@article{HesseKlierSgarzietal.2018, author = {Hesse, Julia and Klier, Dennis Tobias and Sgarzi, Massimo and Nsubuga, Anne and Bauer, Christoph and Grenzer, Joerg and H{\"u}bner, Rene and Wislicenus, Marcus and Joshi, Tanmaya and Kumke, Michael Uwe and Stephan, Holger}, title = {Rapid Synthesis of Sub-10nm Hexagonal NaYF4-Based Upconverting Nanoparticles using Therminol((R))66}, series = {ChemistryOpen : including thesis treasury}, volume = {7}, journal = {ChemistryOpen : including thesis treasury}, number = {2}, publisher = {Wiley-VCH}, address = {Weinheim}, issn = {2191-1363}, doi = {10.1002/open.201700186}, pages = {159 -- 168}, year = {2018}, abstract = {We report a simple one-pot method for the rapid preparation of sub-10nm pure hexagonal (-phase) NaYF4-based upconverting nanoparticles (UCNPs). Using Therminol((R))66 as a co-solvent, monodisperse UCNPs could be obtained in unusually short reaction times. By varying the reaction time and reaction temperature, it was possible to control precisely the particle size and crystalline phase of the UCNPs. The upconversion (UC) luminescence properties of the nanocrystals were tuned by varying the concentrations of the dopants (Nd3+ and Yb3+ sensitizer ions and Er3+ activator ions). The size and phase-purity of the as-synthesized core and core-shell nanocrystals were assessed by using complementary transmission electron microscopy, dynamic light scattering, X-ray diffraction, and small-angle X-ray scattering studies. In-depth photophysical evaluation of the UCNPs was pursued by using steady-state and time-resolved luminescence spectroscopy. An enhancement in the UC intensity was observed if the nanocrystals, doped with optimized concentrations of lanthanide sensitizer/activator ions, were further coated with an inert/active shell. This was attributed to the suppression of surface-related luminescence quenching effects.}, language = {en} } @misc{HesseKlierSgarzietal.2018, author = {Hesse, Julia and Klier, Dennis Tobias and Sgarzi, Massimo and Nsubuga, Anne and Bauer, Christoph and Grenzer, J{\"o}rg and H{\"u}bner, Ren{\´e} and Wislicenus, Marcus and Joshi, Tanmaya and Kumke, Michael Uwe and Stephan, Holger}, title = {Rapid synthesis of sub-10 nm hexagonal NaYF4-based upconverting nanoparticles using Therminol® 66}, series = {Postprints der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Reihe}, journal = {Postprints der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Reihe}, number = {613}, issn = {1866-8372}, doi = {10.25932/publishup-42351}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-423515}, pages = {10}, year = {2018}, abstract = {We report a simple one-pot method for the rapid preparation of sub-10nm pure hexagonal (-phase) NaYF4-based upconverting nanoparticles (UCNPs). Using Therminol((R))66 as a co-solvent, monodisperse UCNPs could be obtained in unusually short reaction times. By varying the reaction time and reaction temperature, it was possible to control precisely the particle size and crystalline phase of the UCNPs. The upconversion (UC) luminescence properties of the nanocrystals were tuned by varying the concentrations of the dopants (Nd3+ and Yb3+ sensitizer ions and Er3+ activator ions). The size and phase-purity of the as-synthesized core and core-shell nanocrystals were assessed by using complementary transmission electron microscopy, dynamic light scattering, X-ray diffraction, and small-angle X-ray scattering studies. In-depth photophysical evaluation of the UCNPs was pursued by using steady-state and time-resolved luminescence spectroscopy. An enhancement in the UC intensity was observed if the nanocrystals, doped with optimized concentrations of lanthanide sensitizer/activator ions, were further coated with an inert/active shell. This was attributed to the suppression of surface-related luminescence quenching effects.}, language = {en} } @article{HesseKrysanovaVetteretal.2013, author = {Hesse, Cornelia and Krysanova, Valentina and Vetter, Tobias and Reinhardt, Julia}, title = {Comparison of several approaches representing terrestrial and in-stream nutrient retention and decomposition in watershed modelling}, series = {Ecological modelling : international journal on ecological modelling and engineering and systems ecolog}, volume = {269}, journal = {Ecological modelling : international journal on ecological modelling and engineering and systems ecolog}, number = {34}, publisher = {Elsevier}, address = {Amsterdam}, issn = {0304-3800}, doi = {10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2013.08.017}, pages = {70 -- 85}, year = {2013}, abstract = {Retention and transformation of nutrients within a river catchment are important mechanisms influencing water quality measured at the watershed outlet. Nutrient storage and reduction can occur in soils as well as in the river and should be considered in water quality modelling. Consideration is possible using various methods at several points during modelling cascade. The study compares the effects of five different equation sets implemented into the Soil and Water Integrated Model (SWIM), one describing terrestrial and four in-stream retention with a rising complexity (including algal growth and death at the highest complexity level). The influences of the different methods alone and in combinations on water quality model outputs (NO3-N, NH4-N, PO4-P) were analyzed for the outlet of the large-scale Saale basin in Germany. Experiments revealed that nutrient forms coming primarily from diffuse sources are mostly influenced by retention processes in the soils of the catchment, and river processes are less important. Nutrients introduced to the river mainly by point sources are more subject to retention by in-stream processes, but both nutrient retention and transformation processes in soils and rivers have to be included. Although the best overall results could be achieved at the highest complexity level, the calibration efforts for this case are extremely high, and only minor improvements of overall model performance with the highest complexity were detected. Therefore, it could be reasoned that for some research questions also less complex model approaches would be sufficient, which could help to reduce unnecessary complexity and diminish high uncertainty in water quality modelling at the catchment scale. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.}, language = {en} }