@article{Hassler2006, author = {Haßler, Gerda}, title = {A Fala : normalizaci{\´o}n tard{\´i}a e identidad cultural}, year = {2006}, language = {en} } @article{Hassler2011, author = {Haßler, Gerda}, title = {Acknowlegements}, isbn = {978-90-272-4606-6}, year = {2011}, language = {en} } @article{Hassler2021, author = {Haßler, Gerda}, title = {Adverbal expression of aspectuality and interaction with perfective and imperfective verbs}, series = {Russian Grammar: System - Usus - Variation/Русская грамматика: Cистема - узус - варьирование}, journal = {Russian Grammar: System - Usus - Variation/Русская грамматика: Cистема - узус - варьирование}, publisher = {Lang}, address = {Berlin}, isbn = {978-3-631-87748-7}, pages = {219 -- 234}, year = {2021}, abstract = {This paper intends to explore the interaction between aspect and lexical means, in this case temporal adverbials, in the bounding of representations of situations. First, the theoretical basis is outlined, followed by the results of a corpus analysis of coccurrences with adverbs that limit situations. The term situation encompasses all representable processes, states, events, or actions. Finally, some theoretical conclusions are drawn concerning the cognitive category of bounding, using the example of aspectuality. The imperfective verb forms maintain their aspectuality in delimiting connections with adverbs, resulting in a complex, multi-dimensional aspectuality. In nongrammaticalized forms, such as lexical markers, the speaker is free to make a temporal localization or an aspectual perspective. Lexical expressions can make temporal and aspect markings even more precisely and clearly than tenses. They can also limit or extend situations and thus express aspect. Aspectuality thus presents itself as a compositional category, in which external bounding and the internal representation of a course of action or development can interact.}, language = {en} } @misc{Hassler2006, author = {Haßler, Gerda}, title = {Alarcos Llorach, Emilio (1922-1998)}, isbn = {0-08-044299-4}, year = {2006}, language = {en} } @article{Hassler2007, author = {Haßler, Gerda}, title = {Analogy : the history of a concept and a term from the 17th to the 19th century}, isbn = {978-90-272-4603-5}, year = {2007}, language = {en} } @incollection{Hassler2018, author = {Haßler, Gerda}, title = {Arbitrariness, Motivation and Value of the Linguistic Sign: Saussurean and Post-Saussurean Perspectives}, series = {The Cours de Linguistique G{\´e}n{\´e}rale Revisited: 1916-2016. Saussure et le Cours de linguistique g{\´e}n{\´e}rale cent ans apr{\`e}s}, booktitle = {The Cours de Linguistique G{\´e}n{\´e}rale Revisited: 1916-2016. Saussure et le Cours de linguistique g{\´e}n{\´e}rale cent ans apr{\`e}s}, editor = {Rico, Christophe and Kirtchuk, Pablo}, publisher = {Polis Institute Press}, address = {Jerusalem}, isbn = {978-9-65769-811-2}, publisher = {Universit{\"a}t Potsdam}, pages = {61 -- 87}, year = {2018}, abstract = {In 1916, three years after the death of Ferdinand de Saussure, the Cours de linguistique g{\´e}n{\´e}rale (CLG) was published in Geneva. This foundational work marked the beginning of a discipline that has profoundly influenced the development of the humanities ever since. What sources influenced the CLG? Do the main concepts of this seminal work have the same validity today as they did in 1916? How has the recent development of language sciences influenced its reception? How does this text account for meaning and communication within the context of speech (parole)? In order to explore these questions, one hundred years after the publication of Ferdinand de Saussure's seminal work on General Linguistics, Polis--The Jerusalem Institute of Languages and Humanities held an interdisciplinary conference that gathered 14 international specialists from various disciplines: general linguistics, pragmatics, philology, dialectology, translation studies, terminology, and philosophy. The first section of this work reassesses the sources and further influence of the CLG on modern linguistics. The book's second part discusses some of the main concepts and dichotomies of the CLG (constitution of the linguistic method, arbitrariness of sign, main dichotomies), under the light of both the original manuscripts and recent linguistic developments (influence of dialectology or translation studies). The third and last part handles the pragmatic and semantic dimensions of language, suggesting new avenues of reflection that could not yet have been fully taken into account within the CLG itself. Uniting 14 scholarly articles, together with an introduction, an index locorum and a collective bibliography, this volume hopes to encourage readers with its reappraisal and reinterpretation of Saussure's ground-breaking work and thus contribute to the future development of linguistics and humanities.