@article{KaramzadehKuehnKriegerowskietal.2019, author = {Karamzadeh, Nasim Toularoud and K{\"u}hn, Daniela and Kriegerowski, Marius and L{\´o}pez-Comino, Jos{\´e} {\´A}ngel and Cesca, Simone and Dahm, Torsten}, title = {Small-aperture array as a tool to monitor fluid injection- and extraction-induced microseismicity}, series = {Acta Geophysica}, volume = {67}, journal = {Acta Geophysica}, number = {1}, publisher = {Springer}, address = {Cham}, issn = {1895-6572}, doi = {10.1007/s11600-018-0231-1}, pages = {311 -- 326}, year = {2019}, abstract = {The monitoring of microseismicity during temporary human activities such as fluid injections for hydrofracturing, hydrothermal stimulations or wastewater disposal is a difficult task. The seismic stations often cannot be installed on hard rock, and at quiet places, noise is strongly increased during the operation itself and the installation of sensors in deep wells is costly and often not feasible. The combination of small-aperture seismic arrays with shallow borehole sensors offers a solution. We tested this monitoring approach at two different sites: (1) accompanying a fracking experiment in sedimentary shale at 4km depth and (2) above a gas field under depletion. The small-aperture arrays were planned according to theoretical wavenumber studies combined with simulations considering the local noise conditions. We compared array recordings with recordings available from shallow borehole sensors and give examples of detection and location performance. Although the high-frequency noise on the 50-m-deep borehole sensors was smaller compared to the surface noise before the injection experiment, the signals were highly contaminated during injection by the pumping activities. Therefore, a set of three small-aperture arrays at different azimuths was more suited to detect small events, since noise recorded on these arrays is uncorrelated with each other. Further, we developed recommendations for the adaptation of the monitoring concept to other sites experiencing induced seismicity.}, language = {en} } @misc{DahmBeckerBischoffetal.2013, author = {Dahm, Torsten and Becker, Dirk and Bischoff, Monika and Cesca, Simone and Dost, B. and Fritschen, R. and Hainzl, Sebastian and Klose, C. D. and Kuhn, D. and Lasocki, S. and Meier, Thomas and Ohrnberger, Matthias and Rivalta, Eleonora and Wegler, Ulrich and Husen, Stephan}, title = {Recommendation for the discrimination of human-related and natural seismicity}, series = {Journal of seismology}, volume = {17}, journal = {Journal of seismology}, number = {1}, publisher = {Springer}, address = {Dordrecht}, issn = {1383-4649}, doi = {10.1007/s10950-012-9295-6}, pages = {197 -- 202}, year = {2013}, abstract = {Various techniques are utilized by the seismological community, extractive industries, energy and geoengineering companies to identify earthquake nucleation processes in close proximity to engineering operation points. These operations may comprise fluid extraction or injections, artificial water reservoir impoundments, open pit and deep mining, deep geothermal power generations or carbon sequestration. In this letter to the editor, we outline several lines of investigation that we suggest to follow to address the discrimination problem between natural seismicity and seismic events induced or triggered by geoengineering activities. These suggestions have been developed by a group of experts during several meetings and workshops, and we feel that their publication as a summary report is helpful for the geoscientific community. Specific investigation procedures and discrimination approaches, on which our recommendations are based, are also published in this Special Issue (SI) of Journal of Seismology.}, language = {en} } @article{ZieglerReiterHeidbachetal.2015, author = {Ziegler, Moritz O. and Reiter, Karsten and Heidbach, Oliver and Zang, Arno and Kwiatek, Grzegorz and Stromeyer, Dietrich and Dahm, Torsten and Dresen, Georg and Hofmann, Gerhard}, title = {Mining-Induced Stress Transfer and Its Relation to a 1.9 Seismic Event in an Ultra-deep South African Gold Mine}, series = {Pure and applied geophysics}, volume = {172}, journal = {Pure and applied geophysics}, number = {10}, publisher = {Springer}, address = {Basel}, issn = {0033-4553}, doi = {10.1007/s00024-015-1033-x}, pages = {2557 -- 2570}, year = {2015}, abstract = {On 27 December 2007, a 1.9 seismic event occurred within a dyke in the deep-level Mponeng Gold Mine, South Africa. From the seismological network of the mine and the one from the Japanese-German Underground Acoustic Emission Research in South Africa (JAGUARS) group, the hypocentral depth (3,509 m), focal mechanism and aftershock location were estimated. Since no mining activity took