@book{UhlenwinkelKrauseHalmanetal.2012,
  author    = {Uhlenwinkel, Anke and Krause, Uwe and Halman, Loek and Rokven, Josja and Sieben, Inge and Pažick{\´y}, Michal and Blahušiakov{\´a}, Andrea and R{\"o}per-K{\"u}hnemann, Christian and Staufenbiel, Christoph and Voz{\´a}rov{\´a}, Hana and Hintze, Katarina and Ivaška, Michal and Kallenbach, Ren{\´e} and Majer, Zdenko and R{\"o}ll, Juliane and Pisarč{\´i}k, Stanislav and Weiser, Ines and Seeger, Anett and Strehmann, Anja and Chovanov{\´a}, Katarina and Gembick{\´y}, Kamil and Nern, Luise and Cornelissen, Sebastiaan and Turgut, Pelin and Knoops, Femke and Erbil, Fethiye and Ert{\"u}rk, Mustafa and Akpinar, Seda and Maas, Desiree and Rooth, Anneke and Azar, Elif Zeynep and Erd{\"o}nmez, {\c{C}}ağlayan and Verscheijden, Desir{\´e}e and Altuntas, Kezban and Ak{\c{c}}ay, Pinar and Kools, Suzanne and Schnabel, Richard and van den Beemt, Martijn and {\c{C}}inkaya, Muhammed and Erdem, Didem Tuğ{\c{c}}e and Janssen, Robert},
  title     = {Teaching about the religious values of Europeans : critical reflections from the second student exchange of the EVE-project},
  editor    = {Uhlenwinkel, Anke},
  isbn      = {978-3-86956-175-2},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-59010},
  publisher      = {Universit{\"a}t Potsdam},
  year      = {2012},
  abstract  = {The European Values Education (EVE) project is a large-scale, cross-national, and longitudinal survey research programme on basic human values. The main topic of its second stage was religion in Europe. Student teachers of several universities in Europe worked together in multicultural exchange groups. Their results are presented in this issue.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{AltuntaşAkcayKoolsetal.2012,
  author    = {Altunta{\c{s}}, Kezban and Ak{\c{c}}ay, Pinar and Kools, Suzanne and Schnabel, Richard},
  title     = {Assignments, curriculum framework and background information as the base of developing lessons},
  series = {Potsdamer geographische Praxis},
  journal   = {Potsdamer geographische Praxis},
  number    = {1},
  publisher = {Universit{\"a}tsverlag Potsdam},
  address   = {Potsdam},
  issn      = {2194-1599},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-65877},
  pages     = {93 -- 98},
  year      = {2012},
  abstract  = {1. What are the general strengths of the assignments? 2. Structure of the assignment 3. Resources of the assignment 4. Fostering self-expression 5. How could you improve the assignment? 6. Lack of specific examples 7. Not relating the issue to the students 8. Language Problems 9. Infeasibility to adaptation 10. In what ways was the additional information useful ? How could this be improved? 11. Was the framework useful for you and in what way? 12. In what ways did the assignments reflect the steps identified in the framework?},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{AkcayDueşerNozonetal.2013,
  author    = {Ak{\c{c}}ay, Pinar and D{\"u}{\c{s}}er, Ece and Nozon, Hannes and Strehmel, Christian},
  title     = {Deepening understanding},
  series = {Potsdamer geographische Praxis},
  journal   = {Potsdamer geographische Praxis},
  number    = {3},
  publisher = {Universit{\"a}tsverlag Potsdam},
  address   = {Potsdam},
  issn      = {2194-1599},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-65957},
  pages     = {53 -- 59},
  year      = {2013},
  abstract  = {1. Introduction 2. What is deepening understanding and why do we need it? 3. Which concepts were offered to explainthe differences between countries? 4. Maps 5. Summary of the appreciation andperception of the student teachers 6. Summary of the appreciation and perception of the pupils},
  language  = {en}
}