media corporations, and data providers. Concluding, we argue that the consecration and dispositif functions rely on some basic principles of the practical functioning of rankings.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{SchmitzSchmidtWellenburgWitteetal.2020,
  author    = {Schmitz, Andreas and Schmidt-Wellenburg, Christian and Witte, Daniel and Keil, Maria},
  title     = {In welcher Gesellschaft forschen wir eigentlich?},
  series = {Zeitschrift f{\"u}r theoretische Soziologie},
  volume    = {8},
  journal   = {Zeitschrift f{\"u}r theoretische Soziologie},
  number    = {2},
  publisher = {Beltz Juventa},
  address   = {Weinheim},
  issn      = {2195-0695},
  doi       = {10.3262/ZTS1902245},
  pages     = {245 -- 281},
  year      = {2020},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{SchmidtWellenburg2024,
  author    = {Schmidt-Wellenburg, Christian},
  title     = {French economists and the symbolic power of (post-)national scopes of capital},
  series = {Serendipities : journal for the sociology and history of the social sciences},
  volume    = {8},
  journal   = {Serendipities : journal for the sociology and history of the social sciences},
  number    = {1-2},
  publisher = {Karl-Franzens-Universit{\"a}t Graz},
  address   = {Graz},
  issn      = {2521-0947},
  doi       = {10.7146/serendipities.v8i1-2.133990},
  pages     = {77 -- 108},
  year      = {2024},
  abstract  = {The paper argues that economists' position-taking in discourses of crises should be understood in the light of economists' positions in the academic field of economics. This hypothesis is investigated by performing a multiple correspondence analysis (MCA) on a prosopographical data set of 144 French economists who positioned themselves between 2008 and 2021 in controversies over the euro crisis, the French political economic model, and French economics. In these disciplinary controversies, different forms of (post-)national academic capital are used by economists to either initiate change or defend the status quo. These strategies are then interpreted as part of more general power struggles over the basic national or post-national constitution and legitimate governance of economy and society.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{GiannettiUmanskySened2022,
  author    = {Giannetti, Daniela and Umansky, Karen and Sened, Itai},
  title     = {The entry of the M5S and the reshaping of party politics in Italy (2008-2018)},
  series = {Government \& opposition},
  volume    = {59},
  journal   = {Government \& opposition},
  number    = {2},
  publisher = {Cambridge University Press},
  address   = {Cambridge},
  issn      = {0017-257X},
  doi       = {10.1017/gov.2022.38},
  pages     = {464 -- 481},
  year      = {2022},
  abstract  = {This article examines how challenger parties enter the political arena and the effect of this entry by looking at the Italian 5 Star Movement (Movimento 5 Stelle - M5S). We explain the M5S's entry strategy in 2013 using the spatial approach to party competition and employing expert survey data collected for each national election between 2008 and 2018. These data allow us to analyse the changing spatial configuration of Italian politics due to the increasing salience of pro/anti-EU and pro/anti-immigration dimensions. We then apply the theoretical notion of the uncovered set (UCS) to trace how the M5S's entry reshaped the overall space of party competition, causing a realignment of existing parties. This work contributes to the ongoing debate on the electoral success of challenger parties and the emerging cleavages and polarization of party systems in Western European countries.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{BuechnerDosdall2022,
  author    = {B{\"u}chner, Stefanie and Dosdall, Henrik},
  title     = {Organisation und digitale Technologien},
  series = {Soziale Systeme},
  volume    = {26},
  journal   = {Soziale Systeme},
  number    = {1-2},
  publisher = {De Gruyter Oldenbourg},
  address   = {Berlin},
  issn      = {0948-423X},
  doi       = {10.1515/sosys-2021-0008},
  pages     = {217 -- 239},
  year      = {2022},
  abstract  = {Die Mehrheit aktueller Studien sch{\"a}tzt das Transformationspotenzial digitaler Technologien f{\"u}r Organisationen hoch ein. In Auseinandersetzung mit dieser Einsch{\"a}tzung entwickelt der Artikel eine konzeptionelle organisationssoziologische Perspektive auf das Verh{\"a}ltnis von Organisation und digitalen Technologien. Wir nutzen diese Perspektive, um den Fall des Predictive Policing in Deutschland zu betrachten und die Entscheidung zur Adaption der Technologie, ihre organisationale Situierung sowie die Rolle des Organisationstyps zu diskutieren. Unsere Perspektive f{\"u}hrt zu einem zur{\"u}ckhaltenden Urteil {\"u}ber das Transformationspotenzial dieser digitalen Technologie, die wir daher als Reform unter anderen Reformen begreifen. Insgesamt argumentieren wir daf{\"u}r, Digitalisierung st{\"a}rker als bisher als heterogenen Prozess zu verstehen.},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{MeischnerAlMousawiHellerHartensteinetal.2024,
  author    = {Meischner-Al-Mousawi, Maja and Heller, Luise and Hartenstein, Sven and Frost, Jonas and Philipp, Aaron and Hinz, Sylvette},
  title     = {Suizide in deutschen Gef{\"a}ngnissen w{\"a}hrend der COVID-19-Pandemie},
