@article{Bircken2008,
  author    = {Bircken, Margrid},
  title     = {Auf der Suche nach der erz{\"a}hlbaren Stadt},
  isbn      = {978-3-89626-620-0},
  year      = {2008},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{Gerber1991,
  author    = {Gerber, Thomas},
  title     = {Auf dem Wege zur Komparatistik : Robert F[ranz] Arnold: Tadeusz Kosciuszko in der deutschen Litteratur, Berlin 1898},
  year      = {1991},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{Bircken2006,
  author    = {Bircken, Margrid},
  title     = {Auf dem Weg zu Anna Seghers},
  isbn      = {978-3-447-05272-6},
  year      = {2006},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{Bircken1998,
  author    = {Bircken, Margrid},
  title     = {Aspekte {\"a}sthetischer Wahrnehmung von Generationserfahrungen},
  year      = {1998},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{Gessinger2003,
  author    = {Gessinger, Joachim},
  title     = {Aspekte einer brandenburgischen Sprachgeschichte},
  isbn      = {3-11-015883-3},
  year      = {2003},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{Demske2019,
  author    = {Demske, Ulrike},
  title     = {Aspectual features and categorial shift},
  series = {Language sciences},
  volume    = {73},
  journal   = {Language sciences},
  publisher = {Elsevier},
  address   = {Oxford},
  issn      = {0388-0001},
  doi       = {10.1016/j.langsci.2018.08.006},
  pages     = {50 -- 61},
  year      = {2019},
  abstract  = {The point of departure of this paper is the claim by Heyvaert, Maekelberghe \& Buyle (2019) that the suffix -ing has no aspectual meaning in English gerunds. Rather, the interpretation of nominal and verbal gerunds depends, so they argue, on situation or viewpoint aspect, a claim that contradicts the wide-spread view that the aspectual meaning of English gerunds is brought about by the nominalizing suffix. The present paper addresses the issue from a comparative perspective, focusing on German ung-nominals: while they share aspectual features with their English counterparts, empirical evidence from productivity, distribution, and argument linking shows (i) that the derivational suffix -ung imposes aspectual restrictions on possible verb bases, and (ii) that with respect to argument linking, the deverbal nominal favors the state component of a complex event predicate over its process component. From the historical record of German, we learn that these aspectual restrictions do not hold for ung-nominals in earlier periods of German. With the rise of aspectual restrictions, the nominalization pattern turns more nominal resulting in a position further towards the nominal end of the deverbalization continuum. It appears, then, that it is only in the historical pariods of German that ung-nominals pattern with English nominals as regards their aspectual features. Currently, German ung-nominals are more noun-like than nominal (and verbal) gerunds in English. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{Stockhorst2008,
  author    = {Stockhorst, Stefanie},
  title     = {Artikulationsm{\"o}glichkeiten von Kriegsgegnerschaft im pazifistischen Roman der Weimarer Republik : zum Problem der heimlichen Affirmation bei Georg von der Vring und Erich Maria Remarque},
  year      = {2008},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{Gessinger1996,
  author    = {Gessinger, Joachim},
  title     = {Art. Berhardi},
  year      = {1996},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{Selting2000,
  author    = {Selting, Margret},
  title     = {Argumente f{\"u}r die Entwicklung einer interaktionalen Linguistik},
  year      = {2000},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{SiehrSeidel2009,
  author    = {Siehr, Karl-Heinz and Seidel, Ute},
  title     = {Antisemitischer Sprachgebrauch : Diskurs zwischen Kontinuit{\"a}t und Wandel},
  isbn      = {978-3-86956-003-8},
  year      = {2009},
  language  = {de}
}