@article{HippKohlerLeumann2019,
  author    = {Hipp, Lena and Kohler, Ulrich and Leumann, Sandra},
  title     = {How to implement respondent-driven sampling in practice},
  series = {Survey methods : insights from the field},
  journal   = {Survey methods : insights from the field},
  publisher = {Swiss Found. for Research in Social Sciences},
  address   = {Lausanne},
  issn      = {2296-4754},
  doi       = {10.13094/SMIF-2019-00009},
  pages     = {1 -- 13},
  year      = {2019},
  abstract  = {This article draws on the experience from an ongoing research project employing respondent-driven sampling (RDS) to survey (illicit) 24-hour home care workers. We highlight issues around the preparatory work and the fielding of the survey to provide researchers with useful insights on how to implement RDS when surveying populations for which the method has not yet been used. We conclude the article with ethical considerations that occur when employing RDS.},
  language  = {en}
}
@unpublished{HippLeumannSchober2024,
  author    = {Hipp, Lena and Leumann, Sandra and Schober, Pia S.},
  title     = {Partnership penalties for working in gender-atypical occupations?},
  doi       = {10.31235/osf.io/ydurp},
  pages     = {35},
  year      = {2024},
  abstract  = {Does working in a gender-atypical occupation reduce individuals' likelihood of finding a different-sex romantic partner, and do such occupational partnership penalties contribute to occupational gender segregation? To answer this question, we theorized partnership penalties for working in gender-atypical occupations by drawing on insights from evolutionary psychology, social constructivism, and rational choice theory and exploited the stability of occupational pathways in Germany. In Study 1, we analyzed observational data from a national probability sample (N= 1,634,944) to assess whether individuals in gender-atypical occupations were less likely to be partnered than individuals who worked in gender typical occupations. To assess whether the observed partnership gaps found in Study 1 were causally related to the gender typicality of men's and women's occupations, we conducted a field experiment on a dating app (N = 6,778). Because the findings from Study 2 suggested that young women and men indeed experienced penalties for working in a gender-atypical occupation (at least when they were not highly attractive), we employed a choice-experimental design in Study 3 (N = 1,250) to assess whether women and men were aware of occupational partnership penalties and showed that anticipating occupational partnership penalties may keep young and highly educated women from working in gender-atypical occupations. Our main conclusion therefore is that that observed penalties and their anticipation seem to be driven by unconscious rather than conscious processes.},
  language  = {en}
}