@book{KubanRottaNolteetal.2024, author = {Kuban, Robert and Rotta, Randolf and Nolte, J{\"o}rg and Chromik, Jonas and Beilharz, Jossekin Jakob and Pirl, Lukas and Friedrich, Tobias and Lenzner, Pascal and Weyand, Christopher and Juiz, Carlos and Bermejo, Belen and Sauer, Joao and Coelh, Leandro dos Santos and Najafi, Pejman and P{\"u}nter, Wenzel and Cheng, Feng and Meinel, Christoph and Sidorova, Julia and Lundberg, Lars and Vogel, Thomas and Tran, Chinh and Moser, Irene and Grunske, Lars and Elsaid, Mohamed Esameldin Mohamed and Abbas, Hazem M. and Rula, Anisa and Sejdiu, Gezim and Maurino, Andrea and Schmidt, Christopher and H{\"u}gle, Johannes and Uflacker, Matthias and Nozza, Debora and Messina, Enza and Hoorn, Andr{\´e} van and Frank, Markus and Schulz, Henning and Alhosseini Almodarresi Yasin, Seyed Ali and Nowicki, Marek and Muite, Benson K. and Boysan, Mehmet Can and Bianchi, Federico and Cremaschi, Marco and Moussa, Rim and Abdel-Karim, Benjamin M. and Pfeuffer, Nicolas and Hinz, Oliver and Plauth, Max and Polze, Andreas and Huo, Da and Melo, Gerard de and Mendes Soares, F{\´a}bio and Oliveira, Roberto C{\´e}lio Lim{\~a}o de and Benson, Lawrence and Paul, Fabian and Werling, Christian and Windheuser, Fabian and Stojanovic, Dragan and Djordjevic, Igor and Stojanovic, Natalija and Stojnev Ilic, Aleksandra and Weidmann, Vera and Lowitzki, Leon and Wagner, Markus and Ifa, Abdessatar Ben and Arlos, Patrik and Megia, Ana and Vendrell, Joan and Pfitzner, Bjarne and Redondo, Alberto and R{\´i}os Insua, David and Albert, Justin Amadeus and Zhou, Lin and Arnrich, Bert and Szab{\´o}, Ildik{\´o} and Fodor, Szabina and Ternai, Katalin and Bhowmik, Rajarshi and Campero Durand, Gabriel and Shevchenko, Pavlo and Malysheva, Milena and Prymak, Ivan and Saake, Gunter}, title = {HPI Future SOC Lab - Proceedings 2019}, number = {158}, editor = {Meinel, Christoph and Polze, Andreas and Beins, Karsten and Strotmann, Rolf and Seibold, Ulrich and R{\"o}dszus, Kurt and M{\"u}ller, J{\"u}rgen}, publisher = {Universit{\"a}tsverlag Potsdam}, address = {Potsdam}, isbn = {978-3-86956-564-4}, issn = {1613-5652}, doi = {10.25932/publishup-59791}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-597915}, publisher = {Universit{\"a}t Potsdam}, pages = {xi, 301}, year = {2024}, abstract = {The "HPI Future SOC Lab" is a cooperation of the Hasso Plattner Institute (HPI) and industry partners. Its mission is to enable and promote exchange and interaction between the research community and the industry partners. The HPI Future SOC Lab provides researchers with free of charge access to a complete infrastructure of state of the art hard and software. This infrastructure includes components, which might be too expensive for an ordinary research environment, such as servers with up to 64 cores and 2 TB main memory. The offerings address researchers particularly from but not limited to the areas of computer science and business information systems. Main areas of research include cloud computing, parallelization, and In-Memory technologies. This technical report presents results of research projects executed in 2019. Selected projects have presented their results on April 9th and November 12th 2019 at the Future SOC Lab Day events.}, language = {en} } @inproceedings{GiessmannBender2024, author = {Gießmann, Nico and Bender, Benedict}, title = {Towards a unified framework for evaluating user satisfaction with mobile government apps}, series = {Electronic Government and the Information Systems Perspective : 13th International Conference, EGOVIS 2024, Naples, Italy, August 26-28, 2024, Proceedings}, booktitle = {Electronic Government and the Information Systems Perspective : 13th International Conference, EGOVIS 2024, Naples, Italy, August 26-28, 2024, Proceedings}, editor = {K{\"o}, Andrea and Kotsis, Gabriele and Tjoa, A. Min and Khalil, Ismail}, publisher = {Springer}, address = {Cham}, isbn = {978-3-031-68210-0}, doi = {10.1007/978-3-031-68211-7_10}, pages = {122 -- 129}, year = {2024}, abstract = {This study aims to bring together