@article{WallentaGranacherLesinskietal.2016, author = {Wallenta, Christopher and Granacher, Urs and Lesinski, Melanie and Schuenemann, C. and M{\"u}hlbauer, Thomas}, title = {Effects of Complex Versus Block Strength Training on the Athletic Performance of Elite Youth Soccer Players}, series = {Sportverletzung, Sportschaden : Grundlagen, Pr{\~A}\ivention, Rehabilitation}, volume = {30}, journal = {Sportverletzung, Sportschaden : Grundlagen, Pr{\~A}\ivention, Rehabilitation}, publisher = {Thieme}, address = {Stuttgart}, issn = {0932-0555}, doi = {10.1055/s-0041-106949}, pages = {31 -- 37}, year = {2016}, abstract = {Hintergrund: Kraft und Schnelligkeit stellen bedeutsame leistungsdeterminierende Faktoren im Fußball dar. Durch Komplextraining (Kombination aus Kraft- und plyometrischen {\"U}bungen in einer Trainingseinheit) lassen sich Kraft- und Schnelligkeitswerte von Athleten steigern. Unklar ist jedoch, ob ein Komplextraining (KT) gegen{\"u}ber einem herk{\"o}mmlichen blockweisen Krafttraining (BT) zu gr{\"o}ßeren sportmotorischen Leistungssteigerungen f{\"u}hrt. Das Ziel der Studie war es, die Effekte von KT versus BT auf Variablen der Kraft, Schnelligkeit und Gewandtheit von Nachwuchsleistungsfußballern zu untersuchen. Methode: Zus{\"a}tzlich zum regul{\"a}ren Fußballtraining (ca. 6 × pro Woche, je 60 - 90 min.) f{\"u}hrten 18 m{\"a}nnliche Nachwuchsleistungsfußballer {\"u}ber sechs Wochen (2 × pro Woche, je 30 min.) entweder ein progressives KT (n = 10, Alter: 18,5 ± 2,2 Jahre) oder BT (n = 8, Alter: 18,1 ± 1,6 Jahre) durch. Vor und nach dem Training wurden Tests zur Erfassung der Kraft (Einer-Wiederholungs-Maximum [EWM] Kniebeuge), der Sprungkraft (Hockstrecksprung [HSS]), der Schnelligkeit (30-m-Sprint) und der Gewandtheit (T-Test) durchgef{\"u}hrt. Es wurden parameterfreie Verfahren zur Bestimmung von Unterschieden innerhalb (Wilcoxon-Test) und zwischen (Mann-Whitney-U-Test) den beiden Gruppen gerechnet. Ergebnisse: Sowohl KT als auch BT sind sichere (keine trainings- aber sechs spielbedingte Verletzungen) und geeignete (Trainingsteilnahme in KT und BT: \&\#8805; 80 \%) Trainingsmaßnahmen in Erg{\"a}nzung zum regul{\"a}ren Fußballtraining. Die statistische Analyse ergab signifikante Verbesserungen vom Pr{\"a}- zum Posttest f{\"u}r die KT-Gruppe im EWM (p = 0,043) und im HSS (p = 0,046) sowie f{\"u}r die BT-Gruppe in der Sprintzeit {\"u}ber 5 m (p = 0,039) und 10 m (p = 0,026). Zudem zeigten sich f{\"u}r beide Gruppen signifikante Verbesserungen im T-Test (KT: p = 0,046; BT: p = 0,027). Der Gruppenvergleich (KT vs. BT) {\"u}ber die Zeit (Post- minus Pr{\"a}test) offenbarte keine bedeutsamen Unterschiede. Schlussfolgerung: Sowohl sechsw{\"o}chiges KT als auch BT f{\"u}hrten zu signifikanten Verbesserungen sportmotorischer Leistungen bei Nachwuchsleistungsfußballern. Allerdings konnten keine zus{\"a}tzlich leistungssteigernden Effekte von KT im Vergleich zu BT ermittelt werden. In zuk{\"u}nftigen Studien sollte gepr{\"u}ft werden, ob die beobachteten testspezifischen Ver{\"a}nderungen, d. h. Verbesserung der Kraft/Sprungkraft in der KT-Gruppe und Verbesserung der Schnelligkeit in der BT-Gruppe der gew{\"a}hlten {\"U}bungsanordnung geschuldet sind oder einen generellen Effekt darstellen. Background: Muscle strength and speed are important determinants of soccer performance. It has previously been shown that complex training (CT, combination of strength and plyometric exercises within a single training session) is effective to enhance strength and speed performance in athletes. However, it is unresolved whether CT is more effective than conventional strength training that is delivered in one single block (BT) to increase proxies of athletic performance. Thus, the aim of the present study was to investigate the effects of CT versus BT on measures of muscle strength/power, speed, and agility in elite youth soccer players. Methods: Eighteen male elite youth soccer players conducted six weeks (2 sessions/week, 30 min, each) of progressive CT (n = 10, age: 18,5 +/- 2.2 years) or BT (n=8, age: 18.1 +/- 1.6 years) in addition to their regular soccer training (approx. 6 sessions/week, 60-90 min, each). Before and after training, tests were conducted for the assessment of strength (one -repetition maximum [1RM] squat), power (countermovement jump [CMJ]), speed (30-m linear sprint), and agility (T test). Non-parametric analyses were used to calculate differences within (Wilcoxon test) and between (Mann-Whitney-U test) groups. Results: Both CT and BT proved to be safe (i.e. no training-related, but six match -related injuries reported) and feasible (i.e. attendance rate of 80\% in both groups) training regimens when implemented in addition to regular soccer training. The statistical analysis revealed significant improvements from pre-training to post-training tests for the CT group in 1 RM squat (p =0.043) and CMJ height (p =0,046). For the BT -group, significantly enhanced sprint times were