@article{ZingraffHamedHueeskerLuppetal.2020,
  author    = {Zingraff-Hamed, Aude and H{\"u}esker, Frank and Lupp, Gerd and Begg, Chloe and Huang, Josh and Oen, Amy M. P. and Vojinović, Zoran and Kuhlicke, Christian and Pauleit, Stephan},
  title     = {Stakeholder mapping to co-create nature-based solutions},
  series = {Sustainability},
  volume    = {12},
  journal   = {Sustainability},
  number    = {20},
  publisher = {MDPI},
  address   = {Basel},
  issn      = {2071-1050},
  doi       = {10.3390/su12208625},
  pages     = {23},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {Nature-based solutions (NBS) are inspired and supported by nature but designed by humans. Historically, governmental stakeholders have aimed to control nature using a top-down approach; more recently, environmental governance has shifted to collaborative planning. Polycentric governance and co-creation procedures, which include a large spectrum of stakeholders, are assumed to be more effective in the management of public goods than traditional approaches. In this context, NBS projects should benefit from strong collaborative governance models, and the European Union is facilitating and encouraging such models. While some theoretical approaches exist, setting-up the NBS co-creation process (namely co-design and co-implementation) currently relies mostly on self-organized stakeholders rather than on strategic decisions. As such, systematic methods to identify relevant stakeholders seem to be crucial to enable higher planning efficiency, reduce bottlenecks and time needed for planning, designing, and implementing NBS. In this context, this contribution is based on the analysis of 16 NBS and 359 stakeholders. Real-life constellations are compared to theoretical typologies, and a systematic stakeholder mapping method to support co-creation is presented. Rather than making one-fit-all statements about the "right" stakeholders, the contribution provides insights for those "in charge" to strategically consider who might be involved at each stage of the NBS project.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{RolfPauleitWiggering2018,
  author    = {Rolf, Werner and Pauleit, Stephan and Wiggering, Hubert},
  title     = {A stakeholder approach, door opener for farmland and multifunctionality in urban green infrastructure},
  series = {Urban forestry \& urban greening},
  volume    = {40},
  journal   = {Urban forestry \& urban greening},
  publisher = {Urban \& Fischer},
  address   = {Jena},
  issn      = {1618-8667},
  doi       = {10.1016/j.ufug.2018.07.012},
  pages     = {73 -- 83},
  year      = {2018},
  abstract  = {During the last years Urban Green Infrastructure (UGI) has evolved as a research focus across Europe. UGI can be understood as a multifunctional network of different urban green spaces and elements contributing to urban benefits. Urban agriculture has gained increasing research interest in this context. While a strong focus has been made on functions and benefits of small scale activities, the question is still open, whether these findings can be up-scaled and transferred to the farmland scale. Furthermore, multifunctionality of urban and peri-urban agriculture is rarely being considered in the landscape context. This research aims to address these gaps and harnesses the question if agricultural landscapes - which in many European metropolitan regions provide significant spatial potential - can contribute to UGI as multifunctional green spaces. This work considers multifunctionality qualitatively based on stakeholder opinion, using a participatory research approach. This study provides new insights in peri-urban farmland potentials for UGI development, resulting into a strategy framework. Furthermore, it reflects on the role of the stakeholder involvement for `multifunctionality planning´. It suggests that it helps to define meaningful bundles of intertwined functions that interact on different scales, helping to deal with non-linearity of multiple functions and to better manage them simultaneously.},
  language  = {en}
}