@article{EbersHochRosenkranzetal.2021,
  author    = {Ebers, Martin and Hoch, Veronica R. S. and Rosenkranz, Frank and Ruschemeier, Hannah and Steinr{\"o}tter, Bj{\"o}rn},
  title     = {The European Commission's proposal for an Artificial Intelligence Act},
  series = {J : multidisciplinary scientific journal},
  volume    = {4},
  journal   = {J : multidisciplinary scientific journal},
  number    = {4},
  publisher = {MDPI},
  address   = {Basel},
  issn      = {2571-8800},
  doi       = {10.3390/j4040043},
  pages     = {589 -- 603},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {On 21 April 2021, the European Commission presented its long-awaited proposal for a Regulation "laying down harmonized rules on Artificial Intelligence", the so-called "Artificial Intelligence Act" (AIA). This article takes a critical look at the proposed regulation. After an introduction (1), the paper analyzes the unclear preemptive effect of the AIA and EU competences (2), the scope of application (3), the prohibited uses of Artificial Intelligence (AI) (4), the provisions on high-risk AI systems (5), the obligations of providers and users (6), the requirements for AI systems with limited risks (7), the enforcement system (8), the relationship of the AIA with the existing legal framework (9), and the regulatory gaps (10). The last section draws some final conclusions (11).},
  language  = {en}
}
@phdthesis{Benz2024,
  author    = {Benz, Eleanor},
  title     = {The advisory function of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights},
  series = {Beitr{\"a}ge zum ausl{\"a}ndischen {\"o}ffentlichen Recht und V{\"o}lkerrecht},
  volume    = {329},
  journal   = {Beitr{\"a}ge zum ausl{\"a}ndischen {\"o}ffentlichen Recht und V{\"o}lkerrecht},
  publisher = {Nomos},
  address   = {Baden-Baden},
  issn      = {978-3-7489-1980-3},
  doi       = {10.5771/9783748919803},
  school      = {Universit{\"a}t Potsdam},
  pages     = {478},
  year      = {2024},
  abstract  = {How do the rights of same-sex couples have to be ensured by states, and which kind of environmental obligations are induced by the right to life and to personal integrity? Questions as diverse and far-reaching as these are regularly dealt with by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights in its advisory function. This book is the first comprehensive, non-Spanish-written treatise on the advisory function of this Court. It analyzes the scope of the Court's advisory jurisdiction and its procedural practice in comparison with that of other international courts. Moreover, the legal effects of the Court's advisory opinions and the question when the Court should better reject a request for an advisory opinion are examined.},
  language  = {en}
}
@misc{Bilgen2023,
  author    = {Bilgen, Isa},
  title     = {Freiheit und Nachhaltigkeit im Verfassungswandel},
  series = {Verfassungsblog : on matters constitutional},
  journal   = {Verfassungsblog : on matters constitutional},
  publisher = {Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog gGmbH},
  address   = {Berlin},
  issn      = {2366-7044},
  doi       = {10.17176/20230617-231023-0},
  pages     = {6},
  year      = {2023},
  abstract  = {Mit dem Klima wandelt sich auch notwendig die offene Gesellschaft. Und mit ihr wandelt sich wiederum auch die Verfassung(-sinterpretation). Periodisch wiederkehrende Gesundheits- und Sicherheitskrisen fordern eine dynamische Reaktion des Grundgesetzes auf mit ihnen einhergehende Probleme. In andauernden Krisen wie der Umweltkrise muss die Verfassung gleichzeitig in vielerlei Hinsicht nachhaltig sein. Dabei muss das, was wir unter Freiheit, Klima‑, Umwelt- oder Tierschutz verstehen, immer im Wandel bleiben.},
  language  = {de}
}
@misc{Lemke2021,
  author    = {Lemke, Tristan},
  title     = {Keine Reform f{\"u}r die Zukunft},
  series = {Verfassungsblog : on matters constitutional},
  journal   = {Verfassungsblog : on matters constitutional},
  publisher = {Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog gGmbH},
  address   = {Berlin},
  issn      = {2366-7044},
  doi       = {10.17176/20210130-222740-0},
  pages     = {4},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {Am 1. Januar 2021 trat die j{\"u}ngste Reform des Erneuerbare-Energien-Gesetzes (EEG) in Kraft. Sie f{\"u}hrte mit der finanziellen Beteiligung der Gemeinden an den Ertr{\"a}gen der Windenergie klammheimlich eine verfassungswidrige Abgabe ein: Durch das Zusammenspiel des neuen \S 36k EEG 2021 mit der altbekannten EEG-Umlage fließt eine bei den Strom-Endverbrauchern erhobene Abgabe in die kommunalen Haushalte. Das kann auf keine Gesetzgebungskompetenz gest{\"u}tzt werden. Dar{\"u}ber hinaus f{\"u}hrt die Deckelung der EEG-Umlage in den Jahren 2021 und 2022 in Verbindung mit \S 36k EEG 2021 dazu, dass in verfassungswidriger Weise Bundesmittel den Gemeinden zur freien Verf{\"u}gung gestellt werden.},
  language  = {de}
}
@misc{Lemke2022,
  author    = {Lemke, Tristan},
  title     = {{\"U}bergewinnsteuer durch die Hintert{\"u}r},
  series = {Verfassungsblog : on matters constitutional},
  journal   = {Verfassungsblog : on matters constitutional},
  publisher = {Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog gGmbH},
  address   = {Berlin},
  issn      = {2366-7044},
  doi       = {10.17176/20220909-230727-0},
  pages     = {5},
  year      = {2022},
  language  = {de}
}