@misc{KuehneMaasWiesenthaletal.2017,
  author    = {K{\"u}hne, Franziska and Maas, Jana and Wiesenthal, Sophia and Weck, Florian},
  title     = {Supervision in der Verhaltenstherapie},
  series = {Postprints der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Humanwissenschaftliche Reihe},
  journal   = {Postprints der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Humanwissenschaftliche Reihe},
  number    = {540},
  doi       = {10.25932/publishup-42694},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-426943},
  pages     = {32},
  year      = {2017},
  abstract  = {Theoretischer Hintergrund:Supervision spielt eine zentrale Rolle zum Wissens- und Kompetenzerwerb sowie in der Qualit{\"a}tssicherung. Fragestellung:Ziel war es, den aktuellen Forschungsstand zur Supervision im Rahmen der kognitiven Verhaltenstherapie abzubilden, um daraus Schlussfolgerungen f{\"u}r die zuk{\"u}nftige Forschung abzuleiten. Methode:Zur Evidenzsynthese wurde ein Scoping Review durchgef{\"u}hrt, das die Darstellung zentraler Konzepte, aktueller Evidenz und m{\"o}glicher Forschungsbedarfe erm{\"o}glichte. Neben einer systematischen Literaturrecherche wurden Vorw{\"a}rts- und R{\"u}ckw{\"a}rtssuchstrategien eingesetzt. Ergebnisse:Eingeschlossen wurden zw{\"o}lf Publikationen basierend auf zehn empirischen Studien. Alle Studien beschrieben Ausbildungssettings, aber nur wenige untersuchten {\"u}bende Interventionen (z. B. Rollenspiele). H{\"a}ufig wurden Effekte subjektiv erfasst, die methodische Qualit{\"a}t der Begleitstudien variierte. Schlussfolgerungen:Notwendig sind weitere methodisch hochwertige Studien, experimentell orientiert oder in der klinischen Praxis, die die Supervisionsforschung bereichern k{\"o}nnen.},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{MaassKuehneMaasetal.2020,
  author    = {Maaß, Ulrike and K{\"u}hne, Franziska and Maas, Jana and Unverdross, Maria and Weck, Florian},
  title     = {Psychological interventions for health anxiety and somatic symptoms},
  series = {Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Psychologie = Journal of psychology},
  volume    = {228},
  journal   = {Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Psychologie = Journal of psychology},
  number    = {2},
  publisher = {Hogrefe},
  address   = {G{\"o}ttingen},
  issn      = {2190-8370},
  doi       = {10.1027/2151-2604/a000400},
  pages     = {68 -- 80},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {This study examined the effectiveness of psychological interventions for severe health anxiety (SHA) regarding somatic symptoms (SS) and health anxiety (HA). The databases Web of Science, EBSCO, and CENTRAL were searched on May 15, 2019, May 16, 2019, and August 5, 2019, respectively. Eighteen randomized controlled trials (N = 2,050) met the inclusion criteria (i.e., hypochondriasis, illness anxiety disorder or somatic symptom disorder with elevated HA being assessed with validated interviews: use of standardized outcome measures). Two reviewers independently evaluated the studies' risk of bias using the Revised Cochrane Risk-of-Bias Tool for randomized trials (RoB-2) tool. Overall, psychological interventions were significantly more effective than waitlist, treatment-as-usual, or placebo post-treatment (g(SS) = 0.70, g(HA) = 1.11) and at follow-up (g(SS) = 0.33, g(HA)= 0.70). CBT outperformed other psychological interventions or pharmacotherapy for HA post- treatment (Hedge's g(HA) = 0.81). The number of sessions did not significantly predict the effect sizes. In sum, psychological interventions were effective for SHA, but the generalizability of the results for SS is limited, because only two high-quatity trials contributed to the comparison.},
  language  = {en}
}
@misc{KuehneMaasWiesenthaletal.2017,
  author    = {K{\"u}hne, Franziska and Maas, Jana and Wiesenthal, Sophia and Weck, Florian},
  title     = {Supervision in der Verhaltenstherapie},
  series = {Zeitschrift f{\"u}r klinische Psychologie und Psychotherapie : Forschung und Praxis},
  volume    = {46},
  journal   = {Zeitschrift f{\"u}r klinische Psychologie und Psychotherapie : Forschung und Praxis},
  number    = {2},
  publisher = {Hogrefe},
  address   = {G{\"o}ttingen},
  issn      = {1616-3443},
  doi       = {10.1026/1616-3443/a000414},
  pages     = {73 -- 82},
  year      = {2017},
