@book{EbkeZanfiKruegeretal.2017,
  author    = {Ebke, Thomas and Zanfi, Caterina and Kr{\"u}ger, Hans-Peter and Sommer, Christian and Viennet, Thomas and Johannßen, Dennis and Balzaretti, Ugo and Toussaint Ondoua, Herv{\´e} and Agard, Olivier and Henckmann, Wolfhart and Simonotti, Edoardo and Hand, Annika and Tavakkoli, Amirpasha and Hackbarth, Daniel and Edinger, Sebastian and Schollmeyer, Justus and von Kalckreuth, Moritz Alexander and Schmieg, Gregor and Batista Rates, Bruno and Kressmann, Philipp and Hilt, Annette and van Buuren, Jasper and Keusch, Juliane and Guzun, Mădălina and Bruff, Kyla and Stahl, Marion and Held, Lukas},
  title     = {Das Leben im Menschen oder der Mensch im Leben?},
  editor    = {Ebke, Thomas and Zanfi, Caterina},
  publisher = {Universit{\"a}tsverlag Potsdam},
  address   = {Potsdam},
  isbn      = {978-3-86956-382-4},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-95409},
  publisher      = {Universit{\"a}t Potsdam},
  pages     = {514 Seiten},
  year      = {2017},
  abstract  = {In der Philosophie des 20. Jahrhunderts wird deutlich, dass es in Frankreich und in Deutschland voneinander abweichende Sichtweisen auf die Frage gibt, ob der Mensch eine "Sonderstellung" in der Dynamik des biologischen und geschichtlichen Lebens genießt. W{\"a}hrend sich in Deutschland die Tradition eines anthropologischen Denkens neu formiert, ist in Frankreich eine scharfe Skepsis gegen{\"u}ber dem Erbe des Humanismus charakteristisch. Die Beitr{\"a}ge dieses zweisprachigen Buches untersuchen diese deutsch-franz{\"o}sische Konstellation von Fragen und Autoren, und aktualisieren die Reflexion auf die (Grenzen der) Singularit{\"a}t des Menschen.},
  language  = {de}
}
@misc{StuetzWeberDolleetal.2016,
  author    = {Stuetz, Wolfgang and Weber, Daniela and Doll{\´e}, Martijn E. T. and Jansen, Eug{\`e}ne and Grubeck-Loebenstein, Beatrix and Fiegl, Simone and Toussaint, Olivier and Bernhardt, Juergen and Gonos, Efstathios S. and Franceschi, Claudio and Sikora, Ewa and Moreno-Villanueva, Mar{\´i}a and Breusing, Nicolle and Grune, Tilman and B{\"u}rkle, Alexander},
  title     = {Plasma carotenoids, tocopherols, and retinol in the age-stratified (35-74 years) general population},
  series = {Nutrients},
  journal   = {Nutrients},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-407659},
  pages     = {17},
  year      = {2016},
  abstract  = {Blood micronutrient status may change with age. We analyzed plasma carotenoids, α-/γ-tocopherol, and retinol and their associations with age, demographic characteristics, and dietary habits (assessed by a short food frequency questionnaire) in a cross-sectional study of 2118 women and men (age-stratified from 35 to 74 years) of the general population from six European countries. Higher age was associated with lower lycopene and α-/β-carotene and higher β-cryptoxanthin, lutein, zeaxanthin, α-/γ-tocopherol, and retinol levels. Significant correlations with age were observed for lycopene (r = -0.248), α-tocopherol (r = 0.208), α-carotene (r = -0.112), and β-cryptoxanthin (r = 0.125; all p < 0.001). Age was inversely associated with lycopene (-6.5\% per five-year age increase) and this association remained in the multiple regression model with the significant predictors (covariables) being country, season, cholesterol, gender, smoking status, body mass index (BMI (kg/m2)), and dietary habits. The positive association of α-tocopherol with age remained when all covariates including cholesterol and use of vitamin supplements were included (1.7\% vs. 2.4\% per five-year age increase). The association of higher β-cryptoxanthin with higher age was no longer statistically significant after adjustment for fruit consumption, whereas the inverse association of α-carotene with age remained in the fully adjusted multivariable model (-4.8\% vs. -3.8\% per five-year age increase). We conclude from our study that age is an independent predictor of plasma lycopene, α-tocopherol, and α-carotene.},
  language  = {en}
}