@misc{ArnisonBibbBierbaumetal.2013, author = {Arnison, Paul G. and Bibb, Mervyn J. and Bierbaum, Gabriele and Bowers, Albert A. and Bugni, Tim S. and Bulaj, Grzegorz and Camarero, Julio A. and Campopiano, Dominic J. and Challis, Gregory L. and Clardy, Jon and Cotter, Paul D. and Craik, David J. and Dawson, Michael and Dittmann-Th{\"u}nemann, Elke and Donadio, Stefano and Dorrestein, Pieter C. and Entian, Karl-Dieter and Fischbach, Michael A. and Garavelli, John S. and Goeransson, Ulf and Gruber, Christian W. and Haft, Daniel H. and Hemscheidt, Thomas K. and Hertweck, Christian and Hill, Colin and Horswill, Alexander R. and Jaspars, Marcel and Kelly, Wendy L. and Klinman, Judith P. and Kuipers, Oscar P. and Link, A. James and Liu, Wen and Marahiel, Mohamed A. and Mitchell, Douglas A. and Moll, Gert N. and Moore, Bradley S. and Mueller, Rolf and Nair, Satish K. and Nes, Ingolf F. and Norris, Gillian E. and Olivera, Baldomero M. and Onaka, Hiroyasu and Patchett, Mark L. and Piel, J{\"o}rn and Reaney, Martin J. T. and Rebuffat, Sylvie and Ross, R. Paul and Sahl, Hans-Georg and Schmidt, Eric W. and Selsted, Michael E. and Severinov, Konstantin and Shen, Ben and Sivonen, Kaarina and Smith, Leif and Stein, Torsten and Suessmuth, Roderich D. and Tagg, John R. and Tang, Gong-Li and Truman, Andrew W. and Vederas, John C. and Walsh, Christopher T. and Walton, Jonathan D. and Wenzel, Silke C. and Willey, Joanne M. and van der Donk, Wilfred A.}, title = {Ribosomally synthesized and post-translationally modified peptide natural products overview and recommendations for a universal nomenclature}, series = {Natural product reports : a journal of current developments in bio-organic chemistry}, volume = {30}, journal = {Natural product reports : a journal of current developments in bio-organic chemistry}, number = {1}, publisher = {Royal Society of Chemistry}, address = {Cambridge}, issn = {0265-0568}, doi = {10.1039/c2np20085f}, pages = {108 -- 160}, year = {2013}, abstract = {This review presents recommended nomenclature for the biosynthesis of ribosomally synthesized and post-translationally modified peptides (RiPPs), a rapidly growing class of natural products. The current knowledge regarding the biosynthesis of the >20 distinct compound classes is also reviewed, and commonalities are discussed.}, language = {en} } @article{StroevenHaettestrandKlemanetal.2016, author = {Stroeven, Arjen P. and H{\"a}ttestrand, Clas and Kleman, Johan and Heyman, Jakob and Fabel, Derek and Fredin, Ola and Goodfellow, Bradley W. and Harbor, Jonathan M. and Jansen, John D. and Olsen, Lars and Caffee, Marc W. and Fink, David and Lundqvist, Jan and Rosqvist, Gunhild C. and Stromberg, Bo and Jansson, Krister N.}, title = {Deglaciation of Fennoscandia}, series = {Quaternary science reviews : the international multidisciplinary research and review journal}, volume = {147}, journal = {Quaternary science reviews : the international multidisciplinary research and review journal}, publisher = {Elsevier}, address = {Oxford}, issn = {0277-3791}, doi = {10.1016/j.quascirev.2015.09.016}, pages = {91 -- 121}, year = {2016}, abstract = {To provide a new reconstruction of the deglaciation of the Fennoscandian Ice Sheet, in the form of calendar-year time-slices, which are particularly useful for ice sheet modelling, we have compiled and synthesized published geomorphological data for eskers, ice-marginal formations, lineations, marginal meltwater channels, striae, ice-dammed lakes, and geochronological data from radiocarbon, varve, optically-stimulated luminescence, and cosmogenic nuclide dating. This is summarized as a deglaciation map of the Fennoscandian Ice Sheet with isochrons marking every 1000 years between 22 and 13 cal kyr BP and every hundred years between 11.6 and final ice decay after 9.7 cal kyr BP. Deglaciation patterns vary across the Fennoscandian Ice Sheet domain, reflecting differences in climatic and geomorphic settings as well as ice sheet basal thermal conditions and terrestrial versus marine margins. For example, the ice sheet margin in the high-precipitation coastal setting of the western sector responded sensitively to climatic variations leaving a detailed record of prominent moraines and other ice-marginal deposits in