@article{Hassler2021,
  author    = {Hassler, Gerda},
  title     = {Meaning and Function},
  series = {Concordia discors vs. discordia concors : international journal for researches into comparative literature, contrastive linguistics, cross-cultural and translation strategies},
  journal   = {Concordia discors vs. discordia concors : international journal for researches into comparative literature, contrastive linguistics, cross-cultural and translation strategies},
  number    = {16},
  publisher = {Ştefan cel Mare University Press},
  address   = {Suceava},
  issn      = {2065-4057},
  pages     = {17 -- 50},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {The use of the word functional in the most diverse theories and approaches has contributed in no small measure to the confusion in linguistics today. This article does not claim to give an overview of the different directions of functionalism in linguistics. Rather, the aim is to present what Coseriu's view characterised as functional in his time and to what extent his theory outlined a path that still makes sense in functional-cognitive linguistics today. This will involve an examination of Coseriu's difficult-to-identify concept of function. Furthermore, the article will also show that functional thinking is relevant for current grammatography.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{Hassler2003,
  author    = {Haßler, Gerda},
  title     = {Scepticism and semantic theory from Locke to Du Marsais},
  isbn      = {1-4020-1377-9},
  year      = {2003},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{Hassler2007,
  author    = {Haßler, Gerda},
  title     = {Texts of reference and serial texts in the constitution of a notional paradigm : the example of the French ideologues},
  isbn      = {978-90-272-4601-1},
  year      = {2007},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{Hassler2020,
  author    = {Haßler, Gerda},
  title     = {The Functional-Communicative Approach to Language of the Potsdam School in the German Democratic Republic},
  series = {History of Humanities},
  volume    = {5},
  journal   = {History of Humanities},
  number    = {1},
  publisher = {The University of Chicago Press Journals},
  address   = {Chicago},
  issn      = {2379-3163},
  pages     = {31 -- 49},
  year      = {2020},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{Hassler2019,
  author    = {Haßler, Gerda},
  title     = {Theory of signs and ideas on the relation between language and thought at the border between the 18th and 19th centuries},
  series = {Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo Universiteta. Jazyk i literatura},
  volume    = {16},
  journal   = {Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo Universiteta. Jazyk i literatura},
  number    = {3},
  publisher = {St. Petersburg University Press},
  address   = {Sankt-Peterburg},
  issn      = {2541-9358},
  doi       = {10.21638/spbu09.2019.308},
  pages     = {463 -- 479},
  year      = {2019},
  abstract  = {The name Ideologues refers to a group of philosophers, psychologists, grammarians, educational theorists and medical specialists who for a short period from 1795 to 1805 determined the intellectual climate in France and sought to develop a science of ideas (id{\´e}ologie). The Ideologues had a rather reserved attitude to Condillac's (1714-1780) ideas and his sensualist sign theory. They strove for the perfection of language for the needs of thought and of scientific knowledge. The connections with the Ideologues can also be discerned in Russia. In the educational theory, Jean-Baptiste Maudru (1740-1808) was close to the Ideologues and, despite his insufficient knowledge of the Russian language, made some interesting remarks on the connection between the language and the national character. According to Maudru and in agreement with the Ideologues, different typologies of word order are not just an indication of greater or lesser closeness to the natural order. Rather, they indicate differences in national character, which manifest themselves in the specific character of individual languages. Maudru taught at the military academy in Saint Petersburg and published the first Russian grammar in France (Maudru 1802). In his grammar, he sought to link mechanically the specific features of languages and of national characters with the climatic influences. His attempt to revive the theory of climatic influences was criticized by Karamzin. Karamzin also treated the discussion of the metaphoric extension of word meanings as an absurd undertaking, which had no place in grammar.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{Hassler2015,
  author    = {Haßler, Gerda},
  title     = {'Communicating the past to the present'},
  series = {History and Philosophy of the Language Sciences},
  journal   = {History and Philosophy of the Language Sciences},
  editor    = {McElvenny, James},
  issn      = {2366-2409},
  year      = {2015},
  language  = {en}
}