@misc{ManzoniCapekPoradaetal.2018, author = {Manzoni, Stefano and Capek, Petr and Porada, Philipp and Thurner, Martin and Winterdahl, Mattias and Beer, Christian and Bruchert, Volker and Frouz, Jan and Herrmann, Anke M. and Lindahl, Bjorn D. and Lyon, Steve W. and Šantrůčkov{\´a}, Hana and Vico, Giulia and Way, Danielle}, title = {Reviews and syntheses}, series = {Biogeosciences}, volume = {15}, journal = {Biogeosciences}, number = {19}, publisher = {Copernicus}, address = {G{\"o}ttingen}, issn = {1726-4170}, doi = {10.5194/bg-15-5929-2018}, pages = {5929 -- 5949}, year = {2018}, abstract = {The cycling of carbon (C) between the Earth surface and the atmosphere is controlled by biological and abiotic processes that regulate C storage in biogeochemical compartments and release to the atmosphere. This partitioning is quantified using various forms of C-use efficiency (CUE) - the ratio of C remaining in a system to C entering that system. Biological CUE is the fraction of C taken up allocated to biosynthesis. In soils and sediments, C storage depends also on abiotic processes, so the term C-storage efficiency (CSE) can be used. Here we first review and reconcile CUE and CSE definitions proposed for autotrophic and heterotrophic organisms and communities, food webs, whole ecosystems and watersheds, and soils and sediments using a common mathematical framework. Second, we identify general CUE patterns; for example, the actual CUE increases with improving growth conditions, and apparent CUE decreases with increasing turnover. We then synthesize > 5000CUE estimates showing that CUE decreases with increasing biological and ecological organization - from uni-cellular to multicellular organisms and from individuals to ecosystems. We conclude that CUE is an emergent property of coupled biological-abiotic systems, and it should be regarded as a flexible and scale-dependent index of the capacity of a given system to effectively retain C.}, language = {en} } @misc{PoradaTammRaggioetal.2019, author = {Porada, Philipp and Tamm, Alexandra and Raggio, Jose and Yafang, Cheng and Kleidon, Axel and P{\"o}schl, Ulrich and Weber, Bettina}, title = {Global NO and HONO emissions of biological soil crusts estimated by a process-based non-vascular vegetation model}, series = {Postprints der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Reihe}, journal = {Postprints der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Reihe}, number = {746}, issn = {1866-8372}, doi = {10.25932/publishup-43568}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-435682}, pages = {2003 -- 2031}, year = {2019}, abstract = {The reactive trace gases nitric oxide (NO) and nitrous acid (HONO) are crucial for chemical processes in the atmosphere, including the formation of ozone and OH radicals, oxidation of pollutants, and atmospheric self-cleaning. Recently, empirical studies have shown that biological soil crusts are able to emit large amounts of NO and HONO, and they may therefore play an important role in the global budget of these trace gases. However, the upscaling of local estimates to the global scale is subject to large uncertainties, due to unknown spatial distribution of crust types and their dynamic metabolic activity. Here, we perform an alternative estimate of global NO and HONO emissions by biological soil crusts, using a process-based modelling approach to these organisms, combined with global data sets of climate and land cover. We thereby consider that NO and HONO are emitted in strongly different proportions, depending on the type of crust and their dynamic activity, and we provide a first estimate of the global distribution of four different crust types. Based on this, we estimate global total values of 1.04 Tg yr⁻¹ NO-N and 0.69 Tg yr⁻¹ HONO-N released by biological soil crusts. This corresponds to around 20\% of global emissions of these trace gases from natural ecosystems. Due to the low number of observations on NO and HONO emissions suitable to validate the model, our estimates are still relatively uncertain. However, they are consistent with the amount estimated by the empirical approach, which confirms that biological soil crusts are likely to have a strong impact on global atmospheric chemistry via emissions of NO and HONO.}, language = {en} } @misc{HargisGotschPoradaetal.2019, author = {Hargis, Hailey and Gotsch, Sybil G. and Porada, Philipp and Moore, Georgianne W. and Ferguson, Briana and Van Stan II, John T.