@incollection{WulffTiberiusMahto2023,
  author    = {Wulff, Markus and Tiberius, Victor and Mahto, Raj V.},
  title     = {Mapping the intellectual structure of family firm research and proposing a research agenda},
  series = {Research handbook on entrepreneurship and innovation in family firms},
  booktitle = {Research handbook on entrepreneurship and innovation in family firms},
  editor    = {Kraus, Sascha and Clauß, Thomas and Kallmuenzer, Andreas},
  publisher = {Edward Elgar Publishing},
  address   = {Cheltenham},
  isbn      = {978-1-80088-923-1},
  doi       = {10.4337/9781800889248.00007},
  pages     = {14 -- 37},
  year      = {2023},
  abstract  = {In this chapter, we conduct bibliometric performance analyses and a co-citation analysis on all articles relating to family firms indexed in Scopus and Web of Science and all articles published in the Family Business Review, Journal of Family Business Management, and the Journal of Family Business Strategy. Based on the literature sample of 4,056 articles published between 1960 and 2020 by 3,600 authors in 783 journals and their 175,163 references, we identify the most productive and most cited journals, the most cited authors, and the 25 most cited articles. Our science mapping reveals the agency theory, definitions, entrepreneurship, internationalization, ownership, resources, socioemotional wealth, and succession as the predominant research themes in family firm research. Whereas entrepreneurship explicitly appears in one of the clusters, innovation does not yet. Based on our findings, we propose a research framework and point to several research gaps to be addressed by future research.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{ZaksParkKurths2000,
  author    = {Zaks, Michael A. and Park, Eun Hyoung and Kurths, J{\"u}rgen},
  title     = {On phase synchronization by periodic force in chaotic oscillators with saddle equilibria},
  year      = {2000},
  language  = {en}
}
@techreport{ZerfassStieglitzClausenetal.2023,
  author    = {Zerfaß, Ansgar and Stieglitz, Stefan and Clausen, S{\"u}nje and Ziegele, Daniel and Berger, Karen},
  title     = {Communications trend radar 2023},
  series = {Communication insights},
  volume    = {17},
  journal   = {Communication insights},
  publisher = {Academic Society for Management \& Communication},
  address   = {Leipzig},
  issn      = {2749-893X},
  doi       = {10419/270993},
  pages     = {35},
  year      = {2023},
  abstract  = {How do social changes, new technologies or new management trends affect communication work? A team of researchers at Leipzig University and the University of Potsdam (Germany) observed new developments in related disciplines. As a result, the five most important trends for corporate communications are identified annually and published in the Communications Trend Radar. Thus, Communications managers can identify challenges and opportunities at an early stage, take a position, address issues and make decisions. For 2023, the Communications Trend Radar identifies five key trends for corporate communications: State Revival, Scarcity Management, Unimagination, Parallel Worlds, Augemented Workflows.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{ZhangHuHuetal.2002,
  author    = {Zhang, H. and Hu, B. and Hu, G. and Ouyang, Q. and Kurths, J{\"u}rgen},
  title     = {Turbulence control by developing a spiral wave with a periodic signal injection in the complex Ginzburg-Laundau equation},
  year      = {2002},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{ZhouKurthsKissetal.2002,
  author    = {Zhou, Changsong and Kurths, J{\"u}rgen and Kiss, Istvan Z. and Hudson, J. L.},
  title     = {Noise-enhanced phase synchronization of chaotic oscillators},
  year      = {2002},
  language  = {en}
}
@incollection{Zimmermann2021,
  author    = {Zimmermann, Andreas},
  title     = {Would the world be a better place if one were to adopt a European approach to state immunity?},
  series = {Remedies against immunity?},
  volume    = {297},
  booktitle = {Remedies against immunity?},
  editor    = {Volpe, Valentina and Peters, Anne and Battini, Stefano},
  publisher = {Springer},
  address   = {Berlin ; Heidelberg},
  isbn      = {978-3-662-62303-9},
  doi       = {10.1007/978-3-662-62304-6_12},
