@phdthesis{Tiwari2019, author = {Tiwari, Abhishek}, title = {Enhancing Users' Privacy: Static Resolution of the Dynamic Properties of Android}, school = {Universit{\"a}t Potsdam}, pages = {xiii, 111}, year = {2019}, abstract = {The usage of mobile devices is rapidly growing with Android being the most prevalent mobile operating system. Thanks to the vast variety of mobile applications, users are preferring smartphones over desktops for day to day tasks like Internet surfing. Consequently, smartphones store a plenitude of sensitive data. This data together with the high values of smartphones make them an attractive target for device/data theft (thieves/malicious applications). Unfortunately, state-of-the-art anti-theft solutions do not work if they do not have an active network connection, e.g., if the SIM card was removed from the device. In the majority of these cases, device owners permanently lose their smartphone together with their personal data, which is even worse. Apart from that malevolent applications perform malicious activities to steal sensitive information from smartphones. Recent research considered static program analysis to detect dangerous data leaks. These analyses work well for data leaks due to inter-component communication, but suffer from shortcomings for inter-app communication with respect to precision, soundness, and scalability. This thesis focuses on enhancing users' privacy on Android against physical device loss/theft and (un)intentional data leaks. It presents three novel frameworks: (1) ThiefTrap, an anti-theft framework for Android, (2) IIFA, a modular inter-app intent information flow analysis of Android applications, and (3) PIAnalyzer, a precise approach for PendingIntent vulnerability analysis. ThiefTrap is based on a novel concept of an anti-theft honeypot account that protects the owner's data while preventing a thief from resetting the device. We implemented the proposed scheme and evaluated it through an empirical user study with 35 participants. In this study, the owner's data could be protected, recovered, and anti-theft functionality could be performed unnoticed from the thief in all cases. IIFA proposes a novel approach for Android's inter-component/inter-app communication (ICC/IAC) analysis. Our main contribution is the first fully automatic, sound, and precise ICC/IAC information flow analysis that is scalable for realistic apps due to modularity, avoiding combinatorial explosion: Our approach determines communicating apps using short summaries rather than inlining intent calls between components and apps, which requires simultaneously analyzing all apps installed on a device. We evaluate IIFA in terms of precision, recall, and demonstrate its scalability to a large corpus of real-world apps. IIFA reports 62 problematic ICC-/IAC-related information flows via two or more apps/components. PIAnalyzer proposes a novel approach to analyze PendingIntent related vulnerabilities. PendingIntents are a powerful and universal feature of Android for inter-component communication. We empirically evaluate PIAnalyzer on a set of 1000 randomly selected applications and find 1358 insecure usages of PendingIntents, including 70 severe vulnerabilities.}, language = {en} } @phdthesis{Boehne2019, author = {B{\"o}hne, Sebastian}, title = {Different degrees of formality}, doi = {10.25932/publishup-42379}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-423795}, school = {Universit{\"a}t Potsdam}, pages = {VI, 167}, year = {2019}, abstract = {In this thesis we introduce the concept of the degree of formality. It is directed against a dualistic point of view, which only distinguishes between formal and informal proofs. This dualistic attitude does not respect the differences between the argumentations classified as informal and it is unproductive because the individual potential of the respective argumentation styles cannot be appreciated and remains untapped. This thesis has two parts. In the first of them we analyse the concept of the degree of formality (including a discussion about the respective benefits for each degree) while in the second we demonstrate its usefulness in three case studies. In the first case study we will repair Haskell B. Curry's view of mathematics, which incidentally is of great importance in the first part of this thesis, in light of the different degrees of formality. In the second case study we delineate how awareness of the different degrees of formality can be used to help students to learn how to prove. Third, we will show how the advantages of proofs of different degrees of formality can be combined by the development of so called tactics having a medium degree of formality. Together the three case studies show that the degrees of formality provide a convincing solution to the problem of untapped potential.