place in the days before the event, dynamic triggering due to blasting can be ruled out as the cause. To investigate the hypothesis that stress transfer, due to excavation of the gold reef, induced the event, we set up a small-scale high-resolution three-dimensional (3D) geomechanical numerical model. The model consisted of the four different rock units present in the mine: quartzite (footwall), hard lava (hanging wall), conglomerate (gold reef) and diorite (dykes). The numerical solution was computed using a finite-element method with a discretised mesh of approximately elements. The initial stress state of the model is in agreement with in situ data from a neighbouring mine, and the step-wise excavation was simulated by mass removal from the gold reef. The resulting 3D stress tensor and its changes due to mining were analysed based on the Coulomb failure stress changes on the fault plane of the event. The results show that the seismic event was induced regardless of how the Coulomb failure stress changes were calculated and of the uncertainties in the fault plane solution. We also used the model to assess the seismic hazard due to the excavation towards the dyke. The resulting curve of stress changes shows a significant increase in the last in front of the dyke, indicating that small changes in the mining progress towards the dyke have a substantial impact on the stress transfer.}, language = {en} } @article{NiemzCescaHeimannetal.2020, author = {Niemz, Peter and Cesca, Simone and Heimann, Sebastian and Grigoli, Francesco and von Specht, Sebastian and Hammer, Conny and Zang, Arno and Dahm, Torsten}, title = {Full-waveform-based characterization of acoustic emission activity in a mine-scale experiment}, series = {Geophysical journal international / the Royal Astronomical Society, the Deutsche Geophysikalische Gesellschaft and the European Geophysical Society}, volume = {222}, journal = {Geophysical journal international / the Royal Astronomical Society, the Deutsche Geophysikalische Gesellschaft and the European Geophysical Society}, number = {1}, publisher = {Oxford Univ. Press}, address = {Oxford}, issn = {0955-419X}, doi = {10.1093/gji/ggaa127}, pages = {189 -- 206}, year = {2020}, abstract = {Understanding fracturing processes and the hydromechanical relation to induced seismicity is a key question for enhanced geothermal systems (EGS). Commonly massive fluid injection, predominately causing hydroshearing, are used in large-scale EGS but also hydraulic fracturing approaches were discussed. To evaluate the applicability of hydraulic fracturing techniques in EGS, six in situ, multistage hydraulic fracturing experiments with three different injection schemes were performed under controlled conditions in crystalline rock at the Aspo Hard Rock Laboratory (Sweden). During the experiments the near-field ground motion was continuously recorded by 11 piezoelectric borehole sensors with a sampling rate of 1 MHz. The sensor network covered a volume of 30x30x30 m around a horizontal, 28-m-long injection borehole at a depth of 410 m. To extract and characterize massive, induced, high-frequency acoustic emission (AE) activity from continuous recordings, a semi-automated workflow was developed relying on full waveform based detection, classification and location procedures. The approach extended the AE catalogue from 196 triggered events in previous studies to more than 19600 located AEs. The enhanced catalogue, for the first time, allows a detailed analysis of induced seismicity during single hydraulic fracturing experiments, including the individual fracturing stages and the comparison between injection schemes. Beside the detailed study of the spatio-temporal patterns, event clusters and the growth of seismic clouds, we estimate relative magnitudes and b-values of AEs for conventional, cyclic progressive and dynamic pulse injection schemes, the latter two being fatigue hydraulic fracturing techniques. While the conventional fracturing leads to AE patterns clustered in planar regions, indicating the generation of a single main fracture plane, the cyclic progressive injection scheme results in a more diffuse, cloud-like AE distribution, indicating the activation of a more complex fracture network. For a given amount of hydraulic energy (pressure multiplied by injected volume) pumped into the system, the cyclic progressive scheme is characterized by a lower rate of seismicity, lower maximum magnitudes and significantly larger b-values, implying an increased number of small events relative to the large ones. To our knowledge, this is the first direct comparison of high resolution seismicity in a mine-scale experiment induced by different hydraulic fracturing schemes.}, language = {en} }