@article{SultanowVladovaWeber2009, author = {Sultanow, Eldar and Vladova, Gergana and Weber, Edzard}, title = {Overcoming communication barriers for CMC in enterprises}, isbn = {978-0-615-30358-1}, year = {2009}, language = {en} } @article{VladovaBahrs2014, author = {Vladova, Gergana and Bahrs, Julian}, title = {Wissenstransfer als Mittel der internen Unternehmenskommunikation}, series = {Handbuch prozessorientiertes Wissensmanagment}, journal = {Handbuch prozessorientiertes Wissensmanagment}, publisher = {GITO}, address = {Berlin}, isbn = {978-3-95545-026-7}, pages = {37 -- 47}, year = {2014}, language = {de} } @article{VladovaBahrs2009, author = {Vladova, Gergana and Bahrs, Julian}, title = {Wissenstransfer als Mittel der internen Unternehmenskommunikation : eine explorative Untersuchung in neun internationalen Unternehmen}, isbn = {978-3-88579-239-0}, year = {2009}, language = {de} } @article{VladovaAdelhelm2009, author = {Vladova, Gergana and Adelhelm, Silvia}, title = {Informal knowledge flows in open innovation : both a blessing and a curse?}, isbn = {978-952-214-767-7}, year = {2009}, language = {en} } @article{VladovaWeber2009, author = {Vladova, Gergana and Weber, Edzard}, title = {Bedarf von KMU f{\"u}r anwendergerechte Aufbereitung von Norminhalten}, issn = {0722-2912}, year = {2009}, language = {de} } @article{BahrsVladova2009, author = {Bahrs, Julian and Vladova, Gergana}, title = {Produktpiraterie : Pr{\"a}vention statt Reaktion}, issn = {1438-4426}, year = {2009}, language = {de} } @article{EppingerVladova2013, author = {Eppinger, Elisabeth and Vladova, Gergana}, title = {Intellectual property management practices at small and medium-sized enterprises}, series = {International journal of technology management}, volume = {61}, journal = {International journal of technology management}, number = {1}, publisher = {Inderscience Enterprises Ltd}, address = {Geneva}, issn = {0267-5730}, doi = {10.1504/IJTM.2013.050244}, pages = {64 -- 81}, year = {2013}, abstract = {Small and medium-sized enterprises (SME) contribute to innovation and economic growth, despite their resource shortages and lack of professional intellectual property (IP) management practices. Drawing on social practice theory and combining insights from recent scholarship on IP strategies and its management, this paper examines the cases of three pharmaceutical SME providing insights into how they appropriate returns on research and development (R\&D) investments. It discusses their IP strategies and management practices, examining how the IP management practices are embedded in the firm's organisational structure. Moreover, this paper develops recommendations for SME regarding the professionalisation of their IP management practices.}, language = {en} } @article{UllrichVladova2016, author = {Ullrich, Andre and Vladova, Gergana}, title = {Weighing the Pros and Cons of Engaging in Open Innovation}, series = {Technology Innovation Management Review}, volume = {8}, journal = {Technology Innovation Management Review}, publisher = {Carleton University Graphic Services}, address = {Ottawa}, issn = {1927-0321}, pages = {34 -- 40}, year = {2016}, abstract = {The positive aspects of open innovation projects are widely discussed in innovation management research and practice by means of case studies and best practices. However, enterprises, particularly small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) also face miscellaneous challenges in open innovation practice, leading to uncertainty and even renunciation of open innovation project participation. Thus, it is essential for SMEs to find the right balance between possible positive effects and negative consequences - the latter being the less studied "dark sides" of open innovation. However, appropriate methods of finding this balance are still lacking. In this article, we discuss the assessment of open innovation project participation by presenting a weighing and decision process framework as a conceivable solution approach. The framework includes an internal, external, and integrated analysis as well as a recommendation and decision phase. Piece by piece, we investigate the current situation and the innovation goals of the enterprise as an initial point for a decision for or against engaging in open innovation. Furthermore, we discuss the development of a software tool that automatically applies this framework and allows self-assessment by SMEs.}, language = {en} } @article{ScheelVladovaUllrich2022, author = {Scheel, Laura and Vladova, Gergana and Ullrich, Andr{\´e}}, title = {The influence of digital competences, self-organization, and independent learning abilities on students' acceptance of digital learning}, series = {International journal of educational technology in higher education}, volume = {19}, journal = {International journal of educational technology in higher education}, number = {44}, publisher = {Springer}, address = {Cham}, issn = {2365-9440}, doi = {10.1186/s41239-022-00350-w}, pages = {33}, year = {2022}, abstract = {Despite digital learning disrupting traditional learning concepts and activities in higher education, for the successful integration of digital learning, the use and acceptance of the students are essential. This acceptance depends in turn on students' characteristics and dispositions, among other factors. In our study, we investigated the influence of digital competences, self-organization, and independent learning abilities on students' acceptance of digital learning and the influence of their acceptance on the resistance to the change from face-to-face to digital learning. To do so, we surveyed 350 students and analyzed the impact of the different dispositions using ordinary least squares regression analysis. We could confirm a significant positive influence of all the tested dispositions on the acceptance of digital learning. With the results, we can contribute to further investigating the underlying factors that can lead to more positive student perceptions of digital learning and build a foundation for future strategies of implementing digital learning into higher education successfully.}, language = {en} } @article{VladovaUllrichBender2021, author = {Vladova, Gergana and Ullrich, Andr{\´e} and Bender, Benedict}, title = {Chancen und Grenzen digitaler Lehre an Hochschulen aus Studierendenperspektive}, series = {HMD : Praxis der Wirtschaftsinformatik}, volume = {58}, journal = {HMD : Praxis der Wirtschaftsinformatik}, publisher = {Springer}, address = {Wiesbaden}, issn = {2198-2775}, doi = {https://doi.org/10.1365/s40702-021-00796-y}, pages = {1313 -- 1326}, year = {2021}, abstract = {The design of qualitative, excellent teaching requires collaboration between teachers and learners. For this purpose, face-to-face teaching benefits from a long-standing tradition, while digital teaching is comparatively still at the beginning of its dissemination. A major developmental step toward the digitization of teaching was achieved in the context of university teaching during the Covid 19 pandemic in spring 2020, when face-to-face teaching was interrupted for months. During this time, important insights into the opportunities and limitations of digital teaching were gained. This paper presents selected results of a study conducted at four German universities and with 875 responses in spring 2020. The study uncovers opportunities and limitations of digital teaching from the students' perspective and against the background of their experience in the completely digital semester. The results are used as a basis for deriving design guidelines for digital teaching and learning offerings. Based on a model for analyzing the design of teaching and learning formats, these indications are structured according to the elements learners, teachers, teaching content, environment and teaching style.}, language = {de} }