}, language = {en} } @misc{AlhosseiniAlmodarresiYasinBinTareafNajafietal.2019, author = {Alhosseini Almodarresi Yasin, Seyed Ali and Bin Tareaf, Raad and Najafi, Pejman and Meinel, Christoph}, title = {Detect me if you can}, series = {Companion Proceedings of The 2019 World Wide Web Conference}, journal = {Companion Proceedings of The 2019 World Wide Web Conference}, publisher = {Association for Computing Machinery}, address = {New York}, isbn = {978-1-4503-6675-5}, doi = {10.1145/3308560.3316504}, pages = {148 -- 153}, year = {2019}, abstract = {Spam Bots have become a threat to online social networks with their malicious behavior, posting misinformation messages and influencing online platforms to fulfill their motives. As spam bots have become more advanced over time, creating algorithms to identify bots remains an open challenge. Learning low-dimensional embeddings for nodes in graph structured data has proven to be useful in various domains. In this paper, we propose a model based on graph convolutional neural networks (GCNN) for spam bot detection. Our hypothesis is that to better detect spam bots, in addition to defining a features set, the social graph must also be taken into consideration. GCNNs are able to leverage both the features of a node and aggregate the features of a node's neighborhood. We compare our approach, with two methods that work solely on a features set and on the structure of the graph. To our knowledge, this work is the first attempt of using graph convolutional neural networks in spam bot detection.}, language = {en} } @misc{Fandino2019, author = {Fandi{\~n}o, Jorge}, title = {Founded (auto)epistemic equilibrium logic satisfies epistemic splitting}, series = {Postprints der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Reihe}, journal = {Postprints der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Reihe}, number = {1060}, issn = {1866-8372}, doi = {10.25932/publishup-46968}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-469685}, pages = {671 -- 687}, year = {2019}, abstract = {In a recent line of research, two familiar concepts from logic programming semantics (unfounded sets and splitting) were extrapolated to the case of epistemic logic programs. The property of epistemic splitting provides a natural and modular way to understand programs without epistemic cycles but, surprisingly, was only fulfilled by Gelfond's original semantics (G91), among the many proposals in the literature. On the other hand, G91 may suffer from a kind of self-supported, unfounded derivations when epistemic cycles come into play. Recently, the absence of these derivations was also formalised as a property of epistemic semantics called foundedness. Moreover, a first semantics proved to satisfy foundedness was also proposed, the so-called Founded Autoepistemic Equilibrium Logic (FAEEL). In this paper, we prove that FAEEL also satisfies the epistemic splitting property something that, together with foundedness, was not fulfilled by any other approach up to date. To prove this result, we provide an alternative characterisation of FAEEL as a combination of G91 with a simpler logic we called Founded Epistemic Equilibrium Logic (FEEL), which is somehow an extrapolation of the stable model semantics to the modal logic S5.}, language = {en} } @misc{AguadoCabalarFandinoetal.2019, author = {Aguado, Felicidad and Cabalar, Pedro and Fandi{\~n}o, Jorge and Pearce, David and Perez, Gilberto and Vidal, Concepcion}, title = {Revisiting explicit negation in answer set programming}, series = {Postprints der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Reihe}, journal = {Postprints der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Reihe}, number = {1104}, issn = {1866-8372}, doi = {10.25932/publishup-46969}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-469697}, pages = {908 -- 924}, year = {2019}, abstract = {A common feature in Answer Set Programming is the use of a second negation, stronger than default negation and sometimes called explicit, strong or classical negation. This explicit negation is normally used in front of atoms, rather than allowing its use as a regular operator. In this paper we consider the arbitrary combination of explicit negation with nested expressions, as those defined by Lifschitz, Tang and Turner. We extend the concept of reduct for this new syntax and then prove that it can be captured by an extension of Equilibrium Logic with this second negation. We study some properties of this variant and compare to the already known combination of Equilibrium Logic with Nelson's strong negation.}, language = {en} } @article{CabalarFandinoSchaubetal.2019, author = {Cabalar, Pedro and Fandi{\~n}o, Jorge and Schaub, Torsten H. and Schellhorn, Sebastian}, title = {Gelfond-Zhang aggregates as propositional formulas}, series = {Artificial intelligence}, volume = {274}, journal = {Artificial intelligence}, publisher = {Elsevier}, address = {Amsterdam}, issn = {0004-3702}, doi = {10.1016/j.artint.2018.10.007}, pages = {26 -- 43}, year = {2019}, abstract = {Answer Set Programming (ASP) has become a popular and widespread paradigm for practical Knowledge Representation thanks to its expressiveness and the available enhancements of its input language. One of such enhancements is the use of aggregates, for which different semantic proposals have been made. In this paper, we show that