observed over 5 m (p = 0.039) and 10 m (p = 0.026), Furthermore, both groups significantly improved their t test time (CT: p =0.046; BT: p =0.027). However, group comparisons (CT vs. BT) over time (post-training minus pre-training test) did not show any significant differences. Conclusion: Six weeks of CT and BT resulted in significant improvements in proxies of athletic performance. Yet CT did not produce any additional effects compared to BT. Future research is needed to examine whether the observed test-specific changes, i.e. improvements in strength/power for the CT-group and improvements in speed for the BT-group, are due to the applied configuration of strength, plyometric, and sprint exercises or if they rather indicate a general training response.}, language = {de} } @misc{LesinskiHortobagyiMuehlbaueretal.2016, author = {Lesinski, Melanie and Hortobagyi, Tibor and M{\"u}hlbauer, Thomas and Gollhofer, Albert and Granacher, Urs}, title = {Effects of Balance Training on Balance Performance in Healthy Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (vol 45, pg 1721, 2015)}, series = {Sports medicine}, volume = {46}, journal = {Sports medicine}, publisher = {Springer}, address = {Northcote}, issn = {0112-1642}, doi = {10.1007/s40279-016-0500-6}, pages = {457 -- 457}, year = {2016}, language = {en} } @article{BeurskensMuehlbauerGrabowetal.2016, author = {Beurskens, Rainer and M{\"u}hlbauer, Thomas and Grabow, Lena and Kliegl, Reinhold and Granacher, Urs}, title = {Effects of Backpack Carriage on Dual-Task Performance in Children During Standing and Walking}, series = {Journal of motor behavior}, volume = {48}, journal = {Journal of motor behavior}, publisher = {Wiley-VCH}, address = {Abingdon}, issn = {0022-2895}, doi = {10.1080/00222895.2016.1152137}, pages = {500 -- 508}, year = {2016}, language = {en} } @article{LacroixKressigMuehlbaueretal.2016, author = {Lacroix, Andre and Kressig, Reto W. and M{\"u}hlbauer, Thomas and Gschwind, Yves J. and Pfenninger, Barbara and Bruegger, Othmar and Granacher, Urs}, title = {Effects of a Supervised versus an Uniupervised Combined Balance and Strength Training Program on Balance and Muscle Power in Healthy Older Adults: A Randomized Controlled Trial}, series = {Gerontology}, volume = {62}, journal = {Gerontology}, publisher = {Karger}, address = {Basel}, issn = {0304-324X}, doi = {10.1159/000442087}, pages = {275 -- 288}, year = {2016}, abstract = {Background: Losses in lower extremity muscle strength/power, muscle mass and deficits in static and particularly dynamic balance due to aging are associated with impaired functional performance and an increased fall risk. It has been shown that the combination of balance and strength training (BST) mitigates these age-related deficits. However, it is unresolved whether supervised versus unsupervised BST is equally effective in improving muscle power and balance in older adults. Objective:This study examined the impact of a 12-week BST program followed by 12 weeks of detraining on measures of balance and muscle power in healthy older adults enrolled in supervised (SUP) or unsupervised (UNSUP) training. Methods: Sixty-six older adults (men: 25, women: 41; age 73 4 years) were randomly assigned to a SUP group (2/week supervised training, 1/week unsupervised training; n = 22), an UNSUP group (3/week unsupervised training; n = 22) or a passive control group (CON; n = 22). Static (i.e., Romberg Test) and dynamic (i.e., 10-meter walk test) steady-state, proactive (i.e., Timed Up and Go Test, Functional Reach Test), and reactive balance (e.g., Push and Release Test), as well as lower extremity muscle power (i.e., Chair Stand Test; Stair Ascent and Descent Test) were tested before and after the active training phase as well as after detraining. Results: Adherence rates to training were 92\% for SUP and 97\% for UNSUP. BST resulted in significant group x time interactions. Post hoc analyses showed, among others, significant training-related improvements for the Romberg Test, stride velocity, Timed Up and Go Test, and Chair Stand Test in favor of the SUP group. Following detraining, significantly enhanced performances (compared to baseline) were still present in 13 variables for the SUP group and in 10 variables for the UNSUP group. Conclusion: Twelve weeks of BST proved to be safe (no training-related injuries) and feasible (high attendance rates of >90\%). Deficits of balance and lower extremity muscle power can be mitigated by BST in healthy older adults. Additionally, supervised as compared to unsupervised BST was more effective. Thus, it is recommended to counteract intrinsic fall risk factors by applying supervised BST programs for older adults. (C) 2015 The Author(s) Published by S. Karger AG, Basel}, language = {en} } @misc{LesinskiPrieskeGranacher2016, author = {Lesinski, Melanie and Prieske, Olaf and Granacher, Urs}, title = {Effects and dose-response relationships of resistance training on