@article{BaierDiCiccioMendlingetal.2018, author = {Baier, Thomas and Di Ciccio, Claudio and Mendling, Jan and Weske, Mathias}, title = {Matching events and activities by integrating behavioral aspects and label analysis}, series = {Software and systems modeling}, volume = {17}, journal = {Software and systems modeling}, number = {2}, publisher = {Springer}, address = {Heidelberg}, issn = {1619-1366}, doi = {10.1007/s10270-017-0603-z}, pages = {573 -- 598}, year = {2018}, abstract = {Nowadays, business processes are increasingly supported by IT services that produce massive amounts of event data during the execution of a process. These event data can be used to analyze the process using process mining techniques to discover the real process, measure conformance to a given process model, or to enhance existing models with performance information. Mapping the produced events to activities of a given process model is essential for conformance checking, annotation and understanding of process mining results. In order to accomplish this mapping with low manual effort, we developed a semi-automatic approach that maps events to activities using insights from behavioral analysis and label analysis. The approach extracts Declare constraints from both the log and the model to build matching constraints to efficiently reduce the number of possible mappings. These mappings are further reduced using techniques from natural language processing, which allow for a matching based on labels and external knowledge sources. The evaluation with synthetic and real-life data demonstrates the effectiveness of the approach and its robustness toward non-conforming execution logs.}, language = {en} } @article{PrzybyllaRomeike2018, author = {Przybylla, Mareen and Romeike, Ralf}, title = {Empowering learners with tools in CS education}, series = {it - Information Technology}, volume = {60}, journal = {it - Information Technology}, number = {2}, publisher = {De Gruyter}, address = {Berlin}, issn = {1611-2776}, doi = {10.1515/itit-2017-0032}, pages = {91 -- 101}, year = {2018}, abstract = {In computer science, computer systems are both, objects of investigation and tools that enable creative learning and design. Tools for learning have a long tradition in computer science education. Already in the late 1960s, Papert developed a concept which had an immense impact on the development of informal education in the following years: his theory of constructionism understands learning as a creative process of knowledge construction that is most effective when learners create something purposeful that they can try out, show around, discuss, analyse and receive praise for. By now, there are numerous learning and programming environments that are based on the constructionist ideas. Modern tools offer opportunities for students to learn in motivating ways and gain impressive results in programming games, animations, implementing 3D models or developing interactive objects. This article gives an overview of computer science education research related to tools and media to be used in educational settings. We analyse different types of tools with a special focus on the categorization and development of tools for student adequate physical computing activities in the classroom. Research around the development and evaluation of tools and learning resources in the domain of physical computing is illustrated with the example of "My Interactive Garden", a constructionist learning and programming environment. It is explained how the results from empirical studies are integrated in the continuous development of the learning material.}, language = {en} } @misc{FrankKreitz2018, author = {Frank, Mario and Kreitz, Christoph}, title = {A theorem prover for scientific and educational purposes}, series = {Electronic proceedings in theoretical computer science}, journal = {Electronic proceedings in theoretical computer science}, number = {267}, publisher = {Open Publishing Association}, address = {Sydney}, issn = {2075-2180}, doi = {10.4204/EPTCS.267.4}, pages = {59 -- 69}, year = {2018}, abstract = {We present a prototype of an integrated reasoning environment for educational purposes. The presented tool is a fragment of a proof assistant and automated theorem prover. We describe the existing and planned functionality of the theorem prover and especially the functionality of the educational fragment. This currently supports working with terms of the untyped lambda calculus and addresses both undergraduate students and researchers. We show how the tool can be used to support the students' understanding of functional programming and discuss general problems related to the process of building theorem proving software that aims at supporting both research and education.