@article{Pittel2021,
  author    = {Pittel, Harald},
  title     = {Ali Smith's 'Coming-of-Age' in the age of Brexit},
  series = {Brexit and Beyond: Nation and Identity},
  journal   = {Brexit and Beyond: Nation and Identity},
  publisher = {Narr},
  address   = {T{\"u}bingen},
  isbn      = {978-3-8233-8414-4},
  pages     = {121 -- 144},
  year      = {2021},
  language  = {en}
}
@phdthesis{vonKalckreuth2021,
  author    = {von Kalckreuth, Moritz Alexander},
  title     = {Philosophie der Personalit{\"a}t},
  publisher = {Meiner},
  address   = {Hamburg},
  isbn      = {978-3-7873-4026-2},
  pages     = {328},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {Die Philosophie der Person tritt mit dem Anspruch an, unser Selbstverst{\"a}ndnis als Individuen artikulieren zu wollen. Wird die g{\"a}ngige Lesart von Personen als rationalen, selbstbewussten Individuen diesem Anspruch wirklich gerecht? In Auseinandersetzung mit unterschiedlichen Ans{\"a}tzen der Gegenwart arbeitet Moritz von Kalckreuth neben der rationalen auch die leibliche, emotionale und soziokulturelle Dimension von Personalit{\"a}t heraus und fragt nach der M{\"o}glichkeit, sie alle in einem „Syntheseversuch" zusammenzuf{\"u}hren. Im Anschluss an Helmuth Plessners Philosophische Anthropologie, Nicolai Hartmanns Neue Ontologie und Max Schelers Ph{\"a}nomenologie lassen sich verschiedene Lesarten von Geist gewinnen, die sich f{\"u}r eine solche Verkn{\"u}pfung der einzelnen Dimensionen von Personalit{\"a}t besonders eignen.},
  language  = {de}
}
@phdthesis{Tamponi2021,
  author    = {Tamponi, Guido Karl},
  title     = {George Santayana},
  series = {Epistemata Philosophie ; 618},
  journal   = {Epistemata Philosophie ; 618},
  publisher = {K{\"o}nigshausen \& Neumann},
  address   = {W{\"u}rzburg},
  isbn      = {978-3-8260-7335-9},
  school      = {Universit{\"a}t Potsdam},
  pages     = {422},
  year      = {2021},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{Krueger2019,
  author    = {Kr{\"u}ger, Hans-Peter},
  title     = {How is the Human Life-Form of Mind Really Possible in Nature?},
  series = {Human studies},
  volume    = {42},
  journal   = {Human studies},
  number    = {1},
  publisher = {Springer},
  address   = {Dordrecht},
  issn      = {0163-8548},
  doi       = {10.1007/s10746-017-9429-5},
  pages     = {47 -- 64},
  year      = {2019},
  abstract  = {J. Dewey and H. Plessner both and independently of one another treated the central question of what new task philosophy must set itself if the assumption is correct that the life-form of mind, i.e., the mental life-form of humans, arose in nature and must also sustain itself in the future within nature. If nature has to reconceived so as to make the irreducible qualities of life and mind truly possible, then it can no longer be restricted to the role of physical material. Conversely humans cannot no longer take on the role of God outside and independent of nature. Instead these philosophers distinguish between three plateaus (Dewey) or stages (Plessner), between physical (inorganic) nature, psycho-physical (living) nature and the nature that is mental life. This distinction is drawn such that a connection between the plateaus is truly possible. The third level, that of the mental form of life, answers mentally within conduct to the break with the first two levels. Hence it depends in the future as well on the continuously renewed difference (between the precarious and the stable for Dewey, between immediacy and mediation for Plessner) in our experience of nature. Within this difference nature as a whole remains an open unknown, which is why we can credit Dewey with a philosophy of diversified and negative holism, Plessner with a differential philosophy of the negativity of the absolute.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{Montemayor2019,
  author    = {Montemayor, Carlos},
  title     = {On the human uniqueness of the temporal reasoning system},
  series = {Behavioral and brain sciences : an international journal of current research and theory with open peer commentary},