  abstract  = {Theoretischer Hintergrund:Supervision spielt eine zentrale Rolle zum Wissens- und Kompetenzerwerb sowie in der Qualit{\"a}tssicherung. Fragestellung:Ziel war es, den aktuellen Forschungsstand zur Supervision im Rahmen der kognitiven Verhaltenstherapie abzubilden, um daraus Schlussfolgerungen f{\"u}r die zuk{\"u}nftige Forschung abzuleiten. Methode:Zur Evidenzsynthese wurde ein Scoping Review durchgef{\"u}hrt, das die Darstellung zentraler Konzepte, aktueller Evidenz und m{\"o}glicher Forschungsbedarfe erm{\"o}glichte. Neben einer systematischen Literaturrecherche wurden Vorw{\"a}rts- und R{\"u}ckw{\"a}rtssuchstrategien eingesetzt. Ergebnisse:Eingeschlossen wurden zw{\"o}lf Publikationen basierend auf zehn empirischen Studien. Alle Studien beschrieben Ausbildungssettings, aber nur wenige untersuchten {\"u}bende Interventionen (z. B. Rollenspiele). H{\"a}ufig wurden Effekte subjektiv erfasst, die methodische Qualit{\"a}t der Begleitstudien variierte. Schlussfolgerungen:Notwendig sind weitere methodisch hochwertige Studien, experimentell orientiert oder in der klinischen Praxis, die die Supervisionsforschung bereichern k{\"o}nnen.},
  language  = {de}
}
@misc{KuehneMaasWiesenthaletal.2019,
  author    = {K{\"u}hne, Franziska and Maas, Jana and Wiesenthal, Sophia and Weck, Florian},
  title     = {Empirical research in clinical supervision},
  series = {Postprints der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam Humanwissenschaftliche Reihe},
  journal   = {Postprints der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam Humanwissenschaftliche Reihe},
  number    = {580},
  issn      = {1866-8364},
  doi       = {10.25932/publishup-43872},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-438721},
  pages     = {11},
  year      = {2019},
  abstract  = {Background: Although clinical supervision is considered to be a major component of the development and maintenance of psychotherapeutic competencies, and despite an increase in supervision research, the empirical evidence on the topic remains sparse. Methods: Because most previous reviews lack methodological rigor, we aimed to review the status and quality of the empirical literature on clinical supervision, and to provide suggestions for future research. MEDLINE, PsycInfo and the Web of Science Core Collection were searched and the review was conducted according to current guidelines. From the review results, we derived suggestions for future research on clinical supervision. Results: The systematic literature search identified 19 publications from 15 empirical studies. Taking into account the review results, the following suggestions for further research emerged: Supervision research would benefit from proper descriptions of how studies are conducted according to current guidelines, more methodologically rigorous empirical studies, the investigation of active supervision interventions, from taking diverse outcome domains into account, and from investigating supervision from a meta-theoretical perspective. Conclusions: In all, the systematic review supported the notion that supervision research often lags behind psychotherapy research in general. Still, the results offer detailed starting points for further supervision research.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{KuehneMaasWiesenthaletal.2019,
  author    = {K{\"u}hne, Franziska and Maas, Jana and Wiesenthal, Sophia and Weck, Florian},
  title     = {Empirical research in clinical supervision},
  series = {BMC Psychology},
  volume    = {7},
  journal   = {BMC Psychology},
  publisher = {BioMed Central},
  address   = {London},
  issn      = {2050-7283},
  doi       = {10.1186/s40359-019-0327-7},
  pages     = {11},
  year      = {2019},
  abstract  = {Background: Although clinical supervision is considered to be a major component of the development and maintenance of psychotherapeutic competencies, and despite an increase in supervision research, the empirical evidence on the topic remains sparse. Methods: Because most previous reviews lack methodological rigor, we aimed to review the status and quality of the empirical literature on clinical supervision, and to provide suggestions for future research. MEDLINE, PsycInfo and the Web of Science Core Collection were searched and the review was conducted according to current guidelines. From the review results, we derived suggestions for future research on clinical supervision. Results: The systematic literature search identified 19 publications from 15 empirical studies. Taking into account the review results, the following suggestions for further research emerged: Supervision research would benefit from proper descriptions of how studies are conducted according to current guidelines, more methodologically rigorous empirical studies, the investigation of active supervision interventions, from taking diverse outcome domains into account, and from investigating supervision from a meta-theoretical perspective. Conclusions: In all, the systematic review supported the notion that supervision research often lags behind psychotherapy research in general. Still, the results offer detailed starting points for further supervision research.},
  language  = {en}
}