}, language = {en} } @incollection{KiyKnothMueller2018, author = {Kiy, Alexander and Knoth, Alexander Henning and M{\"u}ller, Ina}, title = {ReflectUP-App Situative und kontextbezogene Evaluation des Studieneinstiegs}, series = {Digitalisierung der Hochschullehre Neue Anforderungen an die Evaluation?}, booktitle = {Digitalisierung der Hochschullehre Neue Anforderungen an die Evaluation?}, editor = {Harris-Huemmert, Susan and Pohlenz, Philipp and Mitterauer, Lukas}, publisher = {Waxmann}, address = {M{\"u}nster}, isbn = {978-3-8309-3807-1}, publisher = {Universit{\"a}t Potsdam}, pages = {85 -- 102}, year = {2018}, language = {de} } @misc{BordihnNagyVaszil2018, author = {Bordihn, Henning and Nagy, Benedek and Vaszil, Gy{\"o}rgy}, title = {Preface: Non-classical models of automata and applications VIII}, series = {RAIRO-Theoretical informatics and appli and applications}, volume = {52}, journal = {RAIRO-Theoretical informatics and appli and applications}, number = {2-4}, publisher = {EDP Sciences}, address = {Les Ulis}, issn = {0988-3754}, doi = {10.1051/ita/2018019}, pages = {87 -- 88}, year = {2018}, language = {en} } @misc{AfantenosPeldszusStede2018, author = {Afantenos, Stergos and Peldszus, Andreas and Stede, Manfred}, title = {Comparing decoding mechanisms for parsing argumentative structures}, series = {Postprints der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Reihe}, journal = {Postprints der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Reihe}, number = {1062}, issn = {1866-8372}, doi = {10.25932/publishup-47052}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-470527}, pages = {18}, year = {2018}, abstract = {Parsing of argumentative structures has become a very active line of research in recent years. Like discourse parsing or any other natural language task that requires prediction of linguistic structures, most approaches choose to learn a local model and then perform global decoding over the local probability distributions, often imposing constraints that are specific to the task at hand. Specifically for argumentation parsing, two decoding approaches have been recently proposed: Minimum Spanning Trees (MST) and Integer Linear Programming (ILP), following similar trends in discourse parsing. In contrast to discourse parsing though, where trees are not always used as underlying annotation schemes, argumentation structures so far have always been represented with trees. Using the 'argumentative microtext corpus' [in: Argumentation and Reasoned Action: Proceedings of the 1st European Conference on Argumentation, Lisbon 2015 / Vol. 2, College Publications, London, 2016, pp. 801-815] as underlying data and replicating three different decoding mechanisms, in this paper we propose a novel ILP decoder and an extension to our earlier MST work, and then thoroughly compare the approaches. The result is that our new decoder outperforms related work in important respects, and that in general, ILP and MST yield very similar performance.}, language = {en} } @article{PrescherBornscheinKoehlmannetal.2018, author = {Prescher, Denise and Bornschein, Jens and K{\"o}hlmann, Wiebke and Weber, Gerhard}, title = {Touching graphical applications}, series = {Universal Access in the Information Society}, volume = {17}, journal = {Universal Access in the Information Society}, number = {2}, publisher = {Springer}, address = {Heidelberg}, issn = {1615-5289}, doi = {10.1007/s10209-017-0538-8}, pages = {391 -- 409}, year = {2018}, abstract = {Novel two-dimensional tactile displays enable blind users to not only get access to the textual but also to the graphical content of a graphical user interface. Due to the higher amount of information that can be presented in parallel, orientation and exploration can be more complex. In this paper we present the HyperBraille system, which consists of a pin-matrix device as well as a graphical screen reader providing the user with appropriate presentation and interaction possibilities. To allow for a detailed analysis of bimanual interaction strategies on a pin-matrix device, we conducted two user studies with a total of 12 blind people. The task was to fill in .pdf forms on the pin-matrix device by using different input methods, namely gestures, built-in hardware buttons as well as a conventional PC keyboard. The forms were presented in a semigraphic view type that not only contains Braille but also tactile widgets in a spatial arrangement. While completion time and error rate partly depended on the chosen input method, the usage of special reading strategies seemed to be independent of it. A direct comparison of the system and a conventional assistive technology (screen reader with single-line Braille device) showed that interaction on the pin-matrix device can be very efficient if the user is trained. The two-dimensional output can improve access to .pdf forms with insufficient accessibility as the mapping of input controls and the corresponding labels can be supported by a spatial presentation.