}, title = {Arboreal epiphytes in the soil-atmosphere interface}, series = {Postprints der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Reihe}, journal = {Postprints der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Reihe}, number = {928}, issn = {1866-8372}, doi = {10.25932/publishup-44199}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-441993}, pages = {19}, year = {2019}, abstract = {Arboreal epiphytes (plants residing in forest canopies) are present across all major climate zones and play important roles in forest biogeochemistry. The substantial water storage capacity per unit area of the epiphyte "bucket" is a key attribute underlying their capability to influence forest hydrological processes and their related mass and energy flows. It is commonly assumed that the epiphyte bucket remains saturated, or near-saturated, most of the time; thus, epiphytes (particularly vascular epiphytes) can store little precipitation, limiting their impact on the forest canopy water budget. We present evidence that contradicts this common assumption from (i) an examination of past research; (ii) new datasets on vascular epiphyte and epi-soil water relations at a tropical montane cloud forest (Monteverde, Costa Rica); and (iii) a global evaluation of non-vascular epiphyte saturation state using a process-based vegetation model, LiBry. All analyses found that the external and internal water storage capacity of epiphyte communities is highly dynamic and frequently available to intercept precipitation. Globally, non-vascular epiphytes spend <20\% of their time near saturation and regionally, including the humid tropics, model results found that non-vascular epiphytes spend ~1/3 of their time in the dry state (0-10\% of water storage capacity). Even data from Costa Rican cloud forest sites found the epiphyte community was saturated only 1/3 of the time and that internal leaf water storage was temporally dynamic enough to aid in precipitation interception. Analysis of the epi-soils associated with epiphytes further revealed the extent to which the epiphyte bucket emptied—as even the canopy soils were often <50\% saturated (29-53\% of all days observed). Results clearly show that the epiphyte bucket is more dynamic than currently assumed, meriting further research on epiphyte roles in precipitation interception, redistribution to the surface and chemical composition of "net" precipitation waters reaching the surface.}, language = {en} } @article{PoradaVanStanKleidon2018, author = {Porada, Philipp and Van Stan, John T. and Kleidon, Axel}, title = {Significant contribution of non-vascular vegetation to global rainfall interception}, series = {Nature geoscience}, volume = {11}, journal = {Nature geoscience}, number = {8}, publisher = {Nature Publ. Group}, address = {New York}, issn = {1752-0894}, doi = {10.1038/s41561-018-0176-7}, pages = {563 -- +}, year = {2018}, abstract = {Non-vascular vegetation has been shown to capture considerable quantities of rainfall, which may affect the hydrological cycle and climate at continental scales. However, direct measurements of rainfall interception by non-vascular vegetation are confined to the local scale, which makes extrapolation to the global effects difficult. Here we use a process-based numerical simulation model to show that non-vascular vegetation contributes substantially to global rainfall interception. Inferred average global water storage capacity including non-vascular vegetation was 2.7 mm, which is consistent with field observations and markedly exceeds the values used in land surface models, which average around 0.4 mm. Consequently, we find that the total evaporation of free water from the forest canopy and soil surface increases by 61\% when non-vascular vegetation is included, resulting in a global rainfall interception flux that is 22\% of the terrestrial evaporative flux (compared with only 12\% for simulations where interception excludes non-vascular vegetation). We thus conclude that non-vascular vegetation is likely to significantly influence global rainfall interception and evaporation with consequences for regional-to continental-scale hydrologic cycling and climate.}, language = {en} } @misc{HargisGotschPoradaetal.2019, author = {Hargis, Hailey and Gotsch, Sybil G. and Porada, Philipp and Moore, Georgianne W. and Ferguson, Briana and Van Stan, John T.}, title = {Arboreal epiphytes in the soil-atmosphere interface}, series = {Geosciences}, volume = {9}, journal = {Geosciences}, number = {8}, publisher = {MDPI}, address = {Basel}, issn = {2076-3263}, doi = {10.3390/geosciences9080342}, pages = {17}, year = {2019}, abstract = {Arboreal epiphytes (plants residing in forest canopies) are present across all major climate zones and play important roles in forest biogeochemistry. The substantial water storage capacity per unit area of the epiphyte "bucket" is a key attribute underlying their capability to influence forest hydrological processes and their related mass and energy flows. It is commonly assumed that the epiphyte bucket remains saturated, or near-saturated, most of the time; thus, epiphytes (particularly vascular epiphytes) can store little precipitation, limiting their impact on the forest canopy water budget. We present evidence that contradicts this common assumption from (i) an examination of past research; (ii) new datasets on vascular epiphyte and epi-soil water relations at a tropical montane cloud forest (Monteverde, Costa Rica); and (iii) a global evaluation of non-vascular epiphyte saturation state using a process-based vegetation model, LiBry. All analyses found that the external and internal water storage capacity of epiphyte communities is highly dynamic and frequently available to intercept precipitation. Globally, non-vascular epiphytes spend <20\% of their time near saturation and