any ASP aggregate interpreted under Gelfond and Zhang's (GZ) semantics can be replaced (under strong equivalence) by a propositional formula. Restricted to the original GZ syntax, the resulting formula is reducible to a disjunction of conjunctions of literals but the formulation is still applicable even when the syntax is extended to allow for arbitrary formulas (including nested aggregates) in the condition. Once GZ-aggregates are represented as formulas, we establish a formal comparison (in terms of the logic of Here-and-There) to Ferraris' (F) aggregates, which are defined by a different formula translation involving nested implications. In particular, we prove that if we replace an F-aggregate by a GZ-aggregate in a rule head, we do not lose answer sets (although more can be gained). This extends the previously known result that the opposite happens in rule bodies, i.e., replacing a GZ-aggregate by an F-aggregate in the body may yield more answer sets. Finally, we characterize a class of aggregates for which GZ- and F-semantics coincide.}, language = {en} } @article{AguadoCabalarFandinoetal.2019, author = {Aguado, Felicidad and Cabalar, Pedro and Fandi{\~n}o, Jorge and Pearce, David and Perez, Gilberto and Vidal, Concepcion}, title = {Forgetting auxiliary atoms in forks}, series = {Artificial intelligence}, volume = {275}, journal = {Artificial intelligence}, publisher = {Elsevier}, address = {Amsterdam}, issn = {0004-3702}, doi = {10.1016/j.artint.2019.07.005}, pages = {575 -- 601}, year = {2019}, abstract = {In this work we tackle the problem of checking strong equivalence of logic programs that may contain local auxiliary atoms, to be removed from their stable models and to be forbidden in any external context. We call this property projective strong equivalence (PSE). It has been recently proved that not any logic program containing auxiliary atoms can be reformulated, under PSE, as another logic program or formula without them - this is known as strongly persistent forgetting. In this paper, we introduce a conservative extension of Equilibrium Logic and its monotonic basis, the logic of Here-and-There, in which we deal with a new connective '|' we call fork. We provide a semantic characterisation of PSE for forks and use it to show that, in this extension, it is always possible to forget auxiliary atoms under strong persistence. We further define when the obtained fork is representable as a regular formula.}, language = {en} } @misc{CabalarFandinoSchaubetal.2019, author = {Cabalar, Pedro and Fandi{\~n}o, Jorge and Schaub, Torsten H. and Schellhorn, Sebastian}, title = {Lower Bound Founded Logic of Here-and-There}, series = {Logics in Artificial Intelligence}, volume = {11468}, journal = {Logics in Artificial Intelligence}, publisher = {Springer}, address = {Cham}, isbn = {978-3-030-19570-0}, issn = {0302-9743}, doi = {10.1007/978-3-030-19570-0_34}, pages = {509 -- 525}, year = {2019}, abstract = {A distinguishing feature of Answer Set Programming is that all atoms belonging to a stable model must be founded. That is, an atom must not only be true but provably true. This can be made precise by means of the constructive logic of Here-and-There, whose equilibrium models correspond to stable models. One way of looking at foundedness is to regard Boolean truth values as ordered by letting true be greater than false. Then, each Boolean variable takes the smallest truth value that can be proven for it. This idea was generalized by Aziz to ordered domains and applied to constraint satisfaction problems. As before, the idea is that a, say integer, variable gets only assigned to the smallest integer that can be justified. In this paper, we present a logical reconstruction of Aziz' idea in the setting of the logic of Here-and-There. More precisely, we start by defining the logic of Here-and-There with lower bound founded variables along with its equilibrium models and elaborate upon its formal properties. Finally, we compare our approach with related ones and sketch future work.}, language = {en} } @article{AguadoCabalarFandinoetal.2019, author = {Aguado, Felicidad and Cabalar, Pedro and Fandi{\~n}o, Jorge and Pearce, David and Perez, Gilberto and Vidal-Peracho, Concepcion}, title = {Revisiting Explicit Negation in Answer Set Programming}, series = {Theory and practice of logic programming}, volume = {19}, journal = {Theory and practice of logic programming}, number = {5-6}, publisher = {Cambridge Univ. Press}, address = {New York}, issn = {1471-0684}, doi = {10.1017/S1471068419000267}, pages = {908 -- 924}, year = {2019}, language = {en} } @phdthesis{Ashouri2020, author = {Ashouri, Mohammadreza}, title = {TrainTrap}, school = {Universit{\"a}t Potsdam}, pages = {XIX, 103}, year = {2020}, language = {en} } @article{EverardoPerezOsorio2020, author = {Everardo P{\´e}rez, Flavio Omar and Osorio, Mauricio}, title = {Towards an answer set programming methodology for constructing programs following a semi-automatic approach}, series = {Electronic notes in theoretical computer science}, volume = {354}, journal = {Electronic notes in theoretical computer science}, publisher = {Elsevier}, address = {Amsterdam [u.a.]