  series = {Forensische Psychiatrie, Psychologie, Kriminologie},
  volume    = {18},
  journal   = {Forensische Psychiatrie, Psychologie, Kriminologie},
  number    = {2},
  publisher = {Steinkopff},
  address   = {Darmstadt},
  issn      = {1862-7072},
  doi       = {10.1007/s11757-024-00827-6},
  pages     = {106 -- 116},
  year      = {2024},
  abstract  = {Das Risiko, durch einen Suizid im Gef{\"a}ngnis zu versterben, ist erh{\"o}ht. W{\"a}hrend der COVID-19-Pandemie wurden zum Infektionsschutz zahlreiche Maßnahmen, die beispielsweise eine deutliche Minderung der Kontakt- und Behandlungsangebote zur Folge hatten, eingef{\"u}hrt. Im Rahmen eines Kohortenvergleichs der Suizide und ausgew{\"a}hlter Merkmale der Suizident:innen in den Zeitr{\"a}umen vom April 2017 bis zum Dezember 2019 sowie vom April 2020 bis zum Dezember 2022 wird untersucht, ob es eine Ver{\"a}nderung der Suizide w{\"a}hrend der Pandemie gab. Im Ergebnis zeigen sich eine Zunahme der Suizide w{\"a}hrend der Pandemie, insbesondere in den ersten 14 Tagen der Haft, und eine Zunahme der Suizide von Suizident:innen mit erh{\"o}hter Vulnerabilit{\"a}t. Keine Unterschiede wurden in den allgemeinen Risikomerkmalen f{\"u}r Suizide im Gef{\"a}ngnis festgestellt. Es ergeben sich Hinweise auf eine suizidpr{\"a}ventive Wirkung der Kontakt- und Behandlungsangebote. Daraus ergibt sich die Notwendigkeit, intensivere Pr{\"a}ventionsangebote f{\"u}r Gefangene mit erh{\"o}hter Vulnerabilit{\"a}t bzw. geringerer Resilienz anzubieten.},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{SchmidtWellenburgSchmitz2022,
  author    = {Schmidt-Wellenburg, Christian and Schmitz, Andreas},
  title     = {Divorce {\`a} l'allemande},
  series = {Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales},
  volume    = {48},
  journal   = {Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales},
  number    = {3-4 (243-244)},
  publisher = {Ed. du Seuil},
  address   = {Paris},
  issn      = {0335-5322},
  doi       = {10.3917/arss.243.0110},
  pages     = {110 -- 123},
  year      = {2022},
  abstract  = {Avec la cr{\´e}ation de l'Acad{\´e}mie de sociologie (AS), le champ sociologique allemand compte d{\´e}sormais une nouvelle association professionnelle qui s'ajoute {\`a} la Soci{\´e}t{\´e} allemande de sociologie (DGS), {\´e}tablie de longue date. Cet article passe en revue les principales positions discursives, les sujets de controverse majeurs ainsi que les grandes lignes de fracture qui ont conduit {\`a} ce schisme. Les conflits contemporains sont interpr{\´e}t{\´e}s au travers d'une repr{\´e}sentation empirique du champ de la sociologie allemande. De mani{\`e}re g{\´e}n{\´e}rale, la sociologie allemande contemporaine appara{\^i}t une fois de plus domin{\´e}e par deux camps oppos{\´e}s, arbitrairement d{\´e}finis mais puissants, qui se partagent la domination d'une discipline, pourtant r{\´e}ellement pluraliste.},
  language  = {fr}
}
@article{TjadenSeutheWeinert2024,
  author    = {Tjaden, Jasper and Seuthe, Miriam and Weinert, Sebastian},
  title     = {Recruiting refugees to reduce labour shortages in health care professions},
  series = {Human resources for health},
  volume    = {22},
  journal   = {Human resources for health},
  publisher = {Biomed Central},
  address   = {London},
  issn      = {1478-4491},
  doi       = {10.1186/s12960-024-00933-w},
  pages     = {1 -- 9},
  year      = {2024},
  abstract  = {Background Many high-income countries are grappling with severe labour shortages in the healthcare sector. Refugees and recent migrants present a potential pool for staff recruitment due to their higher unemployment rates, younger age, and lower average educational attainment compared to the host society's labour force. Despite this, refugees and recent migrants, often possessing limited language skills in the destination country, are frequently excluded from traditional recruitment campaigns conducted solely in the host country's language. Even those with intermediate language skills may feel excluded, as destination-country language advertisements are perceived as targeting only native speakers. This study experimentally assesses the effectiveness of a recruitment campaign for nursing positions in a German care facility, specifically targeting Arabic and Ukrainian speakers through Facebook advertisements. Methods We employ an experimental design (AB test) approximating a randomized controlled trial, utilizing Facebook as the delivery platform. We compare job advertisements for nursing positions in the native languages of Arabic and Ukrainian speakers (treatment) with the same advertisements displayed in German (control) for the same target group in the context of a real recruitment campaign for nursing jobs in Berlin, Germany. Our evaluation includes comparing link click rates, visits to the recruitment website, initiated applications, and completed applications, along with the unit cost of these indicators. We assess statistical significance in group differences using the Chi-squared test. Results We find that recruitment efforts in the origin language were 5.6 times (Arabic speakers) and 1.9 times (Ukrainian speakers) more effective in initiating nursing job applications compared to the standard model of German-only advertisements among recent migrants and refugees. Overall, targeting refugees and recent migrants was 2.4 (Ukrainians) and 10.8 (Arabic) times cheaper than targeting the reference group of German speakers indicating higher interest among these groups. Conclusions The results underscore the substantial benefits for employers in utilizing targeted recruitment via social media aimed at foreign-language communities within the country. This strategy, which is low-cost and low effort compared to recruiting abroad or investing in digitalization, has the potential for broad applicability in numerous high-income countries with sizable migrant communities. Increased employment rates among underemployed refugee and migrant communities, in turn, contribute to reducing poverty, social exclusion, public expenditure, and foster greater acceptance of newcomers within the receiving society.