@phdthesis{Zuendorf2006,
  author    = {Z{\"u}ndorf, Irmgard},
  title     = {Der Preis der Marktwirtschaft : staatliche Preispolitik und Lebensstandard in Westdeutschland 1948 bis 1963},
  series = {Vierteljahrschrift f{\"u}r Sozial- und Wirtschaftsgeschichte \$ Beihefte},
  volume    = {186},
  journal   = {Vierteljahrschrift f{\"u}r Sozial- und Wirtschaftsgeschichte \$ Beihefte},
  publisher = {Steiner},
  address   = {Stuttgart},
  isbn      = {3-515-08861-X},
  pages     = {331 S. : graph. Darst.},
  year      = {2006},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{ZimmermannSchabedoth2022,
  author    = {Zimmermann, Andreas and Schabedoth, John Alexander},
  title     = {Domestic and international criminal justice},
  series = {KFG working paper series},
  journal   = {KFG working paper series},
  number    = {57},
  publisher = {Berlin Potsdam Research Group International Law - Rise or Decline?},
  address   = {Berlin},
  issn      = {2509-3762},
  doi       = {10.2139/ssrn.4087189},
  pages     = {22},
  year      = {2022},
  abstract  = {This paper consists of two parts: In the first part, some of the challenges with which the Internationaal Criminal Court is currently confronted are being presented. First of all, the article will describe the current state of the International Criminal Court and the Rome Statue. Afterwards, the article analyses the Court's efforts to deal with cases against third-country nationals and the challenges it is facing in that regard. In addition, the Court's case law will be analyzed in order to determine an increasing 'emancipation' of the case law of the International Criminal Court from international humanitarian law. The second part of the paper will briefly discuss the role of domestic international criminal law and domestic courts in the further development and enforcement of international criminal law. As an example of the role that domestic courts may have in clarifying classic issues in international law, the judgment of the German Supreme Court of January 28, 2021 (3 StR 564/19), which deals with the status of costumary international law on functional immunity of State officials before domestic courts, shall be assessed.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{ZimmermannJauer2021,
  author    = {Zimmermann, Andreas and Jauer, Nora},
  title     = {Possible indirect legal effects under international law of non-legally binding instruments},
  series = {KFG working paper series},
  volume    = {48},
  journal   = {KFG working paper series},
  publisher = {Berlin Potsdam Research Group International Law - Rise or Decline?},
  address   = {Berlin},
  issn      = {2509-3770},
  pages     = {24},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {As part of the current overall process of de-formalization in international law States increasingly chose informal, non-legally binding agreements or 'Memoranda of Understanding' ('MOUs') to organize their international affairs. The increasing conclusion of such legally non-binding instruments in addition to their flexibility, however, also leads to uncertainties in international relations. Against this background, this article deals with possible indirect legal consequences produced by MOUs. It discusses the different legal mechanisms and avenues that may give rise to secondary legal effects of MOUs through a process of interaction with and interpretation in line with other (formal) sources of international law. The article further considers various strategies how to avoid such eventual possible unintended or unexpected indirect legal effects of MOUs when drafting such instruments and when dealing with them subsequent to their respective 'adoption'.},
  language  = {en}
}
@incollection{ZimmermannGeiss2022,
  author    = {Zimmermann, Andreas and Geiß, Robin},
  title     = {Article 8 Paras. 2(c)-(f) and 3: War crimes committed in an armed conflict not of an international character},
  series = {Rome statute of the International Criminal Court},
  booktitle = {Rome statute of the International Criminal Court},
  editor    = {Ambos, Kai},
  edition   = {4},
  publisher = {C.H. Beck},
  address   = {M{\"u}nchen},
  isbn      = {978-3-406-74384-9},
  pages     = {837 -- 1048},
  year      = {2022},
  language  = {en}
}
@incollection{ZimmermannGeiss2022,
  author    = {Zimmermann, Andreas and Geiß, Robin},
  title     = {Article 8 Para. 2(b)(xvi): Pillage},
  series = {Rome statute of the International Criminal Court},
  booktitle = {Rome statute of the International Criminal Court},