}, language = {en} } @article{AfantenosPeldszusStede2018, author = {Afantenos, Stergos and Peldszus, Andreas and Stede, Manfred}, title = {Comparing decoding mechanisms for parsing argumentative structures}, series = {Argument \& Computation}, volume = {9}, journal = {Argument \& Computation}, number = {3}, publisher = {IOS Press}, address = {Amsterdam}, issn = {1946-2166}, doi = {10.3233/AAC-180033}, pages = {177 -- 192}, year = {2018}, abstract = {Parsing of argumentative structures has become a very active line of research in recent years. Like discourse parsing or any other natural language task that requires prediction of linguistic structures, most approaches choose to learn a local model and then perform global decoding over the local probability distributions, often imposing constraints that are specific to the task at hand. Specifically for argumentation parsing, two decoding approaches have been recently proposed: Minimum Spanning Trees (MST) and Integer Linear Programming (ILP), following similar trends in discourse parsing. In contrast to discourse parsing though, where trees are not always used as underlying annotation schemes, argumentation structures so far have always been represented with trees. Using the 'argumentative microtext corpus' [in: Argumentation and Reasoned Action: Proceedings of the 1st European Conference on Argumentation, Lisbon 2015 / Vol. 2, College Publications, London, 2016, pp. 801-815] as underlying data and replicating three different decoding mechanisms, in this paper we propose a novel ILP decoder and an extension to our earlier MST work, and then thoroughly compare the approaches. The result is that our new decoder outperforms related work in important respects, and that in general, ILP and MST yield very similar performance.}, language = {en} } @misc{SahlmannSchwotzer2018, author = {Sahlmann, Kristina and Schwotzer, Thomas}, title = {Ontology-based virtual IoT devices for edge computing}, series = {Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on the Internet of Things}, journal = {Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on the Internet of Things}, publisher = {Association for Computing Machinery}, address = {New York}, isbn = {978-1-4503-6564-2}, doi = {10.1145/3277593.3277597}, pages = {1 -- 7}, year = {2018}, abstract = {An IoT network may consist of hundreds heterogeneous devices. Some of them may be constrained in terms of memory, power, processing and network capacity. Manual network and service management of IoT devices are challenging. We propose a usage of an ontology for the IoT device descriptions enabling automatic network management as well as service discovery and aggregation. Our IoT architecture approach ensures interoperability using existing standards, i.e. MQTT protocol and SemanticWeb technologies. We herein introduce virtual IoT devices and their semantic framework deployed at the edge of network. As a result, virtual devices are enabled to aggregate capabilities of IoT devices, derive new services by inference, delegate requests/responses and generate events. Furthermore, they can collect and pre-process sensor data. These tasks on the edge computing overcome the shortcomings of the cloud usage regarding siloization, network bandwidth, latency and speed. We validate our proposition by implementing a virtual device on a Raspberry Pi.}, language = {en} } @misc{BoehneKreitz2018, author = {B{\"o}hne, Sebastian and Kreitz, Christoph}, title = {Learning how to prove}, series = {Electronic proceedings in theoretical computer science}, journal = {Electronic proceedings in theoretical computer science}, number = {267}, publisher = {Open Publishing Association}, address = {Sydney}, issn = {2075-2180}, doi = {10.4204/EPTCS.267.1}, pages = {1 -- 18}, year = {2018}, abstract = {We have developed an alternative approach to teaching computer science students how to prove. First, students are taught how to prove theorems with the Coq proof assistant. In a second, more difficult, step students will transfer their acquired skills to the area of textbook proofs. In this article we present a realisation of the second step. Proofs in Coq have a high degree of formality while textbook proofs have only a medium one. Therefore our key idea is to reduce the degree of formality from the level of Coq to textbook proofs in several small steps. For that purpose we introduce three proof styles between Coq and textbook proofs, called line by line comments, weakened line by line comments, and structure faithful proofs. While this article is mostly conceptional we also report on experiences with putting our approach into practise.}, language = {en} }