@misc{GeissmanJolivetNiemietal.2018,
  author    = {Geissman, John and Jolivet, Laurent and Niemi, Nathan and Schildgen, Taylor F.},
  title     = {Thank you to our 2017 Peer Reviewers},
  series = {Tectonics},
  volume    = {37},
  journal   = {Tectonics},
  number    = {8},
  publisher = {American Geophysical Union},
  address   = {Washington},
  issn      = {0278-7407},
  doi       = {10.1029/2018TC005194},
  pages     = {2272 -- 2277},
  year      = {2018},
  abstract  = {An essential, respected, and critical aspect of the modern practice of science and scientific publishing is peer review. The process of peer review facilitates best practices in scientific conduct and communication, ensuring that manuscripts published as accurate, valuable, and clearly communicated. The over 152 papers published in Tectonics in 2017 benefit from the time, effort, and expertise of our reviewers who have provided thoughtfully considered advice on each manuscript. This role is critical to advancing our understanding of the evolution of the continents and their margins, as these reviews lead to even clearer and higher-quality papers. In 2017, the over 423 papers submitted to Tectonics were the beneficiaries of more than 786 reviews provided by 562 members of the tectonics community and related disciplines. To everyone who has volunteered their time and intellect to peer reviewing, thank you for helping Tectonics and all other AGU Publications provide the best science possible.},
  language  = {en}
}
@misc{GeissmanJolivetRusmoreetal.2019,
  author    = {Geissman, John and Jolivet, Laurent and Rusmore, Margi and Niemi, Nathan and Schildgen, Taylor F.},
  title     = {Thank you to our 2018 peer reviewers},
  series = {Tectonics},
  volume    = {38},
  journal   = {Tectonics},
  number    = {4},
  publisher = {Hoboken},
  address   = {Wiley},
  issn      = {0278-7407},
  doi       = {10.1029/2019TC005595},
  pages     = {1159 -- 1163},
  year      = {2019},
  abstract  = {An essential, respected, and critical aspect of the modern practice of science and scientific publishing is peer review. The process of peer review facilitates best practices in scientific conduct and communication, ensuring that manuscripts published are as accurate, valuable, and clearly communicated. The over 216 papers published in Tectonics in 2018 benefit from the time, effort, and expertise of our reviewers who have provided thoughtfully considered advice on each manuscript. This role is critical to advancing our understanding of the evolution of the continents and their margins, as these reviews lead to even clearer and higher-quality papers. In 2018, the over 443 papers submitted to Tectonics were the beneficiaries of more than 1,010 reviews provided by 668 members of the tectonics community and related disciplines. To everyone who has volunteered their time and intellect to peer reviewing, thank you for helping Tectonics and all other AGU Publications provide the best science possible.},
  language  = {en}
}
@misc{JolivetFaccennaHuetetal.2013,
  author    = {Jolivet, Laurent and Faccenna, Claudio and Huet, Benjamin and Labrousse, Loic and Le Pourhiet, Laetitia and Lacombe, Olivier and Lecomte, Emmanuel and Burov, Evguenii and Denele, Yoann and Brun, Jean-Pierre and Philippon, Melody and Paul, Anne and Salaue, Gwenaelle and Karabulut, Hayrullah and Piromallo, Claudia and Monie, Patrick and Gueydan, Frederic and Okay, Aral I. and Oberh{\"a}nsli, Roland and Pourteau, Amaury and Augier, Romain and Gadenne, Leslie and Driussi, Olivier},
  title     = {Aegean tectonics strain localisation, slab tearing and trench retreat},
  series = {Tectonophysics : international journal of geotectonics and the geology and physics of the interior of the earth},
  volume    = {597},
  journal   = {Tectonophysics : international journal of geotectonics and the geology and physics of the interior of the earth},
  publisher = {Elsevier},
  address   = {Amsterdam},
  issn      = {0040-1951},
  doi       = {10.1016/j.tecto.2012.06.011},
  pages     = {1 -- 33},
  year      = {2013},
  abstract  = {We review the geodynamic evolution of the Aegean-Anatolia region and discuss strain localisation there over geological times. From Late Eocene to Present, crustal deformation in the Aegean backarc has localised progressively during slab retreat. Extension started with the formation of the Rhodope Metamorphic Core Complex (Eocene) and migrated to the Cyclades and the northern Menderes Massif (Oligocene and Miocene), accommodated by crustal-scale detachments and a first series of core complexes (MCCs). Extension then localised in Western Turkey, the Corinth Rift and the external Hellenic arc after Messinian times, while the North Anatolian Fault penetrated the Aegean Sea. Through time the direction and style of extension have not changed significantly except in terms of localisation. The contributions of progressive slab retreat and tearing, basal drag, extrusion tectonics and tectonic inheritance are discussed and we favour a model (I) where slab retreat is the main driving engine, (2) successive slab tearing episodes are the main causes of this stepwise strain localisation and (3) the inherited heterogeneity of the crust is a major factor for localising detachments. The continental crust has an inherited strong heterogeneity and crustal-scale contacts such as major thrust planes act as weak zones or as zones of contrast of resistance and viscosity that can localise later deformation. The dynamics of slabs at depth and the asthenospheric flow due to slab retreat also have influence strain localisation in the upper plate. Successive slab ruptures from the Middle Miocene to the late Miocene have isolated a narrow strip of lithosphere, still attached to the African lithosphere below Crete. The formation of the North Anatolian Fault is partly a consequence of this evolution. The extrusion of Anatolia and the Aegean extension are partly driven from below (asthenospheric flow) and from above (extrusion of a lid of rigid crust).},
  language  = {en}
}