regionally, including the humid tropics, model results found that non-vascular epiphytes spend similar to 1/3 of their time in the dry state (0-10\% of water storage capacity). Even data from Costa Rican cloud forest sites found the epiphyte community was saturated only 1/3 of the time and that internal leaf water storage was temporally dynamic enough to aid in precipitation interception. Analysis of the epi-soils associated with epiphytes further revealed the extent to which the epiphyte bucket emptied-as even the canopy soils were often <50\% saturated (29-53\% of all days observed). Results clearly show that the epiphyte bucket is more dynamic than currently assumed, meriting further research on epiphyte roles in precipitation interception, redistribution to the surface and chemical composition of "net" precipitation waters reaching the surface.}, language = {en} } @article{PoradaTammRaggioetal.2019, author = {Porada, Philipp and Tamm, Alexandra and Raggio, Jose and Yafang, Cheng and Kleidon, Axel and P{\"o}schl, Ulrich and Weber, Bettina}, title = {Global NO and HONO emissions of biological soil crusts estimated by a process-based non-vascular vegetation model}, series = {Biogeosciences}, volume = {16}, journal = {Biogeosciences}, publisher = {Copernicus Publ.}, address = {G{\"o}ttingen}, issn = {1726-4170}, doi = {10.5194/bg-16-2003-2019}, pages = {2003 -- 2031}, year = {2019}, abstract = {The reactive trace gases nitric oxide (NO) and nitrous acid (HONO) are crucial for chemical processes in the atmosphere, including the formation of ozone and OH radicals, oxidation of pollutants, and atmospheric self-cleaning. Recently, empirical studies have shown that biological soil crusts are able to emit large amounts of NO and HONO, and they may therefore play an important role in the global budget of these trace gases. However, the upscaling of local estimates to the global scale is subject to large uncertainties, due to unknown spatial distribution of crust types and their dynamic metabolic activity. Here, we perform an alternative estimate of global NO and HONO emissions by biological soil crusts, using a process-based modelling approach to these organisms, combined with global data sets of climate and land cover. We thereby consider that NO and HONO are emitted in strongly different proportions, depending on the type of crust and their dynamic activity, and we provide a first estimate of the global distribution of four different crust types. Based on this, we estimate global total values of 1.04 Tg yr⁻¹ NO-N and 0.69 Tg yr⁻¹ HONO-N released by biological soil crusts. This corresponds to around 20\% of global emissions of these trace gases from natural ecosystems. Due to the low number of observations on NO and HONO emissions suitable to validate the model, our estimates are still relatively uncertain. However, they are consistent with the amount estimated by the empirical approach, which confirms that biological soil crusts are likely to have a strong impact on global atmospheric chemistry via emissions of NO and HONO.}, language = {en} } @misc{ManzoniČapekPoradaetal.2018, author = {Manzoni, Stefano and Čapek, Petr and Porada, Philipp and Thurner, Martin and Winterdahl, Mattias and Beer, Christian and Br{\"u}chert, Volker and Frouz, Jan and Herrmann, Anke M. and Lindahl, Bj{\"o}rn D. and Lyon, Steve W. and Šantrůčkov{\´a}, Hana and Vico, Giulia and Way, Danielle}, title = {Reviews and syntheses}, series = {Postprints der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Reihe}, journal = {Postprints der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Reihe}, number = {1134}, issn = {1866-8372}, doi = {10.25932/publishup-44638}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-446386}, pages = {23}, year = {2018}, abstract = {The cycling of carbon (C) between the Earth surface and the atmosphere is controlled by biological and abiotic processes that regulate C storage in biogeochemical compartments and release to the atmosphere. This partitioning is quantified using various forms of C-use efficiency (CUE) - the ratio of C remaining in a system to C entering that system. Biological CUE is the fraction of C taken up allocated to biosynthesis. In soils and sediments, C storage depends also on abiotic processes, so the term C-storage efficiency (CSE) can be used. Here we first review and reconcile CUE and CSE definitions proposed for autotrophic and heterotrophic organisms and communities, food webs, whole ecosystems and watersheds, and soils and sediments using a common mathematical framework. Second, we identify general CUE patterns; for example, the actual CUE increases with improving growth conditions, and apparent CUE decreases with increasing turnover. We then synthesize > 5000CUE estimates showing that CUE decreases with increasing biological and ecological organization - from uni-cellular to multicellular organisms and from individuals to ecosystems. We conclude that CUE is an emergent property of coupled biological-abiotic systems, and it should be regarded as a flexible and scale-dependent index of the capacity of a given system to effectively retain C.}, language = {en} }