@article{Krause1998,
  author    = {Krause, Romy},
  title     = {AGBG \S 9 - Unwirksamkeit einer formularm{\"a}ßigen Vorleistungsklausel {\"u}ber 20\% Sicherheitsleistung des Kunden in Kaufvertr{\"a}gen und Werklieferungsvertr{\"a}gen [OLG Dresden, 1998-05-14, 21 U 3679/97]},
  year      = {1998},
  language  = {de}
}
@misc{StadieUlrichGluecketal.2020,
  author    = {Stadie, Nicole and Ulrich, Tanja and Gl{\"u}ck, Christian W. and Richter, Kerstin and Klassert, Annegret and Krause, Carina Denise and Wagner, Susanne and Holzgrefe-Lang, Julia and Lorenz, Elisa and Oelze, Vera and Sch{\"u}tz, Vivien and Peinhardt, Ulrich and Laßmann, Inga and Hanne, Sandra and Wollenberg, Maxi and D{\"u}ring, Sarah and Laubscheer, Ann-Katrin and Heide, Judith and Gruhn, Sophie and Segers, Eliane and Keuning, Jos and Verhoeven, Ludo and Obry, Svenja and Bohn, Bianca and Neise, Romy and Pregla, Dorothea and Wiehe, Lea and Weiland, Katharina and Wahl, Michael},
  title     = {Spektrum Patholinguistik Band 13. Schwerpunktthema: Nur ein Wort? Diagnostik und Therapie von Wortabrufst{\"o}rungen bei Kindern und Erwachsenen},
  series = {Spektrum Patholinguistik},
  journal   = {Spektrum Patholinguistik},
  number    = {13},
  editor    = {Fritzsche, Tom and Breitenstein, Sarah and Wunderlich, Hanna and Ferchland, Lisa and Krug, Ragna},
  publisher = {Universit{\"a}tsverlag Potsdam},
  address   = {Potsdam},
  isbn      = {978-3-86956-488-3},
  issn      = {1866-9433},
  doi       = {10.25932/publishup-46077},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-460777},
  pages     = {viii, 209},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {Das 13. Herbsttreffen Patholinguistik mit dem Schwerpunktthema »Nur ein Wort? Diagnostik und Therapie von Wortabrufst{\"o}rungen bei Kindern und Erwachsenen« fand am 16.11.2019 in Potsdam statt. Das Herbsttreffen wird seit 2007 j{\"a}hrlich vom Verband f{\"u}r Patholinguistik e.V. (vpl) in Kooperation mit dem Deutschen Bundesverband f{\"u}r akademische Sprachtherapie und Logop{\"a}die (dbs) und der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam durchgef{\"u}hrt. Der vorliegende Tagungsband beinhaltet die Hauptvortr{\"a}ge zum Schwerpunktthema sowie die Beitr{\"a}ge der Kurzvortr{\"a}ge im »Spektrum Patholinguistik« und der Posterpr{\"a}sentationen zu weiteren Themen aus der sprachtherapeutischen Forschung und Praxis.},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{FroemerDimigenNiefindetal.2015,
  author    = {Fr{\"o}mer, Romy and Dimigen, Olaf and Niefind, Florian and Krause, Niels and Kliegl, Reinhold and Sommer, Werner},
  title     = {Are Individual Differences in Reading Speed Related to Extrafoveal Visual Acuity and Crowding?},
  series = {PLoS one},
  volume    = {10},
  journal   = {PLoS one},
  number    = {3},
  publisher = {PLoS},
  address   = {San Fransisco},
  issn      = {1932-6203},
  doi       = {10.1371/journal.pone.0121986},
  pages     = {18},
  year      = {2015},
  abstract  = {Readers differ considerably in their speed of self-paced reading. One factor known to influence fixation durations in reading is the preprocessing of words in parafoveal vision. Here we investigated whether individual differences in reading speed or the amount of information extracted from upcoming words (the preview benefit) can be explained by basic differences in extrafoveal vision-i.e., the ability to recognize peripheral letters with or without the presence of flanking letters. Forty participants were given an adaptive test to determine their eccentricity thresholds for the identification of letters presented either in isolation (extrafoveal acuity) or flanked by other letters (crowded letter recognition). In a separate eye-tracking experiment, the same participants read lists of words from left to right, while the preview of the upcoming words was manipulated with the gaze-contingent moving window technique. Relationships between dependent measures were analyzed on the observational level and with linear mixed models. We obtained highly reliable estimates both for extrafoveal letter identification (acuity and crowding) and measures of reading speed (overall reading speed, size of preview benefit). Reading speed was higher in participants with larger uncrowded windows. However, the strength of this relationship was moderate and it was only observed if other sources of variance in reading speed (e.g., the occurrence of regressive saccades) were eliminated. Moreover, the size of the preview benefit-an important factor in normal reading-was larger in participants with better extrafoveal acuity. Together, these results indicate a significant albeit moderate contribution of extrafoveal vision to individual differences in reading speed.},
  language  = {en}
}