@article{BormanndeBritoCharchousietal.2018,
  author    = {Bormann, Helge and de Brito, Mariana Madruga and Charchousi, Despoina and Chatzistratis, Dimitris and David, Amrei and Grosser, Paula Farina and Kebschull, Jenny and Konis, Alexandros and Koutalakis, Paschalis and Korali, Alkistis and Krauzig, Naomi and Meier, Jessica and Meliadou, Varvara and Meinhardt, Markus and Munnelly, Kieran and Stephan, Christiane and de Vos, Leon Frederik and Dietrich, J{\"o}rg and Tzoraki, Ourania},
  title     = {Impact of Hydrological Modellers' Decisions and Attitude on the Performance of a Calibrated Conceptual Catchment Model},
  series = {Hydrology},
  volume    = {5},
  journal   = {Hydrology},
  number    = {4},
  publisher = {MDPI},
  address   = {Basel},
  issn      = {2306-5338},
  doi       = {10.3390/hydrology5040064},
  pages     = {13},
  year      = {2018},
  abstract  = {In this study, 17 hydrologists with different experience in hydrological modelling applied the same conceptual catchment model (HBV) to a Greek catchment, using identical data and model code. Calibration was performed manually. Subsequently, the modellers were asked for their experience, their calibration strategy, and whether they enjoyed the exercise. The exercise revealed that there is considerable modellers' uncertainty even among the experienced modellers. It seemed to be equally important whether the modellers followed a good calibration strategy, and whether they enjoyed modelling. The exercise confirmed previous studies about the benefit of model ensembles: Different combinations of the simulation results (median, mean) outperformed the individual model simulations, while filtering the simulations even improved the quality of the model ensembles. Modellers' experience, decisions, and attitude, therefore, have an impact on the hydrological model application and should be considered as part of hydrological modelling uncertainty.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{FechnerHackethalHoepfneretal.2022,
  author    = {Fechner, Carolin and Hackethal, Christin and H{\"o}pfner, Tobias and Dietrich, Jessica and Bloch, Dorit and Lindtner, Oliver and Sarvan, Irmela},
  title     = {Results of the BfR MEAL Study},
  series = {Food chemistry: X},
  volume    = {14},
  journal   = {Food chemistry: X},
  publisher = {Elsevier},
  address   = {Amsterdam},
  issn      = {2590-1575},
  doi       = {10.1016/j.fochx.2022.100326},
  pages     = {10},
  year      = {2022},
  abstract  = {The BfR MEAL Study provides representative levels of substances in foods consumed in Germany. Mercury, cadmium, lead, and nickel are contaminants present in foods introduced by environmental and industrial processes. Levels of these elements were investigated in 356 foods. Foods were purchased representatively, prepared as consumed and pooled with similar foods before analysis. Highest mean levels of mercury were determined in fish and seafood, while high levels of cadmium, lead, and nickel were present in cocoa products and legumes, nuts, oilseeds, and spices. The sampling by region, season, and production type showed minor differences in element levels for specific foods, however no tendency over all foods or for some food groups was apparent. The data on mercury, cadmium, lead, and nickel provide a comprehensive basis for chronic dietary exposure assessment of the population in Germany. All levels found were below regulated maximum levels.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{SoergelKrieglerWeindletal.2021,
  author    = {Soergel, Bjoern and Kriegler, Elmar and Weindl, Isabelle and Rauner, Sebastian and Dirnaichner, Alois and Ruhe, Constantin and Hofmann, Matthias and Bauer, Nico and Bertram, Christoph and Bodirsky, Benjamin Leon and Leimbach, Marian and Leininger, Julia and Levesque, Antoine and Luderer, Gunnar and Pehl, Michaja and Wingens, Christopher and Baumstark, Lavinia and Beier, Felicitas and Dietrich, Jan Philipp and Humpen{\"o}der, Florian and von Jeetze, Patrick and Klein, David and Koch, Johannes and Pietzcker, Robert C. and Strefler, Jessica and Lotze-Campen, Hermann and Popp, Alexander},
  title     = {A sustainable development pathway for climate action within the UN 2030 Agenda},
  series = {Nature climate change},
  volume    = {11},
  journal   = {Nature climate change},
  number    = {8},
  publisher = {Nature Publishing Group},
  address   = {London},
  issn      = {1758-678X},
  doi       = {10.1038/s41558-021-01098-3},
  pages     = {656 -- 664},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {Ambitious climate policies, as well as economic development, education, technological progress and less resource-intensive lifestyles, are crucial elements for progress towards the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). However, using an integrated modelling framework covering 56 indicators or proxies across all 17 SDGs, we show that they are insufficient to reach the targets. An additional sustainable development package, including international climate finance, progressive redistribution of carbon pricing revenues, sufficient and healthy nutrition and improved access to modern energy, enables a more comprehensive sustainable development pathway. We quantify climate and SDG outcomes, showing that these interventions substantially boost progress towards many aspects of the UN Agenda 2030 and simultaneously facilitate reaching ambitious climate targets. Nonetheless, several important gaps remain; for example, with respect to the eradication of extreme poverty (180 million people remaining in 2030). These gaps can be closed by 2050 for many SDGs while also respecting the 1.5 °C target and several other planetary boundaries.},
  language  = {en}
}