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{TjadenHaarmannSavaskan2022,
  author    = {Tjaden, Jasper and Haarmann, Esther and Savaskan, Nicolai},
  title     = {Experimental evidence on improving COVID-19 vaccine outreach among migrant communities on social media},
  series = {Scientific reports},
  volume    = {12},
  journal   = {Scientific reports},
  publisher = {Springer Nature},
  address   = {London},
  issn      = {2045-2322},
  doi       = {10.1038/s41598-022-20340-2},
  pages     = {10},
  year      = {2022},
  abstract  = {Studies from several countries suggest that COVID-19 vaccination rates are lower among migrants compared to the general population. Urgent calls have been made to improve vaccine outreach to migrants, however, there is limited evidence on effective approaches, especially using social media. We assessed a targeted, low-cost, Facebook campaign disseminating COVID-19 vaccine information among Arabic, Turkish and Russian speakers in Germany (N = 888,994). As part of the campaign, we conducted two randomized, online experiments to assess the impact of the advertisement (1) language and (2) depicted messenger (government authority, religious leader, doctor or family). Key outcomes included reach, click-through rates, conversion rates and cost-effectiveness. Within 29 days, the campaign reached 890 thousand Facebook users. On average, 2.3 individuals accessed the advertised COVID-19 vaccination appointment tool for every euro spent on the campaign. Migrants were 2.4 (Arabic), 1.8 (Russian) and 1.2 (Turkish) times more likely to click on advertisements translated to their native language compared to German-language advertisements. Furthermore, findings showed that government representatives can be more successful in engaging migrants online compared to other messengers, despite common claims of lower trust in government institutions among migrants. This study highlights the potential of tailored, and translated, vaccination campaigns on social media for reaching migrants who may be left out by traditional media campaigns.},
  language  = {en}
}
@book{OPUS4-64214,
  title     = {Postb{\"u}rokratisches Organisieren},
  editor    = {Muster, Judith and Bull, Finn-Rasmus and Kapitzky, Jens},
  publisher = {Verlag Franz Vahlen},
  address   = {Baden-Baden},
  isbn      = {978-3-8006-6376-7},
  doi       = {10.15358/9783800663774},
  pages     = {247},
  year      = {2021},
  language  = {de}
}
@inproceedings{PepplerFeisstSchneideretal.2023,
  author    = {Peppler, Lisa and Feißt, Martin and Schneider, Anna and Apelt, Maja and Schenk, Liane},
  title     = {Beyond one-sided expectations of integration},
  series = {European journal of public health},
  volume    = {33},
  booktitle = {European journal of public health},
  number    = {Supplement 2},
  publisher = {Oxford University Press},
  address   = {London},
  issn      = {1101-1262},
  doi       = {10.1093/eurpub/ckad160.1484},
  pages     = {1},
  year      = {2023},
  abstract  = {Background: Like most countries, Germany is currently recruiting international nurses due to staff shortages. While these are mostly academic, the academisation of nursing in Germany has only just begun. This allows for a broader look at the participation of migrant nurses: How do care teams deal with the fact that immigrant colleagues are theoretically more highly qualified than long-established colleagues? Methods: Case studies were conducted in four inpatient care teams of two hospitals in 2022. Qualitative data include 26 observation protocols, 4 group discussions and 17 guided interviews. These were analysed using the documentary method and validated intersubjectively. Results: Due to current academisation efforts in Germany and the immigration of academised nursing staff from abroad, the areas of activity and responsibility of nursing in Germany are under negotiating pressure. This concerns basic care for example, which in Germany is provided by skilled workers, but in other countries is mostly provided by assistants or relatives. The question of who should provide basic care, whether all nurses or only nursing assistants, documents the struggle between an established and a new understanding of care. In this context, the knowledge and skills of migrant and academicised care workers become a crucial aspect in the struggle for a new professional identity for care in Germany. Conclusions: The specific situation in Germany makes it possible to show the potential for change that international care migration can constitute for destination countries. The far-reaching process of change of German nursing is given a further dimension not only by its academization, but by the immigration of international and academically trained nursing staff, where inclusive or exclusive effects can already be observed. Key messages: The increasing proportion of migrant nurses accelerates the current discussion on nursing in Germany. Conflict areas show up in everyday work of care teams and must be addressed there.},