  volume    = {42},
  journal   = {Behavioral and brain sciences : an international journal of current research and theory with open peer commentary},
  publisher = {Cambridge Univ. Press},
  address   = {New York},
  issn      = {0140-525X},
  doi       = {10.1017/S0140525X19000335},
  pages     = {69},
  year      = {2019},
  abstract  = {A central claim by Hoerl \& McCormack is that the temporal reasoning system is uniquely human. But why exactly? This commentary evaluates two possible options to justify the thesis that temporal reasoning is uniquely human, one based on considerations regarding agency and the other based on language. The commentary raises problems for both of these options.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{Proeve2020,
  author    = {Pr{\"o}ve, Ralf},
  title     = {Strukturierte und strukturierende Zeiten: lebensweltliche Zyklen und deren Erfindungen},
  series = {Zyklizit{\"a}t \& Rhythmik: eine multidisziplin{\"a}re Vorlesungsreihe},
  journal   = {Zyklizit{\"a}t \& Rhythmik: eine multidisziplin{\"a}re Vorlesungsreihe},
  publisher = {trafo},
  address   = {Berlin},
  isbn      = {978-3-86464-169-5},
  pages     = {105 -- 125},
  year      = {2020},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{Petsche2020,
  author    = {Petsche, Hans-Joachim},
  title     = {Einf{\"u}hrung},
  series = {Zyklizit{\"a}t \& Rhythmik: eine multidisziplin{\"a}re Vorlesungsreihe},
  journal   = {Zyklizit{\"a}t \& Rhythmik: eine multidisziplin{\"a}re Vorlesungsreihe},
  publisher = {trafo},
  address   = {Berlin},
  isbn      = {978-3-86464-169-5},
  pages     = {9 -- 11},
  year      = {2020},
  language  = {de}
}
@phdthesis{Scheerer2018,
  author    = {Scheerer, Jana Sibylle},
  title     = {Zur Aushandlung interaktionaler und politischer Accountability in Wahlsendungen mit Zuschauerbeteiligung},
  school      = {Universit{\"a}t Potsdam},
  pages     = {378},
  year      = {2018},
  language  = {de}
}
@phdthesis{HeywoodJones2021,
  author    = {Heywood Jones, David},
  title     = {Moses Hirschel and Enlightenment Breslau},
  publisher = {Palgrave Macmillan},
  address   = {Cham},
  isbn      = {978-3-030-46234-5},
  doi       = {10.1007/978-3-030-46235-2},
  pages     = {viii, 264},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {Breslau has been almost entirely forgotten in the Anglophone sphere as a place of Enlightenment. Moreover, in the context of the Jewish Enlightenment, Breslau has never been discussed as a place of intercultural exchange between German-speaking Jewish, Protestant and Catholic intellectuals. The story of Moses Hirschel offers us an excellent case-study to investigate the complex reciprocal relationship between Jewish and non-Jewish enlighteners in a prosperous and influential Central European city on the cusp of the 18th century.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{Rosso2019,
  author    = {Rosso, Enrico},
  title     = {Ein „Zusammengehen ohne Zusammenkommen". Der Entstehungsprozess des intellektuellen Netzwerkes um die Zeitschrift Die Kreatur},
  series = {Naharaim},
  volume    = {13},
  journal   = {Naharaim},
  number    = {1-2},
  publisher = {De Gruyter},
  address   = {Berlin},
  issn      = {1862-9148},
  doi       = {10.1515/naha-2019-0006},
  pages     = {73 -- 97},
  year      = {2019},
  abstract  = {Eine Gruppe, gar eine innerlich verbundene Gemeinschaft, k{\"o}nnen Intellektuelle im Normalfall nur bilden, soweit sie von gleichem Denken und Wollen bewegt werden […]. Wo dagegen die von den Intellektuellen vertretenen Ansichten weit divergieren, da kann es nur unter sehr kritischen Umst{\"a}nden geschehen, daß die verschieden gearteten (sozialen, politischen, rechtlichen, kulturellen, religi{\"o}sen) Standpunkte und Anliegen - auf Zeit - sich zusammenfinden […]. Das polemische Element, das kritischen Intellektuellen ja wesensm{\"a}ßig zu eigen ist, bringt am ehesten eine gemeinsame Front zwischen ihnen zustande.},
  language  = {de}
}