@misc{FanScaringiKorupetal.2019,
  author    = {Fan, Xuanmei and Scaringi, Gianvito and Korup, Oliver and West, A. Joshua and van Westen, Cees J. and Tanyas, Hakan and Hovius, Niels and Hales, Tristram C. and Jibson, Randall W. and Allstadt, Kate E. and Zhang, Limin and Evans, Stephen G. and Xu, Chong and Li, Gen and Pei, Xiangjun and Xu, Qiang and Huang, Runqiu},
  title     = {Earthquake-Induced Chains of Geologic Hazards},
  series = {Reviews of geophysics},
  volume    = {57},
  journal   = {Reviews of geophysics},
  number    = {2},
  publisher = {American Geophysical Union},
  address   = {Washington},
  issn      = {8755-1209},
  doi       = {10.1029/2018RG000626},
  pages     = {421 -- 503},
  year      = {2019},
  abstract  = {Large earthquakes initiate chains of surface processes that last much longer than the brief moments of strong shaking. Most moderate- and large-magnitude earthquakes trigger landslides, ranging from small failures in the soil cover to massive, devastating rock avalanches. Some landslides dam rivers and impound lakes, which can collapse days to centuries later, and flood mountain valleys for hundreds of kilometers downstream. Landslide deposits on slopes can remobilize during heavy rainfall and evolve into debris flows. Cracks and fractures can form and widen on mountain crests and flanks, promoting increased frequency of landslides that lasts for decades. More gradual impacts involve the flushing of excess debris downstream by rivers, which can generate bank erosion and floodplain accretion as well as channel avulsions that affect flooding frequency, settlements, ecosystems, and infrastructure. Ultimately, earthquake sequences and their geomorphic consequences alter mountain landscapes over both human and geologic time scales. Two recent events have attracted intense research into earthquake-induced landslides and their consequences: the magnitude M 7.6 Chi-Chi, Taiwan earthquake of 1999, and the M 7.9 Wenchuan, China earthquake of 2008. Using data and insights from these and several other earthquakes, we analyze how such events initiate processes that change mountain landscapes, highlight research gaps, and suggest pathways toward a more complete understanding of the seismic effects on the Earth's surface.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{GorumKorupvanWestenetal.2014,
  author    = {Gorum, Tolga and Korup, Oliver and van Westen, Cees J. and van der Meijde, Mark and Xu, Chong and van der Meer, Freek D.},
  title     = {Why so few? Landslides triggered by the 2002 Denali earthquake, Alaska},
  series = {Quaternary science reviews : the international multidisciplinary research and review journal},
  volume    = {95},
  journal   = {Quaternary science reviews : the international multidisciplinary research and review journal},
  publisher = {Elsevier},
  address   = {Oxford},
  issn      = {0277-3791},
  doi       = {10.1016/j.quascirev.2014.04.032},
  pages     = {80 -- 94},
  year      = {2014},
  abstract  = {The 2002 M-w 7.9 Denali Fault earthquake, Alaska, provides an unparalleled opportunity to investigate in quantitative detail the regional hillslope mass-wasting response to strong seismic shaking in glacierized terrain. We present the first detailed inventory of similar to 1580 coseismic slope failures, out of which some 20\% occurred above large valley glaciers, based on mapping from multi-temporal remote sensing data. We find that the Denali earthquake produced at least one order of magnitude fewer landslides in a much narrower corridor along the fault ruptures than empirical predictions for an M 8 earthquake would suggest, despite the availability of sufficiently steep and dissected mountainous topography prone to frequent slope failure. In order to explore potential controls on the reduced extent of regional coseismic landsliding we compare our data with inventories that we compiled for two recent earthquakes in periglacial and formerly glaciated terrain, i.e. at Yushu, Tibet (M-w 6.9, 2010), and Aysen Fjord, Chile (2007 M-w 6.2). Fault movement during these events was, similarly to that of the Denali earthquake, dominated by strike-slip offsets along near-vertical faults. Our comparison returns very similar coseismic landslide patterns that are consistent with the idea that fault type, geometry, and dynamic rupture process rather than widespread glacier cover were among the first-order controls on regional hillslope erosional response in these earthquakes. We conclude that estimating the amount of coseismic hillslope sediment input to the sediment cascade from earthquake magnitude alone remains highly problematic, particularly if glacierized terrain is involved. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.},
  language  = {en}
}