}, language = {en} } @incollection{Hassler2022, author = {Haßler, Gerda}, title = {Aspectual periphrases in Romance languages in contact with the English progressive form}, series = {Linguistic Hybridity. Contact-induced and cognitively motivated grammaticalization and lexicalization processes in Romance Languages}, booktitle = {Linguistic Hybridity. Contact-induced and cognitively motivated grammaticalization and lexicalization processes in Romance Languages}, publisher = {Universit{\"a}tsverlag Winter}, address = {Heidelberg}, isbn = {978-3-8253-4936-3}, pages = {215 -- 229}, year = {2022}, language = {en} } @misc{Hassler2006, author = {Haßler, Gerda}, title = {Beauz{\´e}e, Nicolas (1717-1789)}, isbn = {0-08-044299-4}, year = {2006}, language = {en} } @misc{Hassler2006, author = {Haßler, Gerda}, title = {Bello, Andr{\´e}s (1781-1865)}, series = {Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics}, journal = {Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics}, editor = {Brown, Keith}, edition = {2nd ed.}, publisher = {Elsevier}, address = {Burlington}, isbn = {0-08-044299-4}, year = {2006}, language = {en} } @misc{Hassler2006, author = {Haßler, Gerda}, title = {Brosses, Charles de (1709-1777)}, series = {Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics}, journal = {Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics}, editor = {Brown, Keith}, edition = {2nd ed.}, publisher = {Elsevier}, address = {Burlington}, isbn = {0-08-044299-4}, year = {2006}, language = {en} } @misc{Hassler2002, author = {Haßler, Gerda}, title = {Butt, M. (Hrsg.), Time over matter: diachronic perspectives on morphosyntax; Stanford CSLI Publ., 2001}, year = {2002}, language = {en} } @article{Hassler2001, author = {Haßler, Gerda}, title = {Crosslinguistic and diachronic remarks on the grammaticalization of aspect in Romance languages : location and motion verbs}, year = {2001}, language = {en} } @incollection{Hassler2016, author = {Haßler, Gerda}, title = {Deg{\´e}rando's three prize essays and the shift in linguistic thought at the turn of the 19th century}, series = {History of Linguistics 2014 : selected papers from the 13th International Conference on the History of the Language Sciences (ICHoLS XIII), Vila Real, Portugal, 25-29 August 2014 (Studies in the History of the Language Sciences ; 126)}, booktitle = {History of Linguistics 2014 : selected papers from the 13th International Conference on the History of the Language Sciences (ICHoLS XIII), Vila Real, Portugal, 25-29 August 2014 (Studies in the History of the Language Sciences ; 126)}, publisher = {John Benjamins Publishing Company}, address = {Amsterdam, Philadelphia}, isbn = {978-90-272-4617-2}, issn = {0304-0720}, publisher = {Universit{\"a}t Potsdam}, pages = {149 -- 160}, year = {2016}, abstract = {Deg{\´e}rando started out from the views of the French ideologists on the relationship of language and thought, but increasingly distanced himself from them. This is already evident based on the choice of reference authors and also on the increasing emphasis on empirical research. His prize essays reflect the fundamental changes in linguistic thought during the late 18th century. He was successful in the competition of the Institut National (1797/1799) and with another essay at the Berlin Academy (1802). His main argument against Condillac and the ideologists is that empirical knowledge does not depend on signs. Therefore, the development of better languages will not improve this kind of human knowledge.}, language = {en} } @article{Hassler1999, author = {Haßler, Gerda}, title = {Diversity of human languages and universals of thougth : an eigteenth-century debate in the Berlin Academy}, isbn = {90-272-4583-5}, year = {1999}, language = {en} } @article{Hassler2010, author = {Haßler, Gerda}, title = {Epistemic modality and evidentiality and their determination on a deictic basis}, isbn = {978-3-11-023433-6}, year = {2010}, abstract = {It has often been pointed out that there is some overlap between epistemic modality and evidentiality (Chafe \& Nichols 1986, Cornillie 2007, De Haan 1999, Dendale \& Tasmowski 2001, Plungian 2001, Squartini 2004). In this paper I would like to offer several reflections about the necessity of drawing a boundary between modality and evidentiality. Starting from the typological category of evidentiality - extended here for use in pragmatic studies - I will then explore demarcation problems in Romance languages, which lack grammaticalized forms for expressing evidentiality. The underlying premise of this paper is that evidentiality as marker of the origin of the speaker's knowledge stands in relation to the speaker's pragmatic stance. Because the perspective of the speaker is thus incorporated into the utterance, it seems appropriate to analyse the applicability of the deictic category. Finally, under the aspect of deixis, I shall attempt a demarcation between evidentiality and modality.