@misc{Buerkner2009,
  author    = {B{\"u}rkner, Hans-Joachim},
  title     = {Der lokale Staat als Akteur im Feld kreativer Nischen{\"o}konomien},
  series = {Postprints der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Reihe},
  journal   = {Postprints der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Reihe},
  number    = {812},
  issn      = {1866-8372},
  doi       = {10.25932/publishup-41988},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-419889},
  pages     = {16},
  year      = {2009},
  language  = {de}
}
@misc{HudsonThiekenBubeck2019,
  author    = {Hudson, Paul and Thieken, Annegret and Bubeck, Philip},
  title     = {The challenges of longitudinal surveys in the flood risk domain},
  series = {Postprints der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Reihe},
  journal   = {Postprints der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Reihe},
  number    = {759},
  issn      = {1866-8372},
  doi       = {10.25932/publishup-43409},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-434092},
  pages     = {23},
  year      = {2019},
  abstract  = {There has been much research regarding the perceptions, preferences, behaviour, and responses of people exposed to flooding and other nat- ural hazards. Cross-sectional surveys have been the predominant method applied in such research. While cross-sectional data can provide a snapshot of a respondent's behaviour and perceptions, it cannot be assumed that the respondent's perceptions are constant over time. As a result, many important research questions relating to dynamic processes, such as changes in risk perceptions, adaptation behaviour, and resilience cannot be fully addressed by cross-sectional surveys. To overcome these shortcomings, there has been a call for developing longitudinal (or panel) datasets in research on natural hazards, vulnerabilities, and risks. However, experiences with implementing longitudinal surveys in the flood risk domain (FRD), which pose distinct methodological challenges, are largely lacking. The key problems are sample recruitment, attrition rate, and attrition bias. We present a review of the few existing longitudinal surveys in the FRD. In addition, we investigate the potential attrition bias and attrition rates in a panel dataset of flood-affected households in Germany. We find little potential for attrition bias to occur. High attrition rates across longitudinal survey waves are the larger concern. A high attrition rate rapidly depletes the longitudinal sample. To overcome high attrition, longitudinal data should be collected as part of a multisector partnership to allow for sufficient resources to implement sample retention strategies. If flood-specific panels are developed, different sample retention strategies should be applied and evaluated in future research to understand how much-needed longitudinal surveying techniques can be successfully applied to the study of individuals threatened by flooding.},
  language  = {en}
}
@misc{TostEhmelHeidmannetal.2018,
  author    = {Tost, Jordi and Ehmel, Fabian and Heidmann, Frank and Olen, Stephanie M. and Bookhagen, Bodo},
  title     = {Hazards and accessibility},
  series = {Postprints der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Reihe},
  journal   = {Postprints der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Reihe},
  number    = {710},
  issn      = {1866-8372},
  doi       = {10.25932/publishup-42785},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-427853},
  pages     = {8},
  year      = {2018},
  abstract  = {The assessment of natural hazards and risk has traditionally been built upon the estimation of threat maps, which are used to depict potential danger posed by a particular hazard throughout a given area. But when a hazard event strikes, infrastructure is a significant factor that can determine if the situation becomes a disaster. The vulnerability of the population in a region does not only depend on the area's local threat, but also on the geographical accessibility of the area. This makes threat maps by themselves insufficient for supporting real-time decision-making, especially for those tasks that involve the use of the road network, such as management of relief operations, aid distribution, or planning of evacuation routes, among others. To overcome this problem, this paper proposes a multidisciplinary approach divided in two parts. First, data fusion of satellite-based threat data and open infrastructure data from OpenStreetMap, introducing a threat-based routing service. Second, the visualization of this data through cartographic generalization and schematization. This emphasizes critical areas along roads in a simple way and allows users to visually evaluate the impact natural hazards may have on infrastructure. We develop and illustrate this methodology with a case study of landslide threat for an area in Colombia.},
  language  = {en}
}