  language  = {en}
}
@inproceedings{PepplerFeisstSchneideretal.2023,
  author    = {Peppler, Lisa and Feißt, Martin and Schneider, Anna and Apelt, Maja and Schenk, Liane},
  title     = {Was ist eigentlich das Problem am Waschen?},
  series = {Das Gesundheitswesen},
  volume    = {85},
  booktitle = {Das Gesundheitswesen},
  number    = {8/9},
  publisher = {Thieme},
  address   = {Stuttgart},
  issn      = {1439-4421},
  doi       = {10.1055/s-0043-1770565},
  pages     = {799 -- 800},
  year      = {2023},
  abstract  = {Einleitung Pflege in Deutschland befindet sich in einem Ver{\"a}nderungsprozess. Die politisch forcierte Zuwanderung von Pflegekr{\"a}ften sowie die Akademisierung f{\"u}hren zu einem enormen Anpassungsdruck bei allen Beteiligten. Wie wirkt sich dies auf den Arbeitsalltag aus? Methoden Die qualitative Datenbasis umfasst bisher 36 Tage Teilnehmende Beobachtung, 17 Themenzentrierte Leitfadeninterviews sowie vier Gruppendiskussionen in vier Pflegeteams zweier Krankenh{\"a}user. Die Analyse erfolgt mit der Dokumentarischen Methode. Ergebnisse Am Beispiel der Grundpflege (u. A. dem „Waschen") wird deutlich, wie die Pflegeteams ihren Arbeitsalltag neu aushandeln. Die Teams mit einer hohen migrationsbezogenen Diversit{\"a}t argumentieren eher, dass die Aufgaben der Grund- und Behandlungspflege entsprechend der Qualifikation als Hilfs- oder Fachkraft erledigt werden sollen. Hier treten stereotype (kulturalisierende) Zuschreibungen in den Hintergrund. Demgegen{\"u}ber berufen sich Pflegeteams mit einer niedrigen migrationsbezogenen Diversit{\"a}t eher darauf, dass die Grundpflege in Deutschland - anders als in anderen L{\"a}ndern - zu den Aufgaben einer examinierten Pflegefachkraft z{\"a}hlt. Kolleg*innen aus dem Ausland wird die pflegerische Kompetenz daher eher abgesprochen. Schlussfolgerung Die Frage nach der Aufteilung von Grund- und Behandlungspflege, ist auf allen Stationen virulent. Die Teams entwickeln jedoch in Abh{\"a}ngigkeit von ihrer spezifischen Heterogenit{\"a}t unterschiedliche Umgangsweisen. Demzufolge sollte sich Personal- und Organisationsentwicklung insbesondere an den Pflegeteams orientieren.},
  language  = {de}
}
@book{OPUS4-64672,
  title     = {Siedlerkolonialismus},
  editor    = {Mackert, J{\"u}rgen and Pappe, Ilan},
  edition   = {1. Auflage},
  publisher = {Nomos},
  address   = {Baden-Baden},
  isbn      = {978-3-8487-9011-1},
  doi       = {10.5771/9783748934745},
  pages     = {489},
  year      = {2024},
  abstract  = {„Siedlerkolonialismus" ist der erste in deutscher Sprache erscheinende Band zum in Deutschland vernachl{\"a}ssigten geschichts- und sozialwissenschaftlichen Paradigma des Siedlerkolonialismus. Diese international breit diskutierte Perspektive er{\"o}ffnet einen neuen Blick auf die westliche Moderne und ihrem Verh{\"a}ltnis zum Rest der Welt. Seit 1492 beobachten wir den immer eliminatorischen, oft auch genozidalen Charakter weißer europ{\"a}ischer Siedlergesellschaften in ihrem Verh{\"a}ltnis zu Indigenen, deren Land sie besetzen, sich aneignen und die sie bis heute auspl{\"u}ndern. Die versammelten Grundlagentexte des Paradigmas sowie aktuelle Analysen f{\"u}hren in das Paradigma ein und verdeutlichen, seine entscheidende Bedeutung gerade f{\"u}r deutsche Debatten.},
  language  = {de}
}
@incollection{MackertPappe2024,
  author    = {Mackert, J{\"u}rgen and Pappe, Ilan},
  title     = {Das Paradigma des Siedlerkolonialismus},
  series = {Siedlerkolonialismus : Grundlagentexte des Paradigmas und aktuelle Analysen},
  booktitle = {Siedlerkolonialismus : Grundlagentexte des Paradigmas und aktuelle Analysen},
  editor    = {Mackert, J{\"u}rgen and Pappe, Ilan},
  edition   = {1. Auflage},
  publisher = {Nomos},
  address   = {Baden-Baden},
  isbn      = {978-3-8487-9011-1},
  doi       = {10.5771/9783748934745-11},
  pages     = {11 -- 54},
  year      = {2024},
  language  = {de}
}
@unpublished{VerwiebeBobzienFritschetal.2023,
  author    = {Verwiebe, Roland and Bobzien, Licia and Fritsch, Nina-Sophie and Buder, Claudia},
  title     = {Social inequality and digitization in modern societies},
  series = {SocArXiv : open archive of the social sciences},
  journal   = {SocArXiv : open archive of the social sciences},
  publisher = {Center for Open Science},
  address   = {[Charlottesville, VA]},
  doi       = {10.31235/osf.io/k2zwh},
  pages     = {23},
  year      = {2023},
