@article{CorcoranNicholsPabloetal.2015,
  author    = {Corcoran, Michael F. and Nichols, Joy S. and Pablo, Herbert and Shenar, Tomer and Pollock, Andy M. T. and Waldron, Wayne L. and Moffat, Anthony F. J. and Richardson, Noel D. and Russell, Christopher M. P. and Hamaguchi, Kenji and Huenemoerder, David P. and Oskinova, Lida and Hamann, Wolf-Rainer and Naze, Yael and Ignace, Richard and Evans, Nancy Remage and Lomax, Jamie R. and Hoffman, Jennifer L. and Gayley, Kenneth and Owocki, Stanley P. and Leutenegger, Maurice and Gull, Theodore R. and Hole, Karen Tabetha and Lauer, Jennifer and Iping, Rosina C.},
  title     = {A coordinated X-Ray and optical campaign of the nearest massive eclipsing binary, delta ORIONIS Aa. I. Overview of thr X-Ray spectrum},
  series = {The astrophysical journal : an international review of spectroscopy and astronomical physics},
  volume    = {809},
  journal   = {The astrophysical journal : an international review of spectroscopy and astronomical physics},
  number    = {2},
  publisher = {IOP Publ. Ltd.},
  address   = {Bristol},
  issn      = {0004-637X},
  doi       = {10.1088/0004-637X/809/2/132},
  pages     = {15},
  year      = {2015},
  abstract  = {We present an overview of four deep phase-constrained Chandra HETGS X-ray observations of delta Ori A. Delta Ori A is actually a triple system that includes the nearest massive eclipsing spectroscopic binary, delta Ori Aa, the only such object that can be observed with little phase-smearing with the Chandra gratings. Since the fainter star, delta Ori Aa2, has a much lower X-ray luminosity than the brighter primary (delta Ori Aa1), delta Ori Aa provides a unique system with which to test the spatial distribution of the X-ray emitting gas around delta Ori Aa1 via occultation by the photosphere of, and wind cavity around, the X-ray dark secondary. Here we discuss the X-ray spectrum and X-ray line profiles for the combined observation, having an exposure time of nearly 500 ks and covering nearly the entire binary orbit. The companion papers discuss the X-ray variability seen in the Chandra spectra, present new space-based photometry and ground-based radial velocities obtained simultaneously with the X-ray data to better constrain the system parameters, and model the effects of X-rays on the optical and UV spectra. We find that the X-ray emission is dominated by embedded wind shock emission from star Aa1, with little contribution from the tertiary star Ab or the shocked gas produced by the collision of the wind of Aa1 against the surface of Aa2. We find a similar temperature distribution to previous X-ray spectrum analyses. We also show that the line half-widths are about 0.3-0.5 times the terminal velocity of the wind of star Aa1. We find a strong anti-correlation between line widths and the line excitation energy, which suggests that longer-wavelength, lower-temperature lines form farther out in the wind. Our analysis also indicates that the ratio of the intensities of the strong and weak lines of Fe XVII and Ne X are inconsistent with model predictions, which may be an effect of resonance scattering.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{IgnaceGayleyHamannetal.2013,
  author    = {Ignace, Rico and Gayley, Kenneth G. and Hamann, Wolf-Rainer and Huenemoerder, David P. and Oskinova, Lida and Pollock, Andy M. T. and McFall, Michael},
  title     = {THE XMM-NEWTON/EPIC X-RAY LIGHT CURVE ANALYSIS OF WR 6},
  series = {The astrophysical journal : an international review of spectroscopy and astronomical physics},
  volume    = {775},
  journal   = {The astrophysical journal : an international review of spectroscopy and astronomical physics},
  number    = {1},
  publisher = {IOP Publ. Ltd.},
  address   = {Bristol},
  issn      = {0004-637X},
  doi       = {10.1088/0004-637X/775/1/29},
  pages     = {12},
  year      = {2013},
  abstract  = {We obtained four pointings of over 100 ks each of the well-studied Wolf-Rayet star WR 6 with the XMM-Newton satellite. With a first paper emphasizing the results of spectral analysis, this follow-up highlights the X-ray variability clearly detected in all four pointings. However, phased light curves fail to confirm obvious cyclic behavior on the well-established 3.766 day period widely found at longer wavelengths. The data are of such quality that we were able to conduct a search for event clustering in the arrival times of X-ray photons. However, we fail to detect any such clustering. One possibility is that X-rays are generated in a stationary shock structure. In this context we favor a corotating interaction region (CIR) and present a phenomenological model for X-rays from a CIR structure. We show that a CIR has the potential to account simultaneously for the X-ray variability and constraints provided by the spectral analysis. Ultimately, the viability of the CIR model will require both intermittent long-term X-ray monitoring of WR 6 and better physical models of CIR X-ray production at large radii in stellar winds.},
  language  = {en}
}