physical performance in youth athletes: a systematic review and meta-analysis}, series = {British journal of sports medicine : the journal of sport and exercise medicine}, volume = {50}, journal = {British journal of sports medicine : the journal of sport and exercise medicine}, publisher = {BMJ Publishing Group}, address = {London}, issn = {0306-3674}, doi = {10.1136/bjsports-2015-095497}, pages = {781 -- 795}, year = {2016}, abstract = {Objectives To quantify age, sex, sport and training type-specific effects of resistance training on physical performance, and to characterise dose-response relationships of resistance training parameters that could maximise gains in physical performance in youth athletes. Design Systematic review and meta-analysis of intervention studies. Data sources Studies were identified by systematic literature search in the databases PubMed and Web of Science (1985-2015). Weighted mean standardised mean differences (SMDwm) were calculated using random-effects models. Eligibility criteria for selecting studies Only studies with an active control group were included if these investigated the effects of resistance training in youth athletes (6-18 years) and tested at least one physical performance measure. Results 43 studies met the inclusion criteria. Our analyses revealed moderate effects of resistance training on muscle strength and vertical jump performance (SMDwm 0.8-1.09), and small effects on linear sprint, agility and sport-specific performance (SMDwm 0.58-0.75). Effects were moderated by sex and resistance training type. Independently computed dose-response relationships for resistance training parameters revealed that a training period of >23 weeks, 5 sets/exercise, 6-8 repetitions/set, a training intensity of 80-89\% of 1 repetition maximum (RM), and 3-4 min rest between sets were most effective to improve muscle strength (SMDwm 2.09-3.40). Summary/conclusions Resistance training is an effective method to enhance muscle strength and jump performance in youth athletes, moderated by sex and resistance training type. Dose-response relationships for key training parameters indicate that youth coaches should primarily implement resistance training programmes with fewer repetitions and higher intensities to improve physical performance measures of youth athletes.}, language = {en} } @misc{LesinskiHortobagyiMuehlbaueretal.2016, author = {Lesinski, Melanie and Hortobagyi, Tibor and M{\"u}hlbauer, Thomas and Gollhofer, Albert and Granacher, Urs}, title = {Dose-Response Relationships of Balance Training in Healthy Young Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (vol 45, pg 557, 2015)}, series = {Sports medicine}, volume = {46}, journal = {Sports medicine}, publisher = {Springer}, address = {Northcote}, issn = {0112-1642}, doi = {10.1007/s40279-016-0499-8}, pages = {455 -- 455}, year = {2016}, language = {en} } @article{HammamiChaouachiMakhloufetal.2016, author = {Hammami, Raouf and Chaouachi, Anis and Makhlouf, Issam and Granacher, Urs and Behm, David George}, title = {Associations Between Balance and Muscle Strength, Power Performance in Male Youth Athletes of Different Maturity Status}, series = {Pediatric exercise science}, volume = {28}, journal = {Pediatric exercise science}, publisher = {Human Kinetics Publ.}, address = {Champaign}, issn = {0899-8493}, doi = {10.1123/pes.2015-0231}, pages = {521 -- 534}, year = {2016}, abstract = {Balance, strength and power relationships may contain important information at various maturational stages to determine training priorities. Purpose: The objective was to examine maturity-specific relationships of static/dynamic balance with strength and power measures in young male athletes. Method: Soccer players (N = 130) aged 10-16 were assessed with the Stork and Y balance (YBT) tests. Strength/power measures included back extensor muscle strength, standing long jump (SLJ), countermovement jump (CMJ), and 3-hop jump tests. Associations between balance with strength/power variables were calculated according to peak-height-velocity (PHV). Results: There were significant medium-large sized correlations between all balance measures with back extensor strength (r =.486.791) and large associations with power (r =.511.827). These correlation coefficients were significantly different between pre-PHV and circa PHV as well as pre-PHV and post-PHV with larger associations in the more mature groups. Irrespective of maturity-status, SLJ was the best strength/ power predictor with the highest proportion of variance (12-47\%) for balance (i.e., Stork eyes opened) and the YBT was the best balance predictor with the highest proportion of variance (43-78\%) for all strength/ power variables. Conclusion: The associations between balance and muscle strength/power measures in youth athletes that increase with maturity may imply transfer effects from balance to strength/power training and vice versa in youth athletes.}, language = {en} }