  abstract  = {The digitization process has triggered a profound transformation of modern societies. It encompasses a broad spectrum of technical, social, political, cultural and economic developments related to the mass use of computer- and internet-based technologies. It is now becoming increasingly clear that digitization is also changing existing structures of social inequality and that new structures of digital inequality are emerging. This is shown by a growing number of recent individual studies. In this paper, we set ourselves the task of systematizing this new research within the framework of an empirically supported literature review. To do so, we use the PRISMA model for literature reviews and focus on three central dimensions of inequality - ethnicity, gender, and age - and their relevance within the discourse on digitization and inequality. The empirical basis consists of journal articles published between 2000 and 2020 and listed on the Web of Science, as well as an additional Google Scholar search, through which we attempt to include important monographs and contributions to edited volumes in our analyses. Our text corpus thus comprises a total of 281 articles. Empirically, our literature review shows that unequal access to digital resources largely reproduces existing structures of inequality; in some cases, studies report a reduction in social inequalities as a result of the digitization process.},
  language  = {en}
}
@incollection{Weinbach2022,
  author    = {Weinbach, Christine},
  title     = {Eigenlogik und Druck von außen},
  series = {Privat - {\"o}ffentlich - politisch: Gesellschaftstheorien in feministischer Perspektive},
  booktitle = {Privat - {\"o}ffentlich - politisch: Gesellschaftstheorien in feministischer Perspektive},
  editor    = {Burkart, G{\"u}nter and Cichecki, Diana and Degele, Nina and Kahlert, Heike},
  publisher = {Springer VS},
  address   = {Wiesbaden},
  isbn      = {978-3-658-35400-8},
  doi       = {10.1007/978-3-658-35401-5_10},
  pages     = {285 -- 311},
  year      = {2022},
  abstract  = {In weiten Teilen der Geschlechterforschung ist die Unterscheidung zwischen Privatheit und {\"O}ffentlichkeit von großer analytischer Bedeutung f{\"u}r das Verst{\"a}ndnis moderner Geschlechterverh{\"a}ltnisse. Dennoch weisen ihre Analysen vielfach begriffliche Unsch{\"a}rfen im Gebrauch der Unterscheidung auf: Zum einen wird Familie mit Privatheit, Erwerbsarbeit mit {\"O}ffentlichkeit identisch gesetzt; zum anderen werden beide Unterscheidungen parallel verwendet. Der Beitrag setzt die beiden Unterscheidungen Privatheit/{\"O}ffentlichkeit und Familie/Erwerb mithilfe der Luhmann'schen Systemtheorie auf neue Weise ins Verh{\"a}ltnis. Dazu greift er den Forschungsansatz Doing Family auf, der Familie als Herstellungsleistung versteht. Vorgeschlagen wird, familiale Privatheit als staatlich gesch{\"u}tzte familiale Selbststeuerungsebene zu begreifen, auf der sich die Familie gegen{\"u}ber als {\"o}ffentlich begriffenen Umwelterwartungen wie dem (dynamischen) Arbeitsmarkt sowohl abgrenzt als auch auf sie antwortet. Entsprechend besitzt jedes einzelne Familiensystem seine eigene Privatheit und {\"O}ffentlichkeit. Damit einhergehend, lassen sich die Individualisierung der Familienmitglieder als auch die zunehmende Irrelevanz von Gender f{\"u}r die familiale Binnenstruktur beobachten: Da jedes Familiensystem die Unterscheidung auf unterschiedliche Weise handhabt, findet eine Heterogenisierung von Familienformen statt.},
  language  = {de}
}
@unpublished{HippLeumannSchober2024,
  author    = {Hipp, Lena and Leumann, Sandra and Schober, Pia S.},
  title     = {Partnership penalties for working in gender-atypical occupations?},
  doi       = {10.31235/osf.io/ydurp},
  pages     = {35},
  year      = {2024},
  abstract  = {Does working in a gender-atypical occupation reduce individuals' likelihood of finding a different-sex romantic partner, and do such occupational partnership penalties contribute to occupational gender segregation? To answer this question, we theorized partnership penalties for working in gender-atypical occupations by drawing on insights from evolutionary psychology, social constructivism, and rational choice theory and exploited the stability of occupational pathways in Germany. In Study 1, we analyzed observational data from a national probability sample (N= 1,634,944) to assess whether individuals in gender-atypical occupations were less likely to be partnered than individuals who worked in gender typical occupations. To assess whether the observed partnership gaps found in Study 1 were causally related to the gender typicality of men's and women's occupations, we conducted a field experiment on a dating app (N = 6,778). Because the findings from Study 2 suggested that young women and men indeed experienced penalties for working in a gender-atypical occupation (at least when they were not highly attractive), we employed a choice-experimental design in Study 3 (N = 1,250) to assess whether women and men were aware of occupational partnership penalties and showed that anticipating occupational partnership penalties may keep young and highly educated women from working in gender-atypical occupations. Our main conclusion therefore is that that observed penalties and their anticipation seem to be driven by unconscious rather than conscious processes.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{FrodermannHippBuenning2024,
  author    = {Frodermann, Corinna and Hipp, Lena and B{\"u}nning, Mareike},
  title     = {Money matters!},
  series = {Gender \& society},
  volume    = {38},
  journal   = {Gender \& society},
  number    = {3},
  publisher = {Sage},
  address   = {Thousand Oaks},
  issn      = {0891-2432},
  doi       = {10.1177/08912432241252601},
  pages     = {436 -- 465},
  year      = {2024},
