@inproceedings{GebserHinrichsSchaubetal.2010,
  author    = {Gebser, Martin and Hinrichs, Henrik and Schaub, Torsten H. and Thiele, Sven},
  title     = {xpanda: a (simple) preprocessor for adding multi-valued propositions to ASP},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-41466},
  year      = {2010},
  abstract  = {We introduce a simple approach extending the input language of Answer Set Programming (ASP) systems by multi-valued propositions. Our approach is implemented as a (prototypical) preprocessor translating logic programs with multi-valued propositions into logic programs with Boolean propositions only. Our translation is modular and heavily benefits from the expressive input language of ASP. The resulting approach, along with its implementation, allows for solving interesting constraint satisfaction problems in ASP, showing a good performance.},
  language  = {en}
}
@inproceedings{Zhou2010,
  author    = {Zhou, Neng-Fa},
  title     = {What I have learned from all these solver competitions},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-41431},
  year      = {2010},
  abstract  = {In this talk, I would like to share my experiences gained from participating in four CSP solver competitions and the second ASP solver competition. In particular, I'll talk about how various programming techniques can make huge differences in solving some of the benchmark problems used in the competitions. These techniques include global constraints, table constraints, and problem-specific propagators and labeling strategies for selecting variables and values. I'll present these techniques with experimental results from B-Prolog and other CLP(FD) systems.},
  language  = {en}
}
@inproceedings{HannousseArdourelDouence2010,
  author    = {Hannousse, Abdelhakim and Ardourel, Gilles and Douence, R{\´e}mi},
  title     = {Views for aspectualizing component models},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-41359},
  year      = {2010},
  abstract  = {Component based software development (CBSD) and aspectoriented software development (AOSD) are two complementary approaches. However, existing proposals for integrating aspects into component models are direct transposition of object-oriented AOSD techniques to components. In this article, we propose a new approach based on views. Our proposal introduces crosscutting components quite naturally and can be integrated into different component models.},
  language  = {en}
}
@inproceedings{AbdennadherIsmailKhoury2010,
  author    = {Abdennadher, Slim and Ismail, Haythem and Khoury, Frederick},
  title     = {Transforming imperative algorithms to constraint handling rules},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-41533},
  year      = {2010},
  abstract  = {Different properties of programs, implemented in Constraint Handling Rules (CHR), have already been investigated. Proving these properties in CHR is fairly simpler than proving them in any type of imperative programming language, which triggered the proposal of a methodology to map imperative programs into equivalent CHR. The equivalence of both programs implies that if a property is satisfied for one, then it is satisfied for the other. The mapping methodology could be put to other beneficial uses. One such use is the automatic generation of global constraints, at an attempt to demonstrate the benefits of having a rule-based implementation for constraint solvers.},
  language  = {en}
}
@inproceedings{BynensVanLanduytTruyenetal.2010,
  author    = {Bynens, Maarten and Van Landuyt, Dimitri and Truyen, Eddy and Joosen, Wouter},
  title     = {Towards reusable aspects: the callback mismatch problem},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-41347},
  year      = {2010},
  abstract  = {Because software development is increasingly expensive and timeconsuming, software reuse gains importance. Aspect-oriented software development modularizes crosscutting concerns which enables their systematic reuse. Literature provides a number of AOP patterns and best practices for developing reusable aspects based on compelling examples for concerns like tracing, transactions and persistence. However, such best practices are lacking for systematically reusing invasive aspects. In this paper, we present the 'callback mismatch problem'. This problem arises in the context of abstraction mismatch, in which the aspect is required to issue a callback to the base application. As a consequence, the composition of invasive aspects is cumbersome to implement, difficult to maintain and impossible to reuse. We motivate this problem in a real-world example, show that it persists in the current state-of-the-art, and outline the need for advanced aspectual composition mechanisms to deal with this.},
  language  = {en}
}
@inproceedings{HerreHummel2010,
  author    = {Herre, Heinrich and Hummel, Axel},
  title     = {Stationary generated models of generalized logic programs},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-41501},
  year      = {2010},
  abstract  = {The interest in extensions of the logic programming paradigm beyond the class of normal logic programs is motivated by the need of an adequate representation and processing of knowledge. One of the most difficult problems in this area is to find an adequate declarative semantics for logic programs. In the present paper a general preference criterion is proposed that selects the 'intended' partial models of generalized logic programs which is a conservative extension of the stationary semantics for normal logic programs of [Prz91]. The presented preference criterion defines a partial model of a generalized logic program as intended if it is generated by a stationary chain. It turns out that the stationary generated models coincide with the stationary models on the class of normal logic programs. The general wellfounded semantics of such a program is defined as the set-theoretical intersection of its stationary generated models. For normal logic programs the general wellfounded semantics equals the wellfounded semantics.},