}, issn = {1571-0661}, doi = {10.1016/j.entcs.2020.10.004}, pages = {29 -- 44}, year = {2020}, abstract = {Answer Set Programming (ASP) is a successful rule-based formalism for modeling and solving knowledge-intense combinatorial (optimization) problems. Despite its success in both academic and industry, open challenges like automatic source code optimization, and software engineering remains. This is because a problem encoded into an ASP might not have the desired solving performance compared to an equivalent representation. Motivated by these two challenges, this paper has three main contributions. First, we propose a developing process towards a methodology to implement ASP programs, being faithful to existing methods. Second, we present ASP encodings that serve as the basis from the developing process. Third, we demonstrate the use of ASP to reverse the standard solving process. That is, knowing answer sets in advance, and desired strong equivalent properties, "we" exhaustively reconstruct ASP programs if they exist. This paper was originally motivated by the search of propositional formulas (if they exist) that represent the semantics of a new aggregate operator. Particularly, a parity aggregate. This aggregate comes as an improvement from the already existing parity (xor) constraints from xorro, where lacks expressiveness, even though these constraints fit perfectly for reasoning modes like sampling or model counting. To this end, this extended version covers the fundaments from parity constraints as well as the xorro system. Hence, we delve a little more in the examples and the proposed methodology over parity constraints. Finally, we discuss our results by showing the only representation available, that satisfies different properties from the classical logic xor operator, which is also consistent with the semantics of parity constraints from xorro.}, language = {en} } @article{HollmannFrohmeEndrullatetal.2020, author = {Hollmann, Susanne and Frohme, Marcus and Endrullat, Christoph and Kremer, Andreas and D'Elia, Domenica and Regierer, Babette and Nechyporenko, Alina}, title = {Ten simple rules on how to write a standard operating procedure}, series = {PLOS Computational Biology}, volume = {16}, journal = {PLOS Computational Biology}, number = {9}, publisher = {PLOS}, address = {San Francisco}, pages = {10}, year = {2020}, abstract = {Research publications and data nowadays should be publicly available on the internet and, theoretically, usable for everyone to develop further research, products, or services. The long-term accessibility of research data is, therefore, fundamental in the economy of the research production process. However, the availability of data is not sufficient by itself, but also their quality must be verifiable. Measures to ensure reuse and reproducibility need to include the entire research life cycle, from the experimental design to the generation of data, quality control, statistical analysis, interpretation, and validation of the results. Hence, high-quality records, particularly for providing a string of documents for the verifiable origin of data, are essential elements that can act as a certificate for potential users (customers). These records also improve the traceability and transparency of data and processes, therefore, improving the reliability of results. Standards for data acquisition, analysis, and documentation have been fostered in the last decade driven by grassroot initiatives of researchers and organizations such as the Research Data Alliance (RDA). Nevertheless, what is still largely missing in the life science academic research are agreed procedures for complex routine research workflows. Here, well-crafted documentation like standard operating procedures (SOPs) offer clear direction and instructions specifically designed to avoid deviations as an absolute necessity for reproducibility. Therefore, this paper provides a standardized workflow that explains step by step how to write an SOP to be used as a starting point for appropriate research documentation.}, language = {en} } @article{Stede2020, author = {Stede, Manfred}, title = {From connectives to coherence relations}, series = {Revue roumaine de linguistique : RRL = Romanian review of linguistics}, volume = {65}, journal = {Revue roumaine de linguistique : RRL = Romanian review of linguistics}, number = {3}, publisher = {Ed. Academiei Rom{\^a}ne}, address = {Bucure{\c{s}}ti}, issn = {0035-3957}, pages = {213 -- 233}, year = {2020}, abstract = {The notion of coherence relations is quite widely accepted in general, but concrete proposals differ considerably on the questions of how they should be motivated, which relations are to be assumed, and how they should be defined. This paper takes a "bottom-up" perspective by assessing the contribution made by linguistic signals (connectives), using insights from the relevant literature as well as verification by practical text annotation. We work primarily with the German language here and focus on the realm of contrast. Thus, we suggest a new inventory of contrastive connective functions and discuss their relationship to contrastive coherence relations that have been proposed in earlier work.