}, language = {en} } @article{Hassler2010, author = {Haßler, Gerda}, title = {Epistemic modality and evidentiality and their determination on a deictic basis : the case of Romance languages}, isbn = {978-3-11-022396-5}, year = {2010}, abstract = {In recent years the category of evidentiality has come into use also for the description of Romance languages. This has been contingent on a change in its interpretation from a typological category to a semantic-pragmatic category, which allows an application to languages lacking specialised morphemes for the expression of evidentiality. In the following we will first describe the theoretical framework in which we use the category of evidentiality for the description of Romance languages. A key question to be elucidated here will be the determination of evidentiality as a deictic phenomenon. This will also be the basis for discussing the distinction between evidentiality and epistemic modality.}, language = {en} } @article{Hassler2003, author = {Haßler, Gerda}, title = {Epistemic modality revisited: evidential functions of lexical and grammatical forms in Romance languages}, isbn = {80-8673221-5}, year = {2003}, language = {en} } @article{Hassler2018, author = {Haßler, Gerda}, title = {Evidential and epistemic sentence adverbs in Romance languages}, series = {Linguistik online}, volume = {92}, journal = {Linguistik online}, number = {5}, issn = {1615-3014}, doi = {10.13092/lo.92.4506}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-421822}, pages = {82 -- 98}, year = {2018}, abstract = {In this paper evidential and modal adverbs will be studied, such as French apparemment, {\´e}videmment, visiblement, Italian apparentemente, evidentemente, ovviamente, and Spanish aparentemente, evidentemente and visiblemente. The development of their signification will be discussed, including German adverbs like offensichtlich. In these means of expression, the functional-semantic categories evidentiality and epistemic modality seem to overlap: on the one hand, they are used if the state of affairs talked about cannot be verified, that is, if there is still a moment of insecurity concerning the transmitted information. Then adverbials with a special structure (preposition + article + nominal form of a verb) will be analysed, and we will examine if they behave in the same way.}, language = {en} } @article{Hassler2002, author = {Haßler, Gerda}, title = {Evidentiality and reported speech in Romance languages}, year = {2002}, language = {en} } @article{Hassler2015, author = {Haßler, Gerda}, title = {Evidentiality and the expression of speaker's stance in Romance languages and German}, series = {Discourse studies : an interdisciplinary journal for the study of text and talk}, volume = {17}, journal = {Discourse studies : an interdisciplinary journal for the study of text and talk}, number = {2}, publisher = {Sage Publ.}, address = {London}, issn = {1461-4456}, doi = {10.1177/1461445614564522}, pages = {182 -- 209}, year = {2015}, abstract = {In recent years, the category of evidentiality has also come into use for the description of Romance languages and of German. This has been contingent on a change in its interpretation from a typological category to a semantic-pragmatic category, which allows an application to languages lacking specialised morphemes for the expression of evidentiality. We consider evidentiality to be a structural dimension of grammar, the values of which are expressed by types of constructions that code the source of information which a speaker imparts. If we look at the situation in Romance languages and in German, drawing a boundary between epistemic modality and evidentiality presents problems that are difficult to solve. Adding markers of the source of the speaker's knowledge often limits the degree of responsibility of the speaker for the content of the utterance. Evidential adverbs are a frequently used means of marking the source of the speaker's knowledge. The evidential meaning is generalised to marking any source of knowledge, what can be regarded as a result of a process of pragmaticalisation. The use of certain means which also carry out evidential markings can even contribute to the blurring of the different kinds of evidentiality. German also has modal verbs which in conjunction with the perfect tense of the verb have a predominantly evidential use (sollen and wollen). But even here the evidential marking is not without influence on the modality of the utterance. The Romance languages, however, do not have such specialised verbs for expressing evidentiality in certain contexts. To do this, they mark evidentiality - often context bound - by verb forms such as the conditional and the imperfect tense. This article shall contrast the different architectures used in expressing evidentiality in German and in the Romance languages.}, language = {en} }