scattered research findings on user satisfaction with mobile government apps into a unified framework. The researchers analyzed 70 high-quality papers from leading journals and conferences and systematically integrated different frameworks and case studies to reflect the importance of the field over time while also highlighting methodological and geographical research gaps. The study achieved a significant methodological advance by developing codebooks for empirical analysis utilizing the App Store. This approach validated the framework's dimensions on 8,524 reviews, demonstrating the framework's applicability to platform-based apps and identifying critical areas for future research. Combining academic insights with practical findings, this research provides comprehensive guidance for developing and evaluating user-centered mobile government apps, facilitating improved service delivery and alignment with user expectations.}, language = {en} } @book{OPUS4-64979, title = {The 1951 Convention relating to the status of refugees and its 1967 Protocol}, series = {Oxford commentaries on international law series}, journal = {Oxford commentaries on international law series}, editor = {Zimmermann, Andreas and Terje, Einarsen and Herrmann, Franziska M.}, edition = {Second edition}, publisher = {Oxford University Press}, address = {Oxford}, isbn = {978-0-19-285511-4}, doi = {10.1093/law/9780192855114.001.0001}, pages = {cliii, 1866}, year = {2024}, abstract = {The Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees adopted on 28 July 1951 in Geneva provides the most comprehensive codification of the rights of refugees yet attempted. Consolidating previous international instruments relating to refugees, the 1951 Convention with its 1967 Protocol marks a cornerstone in the development of international refugee law. At present, there are 144 States Parties to one or both of these instruments, expressing a worldwide consensus on the definition of the term refugee and the fundamental rights to be granted to refugees. These facts demonstrate and underline the extraordinary significance of these instruments as the indispensable legal basis of international refugee law. This Commentary provides for a systematic and comprehensive analysis of the 1951 Convention and the 1967 Protocol on an article-by-article basis, exposing the interrelationship between the different articles and discussing the latest developments in international refugee law. In addition, several thematic contributions analyse questions of international refugee law which are of general significance, such as regional developments and the relationship between refugee law and the law of the sea.}, language = {en} } @incollection{ZimmermannHerrmann2024, author = {Zimmermann, Andreas and Herrmann, Franziska M.}, title = {Article 1 A, para. 2 1951 Convention}, series = {The 1951 Convention relating to the status of refugees and its 1967 Protocol}, booktitle = {The 1951 Convention relating to the status of refugees and its 1967 Protocol}, editor = {Zimmermann, Andreas and Terje, Einarsen}, edition = {Second edition}, publisher = {Oxford University Press}, address = {Oxford}, isbn = {978-0-19-285511-4}, doi = {10.1093/law/9780192855114.001.0001}, pages = {359 -- 556}, year = {2024}, abstract = {This chapter focuses on the features of Article 1's paragraph 1 of the 1951 Convention. The article primarily determines the scope of application of the Convention's ratione personae while outlining the basis of the protection of refugees. Additionally, Article 1 addresses the concerns surrounding the inclusion, cessation, and exclusion of refugees. The chapter then tackles the historical development of the article by considering the instruments used prior to the 1951 Convention. It also cites that the Constitution of the International Refugee Organization appears to contain an ambiguity as to how the refugee notion was perceived, so refugees only became the IRO Constitution's concern when they have valid objections to returning to their home country.}, language = {en} }