}, language = {en} } @article{TiwariPrakashGrossetal.2020, author = {Tiwari, Abhishek and Prakash, Jyoti and Groß, Sascha and Hammer, Christian}, title = {A large scale analysis of Android}, series = {The journal of systems and software}, volume = {170}, journal = {The journal of systems and software}, publisher = {Elsevier}, address = {New York}, issn = {0164-1212}, doi = {10.1016/j.jss.2020.110775}, pages = {17}, year = {2020}, abstract = {Many Android applications embed webpages via WebView components and execute JavaScript code within Android. Hybrid applications leverage dedicated APIs to load a resource and render it in a WebView. Furthermore, Android objects can be shared with the JavaScript world. However, bridging the interfaces of the Android and JavaScript world might also incur severe security threats: Potentially untrusted webpages and their JavaScript might interfere with the Android environment and its access to native features. No general analysis is currently available to assess the implications of such hybrid apps bridging the two worlds. To understand the semantics and effects of hybrid apps, we perform a large-scale study on the usage of the hybridization APIs in the wild. We analyze and categorize the parameters to hybridization APIs for 7,500 randomly selected and the 196 most popular applications from the Google Playstore as well as 1000 malware samples. Our results advance the general understanding of hybrid applications, as well as implications for potential program analyses, and the current security situation: We discovered thousands of flows of sensitive data from Android to JavaScript, the vast majority of which could flow to potentially untrustworthy code. Our analysis identified numerous web pages embedding vulnerabilities, which we exemplarily exploited. Additionally, we discovered a multitude of applications in which potentially untrusted JavaScript code may interfere with (trusted) Android objects, both in benign and malign applications.}, language = {en} } @article{BordihnVaszil2020, author = {Bordihn, Henning and Vaszil, Gy{\"o}rgy}, title = {Deterministic Lindenmayer systems with dynamic control of parallelism}, series = {International journal of foundations of computer science}, volume = {31}, journal = {International journal of foundations of computer science}, number = {1}, publisher = {World Scientific}, address = {Singapore}, issn = {0129-0541}, doi = {10.1142/S0129054120400031}, pages = {37 -- 51}, year = {2020}, abstract = {M-rate 0L systems are interactionless Lindenmayer systems together with a function assigning to every string a set of multisets of productions that may be applied simultaneously to the string. Some questions that have been left open in the forerunner papers are examined, and the computational power of deterministic M-rate 0L systems is investigated, where also tabled and extended variants are taken into consideration.}, language = {en} } @misc{HollmannFrohmeEndrullatetal.2020, author = {Hollmann, Susanne and Frohme, Marcus and Endrullat, Christoph and Kremer, Andreas and D'Elia, Domenica and Regierer, Babette and Nechyporenko, Alina}, title = {Ten simple rules on how to write a standard operating procedure}, series = {Postprints der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Reihe}, journal = {Postprints der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Reihe}, number = {9}, issn = {1866-8372}, doi = {10.25932/publishup-52587}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-525877}, pages = {12}, year = {2020}, abstract = {Research publications and data nowadays should be publicly available on the internet and, theoretically, usable for everyone to develop further research, products, or services. The long-term accessibility of research data is, therefore, fundamental in the economy of the research production process. However, the availability of data is not sufficient by itself, but also their quality must be verifiable. Measures to ensure reuse and reproducibility need to include the entire research life cycle, from the experimental design to the generation of data, quality control, statistical analysis, interpretation, and validation of the results. Hence, high-quality records, particularly for providing a string of documents for the verifiable origin of data, are essential elements that can act as a certificate for potential users (customers). These records also improve the traceability and transparency of data and processes, therefore, improving the reliability of results. Standards for data acquisition, analysis, and documentation have been fostered in the last decade driven by grassroot initiatives of researchers and organizations such as the Research Data Alliance (RDA). Nevertheless, what is still largely missing in the life science academic research are agreed procedures for complex routine research workflows. Here, well-crafted documentation like standard operating procedures (SOPs) offer clear direction and instructions specifically designed to avoid deviations as an absolute necessity for reproducibility. Therefore, this paper provides a standardized workflow that explains step by step how to write an SOP to be used as a starting point for appropriate research documentation.