@article{VladovaBahrs2009, author = {Vladova, Gergana and Bahrs, Julian}, title = {Wissenstransfer als Mittel der internen Unternehmenskommunikation : eine explorative Untersuchung in neun internationalen Unternehmen}, isbn = {978-3-88579-239-0}, year = {2009}, language = {de} } @article{VladovaBahrs2014, author = {Vladova, Gergana and Bahrs, Julian}, title = {Wissenstransfer als Mittel der internen Unternehmenskommunikation}, series = {Handbuch prozessorientiertes Wissensmanagment}, journal = {Handbuch prozessorientiertes Wissensmanagment}, publisher = {GITO}, address = {Berlin}, isbn = {978-3-95545-026-7}, pages = {37 -- 47}, year = {2014}, language = {de} } @article{UllrichVladova2016, author = {Ullrich, Andre and Vladova, Gergana}, title = {Weighing the Pros and Cons of Engaging in Open Innovation}, series = {Technology Innovation Management Review}, volume = {8}, journal = {Technology Innovation Management Review}, publisher = {Carleton University Graphic Services}, address = {Ottawa}, issn = {1927-0321}, pages = {34 -- 40}, year = {2016}, abstract = {The positive aspects of open innovation projects are widely discussed in innovation management research and practice by means of case studies and best practices. However, enterprises, particularly small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) also face miscellaneous challenges in open innovation practice, leading to uncertainty and even renunciation of open innovation project participation. Thus, it is essential for SMEs to find the right balance between possible positive effects and negative consequences - the latter being the less studied "dark sides" of open innovation. However, appropriate methods of finding this balance are still lacking. In this article, we discuss the assessment of open innovation project participation by presenting a weighing and decision process framework as a conceivable solution approach. The framework includes an internal, external, and integrated analysis as well as a recommendation and decision phase. Piece by piece, we investigate the current situation and the innovation goals of the enterprise as an initial point for a decision for or against engaging in open innovation. Furthermore, we discuss the development of a software tool that automatically applies this framework and allows self-assessment by SMEs.}, language = {en} } @article{ScheelVladovaUllrich2022, author = {Scheel, Laura and Vladova, Gergana and Ullrich, Andr{\´e}}, title = {The influence of digital competences, self-organization, and independent learning abilities on students' acceptance of digital learning}, series = {International journal of educational technology in higher education}, volume = {19}, journal = {International journal of educational technology in higher education}, number = {44}, publisher = {Springer}, address = {Cham}, issn = {2365-9440}, doi = {10.1186/s41239-022-00350-w}, pages = {33}, year = {2022}, abstract = {Despite digital learning disrupting traditional learning concepts and activities in higher education, for the successful integration of digital learning, the use and acceptance of the students are essential. This acceptance depends in turn on students' characteristics and dispositions, among other factors. In our study, we investigated the influence of digital competences, self-organization, and independent learning abilities on students' acceptance of digital learning and the influence of their acceptance on the resistance to the change from face-to-face to digital learning. To do so, we surveyed 350 students and analyzed the impact of the different dispositions using ordinary least squares regression analysis. We could confirm a significant positive influence of all the tested dispositions on the acceptance of digital learning. With the results, we can contribute to further investigating the underlying factors that can lead to more positive student perceptions of digital learning and build a foundation for future strategies of implementing digital learning into higher education successfully.}, language = {en} } @article{CromwellHaaseVladova2023, author = {Cromwell, Johnathan R. and Haase, Jennifer and Vladova, Gergana}, title = {The creative thinking profile}, series = {Personality and individual differences}, volume = {208}, journal = {Personality and individual differences}, publisher = {Elsevier Science}, address = {Amsterdam}, issn = {0191-8869}, doi = {10.1016/j.paid.2023.112205}, year = {2023}, abstract = {Intrinsic motivation is widely considered essential to creativity because it facilitates more divergent thinking during problem solving. However, we argue that intrinsic motivation has been theorized too heavily as a unitary construct, overlooking various internal factors of a task that can shape the baseline level of intrinsic motivation people have for working on the task. Drawing on theories of cognitive styles, we develop a new scale that measures individual preferences for three different creative thinking styles that we call divergent thinking, bricoleurgent thinking, and emergent thinking. Through a multi-study approach