@article{DelgrandeSchaubTompits2000, author = {Delgrande, James Patrick and Schaub, Torsten H. and Tompits, Hans}, title = {A compilation of Brewka and Eiter's approach to prioritizationtion}, isbn = {3-540-41131-3}, year = {2000}, language = {en} } @article{DelgrandeSchaubTompits2000, author = {Delgrande, James Patrick and Schaub, Torsten H. and Tompits, Hans}, title = {Logic programs with compiled preferences}, isbn = {1-58603-013-2}, year = {2000}, language = {en} } @article{DelgrandeSchaubTompits2000, author = {Delgrande, James Patrick and Schaub, Torsten H. and Tompits, Hans}, title = {Logic programs with compiled preferences}, year = {2000}, language = {en} } @article{DelgrandeSchaubTompits2000, author = {Delgrande, James Patrick and Schaub, Torsten H. and Tompits, Hans}, title = {A compiler for ordered logic programs}, year = {2000}, language = {en} } @article{DelgrandeSchaubTompitsetal.2001, author = {Delgrande, James Patrick and Schaub, Torsten H. and Tompits, Hans and Woltran, Stefan}, title = {On computing solutions to belief change scenarios}, isbn = {3-540- 42464-4}, year = {2001}, language = {en} } @article{DelgrandeSchaubTompits2001, author = {Delgrande, James Patrick and Schaub, Torsten H. and Tompits, Hans}, title = {A generic compiler for ordered logic programs}, isbn = {3-540-42593-4}, year = {2001}, language = {en} } @article{PearceSarsakovSchaubetal.2002, author = {Pearce, David and Sarsakov, Vladimir and Schaub, Torsten H. and Tompits, Hans and Woltran, Stefan}, title = {A polynomial translation of logic programs with nested expressions into disjunctive logic programs}, isbn = {3-540-43930-7}, year = {2002}, language = {en} } @article{BesnardSchaubTompitsetal.2002, author = {Besnard, Philippe and Schaub, Torsten H. and Tompits, Hans and Woltran, Stefan}, title = {Paraconsistent reasoning via quantified boolean formulas}, isbn = {3-540-44190-5}, year = {2002}, language = {en} } @article{PearceSarsakovSchaubetal.2002, author = {Pearce, David and Sarsakov, Vladimir and Schaub, Torsten H. and Tompits, Hans and Woltran, Stefan}, title = {A polynomial translation of logic programs with nested expressions into disjunctive logic programs : preliminary report}, year = {2002}, language = {en} } @article{DelgrandeSchaubTompitsetal.2002, author = {Delgrande, James Patrick and Schaub, Torsten H. and Tompits, Hans and Wang, Kewen}, title = {Towards a classification of preference handling approaches in nonmonotonic reasoning}, isbn = {1-577-35166-5}, year = {2002}, language = {en} } @article{BesnardSchaubTompitsetal.2003, author = {Besnard, Philippe and Schaub, Torsten H. and Tompits, Hans and Woltran, Stefan}, title = {Paraconsistent reasoning via quantified boolean formulas : Part II: Circumscribing inconsistent theories}, isbn = {3-540- 409494-5}, year = {2003}, language = {en} } @article{DelgrandeSchaubTompits2003, author = {Delgrande, James Patrick and Schaub, Torsten H. and Tompits, Hans}, title = {A framework for compiling preferences in logic programs}, year = {2003}, language = {en} } @article{SarsakovSchaubTompitsetal.2004, author = {Sarsakov, Vladimir and Schaub, Torsten H. and Tompits, Hans and Woltran, Stefan}, title = {A compiler for nested logic programming}, isbn = {3-540- 20721-x}, year = {2004}, language = {en} } @article{LinkeTompitsWoltran2004, author = {Linke, Thomas and Tompits, Hans and Woltran, Stefan}, title = {On Acyclic and head-cycle free nested logic programs}, isbn = {3-540-22671-01}, year = {2004}, language = {en} } @article{LinkeTompitsWoltran2004, author = {Linke, Thomas and Tompits, Hans and Woltran, Stefan}, title = {On acyclic and head-cycle free nested logic programs}, year = {2004}, language = {en} } @article{DelgrandeSchaubTompitsetal.2004, author = {Delgrande, James Patrick and Schaub, Torsten H. and Tompits, Hans and Woltran, Stefan}, title = {On Computing belief change operations using quantifield boolean formulas}, issn = {0955-792X}, year = {2004}, abstract = {In this paper, we show how an approach to belief revision and belief contraction can be axiomatized by means of quantified Boolean formulas. Specifically, we consider the approach of belief change scenarios, a general framework that has been introduced for expressing different forms of belief change. The essential idea is that for a belief change scenario (K, R, C), the set of formulas K, representing the knowledge base, is modified so that the sets of formulas R and C are respectively true in, and consistent with the result. By restricting the form of a belief change scenario, one obtains specific belief change operators including belief revision, contraction, update, and merging. For both the general approach and for specific operators, we give a quantified Boolean formula such that satisfying truth assignments to the free variables correspond to belief change extensions in the original approach. Hence, we reduce the problem of determining the results of a belief change operation to that of satisfiability. This approach has several benefits. First, it furnishes an axiomatic specification of belief change with respect to belief change scenarios. This then leads to further insight into the belief change framework. Second, this axiomatization allows us to identify strict complexity bounds for the considered reasoning tasks. Third, we have implemented these different forms of belief change by means of existing solvers for quantified Boolean formulas. As well, it appears that this approach may be straightforwardly applied to other specific approaches to belief change}, language = {en} } @article{DelgrandeSchaubTompits2004, author = {Delgrande, James Patrick and Schaub, Torsten H. and Tompits, Hans}, title = {Domain-specific preference for causal reasoning and planning}, isbn = {1-577-35201-7}, year = {2004}, language = {en} } @article{DelgrandeSchaubTompitsetal.2004, author = {Delgrande, James Patrick and Schaub, Torsten H. and Tompits, Hans and Wang, Kewen}, title = {A classification and survey of preference handling approchaches in nonmonotonic reasoning}, issn = {0824-7935}, year = {2004}, abstract = {In recent years, there has been a large amount of disparate work concerning the representation and reasoning with qualitative preferential information by means of approaches to nonmonotonic reasoning. Given the variety of underlying systems, assumptions, motivations, and intuitions, it is difficult to compare or relate one approach with another. Here, we present an overview and classification for approaches to dealing with preference. A set of criteria for classifying approaches is given, followed by a set of desiderata that an approach might be expected to satisfy. A comprehensive set of approaches is subsequently given and classified with respect to these sets of underlying principles}, language = {en} } @article{DelgrandeSchaubTompits2006, author = {Delgrande, James Patrick and Schaub, Torsten H. and Tompits, Hans}, title = {A Preference-Based Framework for Updating logic Programs : preliminary reports}, year = {2006}, language = {en} } @article{DelgrandeSchaubTompits2006, author = {Delgrande, James Patrick and Schaub, Torsten H. and Tompits, Hans}, title = {An Extended Query language for action languages (and its application to aggregates and preferences)}, year = {2006}, language = {en} }