}, language = {en} } @article{BordihnMitrana2020, author = {Bordihn, Henning and Mitrana, Victor}, title = {On the degrees of non-regularity and non-context-freeness}, series = {Journal of computer and system sciences}, volume = {108}, journal = {Journal of computer and system sciences}, publisher = {Elsevier}, address = {San Diego, Calif. [u.a.]}, issn = {0022-0000}, doi = {10.1016/j.jcss.2019.09.003}, pages = {104 -- 117}, year = {2020}, abstract = {We study the derivational complexity of context-free and context-sensitive grammars by counting the maximal number of non-regular and non-context-free rules used in a derivation, respectively. The degree of non-regularity/non-context-freeness of a language is the minimum degree of non-regularity/non-context-freeness of context-free/context-sensitive grammars generating it. A language has finite degree of non-regularity iff it is regular. We give a condition for deciding whether the degree of non-regularity of a given unambiguous context-free grammar is finite. The problem becomes undecidable for arbitrary linear context-free grammars. The degree of non-regularity of unambiguous context-free grammars generating non-regular languages as well as that of grammars generating deterministic context-free languages that are not regular is of order Omega(n). Context-free non-regular languages of sublinear degree of non-regularity are presented. A language has finite degree of non-context-freeness if it is context-free. Context-sensitive grammars with a quadratic degree of non-context-freeness are more powerful than those of a linear degree.}, language = {en} } @article{GebserJanhunenRintanen2020, author = {Gebser, Martin and Janhunen, Tomi and Rintanen, Jussi}, title = {Declarative encodings of acyclicity properties}, series = {Journal of logic and computation}, volume = {30}, journal = {Journal of logic and computation}, number = {4}, publisher = {Oxford Univ. Press}, address = {Eynsham, Oxford}, issn = {0955-792X}, doi = {10.1093/logcom/exv063}, pages = {923 -- 952}, year = {2020}, abstract = {Many knowledge representation tasks involve trees or similar structures as abstract datatypes. However, devising compact and efficient declarative representations of such structural properties is non-obvious and can be challenging indeed. In this article, we take a number of acyclicity properties into consideration and investigate various logic-based approaches to encode them. We use answer set programming as the primary representation language but also consider mappings to related formalisms, such as propositional logic, difference logic and linear programming. We study the compactness of encodings and the resulting computational performance on benchmarks involving acyclic or tree structures.}, language = {en} } @misc{XenikoudakisAhmedHarrisetal.2020, author = {Xenikoudakis, Georgios and Ahmed, Mayeesha and Harris, Jacob Colt and Wadleigh, Rachel and Paijmans, Johanna L. A. and Hartmann, Stefanie and Barlow, Axel and Lerner, Heather and Hofreiter, Michael}, title = {Ancient DNA reveals twenty million years of aquatic life in beavers}, series = {Current biology : CB}, volume = {30}, journal = {Current biology : CB}, number = {3}, publisher = {Current Biology Ltd.}, address = {London}, issn = {0960-9822}, doi = {10.1016/j.cub.2019.12.041}, pages = {R110 -- R111}, year = {2020}, abstract = {Xenikoudakis et al. report a partial mitochondrial genome of the extinct giant beaver Castoroides and estimate the origin of aquatic behavior in beavers to approximately 20 million years. This time estimate coincides with the extinction of terrestrial beavers and raises the question whether the two events had a common cause.}, language = {en} } @article{GebserMarateaRicca2020, author = {Gebser, Martin and Maratea, Marco and Ricca, Francesco}, title = {The Seventh Answer Set Programming Competition}, series = {Theory and practice of logic programming}, volume = {20}, journal = {Theory and practice of logic programming}, number = {2}, publisher = {Cambridge Univ. Press}, address = {Cambridge [u.a.]}, issn = {1471-0684}, doi = {10.1017/S1471068419000061}, pages = {176 -- 204}, year = {2020}, abstract = {Answer Set Programming (ASP) is a prominent knowledge representation language with roots in logic programming and non-monotonic reasoning. Biennial ASP competitions are organized in order to furnish challenging benchmark collections and assess the advancement of the state of the art in ASP solving. In this paper, we report on the design and results of the Seventh ASP Competition, jointly organized by the University of Calabria (Italy), the University of Genova (Italy), and the University of Potsdam (Germany), in affiliation with the 14th International Conference on Logic Programming and Non-Monotonic Reasoning (LPNMR 2017).}, language = {en} }