@article{Hecher2022,
  author    = {Hecher, Markus},
  title     = {Treewidth-aware reductions of normal ASP to SAT},
  series = {Artificial intelligence},
  volume    = {304},
  journal   = {Artificial intelligence},
  publisher = {Elsevier},
  address   = {Amsterdam},
  issn      = {0004-3702},
  doi       = {10.1016/j.artint.2021.103651},
  pages     = {24},
  year      = {2022},
  abstract  = {Answer Set Programming (ASP) is a paradigm for modeling and solving problems for knowledge representation and reasoning. There are plenty of results dedicated to studying the hardness of (fragments of) ASP. So far, these studies resulted in characterizations in terms of computational complexity as well as in fine-grained insights presented in form of dichotomy-style results, lower bounds when translating to other formalisms like propositional satisfiability (SAT), and even detailed parameterized complexity landscapes. A generic parameter in parameterized complexity originating from graph theory is the socalled treewidth, which in a sense captures structural density of a program. Recently, there was an increase in the number of treewidth-based solvers related to SAT. While there are translations from (normal) ASP to SAT, no reduction that preserves treewidth or at least keeps track of the treewidth increase is known. In this paper we propose a novel reduction from normal ASP to SAT that is aware of the treewidth, and guarantees that a slight increase of treewidth is indeed sufficient. Further, we show a new result establishing that, when considering treewidth, already the fragment of normal ASP is slightly harder than SAT (under reasonable assumptions in computational complexity). This also confirms that our reduction probably cannot be significantly improved and that the slight increase of treewidth is unavoidable. Finally, we present an empirical study of our novel reduction from normal ASP to SAT, where we compare treewidth upper bounds that are obtained via known decomposition heuristics. Overall, our reduction works better with these heuristics than existing translations. (c) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.},
  language  = {en}
}
@misc{FichteHecherMeier2019,
  author    = {Fichte, Johannes Klaus and Hecher, Markus and Meier, Arne},
  title     = {Counting Complexity for Reasoning in Abstract Argumentation},
  series = {The Thirty-Third AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, the Thirty-First Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence Conference, the Ninth AAAI Symposium on Educational Advances in Artificial Intelligence},
  journal   = {The Thirty-Third AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, the Thirty-First Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence Conference, the Ninth AAAI Symposium on Educational Advances in Artificial Intelligence},
  publisher = {AAAI Press},
  address   = {Palo Alto},
  isbn      = {978-1-57735-809-1},
  pages     = {2827 -- 2834},
  year      = {2019},
  abstract  = {In this paper, we consider counting and projected model counting of extensions in abstract argumentation for various semantics. When asking for projected counts we are interested in counting the number of extensions of a given argumentation framework while multiple extensions that are identical when restricted to the projected arguments count as only one projected extension. We establish classical complexity results and parameterized complexity results when the problems are parameterized by treewidth of the undirected argumentation graph. To obtain upper bounds for counting projected extensions, we introduce novel algorithms that exploit small treewidth of the undirected argumentation graph of the input instance by dynamic programming (DP). Our algorithms run in time double or triple exponential in the treewidth depending on the considered semantics. Finally, we take the exponential time hypothesis (ETH) into account and establish lower bounds of bounded treewidth algorithms for counting extensions and projected extension.},
  language  = {en}
}
@phdthesis{Hecher2021,
  author    = {Hecher, Markus},
  title     = {Advanced tools and methods for treewidth-based problem solving},
  doi       = {10.25932/publishup-51251},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-512519},
  school      = {Universit{\"a}t Potsdam},
  pages     = {xv, 184},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {In the last decades, there was a notable progress in solving the well-known Boolean satisfiability (Sat) problem, which can be witnessed by powerful Sat solvers. One of the reasons why these solvers are so fast are structural properties of instances that are utilized by the solver's interna. This thesis deals with the well-studied structural property treewidth, which measures the closeness of an instance to being a tree. In fact, there are many problems parameterized by treewidth that are solvable in polynomial time in the instance size when parameterized by treewidth. In this work, we study advanced treewidth-based methods and tools for problems in knowledge representation and reasoning (KR). Thereby, we provide means to establish precise runtime results (upper bounds) for canonical problems relevant to KR. Then, we present a new type of problem reduction, which we call decomposition-guided (DG) that allows us to precisely monitor the treewidth when reducing from one problem to another problem. This new reduction type will be the basis for a long-open lower bound result for quantified Boolean formulas and allows us to design a new methodology for establishing runtime lower bounds for problems parameterized by treewidth. Finally, despite these lower bounds, we provide an efficient implementation of algorithms that adhere to treewidth. Our approach finds suitable abstractions of instances, which are subsequently refined in a recursive fashion, and it uses Sat solvers for solving subproblems. It turns out that our resulting solver is quite competitive for two canonical counting problems related to Sat.},
  language  = {en}
}