  abstract  = {This paper examines the context dependency of attitudes toward maternal employment. We test three sets of factors that may affect these attitudes—economic benefits, normative obligations, and child-related consequences—by analyzing data from a unique survey experimental design implemented in a large-scale household panel survey in Germany (17,388 observations from 3,494 respondents). Our results show that the economic benefits associated with maternal employment are the most important predictor of attitudes supporting maternal employment. Moreover, we find that attitudes toward maternal employment vary by individual, household, and contextual characteristics (in particular, childcare quality). We interpret this variation as an indication that negative attitudes toward maternal employment do not necessarily reflect gender essentialism; rather, gender role attitudes are contingent upon the frames individuals have in mind.},
  language  = {en}
}
@book{OPUS4-56471,
  title     = {Vienna},
  series = {Built environment city studies},
  journal   = {Built environment city studies},
  editor    = {Kazepov, Yuri and Verwiebe, Roland},
  publisher = {Routledge},
  address   = {London},
  isbn      = {978-0-367-68011-4},
  doi       = {10.4324/9781003133827},
  pages     = {161},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {This book explores and debates the urban transformations that have taken place in Vienna over the past 30 years and their consequences in policy fields such as labour and housing, political and social participation and the environment. Historically, European cities have been characterised by a strong association between social cohesion, quality of life, economic ambition and a robust State. Vienna is an excellent example for that. In more recent years, however, cities were pressured to change policy principles and mechanisms in the context of demographic shifts, post-industrial transformations and welfare recalibration which have led to worsened social conditions in many cities. Each chapter in this volume discusses Vienna's responses to these pressures in key policy arenas, looking at outcomes from the context-specific local arrangements. Against a theoretical framework debating the European city as a model of inclusion and social justice, authors explore the local capacity to innovate urban policies and to address new social risks, while paying attention to potential trade-offs. The book questions and assesses the city's resilience using time series and an institutional analysis of four key dimensions that characterise the European city model within the context of post-industrial transition: redistribution, recognition, representation and sustainability. It offers a multiscalar perspective of urban governance through labour, housing, participatory and environmental policies, bringing together different levels and public policy types.},
  language  = {en}
}
@misc{Verwiebe2024,
  author    = {Verwiebe, Roland},
  title     = {Social institutions},
  series = {Encyclopedia of quality of life and well-being research},
  journal   = {Encyclopedia of quality of life and well-being research},
  editor    = {Maggino, Filomena},
  publisher = {Springer},
  address   = {Cham},
  isbn      = {978-3-031-17298-4},
  doi       = {10.1007/978-3-031-17299-1_2768},
  pages     = {6598 -- 6600},
  year      = {2024},
  abstract  = {Social institutions are a system of behavioral and relationship patterns that are densely interwoven and enduring and function across an entire society. They order and structure the behavior of individuals in core areas of society and thus have a strong impact on the quality of life of individuals. Institutions regulate the following: (a) family and relationship networks carry out social reproduction and socialization; (b) institutions in the realm of education and training ensure the transmission and cultivation of knowledge, abilities, and specialized skills; (c) institutions in the labor market and economy provide for the production and distribution of goods and services; (d) institutions in the realm of law, governance, and politics provide for the maintenance of the social order; (e) while cultural, media, and religious institutions further the development of contexts of meaning, value orientations, and symbolic codes.},
  language  = {en}
}
@incollection{LoewSaymanSchwereretal.2021,
  author    = {L{\"o}w, Martina and Sayman, Volkan and Schwerer, Jona and Wolf, Hannah},
  title     = {Am Ende der Globalisierung},
  series = {Am Ende der Globalisierung},
  booktitle = {Am Ende der Globalisierung},
  editor    = {L{\"o}w, Martina and Sayman, Volkan and Schwerer, Jona and Wolf, Hannah},
  publisher = {transcript},
  address   = {Bielefeld},
  isbn      = {978-3-8394-5402-2},
  doi       = {10.14361/9783839454022},
  pages     = {9 -- 22},
  year      = {2021},
  language  = {de}
}
@techreport{AdriaansGrieseAuspurgetal.2021,
  author    = {Adriaans, Jule and Griese, Florian and Auspurg, Katrin and Bledow, Nona and Bohmann, Sandra and Busemeyer, Marius R. and Delhey, Jan and Goebel, Jan and Groh-Samberg, Olaf and Heckhausen, Jutta and Hinz, Thomas and Kroh, Martin and Lengfeld, Holger and Lersch, Philipp M. and Liebig, Stefan and Richter, David and Sachweh, Patrick and Schupp, J{\"u}rgen and Schwerdt, Guido and Verwiebe, Roland},
