@misc{Eckstein2018,
  author    = {Eckstein, Lars},
  title     = {Recollecting bones},
  series = {Postcolonial Studies},
  journal   = {Postcolonial Studies},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-413654},
  pages     = {15},
  year      = {2018},
  abstract  = {This article critically engages with the different politics of memory involved in debates over the restitution of Indigenous Australian ancestral remains stolen by colonial actors in the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries and brought to Berlin in the name of science. The debates crystallise how deeply divided German scientific discourses still are over the question of whether the historical and moral obligations of colonial injustice should be accepted or whether researchers should continue to profess scientific disinterest'. The debates also reveal an almost unanimous disavowal of Indigenous Australian knowledges and mnemonic conceptions across all camps. The bitter ironies of this disavowal become evident when Indigenous Australian quests for the remains of their ancestral dead lost in the limbo of German scientific collections are juxtaposed with white Australian (fictional) quests for the remains of Ludwig Leichhardt, lost in the Australian interior.},
  language  = {en}
}
@misc{Eckstein2016,
  author    = {Eckstein, Lars},
  title     = {Sound matters},
  series = {Postprints der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Philosophische Reihe},
  journal   = {Postprints der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Philosophische Reihe},
  number    = {119},
  issn      = {1866-8380},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-98393},
  pages     = {13},
  year      = {2016},
  abstract  = {This essay proposes a reorientation in postcolonial studies that takes account of the transcultural realities of the viral twenty-first century. This reorientation entails close attention to actual performances, their specific medial embeddedness, and their entanglement in concrete formal or informal material conditions. It suggests that rather than a focus on print and writing favoured by theories in the wake of the linguistic turn, performed lyrics and sounds may be better suited to guide the conceptual work. Accordingly, the essay chooses a classic of early twentieth-century digital music - M.I.A.'s 2003/2005 single "Galang" - as its guiding example. It ultimately leads up to a reflection on what Ravi Sundaram coined as "pirate modernity," which challenges us to rethink notions of artistic authorship and authority, hegemony and subversion, culture and theory in the postcolonial world of today.},
  language  = {en}
}
@book{Eckstein2006,
  author    = {Eckstein, Lars},
  title     = {Re-Membering the Black Atlantic : on the poetics and politics of literary memory},
  series = {Cross cultures},
  volume    = {84},
  journal   = {Cross cultures},
  publisher = {Rodopi},
  address   = {Amsterdam},
  isbn      = {94-420-1958-1},
  pages     = {XVI, 289 S.},
  year      = {2006},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{EcksteinReinfandt2003,
  author    = {Eckstein, Lars and Reinfandt, Christoph},
  title     = {The Parody of "Parody as Cultural Memory" in Richard Powers" Galatea 2.2 : a response to Anca Rosu},
  year      = {2003},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{Eckstein2005,
  author    = {Eckstein, Lars},
  title     = {Ekphrastic Memory in David Dabydeen's "A Harlot's Progress" and the Politics of Aestheticist Transfiguration},
  year      = {2005},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{Eckstein2001,
  author    = {Eckstein, Lars},
  title     = {Dialogism in Caryl Phillips"s Cambridge, or the Democratisation of cultural memory},
  year      = {2001},
  language  = {en}
}
@misc{Eckstein2010,
  author    = {Eckstein, Lars},
  title     = {Erll, A., Mediation, remediation and the dynamics of cultural memory; Berlin, DeGruyter, 2009},
  year      = {2010},
  language  = {en}
}
@misc{EcksteinSchwarz2018,
  author    = {Eckstein, Lars and Schwarz, Anja},
  title     = {The Making of Tupaia's Map},
  series = {Postprints der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam Philosophische Reihe},
  journal   = {Postprints der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam Philosophische Reihe},
  number    = {154},
  issn      = {1866-8380},
  doi       = {10.25932/publishup-42309},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-423091},
  pages     = {96},
  year      = {2018},
  abstract  = {Tupaia's Map is one of the most famous and enigmatic artefacts to emerge from the early encounters between Europeans and Pacific Islanders. It was drawn by Tupaia, an arioi priest, chiefly advisor and master navigator from Ra'iātea in the Leeward Society Islands in collaboration with various members of the crew of James Cook's Endeavour, in two distinct moments of mapmaking and three draft stages between August 1769 and February 1770. To this day, the identity of many islands on the chart, and the logic of their arrangement have posed a riddle to researchers. Drawing in part on archival material hitherto overlooked, in this long essay we propose a new understanding of the chart's cartographic logic, offer a detailed reconstruction of its genesis, and thus for the first time present a comprehensive reading of Tupaia's Map. The chart not only underscores the extent and mastery of Polynesian navigation, it is also a remarkable feat of translation between two very different wayfinding systems and their respective representational models.},
  language  = {en}
}