consisting of exploratory factor analysis, confirmatory factor analysis, and convergent validity, we provide psychometric evidence showing that people can have distinct preferences for each cognitive process when generating ideas. Furthermore, when validating this scale through an experiment, we find that each style becomes more dominant in predicting overall enjoyment, engagement, and creativity based on different underlying structures of a task. Therefore, this paper makes both theoretical and empirical contributions to literature by unpacking intrinsic motivation, showing how the alignment between different creative thinking styles and task can be essential to predicting intrinsic motivation, thus reversing the direction of causality between the motivational and cognitive components of creativity typically assumed in literature.}, language = {en} } @article{VladovaUllrichBenderetal.2021, author = {Vladova, Gergana and Ullrich, Andr{\´e} and Bender, Benedict and Gronau, Norbert}, title = {Students' acceptance of technology-mediated teaching - How it was influenced during the COVID-19 Pandemic in 2020}, series = {Frontiers in psychology / Frontiers Research Foundation}, volume = {12}, journal = {Frontiers in psychology / Frontiers Research Foundation}, publisher = {Frontiers Research Foundation}, address = {Lausanne}, issn = {1664-1078}, doi = {10.3389/fpsyg.2021.636086}, pages = {15}, year = {2021}, abstract = {In response to the impending spread of COVID-19, universities worldwide abruptly stopped face-to-face teaching and switched to technology-mediated teaching. As a result, the use of technology in the learning processes of students of different disciplines became essential and the only way to teach, communicate and collaborate for months. In this crisis context, we conducted a longitudinal study in four German universities, in which we collected a total of 875 responses from students of information systems and music and arts at four points in time during the spring-summer 2020 semester. Our study focused on (1) the students' acceptance of technology-mediated learning, (2) any change in this acceptance during the semester and (3) the differences in acceptance between the two disciplines. We applied the Technology Acceptance Model and were able to validate it for the extreme situation of the COVID-19 pandemic. We extended the model with three new variables (time flexibility, learning flexibility and social isolation) that influenced the construct of perceived usefulness. Furthermore, we detected differences between the disciplines and over time. In this paper, we present and discuss our study's results and derive short- and long-term implications for science and practice.}, language = {en} } @article{RenzVladova2021, author = {Renz, Andr{\´e} and Vladova, Gergana}, title = {Reinvigorating the discourse on Human-Centered artificial intelligence in educational technologies}, series = {Technology Innovation Management Review}, journal = {Technology Innovation Management Review}, number = {11}, publisher = {Talent First Network}, address = {Ottawa}, issn = {1927-0321}, doi = {doi: 10.22215/timreview/1438}, pages = {5 -- 16}, year = {2021}, abstract = {The increasing relevance of artificial intelligence (AI) applications in various domains has led to high expectations of benefits, ranging from precision, efficiency, and optimization to the completion of routine or time-consuming tasks. Particularly in the field of education, AI applications promise immense innovation potential. A central focus in this field is on analyzing and evaluating learner characteristics to derive learning profiles and create individualized learning environments. The development and implementation of such AI-driven approaches are related to learners' data, and thus involves several privacies, ethics, and morality challenges. In this paper, we introduce the concept of human-centered AI, and consider how an AI system can be developed in line with human values without posing risks to humanity. Because the education market is in the early stages of incorporating AI into educational tools, we believe that this is the right time to raise awareness about the use of principles that foster human-centered values and help in building responsible, ethical, and value-oriented AI.}, language = {en} } @article{BahrsVladova2009, author = {Bahrs, Julian and Vladova, Gergana}, title = {Produktpiraterie : Pr{\"a}vention statt Reaktion}, issn = {1438-4426}, year = {2009}, language = {de} } @article{GronauRegerAdelhelmetal.2009, author = {Gronau, Norbert and Reger, Guido and Adelhelm, Silvia and Bahrs, Julian and Vladova, Gergana}, title = {Planung und Steuerung von offenen Innovationsprozessen in Life Sciences KMUs : Pro und Contra des Know-how- Transfers {\"u}ber die Unternehmensgrenzen}, issn = {1434-1890}, year = {2009}, language = {de} } @article{SultanowVladovaWeber2009, author = {Sultanow, Eldar and Vladova, Gergana and Weber, Edzard}, title = {Overcoming communication barriers for CMC in enterprises}, isbn = {978-0-615-30358-1}, year = {2009}, language = {en} }