many fjords and coastal valleys. Retreat rates across the southern sector differed between slow retreat of the terrestrial margin in western and southern Sweden and rapid retreat of the calving ice margin in the Baltic Basin. Our reconstruction is consistent with much of the published research. However, the synthesis of a large amount of existing and new data support refined reconstructions in some areas. For example, the LGM extent of the ice sheet in northwestern Russia was located far east and it occurred at a later time than the rest of the ice sheet, at around 17-15 cal kyr BP. We also propose a slightly different chronology of moraine formation over southern Sweden based on improved correlations of moraine segments using new LiDAR data and tying the timing of moraine formation to Greenland ice core cold stages. Retreat rates vary by as much as an order of magnitude in different sectors of the ice sheet, with the lowest rates on the high-elevation and maritime Norwegian margin. Retreat rates compared to the climatic information provided by the Greenland ice core record show a general correspondence between retreat rate and climatic forcing, although a close match between retreat rate and climate is unlikely because of other controls, such as topography and marine versus terrestrial margins. Overall, the time slice reconstructions of Fennoscandian Ice Sheet deglaciation from 22 to 9.7 cal kyr BP provide an important dataset for understanding the contexts that underpin spatial and temporal patterns in retreat of the Fennoscandian Ice Sheet, and are an important resource for testing and refining ice sheet models. (C) 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.}, language = {en} } @article{MarkovicCarrizoKaercheretal.2017, author = {Markovic, Danijela and Carrizo, Savrina F. and Kaercher, Oskar and Walz, Ariane and David, Jonathan N. W.}, title = {Vulnerability of European freshwater catchments to climate change}, series = {Global change biology}, volume = {23}, journal = {Global change biology}, publisher = {Wiley}, address = {Hoboken}, issn = {1354-1013}, doi = {10.1111/gcb.13657}, pages = {3567 -- 3580}, year = {2017}, abstract = {Climate change is expected to exacerbate the current threats to freshwater ecosystems, yet multifaceted studies on the potential impacts of climate change on freshwater biodiversity at scales that inform management planning are lacking. The aim of this study was to fill this void through the development of a novel framework for assessing climate change vulnerability tailored to freshwater ecosystems. The three dimensions of climate change vulnerability are as follows: (i) exposure to climate change, (ii) sensitivity to altered environmental conditions and (iii) resilience potential. Our vulnerability framework includes 1685 freshwater species of plants, fishes, molluscs, odonates, amphibians, crayfish and turtles alongside key features within and between catchments, such as topography and connectivity. Several methodologies were used to combine these dimensions across a variety of future climate change models and scenarios. The resulting indices were overlaid to assess the vulnerability of European freshwater ecosystems at the catchment scale (18 783 catchments). The Balkan Lakes Ohrid and Prespa and Mediterranean islands emerge as most vulnerable to climate change. For the 2030s, we showed a consensus among the applied methods whereby up to 573 lake and river catchments are highly vulnerable to climate change. The anthropogenic disruption of hydrological habitat connectivity by dams is the major factor reducing climate change resilience. A gap analysis demonstrated that the current European protected area network covers <25\% of the most vulnerable catchments. Practical steps need to be taken to ensure the persistence of freshwater biodiversity under climate change. Priority should be placed on enhancing stakeholder cooperation at the major basin scale towards preventing further degradation of freshwater ecosystems and maintaining connectivity among catchments. The catchments identified as most vulnerable to climate change provide preliminary targets for development of climate change conservation management and mitigation strategies.}, language = {en} }