@article{DelgrandeSchaubTompits2001,
  author    = {Delgrande, James Patrick and Schaub, Torsten H. and Tompits, Hans},
  title     = {A generic compiler for ordered logic programs},
  isbn      = {3-540-42593-4},
  year      = {2001},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{AngerKonczakLinkeetal.2005,
  author    = {Anger, Christian and Konczak, Kathrin and Linke, Thomas and Schaub, Torsten H.},
  title     = {A Glimpse of Answer Set Programming},
  issn      = {0170-4516},
  year      = {2005},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{TiwariPrakashGrossetal.2020,
  author    = {Tiwari, Abhishek and Prakash, Jyoti and Groß, Sascha and Hammer, Christian},
  title     = {A large scale analysis of Android},
  series = {The journal of systems and software},
  volume    = {170},
  journal   = {The journal of systems and software},
  publisher = {Elsevier},
  address   = {New York},
  issn      = {0164-1212},
  doi       = {10.1016/j.jss.2020.110775},
  pages     = {17},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {Many Android applications embed webpages via WebView components and execute JavaScript code within Android. Hybrid applications leverage dedicated APIs to load a resource and render it in a WebView. Furthermore, Android objects can be shared with the JavaScript world. However, bridging the interfaces of the Android and JavaScript world might also incur severe security threats: Potentially untrusted webpages and their JavaScript might interfere with the Android environment and its access to native features. No general analysis is currently available to assess the implications of such hybrid apps bridging the two worlds. To understand the semantics and effects of hybrid apps, we perform a large-scale study on the usage of the hybridization APIs in the wild. We analyze and categorize the parameters to hybridization APIs for 7,500 randomly selected and the 196 most popular applications from the Google Playstore as well as 1000 malware samples. Our results advance the general understanding of hybrid applications, as well as implications for potential program analyses, and the current security situation: We discovered thousands of flows of sensitive data from Android to JavaScript, the vast majority of which could flow to potentially untrustworthy code. Our analysis identified numerous web pages embedding vulnerabilities, which we exemplarily exploited. Additionally, we discovered a multitude of applications in which potentially untrusted JavaScript code may interfere with (trusted) Android objects, both in benign and malign applications.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{HlawiczkaGoesselSogomonyan1997,
  author    = {Hlawiczka, A. and G{\"o}ssel, Michael and Sogomonyan, Egor S.},
  title     = {A linear code-preserving signature analyzer COPMISR},
  isbn      = {0-8186-7810-0},
  year      = {1997},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{BesnardHunter2001,
  author    = {Besnard, Philippe and Hunter, Anthony},
  title     = {A logic-based theory of deductive arguments},
  issn      = {0004-3702},
  year      = {2001},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{SaposhnikovSaposhnikovGoesseletal.1999,
  author    = {Saposhnikov, V. V. and Saposhnikov, Vl. V. and G{\"o}ssel, Michael and Morosov, Andrej},
  title     = {A method of construction of combinational self-checking units with detection of all single faults},
  year      = {1999},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{BrueningSchaub1996,
  author    = {Br{\"u}ning, Stefan and Schaub, Torsten H.},
  title     = {A model-based approach to consistency-checking},
  isbn      = {3-540-61286-6},
  year      = {1996},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{DelgrandeSchaubTompitsetal.2013,
  author    = {Delgrande, James and Schaub, Torsten H. and Tompits, Hans and Woltran, Stefan},
  title     = {A model-theoretic approach to belief change in answer set programming},
  series = {ACM transactions on computational logic},
  volume    = {14},
  journal   = {ACM transactions on computational logic},
  number    = {2},
  publisher = {Association for Computing Machinery},
  address   = {New York},
  issn      = {1529-3785},
  doi       = {10.1145/2480759.2480766},
  pages     = {46},
  year      = {2013},
  abstract  = {We address the problem of belief change in (nonmonotonic) logic programming under answer set semantics. Our formal techniques are analogous to those of distance-based belief revision in propositional logic. In particular, we build upon the model theory of logic programs furnished by SE interpretations, where an SE interpretation is a model of a logic program in the same way that a classical interpretation is a model of a propositional formula. Hence we extend techniques from the area of belief revision based on distance between models to belief change in logic programs. We first consider belief revision: for logic programs P and Q, the goal is to determine a program R that corresponds to the revision of P by Q, denoted P * Q. We investigate several operators, including (logic program) expansion and two revision operators based on the distance between the SE models of logic programs. It proves to be the case that expansion is an interesting operator in its own right, unlike in classical belief revision where it is relatively uninteresting. Expansion and revision are shown to satisfy a suite of interesting properties; in particular, our revision operators satisfy all or nearly all of the AGM postulates for revision. We next consider approaches for merging a set of logic programs, P-1,...,P-n. Again, our formal techniques are based on notions of relative distance between the SE models of the logic programs. Two approaches are examined. The first informally selects for each program P-i those models of P-i that vary the least from models of the other programs. The second approach informally selects those models of a program P-0 that are closest to the models of programs P-1,...,P-n. In this case, P-0 can be thought of as a set of database integrity constraints. We examine these operators with regards to how they satisfy relevant postulate sets. Last, we present encodings for computing the revision as well as the merging of logic programs within the same logic programming framework. This gives rise to a direct implementation of our approach in terms of off-the-shelf answer set solvers. These encodings also reflect the fact that our change operators do not increase the complexity of the base formalism.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{SogomonyanSinghGoessel1999,
