@article{AltmannBrandtKloskaetal.2002,
  author    = {Altmann, Thomas and Brandt, Stephan Peter and Kloska, Sebastian and Kehr, Julia},
  title     = {Using array hybridization to monitore gene expression at the single cell level},
  year      = {2002},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{CwiekKupczynskaAltmannArendetal.2016,
  author    = {´Cwiek-Kupczynska, Hanna and Altmann, Thomas and Arend, Daniel and Arnaud, Elizabeth and Chen, Dijun and Cornut, Guillaume and Fiorani, Fabio and Frohmberg, Wojciech and Junker, Astrid and Klukas, Christian and Lange, Matthias and Mazurek, Cezary and Nafissi, Anahita and Neveu, Pascal and van Oeveren, Jan and Pommier, Cyril and Poorter, Hendrik and Rocca-Serra, Philippe and Sansone, Susanna-Assunta and Scholz, Uwe and van Schriek, Marco and Seren, {\"U}mit and Usadel, Bjorn and Weise, Stephan and Kersey, Paul and Krajewski, Pawel},
  title     = {Measures for interoperability of phenotypic data: minimum information requirements and formatting},
  series = {Plant Methods},
  volume    = {12},
  journal   = {Plant Methods},
  publisher = {BioMed Central},
  address   = {London},
  issn      = {1746-4811},
  doi       = {10.1186/s13007-016-0144-4},
  pages     = {18},
  year      = {2016},
  abstract  = {Background: Plant phenotypic data shrouds a wealth of information which, when accurately analysed and linked to other data types, brings to light the knowledge about the mechanisms of life. As phenotyping is a field of research comprising manifold, diverse and time-consuming experiments, the findings can be fostered by reusing and combining existing datasets. Their correct interpretation, and thus replicability, comparability and interoperability, is possible provided that the collected observations are equipped with an adequate set of metadata. So far there have been no common standards governing phenotypic data description, which hampered data exchange and reuse. Results: In this paper we propose the guidelines for proper handling of the information about plant phenotyping experiments, in terms of both the recommended content of the description and its formatting. We provide a document called "Minimum Information About a Plant Phenotyping Experiment", which specifies what information about each experiment should be given, and a Phenotyping Configuration for the ISA-Tab format, which allows to practically organise this information within a dataset. We provide examples of ISA-Tab-formatted phenotypic data, and a general description of a few systems where the recommendations have been implemented. Conclusions: Acceptance of the rules described in this paper by the plant phenotyping community will help to achieve findable, accessible, interoperable and reusable data.},
  language  = {en}
}
@book{KlegerWetzelAltmannetal.2008,
  author    = {Kleger, Heinz and Wetzel, Daniel and Altmann, Stephan and Kerber, Stefan and Mersiovsky, Karen and Leinkauf, Simone},
  title     = {Potsdamer Toleranzedikt : f{\"u}r eine offene und tolerante Stadt der B{\"u}rgerschaft},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-24464},
  publisher      = {Universit{\"a}t Potsdam},
  year      = {2008},
  abstract  = {Potsdam hat ein neues Potsdamer Toleranzedikt. Das 100-seitige Edikt ist das Ergebnis eines knapp achtmonatigen Stadtgespr{\"a}chs, das in Potsdam im Jahr 2008 stattgefunden hat. Oberb{\"u}rgermeister Jann Jakobs stellte das Buch am 10. Oktober 2008 zusammen mit Projektinitiator Prof. Heinz Kleger, Universit{\"a}t Potsdam, der {\"O}ffentlichkeit vor. Es ist anders als das historische "Edikt von Potsdam", kein Erlass von oben, sondern wurde in einem offen angelegten Diskussionsprozess von den Einwohnerinnen und Einwohnern der Stadt Potsdam auf vielf{\"a}ltige Art und Weise gestaltet: auf den stadtweit aufgestellten Diskussionstafeln, in zahlreichen Gespr{\"a}chen auf Veranstaltungen, in Diskussionsrunden, durch eingesendete Postkarten, erarbeiteten Selbstverpflichtungen und eingebrachten Diskussionsbeitr{\"a}gen im Internet. Das neue Potsdamer Toleranzedikt besteht aus drei Teilen. Beginnend mit einer Pr{\"a}ambel, die den Begriff Toleranz f{\"u}r die Potsdamer und das gemeinsame Zusammenleben beschreibt, wird im ersten Teil ein historischer und aktueller Zusammenhang hergestellt. Der zweite Teil enth{\"a}lt die Ergebnisse des Stadtgespr{\"a}chs, die detailliert ausgewertet und erl{\"a}utert wurden. Im dritten Teil wurden die Selbstverpflichtungen unterschiedlichster gesellschaftlicher Akteure aus Potsdam abgebildet. Das Projekt Potsdamer Toleranzedikt ist ein Kooperationsprojekt der Landeshauptstadt Potsdam und des Vereins proWissen Potsdam e.V, unterst{\"u}tzt vom Stifterverband der Deutschen Wissenschaft.},
  language  = {de}
}
@misc{ĆwiekKupczyńskaAltmannArendetal.2016,
  author    = {Ćwiek-Kupczyńska, Hanna and Altmann, Thomas and Arend, Daniel and Arnaud, Elizabeth and Chen, Dijun and Cornut, Guillaume and Fiorani, Fabio and Frohmberg, Wojciech and Junker, Astrid and Klukas, Christian and Lange, Matthias and Mazurek, Cezary and Nafissi, Anahita and Neveu, Pascal and van Oeveren, Jan and Pommier, Cyril and Poorter, Hendrik and Rocca-Serra, Philippe and Sansone, Susanna-Assunta and Scholz, Uwe and van Schriek, Marco and Seren, {\"U}mit and Usadel, Bj{\"o}rn and Weise, Stephan and Kersey, Paul and Krajewski, Paweł},
  title     = {Measures for interoperability of phenotypic data},
  series = {Plant methods},
  journal   = {Plant methods},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-407299},
  pages     = {18},
  year      = {2016},
  abstract  = {Background: Plant phenotypic data shrouds a wealth of information which, when accurately analysed and linked to other data types, brings to light the knowledge about the mechanisms of life. As phenotyping is a field of research comprising manifold, diverse and time ‑consuming experiments, the findings can be fostered by reusing and combin‑ ing existing datasets. Their correct interpretation, and thus replicability, comparability and interoperability, is possible provided that the collected observations are equipped with an adequate set of metadata. So far there have been no common standards governing phenotypic data description, which hampered data exchange and reuse. Results: In this paper we propose the guidelines for proper handling of the information about plant phenotyping experiments, in terms of both the recommended content of the description and its formatting. We provide a docu‑ ment called "Minimum Information About a Plant Phenotyping Experiment", which specifies what information about each experiment should be given, and a Phenotyping Configuration for the ISA ‑Tab format, which allows to practically organise this information within a dataset. We provide examples of ISA ‑Tab ‑formatted phenotypic data, and a general description of a few systems where the recommendations have been implemented. Conclusions: Acceptance of the rules described in this paper by the plant phenotyping community will help to achieve findable, accessible, interoperable and reusable data.},
  language  = {en}
}