  editor    = {Ambos, Kai},
  edition   = {Fourth edition},
  publisher = {C.H. Beck},
  address   = {M{\"u}nchen},
  isbn      = {978-3-406-74384-9},
  pages     = {539 -- 554},
  year      = {2022},
  language  = {en}
}
@incollection{ZimmermannGeiss2022,
  author    = {Zimmermann, Andreas and Geiß, Robin},
  title     = {Article 8 Para. 2(b)(x): Prohibition of physical mutilation},
  series = {Rome statute of the International Criminal Court},
  booktitle = {Rome statute of the International Criminal Court},
  editor    = {Ambos, Kai},
  edition   = {4},
  publisher = {Beck},
  address   = {M{\"u}nchen},
  isbn      = {978-3-406-74384-9},
  pages     = {419 -- 436},
  year      = {2022},
  language  = {en}
}
@incollection{ZimmermannGeiss2022,
  author    = {Zimmermann, Andreas and Geiß, Robin},
  title     = {Article 8 Para. 2(b)(xiii): Prohibited destruction},
  series = {Rome statute of the International Criminal Court},
  booktitle = {Rome statute of the International Criminal Court},
  editor    = {Ambos, Kai},
  edition   = {4},
  publisher = {Beck},
  address   = {M{\"u}nchen},
  isbn      = {978-3-406-74384-9},
  pages     = {474 -- 503},
  year      = {2022},
  language  = {en}
}
@incollection{ZimmermannFreiburgBraun2022,
  author    = {Zimmermann, Andreas and Freiburg-Braun, Elisa},
  title     = {Article 15ter Exercise of jurisdiction over the crime of aggression (Security Council referral)},
  series = {Rome statute of the International Criminal Court},
  booktitle = {Rome statute of the International Criminal Court},
  editor    = {Ambos, Kai},
  edition   = {Fourth},
  publisher = {Beck},
  address   = {M{\"u}nchen},
  isbn      = {978-3-406-77926-8},
  doi       = {10.17104/9783406779268-927},
  pages     = {927 -- 932},
  year      = {2022},
  language  = {en}
}
@incollection{ZimmermannFreiburgBraun2022,
  author    = {Zimmermann, Andreas and Freiburg-Braun, Elisa},
  title     = {Article 8bis Crime of aggression},
  series = {Rome statute of the International Criminal Court},
  booktitle = {Rome statute of the International Criminal Court},
  editor    = {Ambos, Kai},
  edition   = {Fourth},
  publisher = {Beck},
  address   = {M{\"u}nchen},
  isbn      = {978-3-406-77926-8},
  doi       = {10.17104/9783406779268-686},
  pages     = {686 -- 726},
  year      = {2022},
  language  = {en}
}
@incollection{ZimmermannEiken2021,
  author    = {Zimmermann, Andreas and Eiken, Jan},
  title     = {Volle Souver{\"a}nit{\"a}t?},
  series = {Zwei plus Vier : die internationale Gr{\"u}ndungsgeschichte der Berliner Republik},
  booktitle = {Zwei plus Vier : die internationale Gr{\"u}ndungsgeschichte der Berliner Republik},
  editor    = {Geiger, Tim and Lillteicher, J{\"u}rgen and Wentker, Hermann},
  publisher = {De Gruyter},
  address   = {Berlin},
  isbn      = {978-3-11-072801-9},
  doi       = {10.1515/9783110728019-007},
  pages     = {103 -- 122},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {Nach Art. 7 Abs. 1 S. 1 des Vertrages zur abschließenden Regelung in Bezug aufDeutschland vom 12. September 1990 (Zwei-plus-Vier-Vertrag)1beendeten die Fran-z{\"o}sische Republik, die Union der Sozialistischen Sowjetrepubliken, das VereinigteK{\"o}nigreich Großbritannien und Nordirland und die Vereinigten Staaten von Ameri-ka„ihre Rechte und Verantwortlichkeiten in Bezug auf Berlin und Deutschland alsGanzes". Dies hatte, wie in dessen Art. 7 Abs. 1 S. 2 ausdr{\"u}cklich niedergelegt, zurFolge, dass„die entsprechenden, damit zusammenh{\"a}ngenden vierseitigen Verein-barungen, Beschl{\"u}sse und Praktiken beendet und alle entsprechenden Einrichtun-gen der vier M{\"a}chte aufgel{\"o}st"wurden.2Art. 7 Abs. 2 Zwei-plus-Vier-Vertrag stelltdemgem{\"a}ß fest, dass das vereinte Deutschland volle Souver{\"a}nit{\"a}t {\"u}ber seine inne-ren und {\"a}ußeren Angelegenheiten erhalten habe. Nach dem Wortlaut des Vertrageshaben die Alliierten damit jegliche Rechte in Bezug auf Deutschland abgegeben,rechtliche Auswirkungen der Besatzungsgeschichte Deutschlands noch bis in dieheutige Zeit scheinen danach zun{\"a}chst ausgeschlossen.In dem folgenden Beitrag soll diese aus heutiger Sicht selbstverst{\"a}ndlich er-scheinende Hypothese kritisch hinterfragt und der Frage nachgegangen werden, obund inwieweit die Besatzungsgeschichte Deutschlands noch immer rechtliche Fol-gen zeitigt. Hierbei soll insbesondere auf Fragen der Fortgeltung alliierten Rechts,Eigentumsfragen sowie auf Fragen der Nachfolge in v{\"o}lkerrechtlichen Vertr{\"a}geneingegangen werden.},
  language  = {de}
}