  title     = {Dokumentation zum Entwicklungsprozess des Moduls Einstellungen zu sozialer Ungleichheit im SOEP (v38)},
  series = {SOEP survey papers, series B - survey reports (Methodenberichte)},
  volume    = {1071},
  journal   = {SOEP survey papers, series B - survey reports (Methodenberichte)},
  publisher = {Deutsches Institut f{\"u}r Wirtschaftsforschung (DIW)},
  address   = {Berlin},
  issn      = {2193-5580},
  pages     = {35},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {Im Rahmen eines einj{\"a}hrigen Entwicklungsprozesses wurde das Fragebogenmodul "Einstellungen zu sozialer Ungleichheit" unter der Leitung der Infrastruktureinrichtung SOEP entwickelt und in der 38. Welle der Haupterhebung des Sozio-oekonomischen Panels erstmalig erhoben. Das finale Fragebogenmodul umfasst 43 Items zu den Themenbereichen Soziale Vergleiche, Soziale Mobilit{\"a}t, Sozialstaat und Nicht-materielle Ungleichheit. In der Tradition des SOEP als forschungsbasierte Infrastruktureinrichtung erfolgte die Fragebogenentwicklung in enger Zusammenarbeit mit externen Forschenden aus dem Bereich der Einstellungs- und Ungleichheitsforschung. Neben der etablierten Nutzung des SOEP Innovation Samples (SOEP-IS) f{\"u}r quantitative Pretests neu entwickelter Fragen kam erstmals ein kognitiver Pretest zum Einsatz. Der vorliegende Bericht dokumentiert den Entwicklungsprozess von der Konzeption bis zum finalen Fragebogen.},
  language  = {de}
}
@book{OPUS4-64594,
  title     = {Am Ende der Globalisierung},
  series = {Re-Figuration von R{\"a}umen},
  volume    = {1},
  journal   = {Re-Figuration von R{\"a}umen},
  editor    = {L{\"o}w, Martina and Sayman, Volkan and Schwerer, Jona and Wolf, Hannah},
  publisher = {transcript},
  address   = {Bielefeld},
  isbn      = {978-3-8376-5402-8},
  doi       = {10.14361/9783839454022},
  pages     = {481},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {Die Globalisierung ist zur allgegenw{\"a}rtigen Gewissheit geworden. Doch wie zutreffend ist das Konzept »Globalisierung«, wenn zeitgleich nationale Grenzen gest{\"a}rkt und transnationale Freihandelszonen ausgeweitet werden, wenn auf unterschiedlichen scales Territorien {\"u}berwunden und zugleich territoriale Abgrenzungen neu gesetzt werden? Aktuelle Ver{\"a}nderungen als Re-Figuration von R{\"a}umen zu verstehen, erm{\"o}glicht die Analyse und Diskussion widerspr{\"u}chlicher, spannungsreicher und konflikthafter r{\"a}umlicher Prozesse und ihrer allt{\"a}glichen Erfahrung. Die interdisziplin{\"a}ren Beitr{\"a}ge des Bandes liefern theoretische und empirische Analysen zu politischen, digitalen und allt{\"a}glichen R{\"a}umen im Konzept der Re-Figuration.},
  language  = {de}
}
@techreport{AngenendtKochTjaden2023,
  type      = {Working Paper},
  author    = {Angenendt, Steffen and Koch, Anne and Tjaden, Jasper},
  title     = {Predicting irregular migration},
  series = {high hopes, meagre results},
  volume    = {11},
  journal   = {high hopes, meagre results},
  publisher = {Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik (SWP)},
  address   = {Berlin},
  issn      = {2747-5123},
  doi       = {10.18449/2023RP11},
  pages     = {36},
  year      = {2023},
  abstract  = {German and European migration policy operates in permanent crisis mode. Sudden increases in irregular immigration create a sense of loss of control, which is instrumentalised by populist forces. This has generated great interest in quantitative migration predictions. High expectations are placed in the AI-based tools currently under devel\&\#x00ad;op\&\#x00ad;ment for forecasting irregular migration. The potential applications of these tools are manifold. They range from managing and strengthening the EU's reception capacity and border protections to configuring humanitarian aid provision and longer-term planning of development programmes. There is a significant gap between the expectations placed in the new instruments and their practical utility. Technical limits exist, medium-term forecasts are methodologically implausible, and channels for feeding the results into political decision-making processes are lacking. The great demand for predictions is driven by the political functions of migration prediction, which include its uses in political communication, funding acquisition and legitimisation of political decisions. Investment in the quality of the underlying data will be more productive than developing a succession of new prediction tools. Funding for applications in emergency relief and development cooperation should be prioritised. Crisis early warning and risk analysis should also be strengthened and their networking improved.},
  language  = {en}
}
@techreport{AngenendtKochTjaden2023,
  type      = {Working Paper},
  author    = {Angenendt, Steffen and Koch, Anne and Tjaden, Jasper},
  title     = {Die Prognose ungeregelter Wanderungen},
  series = {SWP-Studie},
  volume    = {10},
  journal   = {SWP-Studie},
  publisher = {Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik (SWP)},
  address   = {Berlin},
  issn      = {2747-5115},
  doi       = {10.18449/2023S10},
  pages     = {41},
  year      = {2023},