  language  = {en}
}
@inproceedings{Brass2010,
  author    = {Brass, Stefan},
  title     = {Range restriction for general formulas},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-41521},
  year      = {2010},
  abstract  = {Deductive databases need general formulas in rule bodies, not only conjuctions of literals. This is well known since the work of Lloyd and Topor about extended logic programming. Of course, formulas must be restricted in such a way that they can be effectively evaluated in finite time, and produce only a finite number of new tuples (in each iteration of the TP-operator: the fixpoint can still be infinite). It is also necessary to respect binding restrictions of built-in predicates: many of these predicates can be executed only when certain arguments are ground. Whereas for standard logic programming rules, questions of safety, allowedness, and range-restriction are relatively easy and well understood, the situation for general formulas is a bit more complicated. We give a syntactic analysis of formulas that guarantees the necessary properties.},
  language  = {en}
}
@inproceedings{OPUS4-3955,
  title     = {Proceedings of the 23rd Workshop on (Constraint) Logic Programming 2009},
  editor    = {Geske, Ulrich and Wolf, Armin},
  publisher = {Universit{\"a}tsverlag Potsdam},
  address   = {Potsdam},
  isbn      = {978-3-86956-026-7},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-37977},
  pages     = {187},
  year      = {2010},
  abstract  = {The workshops on (constraint) logic programming (WLP) are the annual meeting of the Society of Logic Programming (GLP e.V.) and bring together researchers interested in logic programming, constraint programming, and related areas like databases, artificial intelligence and operations research. The 23rd WLP was held in Potsdam at September 15 - 16, 2009. The topics of the presentations of WLP2009 were grouped into the major areas: Databases, Answer Set Programming, Theory and Practice of Logic Programming as well as Constraints and Constraint Handling Rules.},
  language  = {en}
}
@inproceedings{SurajbaliGraceCoulson2010,
  author    = {Surajbali, Bholanathsingh and Grace, Paul and Coulson, Geoff},
  title     = {Preserving dynamic reconfiguration consistency in aspect oriented middleware},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-41379},
  year      = {2010},
  abstract  = {Aspect-oriented middleware is a promising technology for the realisation of dynamic reconfiguration in heterogeneous distributed systems. However, like other dynamic reconfiguration approaches, AO-middleware-based reconfiguration requires that the consistency of the system is maintained across reconfigurations. AO-middleware-based reconfiguration is an ongoing research topic and several consistency approaches have been proposed. However, most of these approaches tend to be targeted at specific contexts, whereas for distributed systems it is crucial to cover a wide range of operating conditions. In this paper we propose an approach that offers distributed, dynamic reconfiguration in a consistent manner, and features a flexible framework-based consistency management approach to cover a wide range of operating conditions. We evaluate our approach by investigating the configurability and transparency of our approach and also quantify the performance overheads of the associated consistency mechanisms.},
  language  = {en}
}
@inproceedings{OPUS4-3948,
  title     = {Preface},
  editor    = {Adams, Bram and Haupt, Michael and Lohmann, Daniel},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-41338},
  year      = {2010},
  abstract  = {Aspect-oriented programming, component models, and design patterns are modern and actively evolving techniques for improving the modularization of complex software. In particular, these techniques hold great promise for the development of "systems infrastructure" software, e.g., application servers, middleware, virtual machines, compilers, operating systems, and other software that provides general services for higher-level applications. The developers of infrastructure software are faced with increasing demands from application programmers needing higher-level support for application development. Meeting these demands requires careful use of software modularization techniques, since infrastructural concerns are notoriously hard to modularize. Aspects, components, and patterns provide very different means to deal with infrastructure software, but despite their differences, they have much in common. For instance, component models try to free the developer from the need to deal directly with services like security or transactions. These are primary examples of crosscutting concerns, and modularizing such concerns are the main target of aspect-oriented languages. Similarly, design patterns like Visitor and Interceptor facilitate the clean modularization of otherwise tangled concerns. Building on the ACP4IS meetings at AOSD 2002-2009, this workshop aims to provide a highly interactive forum for researchers and developers to discuss the application of and relationships between aspects, components, and patterns within modern infrastructure software. The goal is to put aspects, components, and patterns into a common reference frame and to build connections between the software engineering and systems communities.},
  language  = {en}
}