  author    = {Sogomonyan, Egor S. and Singh, Adit D. and G{\"o}ssel, Michael},
  title     = {A multi-mode scannable memory element for high test application efficiency and delay testing},
  year      = {1999},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{SogomonyanSinghGoessel1998,
  author    = {Sogomonyan, Egor S. and Singh, Adit D. and G{\"o}ssel, Michael},
  title     = {A multi-mode scannable memory element for high test application efficiency and delay testing},
  year      = {1998},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{Gohlke1995,
  author    = {Gohlke, Mario},
  title     = {A new approach for model-based recognition using colour regions},
  year      = {1995},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{SaposhnikovMorosovSaposhnikovetal.1998,
  author    = {Saposhnikov, V. V. and Morosov, Andrej and Saposhnikov, Vl. V. and G{\"o}ssel, Michael},
  title     = {A new design method for self-checking unidirectional combinational circuits},
  year      = {1998},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{Richter1995,
  author    = {Richter, Peter},
  title     = {A new deterministic approach for the optimization of cable layouts for power supply systems},
  year      = {1995},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{Goessel1999,
  author    = {G{\"o}ssel, Michael},
  title     = {A new method of redundancy addition for circuit optimization},
  series = {Preprint / Universit{\"a}t Potsdam, Institut f{\"u}r Informatik},
  volume    = {1999, 08},
  journal   = {Preprint / Universit{\"a}t Potsdam, Institut f{\"u}r Informatik},
  publisher = {Univ.},
  address   = {Potsdam},
  issn      = {0946-7580},
  pages     = {9 Bl.},
  year      = {1999},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{SogomonyanGoessel1995,
  author    = {Sogomonyan, Egor S. and G{\"o}ssel, Michael},
  title     = {A new parity preserving multi-input signature analyser},
  year      = {1995},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{GoesselSogomonyan1996,
  author    = {G{\"o}ssel, Michael and Sogomonyan, Egor S.},
  title     = {A new self-testing parity checker for ultra-reliable applications},
  year      = {1996},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{GoesselSogomonyanMorosov1999,
  author    = {G{\"o}ssel, Michael and Sogomonyan, Egor S. and Morosov, Andrej},
  title     = {A new totally error propagating compactor for arbitrary cores with digital interfaces},
  year      = {1999},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{KawanabeBlanchardSugiyamaetal.2006,
  author    = {Kawanabe, Motoaki and Blanchard, Gilles and Sugiyama, Masashi and Spokoiny, Vladimir G. and M{\"u}ller, Klaus-Robert},
  title     = {A novel dimension reduction procedure for searching non-Gaussian subspaces},
  issn      = {0302-9743},
  doi       = {10.1007/11679363_19},
  year      = {2006},
  abstract  = {In this article, we consider high-dimensional data which contains a low-dimensional non-Gaussian structure contaminated with Gaussian noise and propose a new linear method to identify the non-Gaussian subspace. Our method NGCA (Non-Gaussian Component Analysis) is based on a very general semi-parametric framework and has a theoretical guarantee that the estimation error of finding the non-Gaussian components tends to zero at a parametric rate. NGCA can be used not only as preprocessing for ICA, but also for extracting and visualizing more general structures like clusters. A numerical study demonstrates the usefulness of our method},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{LiangLiuLiuetal.2015,
  author    = {Liang, Feng and Liu, Yunzhen and Liu, Hai and Ma, Shilong and Schnor, Bettina},
  title     = {A Parallel Job Execution Time Estimation Approach Based on User Submission Patterns within Computational Grids},
  series = {International journal of parallel programming},
  volume    = {43},
  journal   = {International journal of parallel programming},
  number    = {3},
  publisher = {Springer},
  address   = {New York},
  issn      = {0885-7458},
  doi       = {10.1007/s10766-013-0294-1},
  pages     = {440 -- 454},
  year      = {2015},
  abstract  = {Scheduling performance in computational grid can potentially benefit a lot from accurate execution time estimation for parallel jobs. Most existing approaches for the parallel job execution time estimation, however, require ample past job traces and the explicit correlations between the job execution time and the outer layout parameters such as the consumed processor numbers, the user-estimated execution time and the job ID, which are hard to obtain or reveal. This paper presents and evaluates a novel execution time estimation approach for parallel jobs, the user-behavior clustering for execution time estimation, which can give more accurate execution time estimation for parallel jobs through exploring the job similarity and revealing the user submission patterns. Experiment results show that compared to the state-of-art algorithms, our approach can improve the accuracy of the job execution time estimation up to 5.6 \%, meanwhile the time that our approach spends on calculation can be reduced up to 3.8 \%.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{GoesselSogomonyan1996,
  author    = {G{\"o}ssel, Michael and Sogomonyan, Egor S.},
  title     = {A parity-preserving multi-input signature analyzer and it application for concurrent checking and BIST},
  year      = {1996},
  language  = {en}
}