  abstract  = {Die deutsche und europ{\"a}ische Migrationspolitik befindet sich im permanenten Krisenmodus. Pl{\"o}tzliche Anstiege ungeregelter Zuwanderung n{\"a}hren ein Gef{\"u}hl von Kontrollverlust, das wiederum von populistischen Kr{\"a}ften instrumentalisiert wird. Daher hat die Politik großes Interesse an quantitativen Migrationsprognosen. Besondere Erwartungen wecken KI-gest{\"u}tzte Instrumente zur Vorhersage ungeregelter Wanderungsbewegungen, wie sie zurzeit entwickelt werden. Die Anwendungsfelder dieser Instrumente sind vielf{\"a}ltig. Sie reichen von einer St{\"a}rkung der Aufnahmekapazit{\"a}ten in der EU {\"u}ber die pr{\"a}ventive Versch{\"a}rfung von Grenzschutzmaßnahmen und eine bedarfsgerechte Bereitstellung von Ressourcen in humanit{\"a}ren Krisen bis zur l{\"a}ngerfristigen entwicklungspolitischen Programmplanung. Allerdings besteht eine deutliche Kluft zwischen den Erwartungen an die neuen Instrumente und ihrem praktischen Mehrwert. Zum einen sind die technischen M{\"o}glichkeiten begrenzt, und mittelfristige Vorhersagen zu ungeregelten Wanderungen sind methodisch kaum m{\"o}glich. Zum anderen mangelt es an Verfahren, um die Ergebnisse in politische Entscheidungsprozesse einfließen zu lassen. Die hohe Nachfrage nach Prognosen erkl{\"a}rt sich aus den politischen Funktionen quantitativer Migrationsvorhersage - beispielsweise ihrem Potential f{\"u}r die politische Kommunikation, die Mitteleinwerbung und die Legitimierung politischer Entscheidungen. Investitionen in die Qualit{\"a}t der den Prognosen zugrunde liegenden Daten sind sinnvoller als die Entwicklung immer neuer Instrumente. Bei der Mittelvergabe f{\"u}r Prognosen sollten Anwendungen in der Nothilfe und der Entwicklungszusammenarbeit priorisiert werden. Zudem sollten die Krisenfr{\"u}herkennung und die Risikoanalyse gest{\"a}rkt werden, und die beteiligten Akteure sollten sich besser vernetzen.},
  language  = {de}
}
@incollection{Wolf2024,
  author    = {Wolf, Hannah},
  title     = {Zuhause},
  series = {WohnWissen : 100 Begriffe des Wohnens},
  booktitle = {WohnWissen : 100 Begriffe des Wohnens},
  editor    = {Genz, Carolin and Schnur, Olaf and Aring, J{\"u}rgen},
  publisher = {Jovis},
  address   = {Berlin},
  isbn      = {978-3-98612-038-2},
  doi       = {10.1515/9783986120412},
  pages     = {240 -- 241},
  year      = {2024},
  language  = {de}
}
@incollection{Tjaden2024,
  author    = {Tjaden, Jasper},
  title     = {Social media data and migration research},
  series = {How to do migration research : how to research guides},
  booktitle = {How to do migration research : how to research guides},
  editor    = {Zapata-Barrero, Ricard and Vintila, Daniela},
  publisher = {Edward Elgar Publishing},
  address   = {Cheltenham, UK},
  isbn      = {9781035306855},
  doi       = {10.4337/9781035306855.00023},
  pages     = {116 -- 124},
  year      = {2024},
  abstract  = {In 2022, there were 4.62 billion social media users worldwide. Social media generates a wealth of data which migration scholars have recently started to explore in pursuit of a variety of methodological and thematic research questions. Scholars use social media data to estimate migration stocks, forecast migration flows, or recruit migrants for targeted online surveys. Social media has also been used to understand how migrants get information about their planned journeys and destination countries, how they organize and mobilize online, how migration issues are politicized online, and how migrants integrate culturally into destination countries by sharing common interests. While social media data drives innovative research, it also poses severe challenges regarding data privacy, data protection, and methodological questions relating to external validity. In this chapter, I briefly introduce various strands of migration research using social media data and discuss the advantages, disadvantages, and opportunities.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{TjadenHeidland2024,
  author    = {Tjaden, Jasper and Heidland, Tobias},
  title     = {Did Merkel's 2015 decision attract more migration to Germany?},
  series = {European journal of political research},
  journal   = {European journal of political research},
  publisher = {Wiley-Blackwell},
  address   = {Oxford},
  issn      = {0304-4130},
  doi       = {10.1111/1475-6765.12669},
  pages     = {1 -- 17},
  year      = {2024},
  abstract  = {In 2015, German Chancellor Angela Merkel decided to allow over a million asylum seekers to cross the border into Germany. One key concern was that her decision would signal an open-door policy to aspiring migrants worldwide - thus further increasing migration to Germany and making the country permanently more attractive to irregular and humanitarian migrants. This 'pull-effect' hypothesis has been a mainstay of policy discussions ever since. With the continued global rise in forced displacement, not appearing welcoming to migrants has become a guiding principle for the asylum policy of many large receiving countries. In this article, we exploit the unique case study that Merkel's 2015 decision provides for answering the fundamental question of whether welcoming migration policies have sustained effects on migration towards destination countries. We analyze an extensive range of data on migration inflows, migration aspirations and online search interest between 2000 and 2020. The results reject the 'pull effect' hypothesis while reaffirming states' capacity to adapt to changing contexts and regulate migration.},
  language  = {en}
}