  pages     = {219 -- 233},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {This chapter argues not only that there is no European Sonderweg (or 'special way') when it comes to the law of state immunity but that there ought not to be one. Debates within The Hague Conference on Private International Law in the late 1990s and those leading to the adoption of the 2002 UN Convention on Jurisdictional Immunities of States, as well as the development of the EU Brussels Regulation on Jurisdiction and Enforcement, as amended in 2015, all demonstrate that state immunity was not meant to be limited by such treaties but 'safeguarded'. Likewise, there is no proof that regional European customary law limits state immunity when it comes to ius cogens violations, as Italy and (partly) Greece are the only European states denying state immunity in such cases while the European Court of Human Rights has, time and again, upheld a broad concept of state immunity. It therefore seems unlikely that in the foreseeable future a specific European customary law norm on state immunity will develop, especially given the lack of participation in such practice by those states most concerned by the matter, including Germany. This chapter considers the possible legal implications of the jurisprudence of the Italian Constitutional Court for European military operations (if such operations went beyond peacekeeping). These implications would mainly depend on the question of attribution: if one where to assume that acts undertaken within the framework of military operations led by the EU were to be, at least also, attributable to the troop-contributing member states, the respective troop-contributing state would be entitled to enjoy state immunity exactly to the same degree as in any kind of unilateral military operations. Additionally, some possible perspectives beyond Sentenza 238/2014 are examined, in particular concerning the redress awarded by domestic courts 'as long as' neither the German nor the international system grant equivalent protection to the victims of serious violations of international humanitarian law committed during World War II. In the author's opinion, strengthening the jurisdiction of international courts and tribunals, bringing interstate cases for damages before the International Court of Justice, as well as providing for claims commissions where individual compensation might be sought for violations of international humanitarian law would be more useful and appropriate mechanisms than denying state immunity.},
  language  = {en}
}
@incollection{Zimmermann2022,
  author    = {Zimmermann, Andreas},
  title     = {Article 15bis. Exercise of jurisdiction over the crime of aggression (State referral, proprio motu)},
  series = {Rome statute of the International Criminal Court},
  booktitle = {Rome statute of the International Criminal Court},
  editor    = {Ambos, Kai},
  edition   = {Fourth},
  publisher = {Beck},
  address   = {M{\"u}nchen},
  isbn      = {978-3-406-77926-8},
  doi       = {10.17104/9783406779268-899},
  pages     = {899 -- 926},
  year      = {2022},
  language  = {en}
}
@incollection{Zimmermann2022,
  author    = {Zimmermann, Andreas},
  title     = {Article 5 Crimes within the jurisdiction of the Court},
  series = {Rome statute of the International Criminal Court},
  booktitle = {Rome statute of the International Criminal Court},
  editor    = {Ambos, Kai},
  edition   = {Fourth},
  publisher = {Beck},
  address   = {M{\"u}nchen},
  isbn      = {978-3-406-74384-9},
  pages     = {107 -- 116},
  year      = {2022},
  language  = {en}
}
@incollection{Zimmermann2022,
  author    = {Zimmermann, Andreas},
  title     = {Article 124 Transitional provision},
  series = {Rome statute of the International Criminal Court},
  booktitle = {Rome statute of the International Criminal Court},
  editor    = {Ambos, Kai},
  edition   = {Fourth},
  publisher = {Beck},
  address   = {M{\"u}nchen},
  isbn      = {978-3-406-77926-8},
  pages     = {2905 -- 2914},
  year      = {2022},
  language  = {en}
}
@incollection{ZimmermannFreiburgBraun2022,
  author    = {Zimmermann, Andreas and Freiburg-Braun, Elisa},
  title     = {Article 15ter Exercise of jurisdiction over the crime of aggression (Security Council referral)},
  series = {Rome statute of the International Criminal Court},
  booktitle = {Rome statute of the International Criminal Court},
  editor    = {Ambos, Kai},
  edition   = {Fourth},
  publisher = {Beck},
  address   = {M{\"u}nchen},
  isbn      = {978-3-406-77926-8},
  doi       = {10.17104/9783406779268-927},
  pages     = {927 -- 932},
  year      = {2022},
  language  = {en}
}